Cards like Elvish Mystic
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 60% of other green decks
70% of decks run two or more
vs. 46% of other green decks
2.6 per deck on average
vs. 1.5 in other green decks
Cards
- Elvish Mystic 71%
- Llanowar Elves 69%
- Fyndhorn Elves 66%
- Llanowar Tribe 26%
- Boreal Druid 23%
- Greenweaver Druid 2%
- Druid of the Cowl 2%
- Fyndhorn Elder 1%
- Leaf Gilder 1%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Soul of the Harvest
5.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Beast Whisperer
5.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 65% of other green decks
56% of decks run two or more
vs. 47% of other green decks
2.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.6 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 42%
- Rampant Growth 40%
- Kodama's Reach 34%
- Boundless Realms 16%
- Traverse the Outlands 15%
- Explosive Vegetation 14%
- Migration Path 12%
- Reshape the Earth 9%
- Map the Frontier 6%
- Shared Roots 5%
- Search for Tomorrow 3%
- Verdant Mastery 3%
- Harvest Season 3%
- Terramorph 2%
- Celebrate the Harvest 2%
- Viewpoint Synchronization 1%
- Grow from the Ashes 1%
- Nissa's Expedition 1%
- New Generation's Technique 1%
Other options: Reach the Horizon, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Slimefoot's Survey, Deep Reconnaissance, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Path to the Festival
Cards like Three Visits
1.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Nissa, Who Shakes the World
8.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
3.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Jubilation, Thundering Ceratok
Cards like Apex Devastator
9.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivator Colossus
2.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Circle of Dreams Druid
11× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Wild Growth
1.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Verdant Haven, Market Festival, Glittering Frost, Dawn's Reflection, Blighted Burgeoning
Cards like Ohran Frostfang
1.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other green decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Ohran Viper
Cards like Nyxbloom Ancient
2.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Priest of Titania
1.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Shamanic Revelation
2.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma
2.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Malamet Brawler, Eel-Hounds, Fangren Pathcutter
Cards like Ashaya, Soul of the Wild
4.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild 19%
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer 3%
- Flora Colossus 1%
- Harmonious Grovestrider 1%
- Mirkwood Pathmaker 1%
Other options: Allosaurus Rider
Cards like Kenrith's Transformation
4.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Garruk, Primal Hunter
4.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Ghalta, Primal Hunger
3.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Augur of Autumn
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Fog
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other green decks
Cards
- Fog 21%
- Moment's Peace 6%
- Winds of Qal Sisma 1%
Other options: Hunter's Ambush, Thwart the Enemy, Hindervines, Tanglesap, Pause for Reflection, Terrifying Presence, Root Snare, Lull, Serene Sunset, Haze of Pollen, Vine Snare
Cards like Selvala, Heart of the Wilds
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other green decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.42 · 37.2% (32 of 86 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.36 · 24.4% (21 of 86 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.34 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.31 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.28 · 23.3% (20 of 86 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.23 · 41.9% (36 of 86 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.28 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf Archdruid relevance 0.31 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Earth Surge relevance 0.32 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.25 · 24.4% (21 of 86 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.29 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.21 · 38.4% (33 of 86 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.23 · 27.9% (24 of 86 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.25 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Kamahl's Druidic Vow relevance 0.29 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.22 · 27.9% (24 of 86 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.29 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.25 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.22 · 27.9% (24 of 86 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.25 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.22 · 23.3% (20 of 86 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.21 · 30.2% (26 of 86 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.23 · 20.9% (18 of 86 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.20 · 31.4% (27 of 86 decks)
- Majestic Genesis relevance 0.25 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.23 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.16 · 52.3% (45 of 86 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.27 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Wild Endeavor relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.25 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.18 · 33.7% (29 of 86 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 0.26 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.25 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 0.23 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.20 · 22.1% (19 of 86 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.13 · 66.3% (57 of 86 decks)
- Regal Force relevance 0.20 · 20.9% (18 of 86 decks)
- Primeval Herald relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.20 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.22 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.18 · 30.2% (26 of 86 decks)
- The Great Aurora relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Anticausal Vestige relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.20 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.19 · 25.6% (22 of 86 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.19 · 24.4% (21 of 86 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.24 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.34 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.31 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.28 · 23.3% (20 of 86 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.23 · 41.9% (36 of 86 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf Archdruid relevance 0.31 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.25 · 24.4% (21 of 86 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.21 · 38.4% (33 of 86 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.25 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.22 · 27.9% (24 of 86 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.25 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.22 · 27.9% (24 of 86 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.25 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.22 · 23.3% (20 of 86 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.21 · 30.2% (26 of 86 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.16 · 52.3% (45 of 86 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.18 · 33.7% (29 of 86 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 0.26 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 0.23 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.20 · 22.1% (19 of 86 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.13 · 66.3% (57 of 86 decks)
- Regal Force relevance 0.20 · 20.9% (18 of 86 decks)
- Primeval Herald relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.20 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Anticausal Vestige relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.20 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.19 · 25.6% (22 of 86 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.19 · 24.4% (21 of 86 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.19 · 22.1% (19 of 86 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.21 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.20 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.21 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.18 · 22.1% (19 of 86 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.19 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.23 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.17 · 26.7% (23 of 86 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.17 · 31.4% (27 of 86 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.18 · 23.3% (20 of 86 decks)
- Outcaster Trailblazer relevance 0.20 · 12.8% (11 of 86 decks)
- The Tarrasque relevance 0.22 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.16 · 29.1% (25 of 86 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.18 · 20.9% (18 of 86 decks)
- Druid of Purification relevance 0.21 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.19 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.18 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.20 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.19 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Wild Wanderer relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
All artifacts (34)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.19 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.17 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.15 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.19 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.15 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.12 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.14 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Endless Atlas relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.16 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Psychic Paper relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.16 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.16 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.14 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.15 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.13 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.08 · 33.7% (29 of 86 decks)
- Staff of the Wild Magus relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.11 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.13 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.09 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.09 · 12.8% (11 of 86 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.08 · 12.8% (11 of 86 decks)
