Harrow

Played in 219,124 decks

Harrow
$0.36 €0.27

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.61 · 73.6% (2,660 of 3,613 decks)
  2. Winter, Cynical Opportunist relevance 3.29 · 57.8% (1,942 of 3,362 decks)
  3. The Gitrog Monster relevance 3.24 · 50.2% (2,677 of 5,328 decks)
  4. The Necrobloom relevance 3.23 · 38.0% (4,271 of 11,242 decks)
  5. Kalamax, the Stormsire relevance 3.21 · 67.9% (3,058 of 4,502 decks)
  6. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.11 · 68.7% (3,570 of 5,195 decks)
  7. Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 3.10 · 58.4% (1,215 of 2,082 decks)
  8. Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 3.09 · 65.8% (1,158 of 1,761 decks)
  9. Zask, Skittering Swarmlord relevance 3.04 · 54.1% (1,322 of 2,444 decks)
  10. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.96 · 81.2% (20,359 of 25,075 decks)
  11. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 2.92 · 65.1% (2,603 of 3,997 decks)
  12. Teval, the Balanced Scale relevance 2.82 · 45.6% (12,174 of 26,717 decks)
  13. Tifa Lockhart relevance 2.81 · 72.3% (7,037 of 9,739 decks)
  14. Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 2.76 · 33.6% (200 of 596 decks)
  15. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.72 · 42.2% (1,770 of 4,197 decks)
  16. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.70 · 48.1% (4,212 of 8,762 decks)
  17. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.67 · 43.6% (3,927 of 9,008 decks)
  18. Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 2.66 · 54.6% (2,328 of 4,266 decks)
  19. Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 2.61 · 44.3% (3,064 of 6,920 decks)
  20. Mazirek, Kraul Death Priest relevance 2.58 · 42.5% (842 of 1,982 decks)
  21. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.58 · 47.4% (2,184 of 4,603 decks)
  22. Homer, the Hermit relevance 2.54 · 54.1% (2,440 of 4,508 decks)
  23. Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 2.54 · 50.2% (638 of 1,272 decks)
  24. The Swarmlord relevance 2.53 · 54.6% (1,054 of 1,930 decks)
  25. Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 2.41 · 75.8% (4,308 of 5,684 decks)
  26. Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 2.39 · 51.4% (966 of 1,880 decks)
  27. Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 2.37 · 23.2% (6,083 of 26,247 decks)
  28. Uurg, Spawn of Turg relevance 2.36 · 63.5% (188 of 296 decks)
  29. Choco, Seeker of Paradise relevance 2.33 · 10.3% (1,111 of 10,755 decks)
  30. Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.32 · 24.8% (1,453 of 5,866 decks)

Replaced By

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
All replaced by (1)
  1. Entish Restoration 3.7% of swaps out (4 swaps)

Parallel Cards

30

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Roiling Regrowth
    1.31 30.6%
    $0.32 €0.30
  • Springbloom Druid
    1.14 28.4%
    $0.59 €2.00
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.08 28.8%
    $2.02 €2.75
  • Entish Restoration
    1.07 28.6%
    $3.00 €1.81
  • Scute Swarm
    1.07 33.0%
    $8.93 €7.90
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.06 29.5%
    $0.37 €0.35
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.06 30.7%
    $5.58 €6.55
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.05 25.5%
    $0.33 €0.77
  • Cultivate
    1.04 59.2%
    $0.44 €0.50
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.01 26.4%
    $4.81 €3.72
All most relevant (30)
  1. Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.31 · 30.6% (67,029 of 219,124 decks)
  2. Springbloom Druid relevance 1.14 · 28.4% (62,322 of 219,124 decks)
  3. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.08 · 28.8% (63,160 of 219,124 decks)
  4. Entish Restoration relevance 1.07 · 28.6% (62,639 of 219,124 decks)
  5. Scute Swarm relevance 1.07 · 33.0% (72,202 of 219,124 decks)
  6. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.06 · 29.5% (64,549 of 219,124 decks)
  7. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.06 · 30.7% (67,262 of 219,124 decks)
  8. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.05 · 25.5% (55,877 of 219,124 decks)
  9. Cultivate relevance 1.04 · 59.2% (129,772 of 219,124 decks)
  10. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.01 · 26.4% (57,747 of 219,124 decks)
  11. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.00 · 28.1% (61,572 of 219,124 decks)
  12. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.95 · 23.2% (50,759 of 219,124 decks)
  13. Rampant Growth relevance 0.94 · 45.5% (99,737 of 219,124 decks)
  14. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.94 · 21.3% (46,744 of 219,124 decks)
  15. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.93 · 29.8% (65,362 of 219,124 decks)
  16. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.93 · 27.3% (59,796 of 219,124 decks)
  17. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.93 · 24.0% (52,591 of 219,124 decks)
  18. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.91 · 25.5% (55,920 of 219,124 decks)
  19. Beast Within relevance 0.91 · 45.1% (98,746 of 219,124 decks)
  20. Crop Rotation relevance 0.91 · 29.1% (63,705 of 219,124 decks)
  21. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.90 · 23.6% (51,606 of 219,124 decks)
  22. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.90 · 32.6% (71,416 of 219,124 decks)
  23. Nature's Lore relevance 0.87 · 44.1% (96,651 of 219,124 decks)
  24. Farseek relevance 0.85 · 45.8% (100,368 of 219,124 decks)
  25. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.85 · 20.4% (44,693 of 219,124 decks)
  26. Zuran Orb relevance 0.81 · 19.6% (43,040 of 219,124 decks)
  27. Explore relevance 0.80 · 24.4% (53,397 of 219,124 decks)
  28. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.77 · 32.8% (71,965 of 219,124 decks)
  29. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.75 · 18.8% (41,259 of 219,124 decks)
  30. Horizon Explorer relevance 0.75 · 16.7% (36,600 of 219,124 decks)

