Reap and Sow
Played in 125 Selesnya decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (8)
- Trostani Discordant relevance 1.14 · 3.0% (4 of 135 decks)
- Farmer Cotton relevance 0.89 · 1.3% (4 of 315 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Noble Heritage relevance 0.71 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 0.60 · 1.3% (2 of 159 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Far Traveler relevance 0.59 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Frodo Baggins relevance 0.58 · 1.1% (2 of 177 decks)
- Sir Shandlar of Eberyn relevance 0.51 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Jasmine Boreal relevance 0.48 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.95 · 42.4% (53 of 125 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.56 · 31.2% (39 of 125 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.23 · 18.4% (23 of 125 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 1.13 · 23.2% (29 of 125 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.09 · 19.2% (24 of 125 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.06 · 35.2% (44 of 125 decks)
- Knight of the Reliquary relevance 1.04 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.03 · 28.0% (35 of 125 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.90 · 18.4% (23 of 125 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.85 · 12.8% (16 of 125 decks)
- Weathered Wayfarer relevance 0.64 · 14.4% (18 of 125 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.60 · 19.2% (24 of 125 decks)
- Reap What Is Sown relevance 0.52 · 8.0% (10 of 125 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.50 · 8.0% (10 of 125 decks)
- Disorienting Choice relevance 0.50 · 8.0% (10 of 125 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.49 · 8.0% (10 of 125 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (11 of 125 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.47 · 8.8% (11 of 125 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.45 · 7.2% (9 of 125 decks)
- Brandywine Farmer relevance 0.45 · 8.0% (10 of 125 decks)
- Ambitious Farmhand // Seasoned Cathar relevance 0.45 · 8.0% (10 of 125 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.44 · 13.6% (17 of 125 decks)
- Omenpath Journey relevance 0.44 · 7.2% (9 of 125 decks)
- Abundant Harvest relevance 0.43 · 8.0% (10 of 125 decks)
- Colossal Plow relevance 0.42 · 6.4% (8 of 125 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.41 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.41 · 6.4% (8 of 125 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.40 · 14.4% (18 of 125 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.39 · 11.2% (14 of 125 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.39 · 8.8% (11 of 125 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 1.13 · 23.2% (29 of 125 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.09 · 19.2% (24 of 125 decks)
- Knight of the Reliquary relevance 1.04 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
- Weathered Wayfarer relevance 0.64 · 14.4% (18 of 125 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.47 · 8.8% (11 of 125 decks)
- Brandywine Farmer relevance 0.45 · 8.0% (10 of 125 decks)
- Ambitious Farmhand // Seasoned Cathar relevance 0.45 · 8.0% (10 of 125 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.44 · 13.6% (17 of 125 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.41 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.41 · 6.4% (8 of 125 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.40 · 14.4% (18 of 125 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.39 · 11.2% (14 of 125 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.39 · 12.0% (15 of 125 decks)
- Eastfarthing Farmer relevance 0.38 · 7.2% (9 of 125 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.56 · 31.2% (39 of 125 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.49 · 8.0% (10 of 125 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (11 of 125 decks)
- Colossal Plow relevance 0.42 · 6.4% (8 of 125 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Omenpath Journey relevance 0.44 · 7.2% (9 of 125 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.39 · 8.8% (11 of 125 decks)
All instants (4)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.06 · 35.2% (44 of 125 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.60 · 19.2% (24 of 125 decks)
- Reap What Is Sown relevance 0.52 · 8.0% (10 of 125 decks)
- Settle the Wreckage relevance 0.39 · 8.8% (11 of 125 decks)
All sorceries (11)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.95 · 42.4% (53 of 125 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.23 · 18.4% (23 of 125 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.03 · 28.0% (35 of 125 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.90 · 18.4% (23 of 125 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.85 · 12.8% (16 of 125 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.50 · 8.0% (10 of 125 decks)
- Disorienting Choice relevance 0.50 · 8.0% (10 of 125 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.45 · 7.2% (9 of 125 decks)
- Abundant Harvest relevance 0.43 · 8.0% (10 of 125 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.39 · 8.8% (11 of 125 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.38 · 8.8% (11 of 125 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.70 · 15.2% (19 of 125 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.61 · 13.6% (17 of 125 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.53 · 29.6% (37 of 125 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.49 · 10.4% (13 of 125 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.43 · 24.0% (30 of 125 decks)
All lands (10)
- Savannah relevance 0.57 · 27.2% (34 of 125 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.56 · 10.4% (13 of 125 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.52 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.45 · 36.8% (46 of 125 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.43 · 15.2% (19 of 125 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.41 · 11.2% (14 of 125 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.41 · 11.2% (14 of 125 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.40 · 13.6% (17 of 125 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.39 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.38 · 12.8% (16 of 125 decks)
EDH data for Reap and Sow: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 125 real decks.