Scapeshift

Played in 63,976 decks

Scapeshift
$41.45 €33.73

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 4.76 · 25.9% (2,983 of 11,537 decks)
  2. The Gitrog Monster relevance 4.11 · 20.0% (1,060 of 5,311 decks)
  3. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 4.05 · 37.7% (1,578 of 4,186 decks)
  4. The Necrobloom relevance 3.71 · 32.3% (3,623 of 11,211 decks)
  5. Homer, the Hermit relevance 3.65 · 37.1% (1,665 of 4,483 decks)
  6. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 3.60 · 36.7% (1,463 of 3,983 decks)
  7. Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 3.57 · 20.1% (417 of 2,079 decks)
  8. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.53 · 32.9% (1,701 of 5,171 decks)
  9. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 3.30 · 19.4% (374 of 1,928 decks)
  10. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 3.30 · 48.2% (2,917 of 6,052 decks)
  11. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 3.24 · 19.4% (1,739 of 8,978 decks)
  12. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.21 · 24.5% (884 of 3,608 decks)
  13. Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 3.03 · 9.6% (57 of 594 decks)
  14. Lord Windgrace relevance 2.96 · 48.1% (2,226 of 4,632 decks)
  15. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.95 · 58.7% (740 of 1,260 decks)
  16. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.94 · 33.4% (8,340 of 25,006 decks)
  17. Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 2.94 · 27.9% (758 of 2,719 decks)
  18. Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 2.89 · 31.1% (267 of 858 decks)
  19. Thrasios, Triton Hero // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 2.86 · 26.0% (107 of 411 decks)
  20. Tifa Lockhart relevance 2.73 · 31.0% (3,009 of 9,705 decks)
  21. Child of Alara relevance 2.66 · 9.6% (552 of 5,754 decks)
  22. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.64 · 15.8% (726 of 4,588 decks)
  23. Borborygmos and Fblthp relevance 2.62 · 17.1% (134 of 784 decks)
  24. Sin, Spira's Punishment relevance 2.60 · 21.2% (706 of 3,335 decks)
  25. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.57 · 27.2% (2,372 of 8,721 decks)
  26. Choco, Seeker of Paradise relevance 2.56 · 2.7% (287 of 10,721 decks)
  27. Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 2.37 · 16.7% (710 of 4,257 decks)
  28. Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 2.35 · 2.7% (92 of 3,356 decks)
  29. Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 2.35 · 20.2% (417 of 2,066 decks)
  30. Flubs, the Fool relevance 2.35 · 6.1% (696 of 11,503 decks)

Parallel Cards

28

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Lotus Cobra
    2.39 69.5%
    $5.67 €6.55
  • Exploration
    2.29 66.0%
    $30.17 €26.52
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    2.29 64.5%
    $13.01 €9.12
  • Splendid Reclamation
    2.09 50.5%
    $0.36 €0.77
  • Crop Rotation
    2.06 66.2%
    $3.90 €3.57
  • Icetill Explorer
    2.06 57.6%
    $19.58 €23.31
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    2.06 50.3%
    $12.51 €10.39
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    2.02 50.6%
    $5.76 €6.51
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.92 50.1%
    $4.84 €3.72
  • Zuran Orb
    1.87 45.0%
    $3.03 €1.81
All most relevant (30)
  1. Lotus Cobra relevance 2.39 · 69.5% (44,488 of 63,976 decks)
  2. Exploration relevance 2.29 · 66.0% (42,227 of 63,976 decks)
  3. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.29 · 64.5% (41,238 of 63,976 decks)
  4. Splendid Reclamation relevance 2.09 · 50.5% (32,324 of 63,976 decks)
  5. Crop Rotation relevance 2.06 · 66.2% (42,366 of 63,976 decks)
  6. Icetill Explorer relevance 2.06 · 57.6% (36,834 of 63,976 decks)
  7. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 2.06 · 50.3% (32,206 of 63,976 decks)
  8. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 2.02 · 50.6% (32,381 of 63,976 decks)
  9. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.92 · 50.1% (32,040 of 63,976 decks)
  10. Zuran Orb relevance 1.87 · 45.0% (28,792 of 63,976 decks)
  11. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.85 · 49.2% (31,470 of 63,976 decks)
  12. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.84 · 46.7% (29,872 of 63,976 decks)
  13. Scute Swarm relevance 1.81 · 55.5% (35,502 of 63,976 decks)
  14. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.75 · 50.2% (32,085 of 63,976 decks)
  15. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.73 · 55.6% (35,547 of 63,976 decks)
  16. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.67 · 43.8% (28,000 of 63,976 decks)
  17. Harrow relevance 1.56 · 47.5% (30,406 of 63,976 decks)
  18. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.49 · 34.0% (21,757 of 63,976 decks)
  19. Spelunking relevance 1.48 · 35.8% (22,932 of 63,976 decks)
  20. Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.45 · 32.4% (20,743 of 63,976 decks)
  21. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.43 · 29.1% (18,642 of 63,976 decks)
  22. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.40 · 31.9% (20,396 of 63,976 decks)
  23. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.39 · 35.9% (22,966 of 63,976 decks)
  24. Life from the Loam relevance 1.31 · 32.7% (20,931 of 63,976 decks)
  25. Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.29 · 26.1% (16,672 of 63,976 decks)
  26. The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.28 · 30.8% (19,696 of 63,976 decks)
  27. Burgeoning relevance 1.28 · 30.7% (19,628 of 63,976 decks)
  28. Six relevance 1.24 · 31.8% (20,365 of 63,976 decks)
  29. Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.22 · 30.7% (19,634 of 63,976 decks)
  30. Constant Mists relevance 1.20 · 23.6% (15,114 of 63,976 decks)