Creatures

22

Showing 1-10 of 22

Page size
  • Springbloom Druid
    1.14 28.4%
    $0.59 €2.00
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.08 28.8%
    $2.02 €2.75
  • Scute Swarm
    1.07 33.0%
    $8.93 €7.90
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.06 29.5%
    $0.37 €0.35
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.06 30.7%
    $5.58 €6.55
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.01 26.4%
    $4.81 €3.72
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.00 28.1%
    $12.74 €9.12
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    0.95 23.2%
    $12.49 €10.39
  • Titania, Protector of Argoth
    0.94 21.3%
    $0.31 €0.45
  • Tireless Provisioner
    0.93 29.8%
    $3.94 €3.03
All creatures (22)
  1. Springbloom Druid relevance 1.14 · 28.4% (62,322 of 219,124 decks)
  2. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.08 · 28.8% (63,160 of 219,124 decks)
  3. Scute Swarm relevance 1.07 · 33.0% (72,202 of 219,124 decks)
  4. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.06 · 29.5% (64,549 of 219,124 decks)
  5. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.06 · 30.7% (67,262 of 219,124 decks)
  6. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.01 · 26.4% (57,747 of 219,124 decks)
  7. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.00 · 28.1% (61,572 of 219,124 decks)
  8. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.95 · 23.2% (50,759 of 219,124 decks)
  9. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.94 · 21.3% (46,744 of 219,124 decks)
  10. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.93 · 29.8% (65,362 of 219,124 decks)
  11. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.93 · 27.3% (59,796 of 219,124 decks)
  12. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.91 · 25.5% (55,920 of 219,124 decks)
  13. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.90 · 23.6% (51,606 of 219,124 decks)
  14. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.90 · 32.6% (71,416 of 219,124 decks)
  15. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.85 · 20.4% (44,693 of 219,124 decks)
  16. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.75 · 18.8% (41,259 of 219,124 decks)
  17. Horizon Explorer relevance 0.75 · 16.7% (36,600 of 219,124 decks)
  18. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.72 · 17.6% (38,569 of 219,124 decks)
  19. Tireless Tracker relevance 0.68 · 16.9% (37,056 of 219,124 decks)
  20. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.65 · 18.7% (40,890 of 219,124 decks)
  21. Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.63 · 13.1% (28,667 of 219,124 decks)
  22. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.62 · 13.4% (29,290 of 219,124 decks)

Artifacts

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Conduit of Worlds
    0.93 24.0%
    $1.13 €1.46
  • Zuran Orb
    0.81 19.6%
    $3.27 €1.81
  • Exploration Broodship
    0.75 17.1%
    $2.91 €3.31
All artifacts (3)
  1. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.93 · 24.0% (52,591 of 219,124 decks)
  2. Zuran Orb relevance 0.81 · 19.6% (43,040 of 219,124 decks)
  3. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.75 · 17.1% (37,362 of 219,124 decks)

