Azusa, Lost but Seeking

Played in 170,217 decks

Azusa, Lost but Seeking
$12.74 €9.12

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. The Gitrog Monster relevance 4.29 · 42.8% (2,281 of 5,328 decks)
  2. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 4.28 · 38.8% (4,489 of 11,566 decks)
  3. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 4.11 · 61.7% (2,590 of 4,197 decks)
  4. Baba Lysaga, Night Witch relevance 3.80 · 39.9% (1,103 of 2,762 decks)
  5. The Necrobloom relevance 3.68 · 54.7% (6,146 of 11,242 decks)
  6. Child of Alara relevance 3.67 · 33.7% (1,948 of 5,773 decks)
  7. Flubs, the Fool relevance 3.62 · 57.1% (6,591 of 11,541 decks)
  8. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 3.30 · 58.4% (2,336 of 3,997 decks)
  9. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 3.25 · 65.5% (5,897 of 9,008 decks)
  10. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.25 · 39.7% (1,436 of 3,613 decks)
  11. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.23 · 52.7% (2,740 of 5,195 decks)
  12. Isu the Abominable relevance 2.99 · 32.6% (387 of 1,188 decks)
  13. Grizzlegom, Hurloon Hero relevance 2.97 · 61.1% (950 of 1,554 decks)
  14. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.96 · 47.5% (11,901 of 25,075 decks)
  15. Lord Windgrace relevance 2.87 · 62.9% (2,923 of 4,646 decks)
  16. Zask, Skittering Swarmlord relevance 2.86 · 23.6% (577 of 2,444 decks)
  17. Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 2.85 · 37.9% (668 of 1,761 decks)
  18. Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.83 · 38.9% (2,281 of 5,866 decks)
  19. Sergeant John Benton relevance 2.81 · 27.2% (627 of 2,305 decks)
  20. Tifa Lockhart relevance 2.80 · 66.1% (6,434 of 9,739 decks)
  21. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.72 · 64.2% (5,624 of 8,762 decks)
  22. Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 2.67 · 35.6% (4,793 of 13,454 decks)
  23. Homer, the Hermit relevance 2.62 · 43.2% (1,946 of 4,508 decks)
  24. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.62 · 51.6% (2,373 of 4,603 decks)
  25. Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 2.53 · 34.4% (205 of 596 decks)
  26. Choco, Seeker of Paradise relevance 2.45 · 12.4% (1,336 of 10,755 decks)
  27. Loot, the Key to Everything relevance 2.44 · 43.6% (769 of 1,762 decks)
  28. Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 2.42 · 45.3% (2,574 of 5,684 decks)
  29. Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 2.38 · 41.3% (1,126 of 2,726 decks)
  30. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 2.29 · 38.4% (743 of 1,935 decks)

Replaced By

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
All replaced by (2)
  1. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove 4.5% of swaps out (4 swaps)
  2. Exploration 3.4% of swaps out (3 swaps)

