Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 0.53 · 19.7% (23 of 117 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 0.48 · 29.9% (35 of 117 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.40 · 46.2% (54 of 117 decks)
- Kindercatch relevance 0.54 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 0.48 · 24.8% (29 of 117 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 0.51 · 17.1% (20 of 117 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 0.46 · 26.5% (31 of 117 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 0.46 · 26.5% (31 of 117 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 0.50 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 0.50 · 16.2% (19 of 117 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 0.49 · 16.2% (19 of 117 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 0.46 · 18.8% (22 of 117 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 0.44 · 21.4% (25 of 117 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 0.42 · 24.8% (29 of 117 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 0.46 · 17.1% (20 of 117 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 0.44 · 19.7% (23 of 117 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 0.45 · 17.1% (20 of 117 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 0.47 · 12.8% (15 of 117 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.32 · 49.6% (58 of 117 decks)
- Axebane Beast relevance 0.50 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 0.42 · 18.8% (22 of 117 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 0.43 · 17.1% (20 of 117 decks)
- Axebane Stag relevance 0.48 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Cylian Elf relevance 0.49 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Silverback Ape relevance 0.49 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 0.42 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 0.43 · 12.8% (15 of 117 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 0.41 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 0.45 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 0.45 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Broodhunter Wurm relevance 0.44 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Nettle Swine relevance 0.46 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Spined Karok relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 0.43 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.35 · 23.9% (28 of 117 decks)
- Murasa Brute relevance 0.42 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Barbary Apes relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Willow Elf relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Alpha Tyrranax relevance 0.43 · 8.5% (10 of 117 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 0.41 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Trained Armodon relevance 0.42 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Biowaste Blob relevance 0.34 · 16.2% (19 of 117 decks)
- Harrier Naga relevance 0.41 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Colossodon Yearling relevance 0.42 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 0.31 · 21.4% (25 of 117 decks)
- Scaled Wurm relevance 0.39 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Moss Monster relevance 0.41 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Trained Jackal relevance 0.40 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 0.33 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
Card Stacks
20
Card Stacks
20Showing 1-2 of 20
Cards like Quakestrider Ceratops
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
2.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
- Quakestrider Ceratops 46%
- Ancient Brontodon 30%
- Vorstclaw 21%
- Enormous Baloth 20%
- Primordial Wurm 19%
- Cowl Prowler 16%
- Kindercatch 14%
- Axebane Stag 10%
- Scaled Wurm 7%
- Canopy Gorger 6%
- Barbtooth Wurm 5%
- Vastwood Gorger 4%
- Tusked Colossodon 4%
Cards like Gigantosaurus
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
2.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
- Gigantosaurus 50%
- Leatherback Baloth 25%
- Colossapede 17%
- Hollowhenge Beast 15%
- Grizzled Outrider 13%
- Broodhunter Wurm 10%
- Gnarled Mass 10%
- Murasa Brute 10%
- Axebane Beast 9%
- Silverback Ape 9%
- Trained Armodon 8%
- Spined Karok 8%
- Nettle Swine 8%
- Golden Bear 5%
- Pheres-Band Centaurs 4%
- Wild Ceratok 4%
- Moss Monster 4%
- Thornhide Wolves 4%
- Southern Elephant 3%
- Ironroot Treefolk 3%
- Nema Siltlurker 3%
- Feral Krushok 3%
- Blanchwood Treefolk 3%
- Plated Wurm 3%
- Order of the Sacred Bell 2%
- Durkwood Boars 2%
Cards like Kalonian Tusker
7.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
2.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
- Kalonian Tusker 26%
- Alpine Grizzly 21%
- Orazca Frillback 20%
- Jibbirik Omnivore 19%
- Rumbling Baloth 17%
- Terrain Elemental 17%
- Ferocious Zheng 16%
- Swordwise Centaur 15%
- Bear Cub 15%
- Balduvian Bears 12%
- Runeclaw Bear 10%
- Cylian Elf 9%
- Forest Bear 7%
- Colossodon Yearling 6%
- Trained Jackal 5%
Cards like Rishkar's Expertise
5.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other green decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Elvish Warrior
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
- Elvish Warrior 15%
- Norwood Ranger 10%
- Harrier Naga 8%
Cards like Grizzly Bears
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
- Grizzly Bears 17%
- Spined Wurm 6%
- Elvish Ranger 6%
- Whiptail Wurm 5%
- Redwood Treefolk 3%
- Gorilla Warrior 3%
Other options: Rowan Treefolk, Giant Spider
Cards like Fanatic of Rhonas
2.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Leafkin Druid
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.51 in other green decks
Cards
- Garruk's Uprising 60%
- Elemental Bond 21%
- Kavu Lair 2%
Cards like Bite Down
3.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Compel Brutality
Cards like Wild Growth
2.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Verdant Haven, Market Festival, Glittering Frost, Dawn's Reflection, Blighted Burgeoning
Cards like Cultivate
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 50%
- Rampant Growth 42%
- Kodama's Reach 34%
- Shared Roots 15%
- Explosive Vegetation 7%
- Migration Path 6%
- Roamer's Routine 3%
- Search for Tomorrow 2%
- Untamed Wilds 2%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, They Went This Way, Grow from the Ashes, Path to the Festival, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Map the Wastes, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Quilled Slagwurm
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Return to Nature
3.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Colossal Majesty
12× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Fog
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards like Overwhelming Stampede
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other green decks
Cards like Ghalta, Primal Hunger
4.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Shamanic Revelation
2.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Garruk, Primal Hunter
3.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other green decks
Cards like Kenrith's Transformation
3.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other green decks
Cards
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 0.53 · 19.7% (23 of 117 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 0.48 · 29.9% (35 of 117 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.40 · 46.2% (54 of 117 decks)
- Kindercatch relevance 0.54 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 0.48 · 24.8% (29 of 117 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 0.51 · 17.1% (20 of 117 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 0.46 · 26.5% (31 of 117 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 0.46 · 26.5% (31 of 117 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 0.50 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 0.50 · 16.2% (19 of 117 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 0.49 · 16.2% (19 of 117 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 0.46 · 18.8% (22 of 117 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 0.44 · 21.4% (25 of 117 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 0.42 · 24.8% (29 of 117 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 0.46 · 17.1% (20 of 117 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 0.44 · 19.7% (23 of 117 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 0.45 · 17.1% (20 of 117 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 0.47 · 12.8% (15 of 117 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.32 · 49.6% (58 of 117 decks)
