Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.39 · 28.9% (28 of 97 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.36 · 32.0% (31 of 97 decks)
- Kalonian Twingrove relevance 0.37 · 25.8% (25 of 97 decks)
- Strength of Cedars relevance 0.43 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.33 · 27.8% (27 of 97 decks)
- Fruition relevance 0.40 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Elvish Scrapper relevance 0.39 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 0.32 · 24.7% (24 of 97 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.29 · 36.1% (35 of 97 decks)
- Deep Reconnaissance relevance 0.40 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Accelerated Mutation relevance 0.40 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.34 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.33 · 15.5% (15 of 97 decks)
- Civic Wayfinder relevance 0.37 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Primal Bellow relevance 0.28 · 27.8% (27 of 97 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.28 · 26.8% (26 of 97 decks)
- Burnished Hart relevance 0.32 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Strider Harness relevance 0.37 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Reap relevance 0.35 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.29 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Haunted Plate Mail relevance 0.39 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.34 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.23 · 43.3% (42 of 97 decks)
- Bind relevance 0.33 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Nettle Sentinel relevance 0.34 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Mirri's Guile relevance 0.31 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Imaryll, Elfhame Elite relevance 0.34 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Skyshroud Poacher relevance 0.33 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Fleetfeather Sandals relevance 0.34 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.31 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- True-Faith Censer relevance 0.37 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Nissa's Renewal relevance 0.31 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.28 · 15.5% (15 of 97 decks)
- Argentum Armor relevance 0.33 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Wirewood Herald relevance 0.31 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.27 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.28 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Stonewood Invocation relevance 0.33 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.24 · 29.9% (29 of 97 decks)
- Nissa's Expedition relevance 0.32 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.28 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.26 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Collected Company relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.28 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Strata Scythe relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Mantis Engine relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Blossoming Bogbeast relevance 0.31 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Seek the Horizon relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Nath's Elite relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
Card Stacks
18
Card Stacks
18Showing 1-2 of 18
Cards like Cultivate
1.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other green decks
76% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
3.5 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 62%
- Rampant Growth 55%
- Kodama's Reach 54%
- Explosive Vegetation 36%
- Migration Path 27%
- Far Wanderings 15%
- Grow from the Ashes 13%
- Search for Tomorrow 12%
- Shared Roots 11%
- Deep Reconnaissance 9%
- Roamer's Routine 7%
- Map the Frontier 6%
- Beneath the Sands 6%
- Terramorph 5%
- They Went This Way 5%
- Map the Wastes 5%
- Primal Growth 4%
- Untamed Wilds 4%
- New Generation's Technique 4%
- Reach the Horizon 3%
- Viewpoint Synchronization 3%
- Verdant Mastery 3%
- Path to the Festival 2%
- Peregrination 1%
Cards like Boundless Realms
17× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other green decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
- Boundless Realms 32%
- Traverse the Outlands 22%
- Nissa's Expedition 8%
- Reshape the Earth 7%
- Turtle Tracks 1%
- New Frontiers 1%
- Slimefoot's Survey 1%
Other options: Celebrate the Harvest, Harvest Season
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
53% of decks run two or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 46%
- Skyshroud Claim 39%
- Ranger's Path 29%
- Three Visits 23%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 18%
- Hunting Wilds 10%
- Glimpse the Core 3%
- Field Trip 2%
Cards like Kalonian Twingrove
17× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: People of the Woods, Coiling Woodworm, Gaea's Liege
Cards like Oracle of Mul Daya
2.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other green decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.38 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivator Colossus
10× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Explore
7.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Rishkar's Expertise
2.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Wood Elves
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Farhaven Elf
9.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other green decks
Cards
- Farhaven Elf 19%
- Ondu Giant 5%
- Primeval Herald 4%
- Quirion Trailblazer 4%
- Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru 3%
- Wild Wanderer 3%
- Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary 2%
- Yavimaya Granger 1%
Other options: Simulacrum Shaper
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Elder
6.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Krosan Wayfarer
Cards like Ashaya, Soul of the Wild
8.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Awakened Amalgam
Cards like Exploration
3.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Arbor Elf
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards like Blanchwood Armor
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps
8.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards like Giant Growth
6.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
- Giant Growth 18%
- Might of Oaks 3%
- Bounty of Might 2%
- Resize 1%
Other options: Pack's Favor, Sudden Strength, Primal Boost, Earthbrawn, Thoughtweft Charge, Highspire Infusion
Cards like Krosan Grip
2.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
- Krosan Grip 25%
- Naturalize 12%
- Natural Reclamation 4%
- Relic Crush 1%
- Break Asunder 1%
Other options: Oxidize, Wilt, Stomp and Howl, Wear Away, Verdigris
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Kalonian Twingrove relevance 0.37 · 25.8% (25 of 97 decks)
- Elvish Scrapper relevance 0.39 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 0.32 · 24.7% (24 of 97 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.34 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Civic Wayfinder relevance 0.37 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Burnished Hart relevance 0.32 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.29 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Nettle Sentinel relevance 0.34 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Imaryll, Elfhame Elite relevance 0.34 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Skyshroud Poacher relevance 0.33 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.28 · 15.5% (15 of 97 decks)
- Wirewood Herald relevance 0.31 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.26 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Mantis Engine relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Blossoming Bogbeast relevance 0.31 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Nath's Elite relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Ondu Giant relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.26 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.22 · 26.8% (26 of 97 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.24 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Ivy Elemental relevance 0.31 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Uktabi Wildcats relevance 0.30 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.23 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Quirion Trailblazer relevance 0.31 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Stampeding Wildebeests relevance 0.30 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Wirewood Guardian relevance 0.31 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.28 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Penumbra Spider relevance 0.30 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.22 · 23.7% (23 of 97 decks)
