Lotus Field

Played in 99,021 decks

Lotus Field
$2.61 €2.52

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Obeka, Brute Chronologist relevance 5.06 · 30.0% (1,417 of 4,722 decks)
  2. Quintorius, History Chaser relevance 4.43 · 58.0% (7,450 of 12,849 decks)
  3. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 4.31 · 21.1% (2,438 of 11,566 decks)
  4. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 4.19 · 71.6% (4,345 of 6,071 decks)
  5. Impossible Man relevance 4.06 · 72.3% (146 of 202 decks)
  6. The Gitrog Monster relevance 3.82 · 23.0% (1,226 of 5,328 decks)
  7. Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 3.80 · 44.7% (385 of 862 decks)
  8. Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 3.76 · 30.0% (625 of 2,082 decks)
  9. The Necrobloom relevance 3.34 · 22.6% (2,543 of 11,242 decks)
  10. Derevi, Empyrial Tactician relevance 3.32 · 11.1% (679 of 6,123 decks)
  11. Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 3.31 · 21.9% (936 of 4,266 decks)
  12. Zask, Skittering Swarmlord relevance 3.30 · 21.7% (530 of 2,444 decks)
  13. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 3.18 · 62.7% (793 of 1,265 decks)
  14. Super Shredder relevance 3.17 · 8.6% (365 of 4,226 decks)
  15. Ertai Resurrected relevance 3.15 · 17.8% (82 of 460 decks)
  16. Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 3.14 · 20.1% (5,266 of 26,247 decks)
  17. Sin, Spira's Punishment relevance 2.99 · 31.9% (1,068 of 3,349 decks)
  18. Juri, Master of the Revue relevance 2.95 · 5.2% (181 of 3,466 decks)
  19. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.90 · 33.8% (8,465 of 25,075 decks)
  20. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 2.80 · 15.1% (782 of 5,195 decks)
  21. Borborygmos and Fblthp relevance 2.77 · 16.5% (130 of 789 decks)
  22. Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 2.75 · 36.8% (53 of 144 decks)
  23. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 2.68 · 24.0% (866 of 3,613 decks)
  24. The Lady of Otaria relevance 2.66 · 33.1% (118 of 356 decks)
  25. Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 2.61 · 50.3% (380 of 756 decks)
  26. Rakdos the Defiler relevance 2.56 · 17.4% (25 of 144 decks)
  27. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.56 · 21.3% (894 of 4,197 decks)
  28. Beza, the Bounding Spring relevance 2.53 · 47.9% (282 of 589 decks)
  29. Tymna the Weaver // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 2.50 · 43.8% (14 of 32 decks)
  30. Vadrok, Apex of Thunder relevance 2.38 · 8.5% (69 of 815 decks)

Parallel Cards

30

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Zuran Orb
    1.32 31.8%
    $3.27 €1.81
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.22 30.4%
    $6.38 €6.51
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.19 34.7%
    $5.58 €6.55
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.19 33.1%
    $22.14 €23.31
  • Aftermath Analyst
    1.07 28.1%
    $0.77 €1.28
  • Crop Rotation
    1.07 34.3%
    $3.89 €3.57
  • Scapeshift
    0.99 21.9%
    $41.50 €33.73
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.96 27.2%
    $12.74 €9.12
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.95 23.0%
    $0.33 €0.77
  • Exploration
    0.93 26.7%
    $30.48 €26.52
All most relevant (30)
  1. Zuran Orb relevance 1.32 · 31.8% (31,523 of 99,021 decks)
  2. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.22 · 30.4% (30,137 of 99,021 decks)
  3. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.19 · 34.7% (34,331 of 99,021 decks)
  4. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.19 · 33.1% (32,794 of 99,021 decks)
  5. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.07 · 28.1% (27,819 of 99,021 decks)
  6. Crop Rotation relevance 1.07 · 34.3% (33,974 of 99,021 decks)
  7. Scapeshift relevance 0.99 · 21.9% (21,721 of 99,021 decks)
  8. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.96 · 27.2% (26,930 of 99,021 decks)
  9. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.95 · 23.0% (22,789 of 99,021 decks)
  10. Exploration relevance 0.93 · 26.7% (26,446 of 99,021 decks)
  11. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.90 · 28.8% (28,476 of 99,021 decks)
  12. Scute Swarm relevance 0.88 · 26.9% (26,643 of 99,021 decks)
  13. Six relevance 0.87 · 22.3% (22,062 of 99,021 decks)
  14. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.87 · 22.5% (22,321 of 99,021 decks)
  15. Spelunking relevance 0.86 · 21.0% (20,761 of 99,021 decks)
  16. Harrow relevance 0.86 · 26.1% (25,887 of 99,021 decks)
  17. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.86 · 20.6% (20,426 of 99,021 decks)
  18. Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.85 · 21.6% (21,396 of 99,021 decks)
  19. Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.83 · 18.6% (18,384 of 99,021 decks)
  20. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.81 · 18.4% (18,259 of 99,021 decks)
  21. Horizon Explorer relevance 0.80 · 17.9% (17,710 of 99,021 decks)
  22. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.80 · 19.5% (19,303 of 99,021 decks)
  23. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.79 · 21.0% (20,793 of 99,021 decks)
  24. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.76 · 21.8% (21,626 of 99,021 decks)
  25. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.76 · 17.3% (17,156 of 99,021 decks)
  26. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.74 · 19.2% (18,987 of 99,021 decks)
  27. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.74 · 16.9% (16,776 of 99,021 decks)
  28. Life from the Loam relevance 0.73 · 18.3% (18,118 of 99,021 decks)
  29. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.72 · 14.6% (14,481 of 99,021 decks)
  30. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.71 · 17.9% (17,699 of 99,021 decks)

