Ramunap Excavator

Played in 126,659 decks

Ramunap Excavator
$4.81 €3.72

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 5.00 · 78.1% (2,820 of 3,613 decks)
  2. The Gitrog Monster relevance 4.44 · 59.7% (3,180 of 5,328 decks)
  3. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 4.16 · 15.6% (1,810 of 11,566 decks)
  4. Flubs, the Fool relevance 3.98 · 41.6% (4,801 of 11,541 decks)
  5. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.73 · 38.8% (1,627 of 4,197 decks)
  6. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.64 · 49.3% (2,559 of 5,195 decks)
  7. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 3.59 · 51.3% (2,051 of 3,997 decks)
  8. Baba Lysaga, Night Witch relevance 3.48 · 42.6% (1,177 of 2,762 decks)
  9. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 3.45 · 54.8% (4,939 of 9,008 decks)
  10. The Necrobloom relevance 3.33 · 49.1% (5,515 of 11,242 decks)
  11. Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 3.32 · 56.5% (3,313 of 5,866 decks)
  12. Child of Alara relevance 3.26 · 11.6% (670 of 5,773 decks)
  13. Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 3.18 · 16.4% (98 of 596 decks)
  14. Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 3.11 · 34.5% (608 of 1,761 decks)
  15. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 3.10 · 57.1% (14,320 of 25,075 decks)
  16. Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 3.06 · 35.9% (747 of 2,082 decks)
  17. Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 3.00 · 45.0% (3,089 of 6,862 decks)
  18. Tifa Lockhart relevance 2.94 · 45.7% (4,451 of 9,739 decks)
  19. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.94 · 73.9% (935 of 1,265 decks)
  20. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.94 · 57.1% (2,001 of 3,504 decks)
  21. Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 2.79 · 51.2% (373 of 729 decks)
  22. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.79 · 50.8% (4,450 of 8,762 decks)
  23. Jarad, Golgari Lich Lord relevance 2.70 · 25.6% (799 of 3,120 decks)
  24. Lord Windgrace relevance 2.70 · 62.6% (2,909 of 4,646 decks)
  25. Borborygmos and Fblthp relevance 2.65 · 39.4% (311 of 789 decks)
  26. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.56 · 37.4% (1,722 of 4,603 decks)
  27. Borborygmos Enraged relevance 2.53 · 35.7% (488 of 1,368 decks)
  28. Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 2.53 · 33.6% (2,324 of 6,920 decks)
  29. Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 2.45 · 5.0% (168 of 3,373 decks)
  30. Six relevance 2.43 · 48.3% (876 of 1,815 decks)

Replaced By

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
All replaced by (1)
  1. Mole Man, Moloid Master 28.0% of swaps out (23 swaps)

Parallel Cards

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
All parallel cards (3)
  1. Ancient Greenwarden
  2. Icetill Explorer
  3. Crucible of Worlds