Enchantments

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Exploration
    0.72 20.8%
    $30.48 €26.52
  • Spelunking
    0.61 14.9%
    $3.51 €3.11
All enchantments (2)
  1. Exploration relevance 0.72 · 20.8% (45,663 of 219,124 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 0.61 · 14.9% (32,584 of 219,124 decks)

Instants

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Roiling Regrowth
    1.31 30.6%
    $0.32 €0.30
  • Entish Restoration
    1.07 28.6%
    $3.00 €1.81
  • Beast Within
    0.91 45.1%
    $0.73 €0.89
  • Crop Rotation
    0.91 29.1%
    $3.89 €3.57
  • Tear Asunder
    0.62 15.6%
    $0.33 €0.33
  • Putrefy
    0.62 18.1%
    $0.29 €0.19
All instants (6)
  1. Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.31 · 30.6% (67,029 of 219,124 decks)
  2. Entish Restoration relevance 1.07 · 28.6% (62,639 of 219,124 decks)
  3. Beast Within relevance 0.91 · 45.1% (98,746 of 219,124 decks)
  4. Crop Rotation relevance 0.91 · 29.1% (63,705 of 219,124 decks)
  5. Tear Asunder relevance 0.62 · 15.6% (34,176 of 219,124 decks)
  6. Putrefy relevance 0.62 · 18.1% (39,679 of 219,124 decks)

Sorceries

10

Showing 1-10 of 10

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.05 25.5%
    $0.33 €0.77
  • Cultivate
    1.04 59.2%
    $0.44 €0.50
  • Rampant Growth
    0.94 45.5%
    $1.14 €0.56
  • Nature's Lore
    0.87 44.1%
    $2.12 €2.78
  • Farseek
    0.85 45.8%
    $0.47 €0.78
  • Explore
    0.80 24.4%
    $0.18 €0.26
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.77 32.8%
    $1.83 €1.54
  • Skyshroud Claim
    0.75 21.7%
    $0.95 €1.13
  • Life from the Loam
    0.68 17.1%
    $5.14 €4.96
  • Scapeshift
    0.63 13.9%
    $41.50 €33.73
All sorceries (10)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.05 · 25.5% (55,877 of 219,124 decks)
  2. Cultivate relevance 1.04 · 59.2% (129,772 of 219,124 decks)
  3. Rampant Growth relevance 0.94 · 45.5% (99,737 of 219,124 decks)
  4. Nature's Lore relevance 0.87 · 44.1% (96,651 of 219,124 decks)
  5. Farseek relevance 0.85 · 45.8% (100,368 of 219,124 decks)
  6. Explore relevance 0.80 · 24.4% (53,397 of 219,124 decks)
  7. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.77 · 32.8% (71,965 of 219,124 decks)
  8. Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.75 · 21.7% (47,616 of 219,124 decks)
  9. Life from the Loam relevance 0.68 · 17.1% (37,396 of 219,124 decks)
  10. Scapeshift relevance 0.63 · 13.9% (30,518 of 219,124 decks)

Utility Lands

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Myriad Landscape
    0.68 31.2%
    $0.27 €0.26
All utility lands (1)
  1. Myriad Landscape relevance 0.68 · 31.2% (68,367 of 219,124 decks)

Lands

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    0.95 47.0%
    $0.28 €0.10
  • Fabled Passage
    0.84 39.9%
    $0.55 €1.06
  • Evolving Wilds
    0.82 48.0%
    $0.28 €0.13
  • Riveteers Overlook
    0.79 20.1%
    $0.29 €0.16
  • Cabaretti Courtyard
    0.74 17.5%
    $0.34 €0.32
  • Cinder Glade
    0.67 26.2%
    $0.30 €0.26
All lands (6)
  1. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.95 · 47.0% (103,089 of 219,124 decks)
  2. Fabled Passage relevance 0.84 · 39.9% (87,536 of 219,124 decks)
  3. Evolving Wilds relevance 0.82 · 48.0% (105,222 of 219,124 decks)
  4. Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.79 · 20.1% (44,076 of 219,124 decks)
  5. Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.74 · 17.5% (38,280 of 219,124 decks)
  6. Cinder Glade relevance 0.67 · 26.2% (57,407 of 219,124 decks)

EDH data for Harrow: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 219,124 real decks.