Creatures

22

Showing 1-10 of 22

Page size
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.22 30.4%
    $6.38 €6.51
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.19 34.7%
    $5.58 €6.55
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.19 33.1%
    $22.14 €23.31
  • Aftermath Analyst
    1.07 28.1%
    $0.77 €1.28
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.96 27.2%
    $12.74 €9.12
  • Tireless Provisioner
    0.90 28.8%
    $3.94 €3.03
  • Scute Swarm
    0.88 26.9%
    $8.93 €7.90
  • Six
    0.87 22.3%
    $5.00 €4.86
  • Ramunap Excavator
    0.87 22.5%
    $4.81 €3.72
  • The Gitrog Monster
    0.86 20.6%
    $0.47 €1.03
All creatures (22)
  1. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.22 · 30.4% (30,137 of 99,021 decks)
  2. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.19 · 34.7% (34,331 of 99,021 decks)
  3. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.19 · 33.1% (32,794 of 99,021 decks)
  4. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.07 · 28.1% (27,819 of 99,021 decks)
  5. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.96 · 27.2% (26,930 of 99,021 decks)
  6. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.90 · 28.8% (28,476 of 99,021 decks)
  7. Scute Swarm relevance 0.88 · 26.9% (26,643 of 99,021 decks)
  8. Six relevance 0.87 · 22.3% (22,062 of 99,021 decks)
  9. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.87 · 22.5% (22,321 of 99,021 decks)
  10. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.86 · 20.6% (20,426 of 99,021 decks)
  11. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.81 · 18.4% (18,259 of 99,021 decks)
  12. Horizon Explorer relevance 0.80 · 17.9% (17,710 of 99,021 decks)
  13. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.80 · 19.5% (19,303 of 99,021 decks)
  14. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.79 · 21.0% (20,793 of 99,021 decks)
  15. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.76 · 21.8% (21,626 of 99,021 decks)
  16. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.74 · 16.9% (16,776 of 99,021 decks)
  17. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.72 · 14.6% (14,481 of 99,021 decks)
  18. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.71 · 17.9% (17,699 of 99,021 decks)
  19. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.67 · 14.6% (14,475 of 99,021 decks)
  20. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.64 · 15.3% (15,127 of 99,021 decks)
  21. Famished Worldsire relevance 0.61 · 11.6% (11,469 of 99,021 decks)
  22. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.58 · 16.0% (15,834 of 99,021 decks)

Artifacts

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Zuran Orb
    1.32 31.8%
    $3.27 €1.81
  • Crucible of Worlds
    0.85 21.6%
    $32.55 €20.90
  • Amulet of Vigor
    0.83 18.6%
    $50.54 €33.60
  • Exploration Broodship
    0.76 17.3%
    $2.91 €3.31
  • Conduit of Worlds
    0.74 19.2%
    $1.13 €1.46
All artifacts (5)
  1. Zuran Orb relevance 1.32 · 31.8% (31,523 of 99,021 decks)
  2. Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.85 · 21.6% (21,396 of 99,021 decks)
  3. Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.83 · 18.6% (18,384 of 99,021 decks)
  4. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.76 · 17.3% (17,156 of 99,021 decks)
  5. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.74 · 19.2% (18,987 of 99,021 decks)

