Lotus Cobra

Played in 190,033 decks

Lotus Cobra
$5.61 €6.44

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 4.81 · 37.3% (4,331 of 11,619 decks)
  2. Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 4.71 · 53.3% (1,804 of 3,383 decks)
  3. Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 4.14 · 45.4% (2,214 of 4,875 decks)
  4. The Gitrog Monster relevance 3.87 · 50.6% (2,701 of 5,340 decks)
  5. The Necrobloom relevance 3.75 · 58.8% (6,633 of 11,274 decks)
  6. Aphelia, Viper Whisperer relevance 3.62 · 54.8% (1,302 of 2,375 decks)
  7. Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 3.53 · 47.7% (12,568 of 26,326 decks)
  8. Flubs, the Fool relevance 3.44 · 54.1% (6,262 of 11,585 decks)
  9. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 3.28 · 65.0% (5,878 of 9,047 decks)
  10. Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 3.25 · 56.8% (3,982 of 7,016 decks)
  11. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 3.13 · 60.2% (15,149 of 25,152 decks)
  12. Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.99 · 44.4% (2,613 of 5,888 decks)
  13. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 2.89 · 76.2% (4,637 of 6,087 decks)
  14. Sméagol, Helpful Guide relevance 2.88 · 30.7% (1,236 of 4,029 decks)
  15. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 2.84 · 57.7% (3,006 of 5,211 decks)
  16. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.83 · 67.9% (5,971 of 8,798 decks)
  17. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.75 · 44.9% (1,894 of 4,214 decks)
  18. Lord Windgrace relevance 2.74 · 66.5% (3,101 of 4,666 decks)
  19. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 2.71 · 56.3% (2,260 of 4,012 decks)
  20. The Gitrog, Ravenous Ride relevance 2.69 · 28.4% (947 of 3,332 decks)
  21. Averna, the Chaos Bloom relevance 2.63 · 45.4% (1,343 of 2,955 decks)
  22. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.59 · 49.7% (2,293 of 4,615 decks)
  23. Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 2.58 · 27.1% (162 of 597 decks)
  24. Bello, Bard of the Brambles relevance 2.56 · 38.5% (6,422 of 16,666 decks)
  25. Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 2.51 · 49.0% (2,097 of 4,281 decks)
  26. Zimone and Dina relevance 2.47 · 41.4% (1,391 of 3,362 decks)
  27. Blech, Loafing Pest relevance 2.40 · 16.5% (2,571 of 15,626 decks)
  28. Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 2.33 · 41.9% (741 of 1,767 decks)
  29. Kodama of the East Tree // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 2.32 · 67.1% (463 of 690 decks)
  30. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 2.30 · 34.7% (1,255 of 3,621 decks)