- Greenwarden of Murasa relevance 0.27 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.23 · 17.5% (17 of 97 decks)
- Yavimaya Dryad relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Viridian Emissary relevance 0.28 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.23 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.23 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Allosaurus Rider relevance 0.27 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.24 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Rootwalla relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Thicket Elemental relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.24 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.24 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.18 · 29.9% (29 of 97 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.23 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.21 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Dauntless Dourbark relevance 0.25 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Masked Vandal relevance 0.22 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.18 · 27.8% (27 of 97 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All artifacts (50)
- Strider Harness relevance 0.37 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Haunted Plate Mail relevance 0.39 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Fleetfeather Sandals relevance 0.34 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- True-Faith Censer relevance 0.37 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Argentum Armor relevance 0.33 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.24 · 29.9% (29 of 97 decks)
- Strata Scythe relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Cloak of the Bat relevance 0.30 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.24 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Planar Portal relevance 0.29 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.22 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.24 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.26 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.24 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.26 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.22 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Ring of Three Wishes relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Sword of Vengeance relevance 0.23 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.21 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.20 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.18 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Greatsword relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Tormod's Crypt relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Traveler's Amulet relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Mirror Shield relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Wurm's Tooth relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Blood Clock relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Slagwurm Armor relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Kitesail relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.10 · 24.7% (24 of 97 decks)
- Brainstone relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Loreseeker's Stone relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Crown of Gondor relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.14 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.12 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Claws of Gix relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Kaldra Compleat relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.10 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Vivien's Arkbow relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Staff of the Wild Magus relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Inquisitor's Flail relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Short Bow relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.07 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All enchantments (50)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.33 · 27.8% (27 of 97 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.23 · 43.3% (42 of 97 decks)
- Mirri's Guile relevance 0.31 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.27 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.25 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Into the Wilds relevance 0.29 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.26 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Lure relevance 0.25 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Trollhide relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.20 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Quiet Disrepair relevance 0.28 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.22 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Regeneration relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 0.23 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Greener Pastures relevance 0.27 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Earthcraft relevance 0.22 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.16 · 25.8% (25 of 97 decks)
- Savage Silhouette relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.15 · 25.8% (25 of 97 decks)
- Gift of Paradise relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.20 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.20 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.18 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Oakenform relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Aspect of Wolf relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.16 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.18 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.15 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.15 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.17 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Lost in the Woods relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.13 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.13 · 15.5% (15 of 97 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.14 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Perilous Forays relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.16 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Wolfkin Bond relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.13 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.14 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Primitive Etchings relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Seton's Desire relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Boar Umbra relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Oath of Nissa relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Strength of Cedars relevance 0.43 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Accelerated Mutation relevance 0.40 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Primal Bellow relevance 0.28 · 27.8% (27 of 97 decks)
- Reap relevance 0.35 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Bind relevance 0.33 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Stonewood Invocation relevance 0.33 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.28 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Collected Company relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.27 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.25 · 17.5% (17 of 97 decks)
- Natural Connection relevance 0.29 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Bounty of the Hunt relevance 0.29 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Slice in Twain relevance 0.28 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Mutagenic Growth relevance 0.25 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Wildsize relevance 0.27 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.23 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.21 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.16 · 29.9% (29 of 97 decks)
- Run Wild relevance 0.28 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.17 · 24.7% (24 of 97 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.17 · 17.5% (17 of 97 decks)