Creatures

25

Showing 1-10 of 25

Page size
  • Lotus Cobra
    2.39 69.5%
    $5.67 €6.55
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    2.29 64.5%
    $13.01 €9.12
  • Icetill Explorer
    2.06 57.6%
    $19.58 €23.31
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    2.06 50.3%
    $12.51 €10.39
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    2.02 50.6%
    $5.76 €6.51
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.92 50.1%
    $4.84 €3.72
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.85 49.2%
    $2.01 €2.75
  • Scute Swarm
    1.81 55.5%
    $9.00 €7.90
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.75 50.2%
    $9.87 €6.54
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.73 55.6%
    $3.94 €3.03
All creatures (25)
  1. Lotus Cobra relevance 2.39 · 69.5% (44,488 of 63,976 decks)
  2. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.29 · 64.5% (41,238 of 63,976 decks)
  3. Icetill Explorer relevance 2.06 · 57.6% (36,834 of 63,976 decks)
  4. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 2.06 · 50.3% (32,206 of 63,976 decks)
  5. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 2.02 · 50.6% (32,381 of 63,976 decks)
  6. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.92 · 50.1% (32,040 of 63,976 decks)
  7. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.85 · 49.2% (31,470 of 63,976 decks)
  8. Scute Swarm relevance 1.81 · 55.5% (35,502 of 63,976 decks)
  9. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.75 · 50.2% (32,085 of 63,976 decks)
  10. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.73 · 55.6% (35,547 of 63,976 decks)
  11. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.67 · 43.8% (28,000 of 63,976 decks)
  12. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.49 · 34.0% (21,757 of 63,976 decks)
  13. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.43 · 29.1% (18,642 of 63,976 decks)
  14. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.40 · 31.9% (20,396 of 63,976 decks)
  15. Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.29 · 26.1% (16,672 of 63,976 decks)
  16. The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.28 · 30.8% (19,696 of 63,976 decks)
  17. Six relevance 1.24 · 31.8% (20,365 of 63,976 decks)
  18. Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.22 · 30.7% (19,634 of 63,976 decks)
  19. Traveling Chocobo relevance 1.19 · 25.2% (16,103 of 63,976 decks)
  20. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.16 · 34.1% (21,804 of 63,976 decks)
  21. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.11 · 26.6% (17,043 of 63,976 decks)
  22. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.10 · 30.6% (19,588 of 63,976 decks)
  23. Horizon Explorer relevance 1.08 · 24.1% (15,393 of 63,976 decks)
  24. Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.02 · 25.1% (16,037 of 63,976 decks)
  25. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.01 · 21.9% (13,986 of 63,976 decks)

