Reap and Sow
Played in 370 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
1630+19+2+3+3+15+5+3+
That's every commander.
All commanders (16)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 2.63 · 6.5% (47 of 718 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.35 · 2.1% (16 of 759 decks)
- Grizzlegom, Hurloon Hero relevance 1.20 · 1.3% (21 of 1,680 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Street Urchin relevance 1.18 · 1.7% (14 of 847 decks)
- Wort, the Raidmother relevance 1.12 · 1.2% (19 of 1,651 decks)
- Klothys, God of Destiny relevance 1.08 · 1.3% (14 of 1,050 decks)
- Gladiolus Amicitia relevance 0.94 · 1.6% (8 of 498 decks)
- Radha, Heart of Keld relevance 0.90 · 1.6% (7 of 431 decks)
- Popular Entertainer // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.48 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Tuya Bearclaw relevance 0.44 · 1.3% (2 of 150 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh relevance 0.44 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.44 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- The Lady of the Mountain relevance 0.33 · 2.1% (1 of 47 decks)
- Sunastian Falconer relevance 0.31 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Guild Artisan relevance 0.28 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
- Kraven, Proud Predator relevance 0.25 · 1.1% (1 of 93 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.71 · 42.7% (158 of 370 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.41 · 32.2% (119 of 370 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.31 · 35.9% (133 of 370 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 1.13 · 20.3% (75 of 370 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.99 · 21.4% (79 of 370 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.93 · 22.4% (83 of 370 decks)
- Mwonvuli Acid-Moss relevance 0.93 · 14.1% (52 of 370 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.85 · 36.8% (136 of 370 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.84 · 15.9% (59 of 370 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.82 · 14.9% (55 of 370 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.68 · 22.2% (82 of 370 decks)
- Spitfire Lagac relevance 0.68 · 18.9% (70 of 370 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.68 · 21.9% (81 of 370 decks)
- Tunneling Geopede relevance 0.66 · 18.1% (67 of 370 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.65 · 23.2% (86 of 370 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.64 · 23.8% (88 of 370 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.63 · 23.0% (85 of 370 decks)
- Stone Rain relevance 0.63 · 10.0% (37 of 370 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.62 · 21.9% (81 of 370 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.61 · 20.8% (77 of 370 decks)
- Molten Rain relevance 0.61 · 9.2% (34 of 370 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.59 · 12.2% (45 of 370 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.58 · 19.7% (73 of 370 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.56 · 24.6% (91 of 370 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.56 · 18.4% (68 of 370 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.56 · 19.7% (73 of 370 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.56 · 18.4% (68 of 370 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.55 · 16.8% (62 of 370 decks)
- Vibrance relevance 0.55 · 12.7% (47 of 370 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.55 · 17.8% (66 of 370 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.99 · 21.4% (79 of 370 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.93 · 22.4% (83 of 370 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.68 · 22.2% (82 of 370 decks)
- Spitfire Lagac relevance 0.68 · 18.9% (70 of 370 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.68 · 21.9% (81 of 370 decks)
- Tunneling Geopede relevance 0.66 · 18.1% (67 of 370 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.65 · 23.2% (86 of 370 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.64 · 23.8% (88 of 370 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.62 · 21.9% (81 of 370 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.61 · 20.8% (77 of 370 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.58 · 19.7% (73 of 370 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.56 · 24.6% (91 of 370 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.56 · 18.4% (68 of 370 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.56 · 19.7% (73 of 370 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.56 · 18.4% (68 of 370 decks)
- Vibrance relevance 0.55 · 12.7% (47 of 370 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.55 · 17.8% (66 of 370 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.54 · 12.7% (47 of 370 decks)
- Gladiolus Amicitia relevance 0.54 · 13.8% (51 of 370 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.41 · 32.2% (119 of 370 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.82 · 14.9% (55 of 370 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.54 · 17.8% (66 of 370 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.47 · 15.1% (56 of 370 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.47 · 18.1% (67 of 370 decks)
All instants (3)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.85 · 36.8% (136 of 370 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.63 · 23.0% (85 of 370 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.51 · 22.7% (84 of 370 decks)
All sorceries (15)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.71 · 42.7% (158 of 370 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.31 · 35.9% (133 of 370 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 1.13 · 20.3% (75 of 370 decks)
- Mwonvuli Acid-Moss relevance 0.93 · 14.1% (52 of 370 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.84 · 15.9% (59 of 370 decks)
- Stone Rain relevance 0.63 · 10.0% (37 of 370 decks)
- Molten Rain relevance 0.61 · 9.2% (34 of 370 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.59 · 12.2% (45 of 370 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.55 · 16.8% (62 of 370 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.54 · 15.1% (56 of 370 decks)
- Seismic Spike relevance 0.51 · 7.6% (28 of 370 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.49 · 8.9% (33 of 370 decks)
- Pillage relevance 0.48 · 7.6% (28 of 370 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.48 · 25.9% (96 of 370 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.48 · 21.6% (80 of 370 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Urza's Cave relevance 1.00 · 26.2% (97 of 370 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.95 · 23.2% (86 of 370 decks)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 0.53 · 13.8% (51 of 370 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.47 · 12.7% (47 of 370 decks)
- Sheltered Thicket relevance 0.47 · 29.2% (108 of 370 decks)
All lands (3)
- Vesuva relevance 0.77 · 19.5% (72 of 370 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.66 · 13.8% (51 of 370 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.56 · 13.0% (48 of 370 decks)
EDH data for Reap and Sow: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 370 real decks.





































