Parallel Cards

30

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Scute Swarm
    1.72 52.9%
    $8.85 €7.98
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.69 54.3%
    $4.19 €3.03
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.65 46.4%
    $12.94 €8.93
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.39 34.1%
    $12.76 €10.17
  • Exploration
    1.38 39.8%
    $30.16 €26.59
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.38 35.9%
    $4.81 €3.73
  • Crop Rotation
    1.36 43.6%
    $3.91 €3.60
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.34 35.6%
    $2.01 €2.69
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.33 37.0%
    $21.84 €23.44
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.30 36.2%
    $0.35 €0.32
All most relevant (30)
  1. Scute Swarm relevance 1.72 · 52.9% (100,509 of 190,033 decks)
  2. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.69 · 54.3% (103,118 of 190,033 decks)
  3. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.65 · 46.4% (88,151 of 190,033 decks)
  4. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.39 · 34.1% (64,765 of 190,033 decks)
  5. Exploration relevance 1.38 · 39.8% (75,580 of 190,033 decks)
  6. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.38 · 35.9% (68,149 of 190,033 decks)
  7. Crop Rotation relevance 1.36 · 43.6% (82,826 of 190,033 decks)
  8. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.34 · 35.6% (67,613 of 190,033 decks)
  9. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.33 · 37.0% (70,359 of 190,033 decks)
  10. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.30 · 36.2% (68,754 of 190,033 decks)
  11. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.28 · 32.0% (60,754 of 190,033 decks)
  12. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.25 · 35.8% (68,077 of 190,033 decks)
  13. Zuran Orb relevance 1.24 · 29.9% (56,861 of 190,033 decks)
  14. Harrow relevance 1.17 · 35.5% (67,500 of 190,033 decks)
  15. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.16 · 34.1% (64,888 of 190,033 decks)
  16. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.09 · 26.4% (50,128 of 190,033 decks)
  17. Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.08 · 27.2% (51,677 of 190,033 decks)
  18. Scapeshift relevance 1.07 · 23.6% (44,791 of 190,033 decks)
  19. Spelunking relevance 1.01 · 24.5% (46,500 of 190,033 decks)
  20. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.00 · 26.2% (49,871 of 190,033 decks)
  21. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.99 · 23.7% (45,000 of 190,033 decks)
  22. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.97 · 23.7% (45,080 of 190,033 decks)
  23. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.96 · 24.8% (47,080 of 190,033 decks)
  24. Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.95 · 24.1% (45,776 of 190,033 decks)
  25. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.90 · 20.6% (39,160 of 190,033 decks)
  26. Beast Within relevance 0.90 · 44.4% (84,298 of 190,033 decks)
  27. Nature's Lore relevance 0.89 · 45.0% (85,577 of 190,033 decks)
  28. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.86 · 18.7% (35,563 of 190,033 decks)
  29. Six relevance 0.85 · 21.6% (41,123 of 190,033 decks)
  30. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.84 · 22.1% (41,977 of 190,033 decks)

Creatures

26

Showing 1-10 of 26

Page size
  • Scute Swarm
    1.72 52.9%
    $8.85 €7.98
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.69 54.3%
    $4.19 €3.03
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.65 46.4%
    $12.94 €8.93
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.39 34.1%
    $12.76 €10.17
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.38 35.9%
    $4.81 €3.73
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.34 35.6%
    $2.01 €2.69
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.33 37.0%
    $21.84 €23.44
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.30 36.2%
    $0.35 €0.32
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.28 32.0%
    $6.61 €6.67
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.25 35.8%
    $9.88 €6.51
All creatures (26)
  1. Scute Swarm relevance 1.72 · 52.9% (100,509 of 190,033 decks)
  2. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.69 · 54.3% (103,118 of 190,033 decks)
  3. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.65 · 46.4% (88,151 of 190,033 decks)
  4. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.39 · 34.1% (64,765 of 190,033 decks)
  5. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.38 · 35.9% (68,149 of 190,033 decks)
  6. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.34 · 35.6% (67,613 of 190,033 decks)
  7. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.33 · 37.0% (70,359 of 190,033 decks)
  8. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.30 · 36.2% (68,754 of 190,033 decks)
  9. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.28 · 32.0% (60,754 of 190,033 decks)
  10. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.25 · 35.8% (68,077 of 190,033 decks)
  11. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.16 · 34.1% (64,888 of 190,033 decks)
  12. Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.08 · 27.2% (51,677 of 190,033 decks)
  13. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.00 · 26.2% (49,871 of 190,033 decks)
  14. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.99 · 23.7% (45,000 of 190,033 decks)
  15. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.97 · 23.7% (45,080 of 190,033 decks)
  16. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.90 · 20.6% (39,160 of 190,033 decks)
  17. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.86 · 18.7% (35,563 of 190,033 decks)
  18. Six relevance 0.85 · 21.6% (41,123 of 190,033 decks)
  19. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.84 · 22.1% (41,977 of 190,033 decks)
  20. Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.84 · 17.0% (32,349 of 190,033 decks)
  21. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.82 · 19.8% (37,655 of 190,033 decks)
  22. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.80 · 18.3% (34,798 of 190,033 decks)
  23. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.79 · 18.4% (34,877 of 190,033 decks)
  24. Horizon Explorer relevance 0.77 · 17.3% (32,871 of 190,033 decks)
  25. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.77 · 27.9% (52,944 of 190,033 decks)
  26. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.75 · 18.3% (34,796 of 190,033 decks)