Enchantments

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Exploration
    0.93 26.7%
    $30.48 €26.52
  • Spelunking
    0.86 21.0%
    $3.51 €3.11
All enchantments (2)
  1. Exploration relevance 0.93 · 26.7% (26,446 of 99,021 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 0.86 · 21.0% (20,761 of 99,021 decks)

Instants

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    1.07 34.3%
    $3.89 €3.57
  • Harrow
    0.86 26.1%
    $0.36 €0.27
  • Entish Restoration
    0.59 15.7%
    $3.00 €1.81
  • Constant Mists
    0.58 11.4%
    $20.36 €14.65
All instants (4)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 1.07 · 34.3% (33,974 of 99,021 decks)
  2. Harrow relevance 0.86 · 26.1% (25,887 of 99,021 decks)
  3. Entish Restoration relevance 0.59 · 15.7% (15,503 of 99,021 decks)
  4. Constant Mists relevance 0.58 · 11.4% (11,303 of 99,021 decks)

Sorceries

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Scapeshift
    0.99 21.9%
    $41.50 €33.73
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.95 23.0%
    $0.33 €0.77
  • Life from the Loam
    0.73 18.3%
    $5.14 €4.96
All sorceries (3)
  1. Scapeshift relevance 0.99 · 21.9% (21,721 of 99,021 decks)
  2. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.95 · 23.0% (22,789 of 99,021 decks)
  3. Life from the Loam relevance 0.73 · 18.3% (18,118 of 99,021 decks)

Utility Lands

8

Showing 1-8 of 8

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    0.92 24.3%
    $28.53 €27.22
  • Strip Mine
    0.83 21.9%
    $10.71 €5.96
  • Shifting Woodland
    0.77 22.0%
    $6.96 €5.29
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.74 29.0%
    $17.19 €12.85
  • Boseiju, Who Endures
    0.63 25.1%
    $48.70 €40.11
  • Thespian's Stage
    0.62 16.0%
    $0.46 €0.70
  • Urza's Cave
    0.62 16.8%
    $2.46 €1.26
  • Arid Archway
    0.59 12.5%
    $1.49 €0.55
All utility lands (8)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 0.92 · 24.3% (24,098 of 99,021 decks)
  2. Strip Mine relevance 0.83 · 21.9% (21,702 of 99,021 decks)
  3. Shifting Woodland relevance 0.77 · 22.0% (21,750 of 99,021 decks)
  4. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.74 · 29.0% (28,710 of 99,021 decks)
  5. Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.63 · 25.1% (24,807 of 99,021 decks)
  6. Thespian's Stage relevance 0.62 · 16.0% (15,848 of 99,021 decks)
  7. Urza's Cave relevance 0.62 · 16.8% (16,644 of 99,021 decks)
  8. Arid Archway relevance 0.59 · 12.5% (12,337 of 99,021 decks)

Lands

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Fabled Passage
    0.96 45.5%
    $0.55 €1.06
  • Vesuva
    0.74 17.6%
    $3.79 €3.14
  • Verdant Catacombs
    0.60 26.1%
    $29.61 €24.52
  • Lotus Vale
    0.59 9.5%
    $46.94 €29.07
  • Echoing Deeps
    0.58 11.4%
    $0.84 €0.44
  • Wooded Foothills
    0.58 25.3%
    $17.87 €16.71
All lands (6)
  1. Fabled Passage relevance 0.96 · 45.5% (45,029 of 99,021 decks)
  2. Vesuva relevance 0.74 · 17.6% (17,425 of 99,021 decks)
  3. Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.60 · 26.1% (25,828 of 99,021 decks)
  4. Lotus Vale relevance 0.59 · 9.5% (9,421 of 99,021 decks)
  5. Echoing Deeps relevance 0.58 · 11.4% (11,305 of 99,021 decks)
  6. Wooded Foothills relevance 0.58 · 25.3% (25,028 of 99,021 decks)

EDH data for Lotus Field: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 99,021 real decks.