Artifacts

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Zuran Orb
    1.87 45.0%
    $3.03 €1.81
  • Crucible of Worlds
    1.84 46.7%
    $31.82 €20.90
  • Amulet of Vigor
    1.45 32.4%
    $50.54 €33.60
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.39 35.9%
    $1.13 €1.46
  • Exploration Broodship
    1.00 22.8%
    $2.93 €3.31
All artifacts (5)
  1. Zuran Orb relevance 1.87 · 45.0% (28,792 of 63,976 decks)
  2. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.84 · 46.7% (29,872 of 63,976 decks)
  3. Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.45 · 32.4% (20,743 of 63,976 decks)
  4. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.39 · 35.9% (22,966 of 63,976 decks)
  5. Exploration Broodship relevance 1.00 · 22.8% (14,601 of 63,976 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Exploration
    2.29 66.0%
    $30.17 €26.52
  • Spelunking
    1.48 35.8%
    $3.55 €3.11
  • Burgeoning
    1.28 30.7%
    $33.58 €25.64
All enchantments (3)
  1. Exploration relevance 2.29 · 66.0% (42,227 of 63,976 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 1.48 · 35.8% (22,932 of 63,976 decks)
  3. Burgeoning relevance 1.28 · 30.7% (19,628 of 63,976 decks)

Instants

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    2.06 66.2%
    $3.90 €3.57
  • Harrow
    1.56 47.5%
    $0.31 €0.27
  • Constant Mists
    1.20 23.6%
    $20.36 €14.65
  • Entish Restoration
    1.14 30.3%
    $2.88 €1.81
  • Roiling Regrowth
    1.05 24.4%
    $0.26 €0.30
All instants (5)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 2.06 · 66.2% (42,366 of 63,976 decks)
  2. Harrow relevance 1.56 · 47.5% (30,406 of 63,976 decks)
  3. Constant Mists relevance 1.20 · 23.6% (15,114 of 63,976 decks)
  4. Entish Restoration relevance 1.14 · 30.3% (19,390 of 63,976 decks)
  5. Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.05 · 24.4% (15,637 of 63,976 decks)

Sorceries

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    2.09 50.5%
    $0.36 €0.77
  • Life from the Loam
    1.31 32.7%
    $5.16 €4.96
All sorceries (2)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 2.09 · 50.5% (32,324 of 63,976 decks)
  2. Life from the Loam relevance 1.31 · 32.7% (20,931 of 63,976 decks)

Utility Lands

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    1.76 46.7%
    $28.55 €27.22
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    1.26 49.4%
    $17.17 €12.85
  • Strip Mine
    1.22 32.3%
    $10.87 €5.96
  • Boseiju, Who Endures
    1.17 46.7%
    $48.11 €40.11
  • Shifting Woodland
    1.13 32.6%
    $6.55 €5.29
All utility lands (5)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 1.76 · 46.7% (29,861 of 63,976 decks)
  2. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 1.26 · 49.4% (31,599 of 63,976 decks)
  3. Strip Mine relevance 1.22 · 32.3% (20,673 of 63,976 decks)
  4. Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 1.17 · 46.7% (29,852 of 63,976 decks)
  5. Shifting Woodland relevance 1.13 · 32.6% (20,832 of 63,976 decks)

Lands

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Lotus Field
    1.38 33.8%
    $2.56 €2.52
  • Verdant Catacombs
    1.15 50.3%
    $29.79 €24.52
  • Wooded Foothills
    1.14 49.6%
    $17.41 €16.71
  • Fabled Passage
    1.11 52.7%
    $0.60 €1.06
  • Windswept Heath
    1.00 43.8%
    $12.47 €10.58
All lands (5)
  1. Lotus Field relevance 1.38 · 33.8% (21,655 of 63,976 decks)
  2. Verdant Catacombs relevance 1.15 · 50.3% (32,187 of 63,976 decks)
  3. Wooded Foothills relevance 1.14 · 49.6% (31,747 of 63,976 decks)
  4. Fabled Passage relevance 1.11 · 52.7% (33,686 of 63,976 decks)
  5. Windswept Heath relevance 1.00 · 43.8% (28,041 of 63,976 decks)

EDH data for Scapeshift: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 63,976 real decks.