Parallel Cards

6

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.77 51.6%
    $5.58 €6.55
  • Exploration
    1.75 50.4%
    $30.48 €26.52
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.63 43.5%
    $2.02 €2.75
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.59 41.5%
    $4.81 €3.72
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.58 45.2%
    $9.88 €6.54
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.58 38.7%
    $12.49 €10.39
  • Scute Swarm
    1.55 47.8%
    $8.93 €7.90
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.39 38.9%
    $22.14 €23.31
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.35 43.3%
    $3.94 €3.03
  • Crop Rotation
    1.28 41.0%
    $3.89 €3.57
All most relevant (30)
  1. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.77 · 51.6% (87,827 of 170,217 decks)
  2. Exploration relevance 1.75 · 50.4% (85,736 of 170,217 decks)
  3. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.63 · 43.5% (74,017 of 170,217 decks)
  4. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.59 · 41.5% (70,666 of 170,217 decks)
  5. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.58 · 45.2% (76,866 of 170,217 decks)
  6. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.58 · 38.7% (65,790 of 170,217 decks)
  7. Scute Swarm relevance 1.55 · 47.8% (81,306 of 170,217 decks)
  8. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.39 · 38.9% (66,239 of 170,217 decks)
  9. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.35 · 43.3% (73,754 of 170,217 decks)
  10. Crop Rotation relevance 1.28 · 41.0% (69,716 of 170,217 decks)
  11. Harrow relevance 1.19 · 36.2% (61,572 of 170,217 decks)
  12. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.19 · 30.2% (51,399 of 170,217 decks)
  13. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.18 · 28.6% (48,715 of 170,217 decks)
  14. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.16 · 30.0% (51,014 of 170,217 decks)
  15. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.15 · 31.8% (54,112 of 170,217 decks)
  16. Scapeshift relevance 1.10 · 24.3% (41,382 of 170,217 decks)
  17. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.09 · 32.1% (54,683 of 170,217 decks)
  18. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.05 · 26.3% (44,722 of 170,217 decks)
  19. Zuran Orb relevance 1.04 · 25.2% (42,904 of 170,217 decks)
  20. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.04 · 23.9% (40,703 of 170,217 decks)
  21. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.94 · 24.5% (41,721 of 170,217 decks)
  22. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.93 · 22.9% (39,006 of 170,217 decks)
  23. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.91 · 20.8% (35,394 of 170,217 decks)
  24. Spelunking relevance 0.91 · 22.1% (37,626 of 170,217 decks)
  25. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.90 · 23.6% (40,109 of 170,217 decks)
  26. Nature's Lore relevance 0.89 · 45.1% (76,795 of 170,217 decks)
  27. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.89 · 21.3% (36,263 of 170,217 decks)
  28. Burgeoning relevance 0.88 · 21.1% (35,948 of 170,217 decks)
  29. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.86 · 20.7% (35,163 of 170,217 decks)
  30. Beast Within relevance 0.85 · 42.3% (72,029 of 170,217 decks)

Creatures

25

Showing 1-10 of 25

Page size
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.77 51.6%
    $5.58 €6.55
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.63 43.5%
    $2.02 €2.75
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.59 41.5%
    $4.81 €3.72
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.58 45.2%
    $9.88 €6.54
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.58 38.7%
    $12.49 €10.39
  • Scute Swarm
    1.55 47.8%
    $8.93 €7.90
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.39 38.9%
    $22.14 €23.31
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.35 43.3%
    $3.94 €3.03
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.15 31.8%
    $0.37 €0.35
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    1.09 32.1%
    $0.50 €0.60
All creatures (25)
  1. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.77 · 51.6% (87,827 of 170,217 decks)
  2. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.63 · 43.5% (74,017 of 170,217 decks)
  3. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.59 · 41.5% (70,666 of 170,217 decks)
  4. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.58 · 45.2% (76,866 of 170,217 decks)
  5. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.58 · 38.7% (65,790 of 170,217 decks)
  6. Scute Swarm relevance 1.55 · 47.8% (81,306 of 170,217 decks)
  7. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.39 · 38.9% (66,239 of 170,217 decks)
  8. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.35 · 43.3% (73,754 of 170,217 decks)
  9. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.15 · 31.8% (54,112 of 170,217 decks)
  10. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.09 · 32.1% (54,683 of 170,217 decks)
  11. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.05 · 26.3% (44,722 of 170,217 decks)
  12. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.04 · 23.9% (40,703 of 170,217 decks)
  13. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.94 · 24.5% (41,721 of 170,217 decks)
  14. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.93 · 22.9% (39,006 of 170,217 decks)
  15. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.91 · 20.8% (35,394 of 170,217 decks)
  16. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.90 · 23.6% (40,109 of 170,217 decks)
  17. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.89 · 21.3% (36,263 of 170,217 decks)
  18. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.86 · 20.7% (35,163 of 170,217 decks)
  19. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.81 · 18.6% (31,715 of 170,217 decks)
  20. Six relevance 0.81 · 20.7% (35,201 of 170,217 decks)
  21. Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.81 · 17.1% (29,098 of 170,217 decks)
  22. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.81 · 18.4% (31,371 of 170,217 decks)
  23. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.75 · 19.0% (32,297 of 170,217 decks)
  24. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.70 · 17.1% (29,047 of 170,217 decks)
  25. Eternal Witness relevance 0.69 · 24.9% (42,454 of 170,217 decks)