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.98 55.8%
    $12.74 €9.12
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.84 53.6%
    $5.58 €6.55
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.80 47.8%
    $2.02 €2.75
  • Scute Swarm
    1.77 54.5%
    $8.93 €7.90
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.75 42.8%
    $12.49 €10.39
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.62 39.1%
    $0.33 €0.77
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.61 41.6%
    $1.13 €1.46
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.58 44.1%
    $22.14 €23.31
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.52 43.5%
    $9.88 €6.54
  • Harrow
    1.50 45.6%
    $0.36 €0.27
All most relevant (30)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.98 · 55.8% (70,666 of 126,659 decks)
  2. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.84 · 53.6% (67,903 of 126,659 decks)
  3. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.80 · 47.8% (60,580 of 126,659 decks)
  4. Scute Swarm relevance 1.77 · 54.5% (69,048 of 126,659 decks)
  5. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.75 · 42.8% (54,150 of 126,659 decks)
  6. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.62 · 39.1% (49,556 of 126,659 decks)
  7. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.61 · 41.6% (52,671 of 126,659 decks)
  8. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.58 · 44.1% (55,808 of 126,659 decks)
  9. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.52 · 43.5% (55,072 of 126,659 decks)
  10. Harrow relevance 1.50 · 45.6% (57,747 of 126,659 decks)
  11. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.48 · 37.6% (47,664 of 126,659 decks)
  12. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.47 · 47.2% (59,834 of 126,659 decks)
  13. Exploration relevance 1.46 · 42.1% (53,300 of 126,659 decks)
  14. Crop Rotation relevance 1.43 · 45.7% (57,946 of 126,659 decks)
  15. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.40 · 38.9% (49,314 of 126,659 decks)
  16. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.37 · 35.7% (45,273 of 126,659 decks)
  17. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.36 · 39.9% (50,534 of 126,659 decks)
  18. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.34 · 30.4% (38,548 of 126,659 decks)
  19. The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.30 · 31.2% (39,504 of 126,659 decks)
  20. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.28 · 32.1% (40,712 of 126,659 decks)
  21. Zuran Orb relevance 1.28 · 30.9% (39,107 of 126,659 decks)
  22. Life from the Loam relevance 1.27 · 31.6% (40,035 of 126,659 decks)
  23. Scapeshift relevance 1.15 · 25.4% (32,166 of 126,659 decks)
  24. Six relevance 1.11 · 28.5% (36,138 of 126,659 decks)
  25. Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.98 · 22.9% (29,018 of 126,659 decks)
  26. Spelunking relevance 0.98 · 23.7% (30,047 of 126,659 decks)
  27. Beast Within relevance 0.98 · 48.4% (61,291 of 126,659 decks)
  28. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.94 · 24.6% (31,172 of 126,659 decks)
  29. World Shaper relevance 0.94 · 19.8% (25,019 of 126,659 decks)
  30. Eternal Witness relevance 0.94 · 33.8% (42,804 of 126,659 decks)

Creatures

28

Showing 1-10 of 28

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.98 55.8%
    $12.74 €9.12
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.84 53.6%
    $5.58 €6.55
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.80 47.8%
    $2.02 €2.75
  • Scute Swarm
    1.77 54.5%
    $8.93 €7.90
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.75 42.8%
    $12.49 €10.39
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.58 44.1%
    $22.14 €23.31
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.52 43.5%
    $9.88 €6.54
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.47 47.2%
    $3.94 €3.03
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.40 38.9%
    $0.37 €0.35
  • Aftermath Analyst
    1.37 35.7%
    $0.77 €1.28
All creatures (28)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.98 · 55.8% (70,666 of 126,659 decks)
  2. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.84 · 53.6% (67,903 of 126,659 decks)
  3. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.80 · 47.8% (60,580 of 126,659 decks)
  4. Scute Swarm relevance 1.77 · 54.5% (69,048 of 126,659 decks)
  5. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.75 · 42.8% (54,150 of 126,659 decks)
  6. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.58 · 44.1% (55,808 of 126,659 decks)
  7. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.52 · 43.5% (55,072 of 126,659 decks)
  8. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.47 · 47.2% (59,834 of 126,659 decks)
  9. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.40 · 38.9% (49,314 of 126,659 decks)
  10. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.37 · 35.7% (45,273 of 126,659 decks)
  11. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.36 · 39.9% (50,534 of 126,659 decks)
  12. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.34 · 30.4% (38,548 of 126,659 decks)
  13. The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.30 · 31.2% (39,504 of 126,659 decks)
  14. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.28 · 32.1% (40,712 of 126,659 decks)
  15. Six relevance 1.11 · 28.5% (36,138 of 126,659 decks)
  16. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.94 · 24.6% (31,172 of 126,659 decks)
  17. World Shaper relevance 0.94 · 19.8% (25,019 of 126,659 decks)
  18. Eternal Witness relevance 0.94 · 33.8% (42,804 of 126,659 decks)
  19. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.94 · 21.6% (27,392 of 126,659 decks)
  20. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.92 · 22.9% (29,058 of 126,659 decks)
  21. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.87 · 31.6% (39,961 of 126,659 decks)
  22. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.86 · 19.6% (24,887 of 126,659 decks)
  23. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.86 · 21.0% (26,605 of 126,659 decks)
  24. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.85 · 20.7% (26,191 of 126,659 decks)
  25. Tireless Tracker relevance 0.84 · 20.9% (26,522 of 126,659 decks)
  26. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.78 · 19.7% (24,983 of 126,659 decks)
  27. Horizon Explorer relevance 0.78 · 17.4% (22,073 of 126,659 decks)
  28. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.77 · 18.5% (23,463 of 126,659 decks)

