Reap and Sow
Played in 634 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (30)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 2.57 · 8.1% (64 of 788 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.59 · 2.9% (38 of 1,306 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 1.24 · 9.2% (6 of 65 decks)
- Verdeloth the Ancient relevance 1.21 · 8.3% (6 of 72 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 1.18 · 4.6% (9 of 196 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.16 · 1.3% (46 of 3,637 decks)
- Mirri, Cat Warrior relevance 1.15 · 7.1% (6 of 84 decks)
- Glissa Sunseeker relevance 1.08 · 7.6% (5 of 66 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.95 · 2.0% (12 of 610 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen of Efrava relevance 0.91 · 6.1% (4 of 66 decks)
- Harold and Bob, First Numens relevance 0.86 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Kura, the Boundless Sky relevance 0.80 · 1.9% (8 of 418 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.78 · 3.9% (4 of 103 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.72 · 1.9% (6 of 310 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 0.70 · 1.6% (7 of 435 decks)
- The Tarrasque relevance 0.61 · 1.7% (5 of 302 decks)
- Grunn, the Lonely King relevance 0.56 · 1.4% (5 of 365 decks)
- Christine Chapel, Combat Medic relevance 0.52 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.52 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.51 · 1.4% (4 of 282 decks)
- Black Tom Cassidy relevance 0.50 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- White Tiger, Ava Ayala relevance 0.50 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.48 · 1.0% (5 of 494 decks)
- Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru relevance 0.45 · 2.5% (2 of 81 decks)
- Shisato, Whispering Hunter relevance 0.45 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.44 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Myojin of Towering Might relevance 0.40 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 0.38 · 1.7% (2 of 118 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid relevance 0.38 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Melira, Sylvok Outcast relevance 0.37 · 1.6% (2 of 129 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.57 · 49.7% (315 of 634 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.39 · 38.5% (244 of 634 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.97 · 26.3% (167 of 634 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.86 · 50.6% (321 of 634 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.83 · 28.2% (179 of 634 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.79 · 15.0% (95 of 634 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.77 · 23.2% (147 of 634 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.73 · 13.4% (85 of 634 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.68 · 16.4% (104 of 634 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.64 · 12.5% (79 of 634 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.61 · 20.3% (129 of 634 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.57 · 28.4% (180 of 634 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.56 · 30.1% (191 of 634 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.56 · 22.6% (143 of 634 decks)
- Mwonvuli Acid-Moss relevance 0.53 · 8.5% (54 of 634 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.53 · 37.2% (236 of 634 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.52 · 17.7% (112 of 634 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.51 · 19.4% (123 of 634 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.51 · 18.0% (114 of 634 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.50 · 14.8% (94 of 634 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.50 · 27.8% (176 of 634 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.48 · 17.5% (111 of 634 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.47 · 20.2% (128 of 634 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.47 · 24.4% (155 of 634 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.46 · 14.0% (89 of 634 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.46 · 13.2% (84 of 634 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.45 · 20.2% (128 of 634 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.44 · 18.6% (118 of 634 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.44 · 16.9% (107 of 634 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.44 · 17.2% (109 of 634 decks)
All creatures (12)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.83 · 28.2% (179 of 634 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.77 · 23.2% (147 of 634 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.61 · 20.3% (129 of 634 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.57 · 28.4% (180 of 634 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.56 · 22.6% (143 of 634 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.47 · 20.2% (128 of 634 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.47 · 24.4% (155 of 634 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.46 · 14.0% (89 of 634 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.45 · 20.2% (128 of 634 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.44 · 18.6% (118 of 634 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.44 · 17.2% (109 of 634 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.43 · 22.4% (142 of 634 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.39 · 38.5% (244 of 634 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.64 · 12.5% (79 of 634 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.52 · 17.7% (112 of 634 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.51 · 19.4% (123 of 634 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.48 · 17.5% (111 of 634 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Exploration relevance 0.56 · 30.1% (191 of 634 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.44 · 16.9% (107 of 634 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.43 · 13.4% (85 of 634 decks)
All instants (4)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.86 · 50.6% (321 of 634 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.53 · 37.2% (236 of 634 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.50 · 27.8% (176 of 634 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.43 · 10.4% (66 of 634 decks)
All sorceries (11)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.57 · 49.7% (315 of 634 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.97 · 26.3% (167 of 634 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.79 · 15.0% (95 of 634 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.73 · 13.4% (85 of 634 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.68 · 16.4% (104 of 634 decks)
- Mwonvuli Acid-Moss relevance 0.53 · 8.5% (54 of 634 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.51 · 18.0% (114 of 634 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.50 · 14.8% (94 of 634 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.46 · 13.2% (84 of 634 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.42 · 23.3% (148 of 634 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.42 · 23.5% (149 of 634 decks)
All utility lands (8)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.89 · 32.5% (206 of 634 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.62 · 18.0% (114 of 634 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.61 · 21.9% (139 of 634 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.52 · 34.7% (220 of 634 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.48 · 14.5% (92 of 634 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.47 · 15.8% (100 of 634 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.46 · 27.9% (177 of 634 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.46 · 14.7% (93 of 634 decks)
All lands (7)
- Vesuva relevance 0.47 · 14.7% (93 of 634 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.46 · 24.3% (154 of 634 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.45 · 9.8% (62 of 634 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.45 · 9.8% (62 of 634 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.44 · 9.8% (62 of 634 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.44 · 15.0% (95 of 634 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.44 · 11.2% (71 of 634 decks)
EDH data for Reap and Sow: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 634 real decks.