- Axebane Beast relevance 0.50 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 0.42 · 18.8% (22 of 117 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 0.43 · 17.1% (20 of 117 decks)
- Axebane Stag relevance 0.48 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Cylian Elf relevance 0.49 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Silverback Ape relevance 0.49 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 0.42 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 0.43 · 12.8% (15 of 117 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 0.41 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 0.45 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 0.45 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Broodhunter Wurm relevance 0.44 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Nettle Swine relevance 0.46 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Spined Karok relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 0.43 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.35 · 23.9% (28 of 117 decks)
- Murasa Brute relevance 0.42 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Willow Elf relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Barbary Apes relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Alpha Tyrranax relevance 0.43 · 8.5% (10 of 117 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 0.41 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Trained Armodon relevance 0.42 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Biowaste Blob relevance 0.34 · 16.2% (19 of 117 decks)
- Harrier Naga relevance 0.41 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Colossodon Yearling relevance 0.42 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 0.31 · 21.4% (25 of 117 decks)
- Scaled Wurm relevance 0.39 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Moss Monster relevance 0.41 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Trained Jackal relevance 0.40 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Canopy Gorger relevance 0.39 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All artifacts (50)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.26 · 17.9% (21 of 117 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.27 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Thrumming Stone relevance 0.26 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Locket of Yesterdays relevance 0.26 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 0.25 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.19 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.21 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.17 · 19.7% (23 of 117 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.22 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.21 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (13 of 117 decks)
- Ivory Tower relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Spellweaver Helix relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.19 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.12 · 27.4% (32 of 117 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.17 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.17 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Resurrection Orb relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.10 · 45.3% (53 of 117 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.12 · 17.1% (20 of 117 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.13 · 12.0% (14 of 117 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.14 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Grafted Exoskeleton relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.14 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Prowler's Helm relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Saddle of the Cavalier relevance 0.20 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.13 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.10 · 17.1% (20 of 117 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Endless Atlas relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Collector's Vault relevance 0.19 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Quick-Draw Katana relevance 0.18 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 0.18 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Rope relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Meltstrider's Gear relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All enchantments (50)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 0.33 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.28 · 17.1% (20 of 117 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.23 · 35.9% (42 of 117 decks)
- Triumph of Ferocity relevance 0.31 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Primal Rage relevance 0.28 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.26 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.26 · 11.1% (13 of 117 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.22 · 23.1% (27 of 117 decks)
- Gutter Grime relevance 0.29 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (13 of 117 decks)
- Case of the Trampled Garden relevance 0.27 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.16 · 45.3% (53 of 117 decks)
- Meltstrider's Resolve relevance 0.25 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.19 · 16.2% (19 of 117 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.18 · 20.5% (24 of 117 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.22 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (13 of 117 decks)
- Indomitable Might relevance 0.22 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Death's Presence relevance 0.22 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.18 · 14.5% (17 of 117 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.16 · 23.1% (27 of 117 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.21 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.20 · 8.5% (10 of 117 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.11 · 59.8% (70 of 117 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 0.21 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.15 · 20.5% (24 of 117 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.19 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.13 · 29.1% (34 of 117 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.18 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Shimmerwilds Growth relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.14 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.17 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.17 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.15 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.15 · 8.5% (10 of 117 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.13 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Ooze Flux relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Tiger Claws relevance 0.23 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.15 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.13 · 8.5% (10 of 117 decks)
- Crystalline Armor relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Prodigious Growth relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Canopy Cover relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Bite Down relevance 0.24 · 26.5% (31 of 117 decks)
- Winds of Qal Sisma relevance 0.30 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.27 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.22 · 20.5% (24 of 117 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.22 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Aspect of Hydra relevance 0.25 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.19 · 21.4% (25 of 117 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.24 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.18 · 17.9% (21 of 117 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (13 of 117 decks)