- Doubling Cube relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 45.3% (39 of 86 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.07 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.08 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.08 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.08 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Earth Surge relevance 0.32 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.23 · 27.9% (24 of 86 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.23 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- Lost in the Woods relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.20 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.15 · 27.9% (24 of 86 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.19 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.18 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.17 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.13 · 32.6% (28 of 86 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.15 · 12.8% (11 of 86 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.14 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.14 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.16 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.19 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.16 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.15 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.16 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Vernal Bloom relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.14 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Cream of the Crop relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.13 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.15 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.13 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.12 · 20.9% (18 of 86 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.14 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Spawning Grounds relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.09 · 38.4% (33 of 86 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.13 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.11 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.14 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.12 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Sight of the Scalelords relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.12 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Overwhelming Instinct relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.11 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Primal Order relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Living Lands relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.13 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.11 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Shimmerwilds Growth relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Spidersilk Armor relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Bonds of Mortality relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.10 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Mirri's Guile relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
All instants (50)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.42 · 37.2% (32 of 86 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.29 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Mystic Repeal relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.20 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.15 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.14 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Once Upon a Time relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Kindred Summons relevance 0.18 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.16 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.14 · 20.9% (18 of 86 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.14 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.15 · 12.8% (11 of 86 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.16 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.13 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.16 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.12 · 26.7% (23 of 86 decks)
- Vitality Charm relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.14 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.16 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.14 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.10 · 37.2% (32 of 86 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.15 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.13 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.14 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.11 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- Fowl Strike relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.15 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.13 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.12 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.13 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.11 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.10 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.07 · 39.5% (34 of 86 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.10 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Barrier Breach relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (43 of 86 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.12 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.12 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.10 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Glorious Decay relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Rampage of the Clans relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.10 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Back to Nature relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.09 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.36 · 24.4% (21 of 86 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.28 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.29 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Kamahl's Druidic Vow relevance 0.29 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.23 · 20.9% (18 of 86 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.20 · 31.4% (27 of 86 decks)
- Majestic Genesis relevance 0.25 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.27 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Wild Endeavor relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.25 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- The Great Aurora relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.24 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.20 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.23 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.22 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.21 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.21 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Green Sun's Twilight relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Nissa's Renewal relevance 0.22 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.18 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Desert Twister relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.15 · 31.4% (27 of 86 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.16 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Gaea's Blessing relevance 0.21 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.21 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.20 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.17 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.15 · 25.6% (22 of 86 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.19 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.22 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.18 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Verdant Mastery relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.12 · 40.7% (35 of 86 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.17 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.19 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.13 · 24.4% (21 of 86 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.12 · 37.2% (32 of 86 decks)
- Beacon of Creation relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.17 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.12 · 26.7% (23 of 86 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.16 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.15 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Atraxa's Fall relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Through the Forest Gate relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Biorhythm relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.10 · 33.7% (29 of 86 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.12 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.12 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (12)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.25 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.22 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.18 · 30.2% (26 of 86 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.18 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.19 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.15 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.14 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Nissa, Nature's Artisan relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.13 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Garruk, Curse Breaker relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.23 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.08 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.23 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.19 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.16 · 34.9% (30 of 86 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.18 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.20 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.17 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.16 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.16 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.13 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.14 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.11 · 32.6% (28 of 86 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.13 · 20.9% (18 of 86 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.16 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.13 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.13 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.16 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.11 · 25.6% (22 of 86 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.11 · 25.6% (22 of 86 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.11 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Treetop Village relevance 0.16 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.14 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.13 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.14 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.10 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.14 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.14 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.13 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.12 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.09 · 23.3% (20 of 86 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.12 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.11 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Kazandu Mammoth // Kazandu Valley relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Okina, Temple to the Grandfathers relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.09 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.07 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
All lands (21)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.16 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.14 · 12.8% (11 of 86 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.11 · 20.9% (18 of 86 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.12 · 10.5% (9 of 86 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.12 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.12 · 7.0% (6 of 86 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.12 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.13 · 5.8% (5 of 86 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.11 · 8.1% (7 of 86 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.10 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.10 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.10 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.10 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.09 · 4.7% (4 of 86 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.09 · 3.5% (3 of 86 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Havenwood Battleground relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.08 · 2.3% (2 of 86 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 86.0% (74 of 86 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood, from 86 real Commander partner decks.