Artifacts

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.61 41.6%
    $1.13 €1.46
  • Crucible of Worlds
    1.48 37.6%
    $32.55 €20.90
  • Zuran Orb
    1.28 30.9%
    $3.27 €1.81
  • Exploration Broodship
    0.89 20.4%
    $2.91 €3.31
All artifacts (4)
  1. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.61 · 41.6% (52,671 of 126,659 decks)
  2. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.48 · 37.6% (47,664 of 126,659 decks)
  3. Zuran Orb relevance 1.28 · 30.9% (39,107 of 126,659 decks)
  4. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.89 · 20.4% (25,825 of 126,659 decks)

Enchantments

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Exploration
    1.46 42.1%
    $30.48 €26.52
  • Spelunking
    0.98 23.7%
    $3.51 €3.11
All enchantments (2)
  1. Exploration relevance 1.46 · 42.1% (53,300 of 126,659 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 0.98 · 23.7% (30,047 of 126,659 decks)

Instants

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Harrow
    1.50 45.6%
    $0.36 €0.27
  • Crop Rotation
    1.43 45.7%
    $3.89 €3.57
  • Roiling Regrowth
    0.98 22.9%
    $0.32 €0.30
  • Beast Within
    0.98 48.4%
    $0.73 €0.89
  • Entish Restoration
    0.91 24.2%
    $3.00 €1.81
All instants (5)
  1. Harrow relevance 1.50 · 45.6% (57,747 of 126,659 decks)
  2. Crop Rotation relevance 1.43 · 45.7% (57,946 of 126,659 decks)
  3. Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.98 · 22.9% (29,018 of 126,659 decks)
  4. Beast Within relevance 0.98 · 48.4% (61,291 of 126,659 decks)
  5. Entish Restoration relevance 0.91 · 24.2% (30,654 of 126,659 decks)

Sorceries

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.62 39.1%
    $0.33 €0.77
  • Life from the Loam
    1.27 31.6%
    $5.14 €4.96
  • Scapeshift
    1.15 25.4%
    $41.50 €33.73
  • Nature's Lore
    0.88 44.5%
    $2.12 €2.78
  • Explore
    0.78 23.8%
    $0.18 €0.26
All sorceries (5)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.62 · 39.1% (49,556 of 126,659 decks)
  2. Life from the Loam relevance 1.27 · 31.6% (40,035 of 126,659 decks)
  3. Scapeshift relevance 1.15 · 25.4% (32,166 of 126,659 decks)
  4. Nature's Lore relevance 0.88 · 44.5% (56,345 of 126,659 decks)
  5. Explore relevance 0.78 · 23.8% (30,119 of 126,659 decks)

Utility Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    1.04 27.5%
    $28.53 €27.22
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.84 33.0%
    $17.19 €12.85
All utility lands (2)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 1.04 · 27.5% (34,802 of 126,659 decks)
  2. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.84 · 33.0% (41,829 of 126,659 decks)

Lands

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Fabled Passage
    1.01 48.0%
    $0.55 €1.06
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    0.84 41.4%
    $0.28 €0.10
  • Verdant Catacombs
    0.77 33.7%
    $29.61 €24.52
  • Evolving Wilds
    0.77 44.8%
    $0.28 €0.13
All lands (4)
  1. Fabled Passage relevance 1.01 · 48.0% (60,735 of 126,659 decks)
  2. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.84 · 41.4% (52,425 of 126,659 decks)
  3. Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.77 · 33.7% (42,645 of 126,659 decks)
  4. Evolving Wilds relevance 0.77 · 44.8% (56,734 of 126,659 decks)

EDH data for Ramunap Excavator: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 126,659 real decks.