Reap and Sow
Played in 283 Golgari decks
Color Identity Spread
930+4+4+1+4+17+11+9+
That's every commander.
All commanders (9)
- Iname as One relevance 1.96 · 5.9% (11 of 185 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Scion of Halaster relevance 1.30 · 2.0% (8 of 391 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar relevance 1.12 · 20.0% (2 of 10 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Agent of the Shadow Thieves relevance 1.06 · 5.3% (3 of 57 decks)
- Sisters of Stone Death relevance 0.68 · 1.2% (3 of 257 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Haunted One relevance 0.61 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Keskit, the Flesh Sculptor relevance 0.60 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- Vraska, the Cutting Glare relevance 0.33 · 1.0% (1 of 96 decks)
- Rhys the Exiled relevance 0.33 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.58 · 39.2% (111 of 283 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.43 · 30.7% (87 of 283 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.36 · 30.7% (87 of 283 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 1.29 · 21.2% (60 of 283 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.25 · 21.2% (60 of 283 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.99 · 39.6% (112 of 283 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.96 · 19.1% (54 of 283 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.89 · 19.8% (56 of 283 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.71 · 11.7% (33 of 283 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.64 · 11.0% (31 of 283 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.63 · 19.8% (56 of 283 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.63 · 16.3% (46 of 283 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.61 · 18.0% (51 of 283 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.53 · 9.9% (28 of 283 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.49 · 22.3% (63 of 283 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.48 · 14.8% (42 of 283 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (24 of 283 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.47 · 9.9% (28 of 283 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.46 · 9.9% (28 of 283 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.46 · 14.5% (41 of 283 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.43 · 12.7% (36 of 283 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.40 · 13.8% (39 of 283 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.40 · 21.9% (62 of 283 decks)
- Stinging Study relevance 0.39 · 11.3% (32 of 283 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.38 · 11.0% (31 of 283 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.38 · 13.1% (37 of 283 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.36 · 18.7% (53 of 283 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.36 · 7.1% (20 of 283 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.36 · 9.9% (28 of 283 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.36 · 13.4% (38 of 283 decks)
All creatures (4)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.96 · 19.1% (54 of 283 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.89 · 19.8% (56 of 283 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (24 of 283 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.43 · 12.7% (36 of 283 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.36 · 30.7% (87 of 283 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.71 · 11.7% (33 of 283 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.63 · 16.3% (46 of 283 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.48 · 14.8% (42 of 283 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Exploration relevance 0.38 · 11.0% (31 of 283 decks)
All instants (4)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.99 · 39.6% (112 of 283 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.63 · 19.8% (56 of 283 decks)
- Stinging Study relevance 0.39 · 11.3% (32 of 283 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.36 · 7.1% (20 of 283 decks)
All sorceries (17)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.58 · 39.2% (111 of 283 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.43 · 30.7% (87 of 283 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 1.29 · 21.2% (60 of 283 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.25 · 21.2% (60 of 283 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.64 · 11.0% (31 of 283 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.61 · 18.0% (51 of 283 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.53 · 9.9% (28 of 283 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.49 · 22.3% (63 of 283 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.47 · 9.9% (28 of 283 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.46 · 9.9% (28 of 283 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.46 · 14.5% (41 of 283 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.40 · 13.8% (39 of 283 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.40 · 21.9% (62 of 283 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.38 · 13.1% (37 of 283 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.36 · 18.7% (53 of 283 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.36 · 9.9% (28 of 283 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.36 · 13.4% (38 of 283 decks)
All utility lands (11)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.91 · 22.6% (64 of 283 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.78 · 17.7% (50 of 283 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.58 · 35.7% (101 of 283 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.57 · 17.7% (50 of 283 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.49 · 12.0% (34 of 283 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.44 · 31.4% (89 of 283 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.44 · 18.7% (53 of 283 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.43 · 11.3% (32 of 283 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.42 · 8.1% (23 of 283 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.38 · 21.6% (61 of 283 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.36 · 20.8% (59 of 283 decks)
All lands (9)
- Vesuva relevance 0.60 · 12.7% (36 of 283 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.59 · 21.6% (61 of 283 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.50 · 10.2% (29 of 283 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.45 · 9.2% (26 of 283 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.43 · 32.5% (92 of 283 decks)
- Darkmoss Bridge relevance 0.42 · 15.2% (43 of 283 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.39 · 14.8% (42 of 283 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.37 · 11.0% (31 of 283 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.37 · 11.0% (31 of 283 decks)
EDH data for Reap and Sow: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 283 real decks.






























