Artifacts

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Zuran Orb
    1.24 29.9%
    $3.51 €1.80
  • Conduit of Worlds
    0.96 24.8%
    $1.13 €1.42
  • Crucible of Worlds
    0.95 24.1%
    $32.32 €20.30
  • Exploration Broodship
    0.75 17.1%
    $2.97 €3.27
  • Amulet of Vigor
    0.74 16.6%
    $50.54 €33.91
All artifacts (5)
  1. Zuran Orb relevance 1.24 · 29.9% (56,861 of 190,033 decks)
  2. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.96 · 24.8% (47,080 of 190,033 decks)
  3. Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.95 · 24.1% (45,776 of 190,033 decks)
  4. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.75 · 17.1% (32,532 of 190,033 decks)
  5. Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.74 · 16.6% (31,569 of 190,033 decks)

Enchantments

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Exploration
    1.38 39.8%
    $30.16 €26.59
  • Spelunking
    1.01 24.5%
    $3.57 €3.20
All enchantments (2)
  1. Exploration relevance 1.38 · 39.8% (75,580 of 190,033 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 1.01 · 24.5% (46,500 of 190,033 decks)

Instants

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    1.36 43.6%
    $3.91 €3.60
  • Harrow
    1.17 35.5%
    $0.34 €0.41
  • Beast Within
    0.90 44.4%
    $0.73 €0.86
  • Entish Restoration
    0.80 21.4%
    $3.19 €1.86
All instants (4)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 1.36 · 43.6% (82,826 of 190,033 decks)
  2. Harrow relevance 1.17 · 35.5% (67,500 of 190,033 decks)
  3. Beast Within relevance 0.90 · 44.4% (84,298 of 190,033 decks)
  4. Entish Restoration relevance 0.80 · 21.4% (40,620 of 190,033 decks)

Sorceries

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.09 26.4%
    $0.33 €0.76
  • Scapeshift
    1.07 23.6%
    $41.48 €32.65
  • Nature's Lore
    0.89 45.0%
    $2.13 €2.81
  • Explore
    0.77 23.6%
    $0.18 €0.25
  • Cultivate
    0.75 43.0%
    $0.45 €0.48
  • Life from the Loam
    0.74 18.4%
    $5.35 €5.14
All sorceries (6)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.09 · 26.4% (50,128 of 190,033 decks)
  2. Scapeshift relevance 1.07 · 23.6% (44,791 of 190,033 decks)
  3. Nature's Lore relevance 0.89 · 45.0% (85,577 of 190,033 decks)
  4. Explore relevance 0.77 · 23.6% (44,777 of 190,033 decks)
  5. Cultivate relevance 0.75 · 43.0% (81,628 of 190,033 decks)
  6. Life from the Loam relevance 0.74 · 18.4% (34,948 of 190,033 decks)

Utility Lands

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    0.98 25.9%
    $28.53 €26.97
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.89 35.1%
    $17.18 €13.09
  • Boseiju, Who Endures
    0.78 30.9%
    $49.18 €39.73
  • Shifting Woodland
    0.75 21.4%
    $7.33 €5.34
All utility lands (4)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 0.98 · 25.9% (49,237 of 190,033 decks)
  2. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.89 · 35.1% (66,694 of 190,033 decks)
  3. Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.78 · 30.9% (58,806 of 190,033 decks)
  4. Shifting Woodland relevance 0.75 · 21.4% (40,701 of 190,033 decks)

Lands

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Fabled Passage
    0.92 43.6%
    $0.53 €0.98
  • Wooded Foothills
    0.80 34.6%
    $17.87 €16.79
  • Lotus Field
    0.74 18.1%
    $2.55 €2.57
All lands (3)
  1. Fabled Passage relevance 0.92 · 43.6% (82,833 of 190,033 decks)
  2. Wooded Foothills relevance 0.80 · 34.6% (65,732 of 190,033 decks)
  3. Lotus Field relevance 0.74 · 18.1% (34,447 of 190,033 decks)

EDH data for Lotus Cobra: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 190,033 real decks.