- Deglamer relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.21 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.16 · 22.2% (26 of 117 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.15 · 28.2% (33 of 117 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.21 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.20 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Master's Rebuke relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.16 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.15 · 20.5% (24 of 117 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.15 · 22.2% (26 of 117 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.17 · 11.1% (13 of 117 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.20 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.12 · 44.4% (52 of 117 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.15 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Bind relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.17 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Choose Your Weapon relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.17 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Primal Bellow relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Ruinous Intrusion relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.14 · 12.8% (15 of 117 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.12 · 23.1% (27 of 117 decks)
- You Look Upon the Tarrasque relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.16 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Diplomatic Relations relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.13 · 17.1% (20 of 117 decks)
- Bestow Greatness relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.16 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.15 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Staggering Size relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.15 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Pawpatch Formation relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Rocky Rebuke relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All sorceries (50)
- Miming Slime relevance 0.35 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Soul's Majesty relevance 0.26 · 21.4% (25 of 117 decks)
- Slime Against Humanity relevance 0.28 · 8.5% (10 of 117 decks)
- Roar of Challenge relevance 0.28 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.21 · 23.1% (27 of 117 decks)
- Gelatinous Genesis relevance 0.26 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.20 · 17.9% (21 of 117 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.21 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Klothys's Design relevance 0.25 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.20 · 14.5% (17 of 117 decks)
- Contest of Claws relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Life's Legacy relevance 0.21 · 11.1% (13 of 117 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.22 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.14 · 46.2% (54 of 117 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.18 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.16 · 24.8% (29 of 117 decks)
- Fungal Sprouting relevance 0.22 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (13 of 117 decks)
- Hunter's Prowess relevance 0.21 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Slime Molding relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Tumbleweed Rising relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Savage Stomp relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.14 · 22.2% (26 of 117 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.14 · 25.6% (30 of 117 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.18 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Ent's Fury relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Predatory Rampage relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.11 · 34.2% (40 of 117 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.14 · 14.5% (17 of 117 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.13 · 16.2% (19 of 117 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.10 · 41.9% (49 of 117 decks)
- Thunderherd Migration relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.16 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.12 · 25.6% (30 of 117 decks)
- Glimpse the Core relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Animist's Might relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.15 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
- Exponential Growth relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.09 · 50.4% (59 of 117 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.14 · 8.5% (10 of 117 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.15 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.10 · 31.6% (37 of 117 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- See the Unwritten relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Overcome relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Monstrous Step relevance 0.21 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
Planeswalkers
7
Planeswalkers
7 Showing 1-7 of 7
Page size
All planeswalkers (7)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.22 · 20.5% (24 of 117 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.11 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 0.12 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.10 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.09 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
Battles
3
Battles
3 Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All battles (3)
- Invasion of Muraganda // Primordial Plasm relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
Utility Lands
50
Utility Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All utility lands (50)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.20 · 15.4% (18 of 117 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.19 · 17.1% (20 of 117 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.18 · 13.7% (16 of 117 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.16 · 18.8% (22 of 117 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.13 · 37.6% (44 of 117 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.18 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.19 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.15 · 14.5% (17 of 117 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.14 · 20.5% (24 of 117 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.19 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.12 · 29.1% (34 of 117 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.11 · 38.5% (45 of 117 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.14 · 16.2% (19 of 117 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.12 · 21.4% (25 of 117 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.13 · 12.0% (14 of 117 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.13 · 11.1% (13 of 117 decks)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.13 · 8.5% (10 of 117 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.13 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Avishkar Raceway relevance 0.18 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.12 · 4.3% (5 of 117 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.10 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Okina, Temple to the Grandfathers relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Detection Tower relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Sandstorm Verge relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.09 · 10.3% (12 of 117 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (4 of 117 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.11 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
Lands
22
Lands
22 Showing 1-10 of 22
Page size
All lands (22)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.16 · 8.5% (10 of 117 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.12 · 18.8% (22 of 117 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.13 · 9.4% (11 of 117 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.13 · 8.5% (10 of 117 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.14 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.11 · 6.8% (8 of 117 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.11 · 6.0% (7 of 117 decks)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.11 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.10 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.08 · 2.6% (3 of 117 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.09 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.08 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.08 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.08 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.07 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.07 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.06 · 1.7% (2 of 117 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 86.3% (101 of 117 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Terrian, World Tyrant, from 117 real Commander decks.