- Refresh relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.18 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Aerial Predation relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Tanglesap relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Squall Line relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Rending Vines relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Pillar Launch relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Withstand Death relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.14 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Might of Oaks relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.13 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
- Fistful of Force relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.15 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.15 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Aggressive Urge relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Pierce the Sky relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Sprouting Vines relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Sylvan Bounty relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.13 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Root Snare relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.14 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.15 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Seedship Impact relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Mortal's Resolve relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Revealing Wind relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf Ambush relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Sudden Reclamation relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All sorceries (50)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.39 · 28.9% (28 of 97 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.36 · 32.0% (31 of 97 decks)
- Fruition relevance 0.40 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.29 · 36.1% (35 of 97 decks)
- Deep Reconnaissance relevance 0.40 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.33 · 15.5% (15 of 97 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.28 · 26.8% (26 of 97 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.34 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.31 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Nissa's Renewal relevance 0.31 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.28 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Nissa's Expedition relevance 0.32 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.28 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Seek the Horizon relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 0.28 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.26 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.27 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Mwonvuli Acid-Moss relevance 0.29 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Into the North relevance 0.28 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Beneath the Sands relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Map the Wastes relevance 0.28 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Desert Twister relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.22 · 17.5% (17 of 97 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.26 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.26 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.17 · 39.2% (38 of 97 decks)
- Untamed Wilds relevance 0.28 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 0.26 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- They Went This Way relevance 0.27 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Coming Attraction relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.16 · 41.2% (40 of 97 decks)
- Soul's Might relevance 0.26 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Incremental Growth relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.19 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
- Terramorph relevance 0.26 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.24 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Reap and Sow relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Emergent Sequence relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.22 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.21 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Primal Growth relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Verdant Confluence relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.12 · 53.6% (52 of 97 decks)
- Soul's Majesty relevance 0.19 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.18 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Recross the Paths relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.21 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.20 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Gift of the Gargantuan relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
Planeswalkers
8
Planeswalkers
8 Showing 1-8 of 8
Page size
All planeswalkers (8)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.17 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.15 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
Battles
1
Battles
1 Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
Utility Lands
50
Utility Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All utility lands (50)
- Encroaching Wastes relevance 0.36 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.20 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.19 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.17 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Sapseep Forest relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.14 · 24.7% (24 of 97 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.18 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.16 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Treetop Village relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.16 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Bucolic Ranch relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.15 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.11 · 17.5% (17 of 97 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.10 · 29.9% (29 of 97 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.11 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.10 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.12 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.10 · 15.5% (15 of 97 decks)
- Kishla Village relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.09 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.11 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Hall of the Bandit Lord relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Adventurer's Inn relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Kazandu Mammoth // Kazandu Valley relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.09 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.08 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.07 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.07 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.08 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.07 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.06 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.06 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
Lands
18
Lands
18 Showing 1-10 of 18
Page size
All lands (18)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.20 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.21 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Havenwood Battleground relevance 0.21 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.16 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.12 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.10 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.09 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.08 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.08 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.08 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.07 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.07 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.07 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.07 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 89.7% (87 of 97 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer, from 97 real Commander decks.