Artifacts

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Crucible of Worlds
    1.19 30.2%
    $32.55 €20.90
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.16 30.0%
    $1.13 €1.46
  • Zuran Orb
    1.04 25.2%
    $3.27 €1.81
  • Exploration Broodship
    0.77 17.5%
    $2.91 €3.31
All artifacts (4)
  1. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.19 · 30.2% (51,399 of 170,217 decks)
  2. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.16 · 30.0% (51,014 of 170,217 decks)
  3. Zuran Orb relevance 1.04 · 25.2% (42,904 of 170,217 decks)
  4. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.77 · 17.5% (29,813 of 170,217 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Exploration
    1.75 50.4%
    $30.48 €26.52
  • Spelunking
    0.91 22.1%
    $3.51 €3.11
  • Burgeoning
    0.88 21.1%
    $34.10 €25.64
All enchantments (3)
  1. Exploration relevance 1.75 · 50.4% (85,736 of 170,217 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 0.91 · 22.1% (37,626 of 170,217 decks)
  3. Burgeoning relevance 0.88 · 21.1% (35,948 of 170,217 decks)

Instants

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    1.28 41.0%
    $3.89 €3.57
  • Harrow
    1.19 36.2%
    $0.36 €0.27
  • Beast Within
    0.85 42.3%
    $0.73 €0.89
  • Entish Restoration
    0.85 22.7%
    $3.00 €1.81
  • Heroic Intervention
    0.77 38.9%
    $17.65 €14.11
  • Roiling Regrowth
    0.74 17.3%
    $0.32 €0.30
All instants (6)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 1.28 · 41.0% (69,716 of 170,217 decks)
  2. Harrow relevance 1.19 · 36.2% (61,572 of 170,217 decks)
  3. Beast Within relevance 0.85 · 42.3% (72,029 of 170,217 decks)
  4. Entish Restoration relevance 0.85 · 22.7% (38,557 of 170,217 decks)
  5. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.77 · 38.9% (66,188 of 170,217 decks)
  6. Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.74 · 17.3% (29,382 of 170,217 decks)

Sorceries

7

Showing 1-7 of 7

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.18 28.6%
    $0.33 €0.77
  • Scapeshift
    1.10 24.3%
    $41.50 €33.73
  • Nature's Lore
    0.89 45.1%
    $2.12 €2.78
  • Explore
    0.82 24.9%
    $0.18 €0.26
  • Life from the Loam
    0.79 19.6%
    $5.14 €4.96
  • Cultivate
    0.78 44.9%
    $0.44 €0.50
  • Three Visits
    0.76 33.9%
    $5.60 €4.82
All sorceries (7)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.18 · 28.6% (48,715 of 170,217 decks)
  2. Scapeshift relevance 1.10 · 24.3% (41,382 of 170,217 decks)
  3. Nature's Lore relevance 0.89 · 45.1% (76,795 of 170,217 decks)
  4. Explore relevance 0.82 · 24.9% (42,361 of 170,217 decks)
  5. Life from the Loam relevance 0.79 · 19.6% (33,427 of 170,217 decks)
  6. Cultivate relevance 0.78 · 44.9% (76,376 of 170,217 decks)
  7. Three Visits relevance 0.76 · 33.9% (57,722 of 170,217 decks)

Utility Lands

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    0.94 24.9%
    $28.53 €27.22
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.85 33.6%
    $17.19 €12.85
  • Boseiju, Who Endures
    0.71 28.4%
    $48.70 €40.11
All utility lands (3)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 0.94 · 24.9% (42,422 of 170,217 decks)
  2. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.85 · 33.6% (57,119 of 170,217 decks)
  3. Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.71 · 28.4% (48,367 of 170,217 decks)

Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Fabled Passage
    0.87 41.3%
    $0.55 €1.06
  • Wooded Foothills
    0.70 30.4%
    $17.87 €16.71
All lands (2)
  1. Fabled Passage relevance 0.87 · 41.3% (70,251 of 170,217 decks)
  2. Wooded Foothills relevance 0.70 · 30.4% (51,802 of 170,217 decks)

EDH data for Azusa, Lost but Seeking: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 170,217 real decks.