Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-25 of 50
All top picks (50)
- Pheres-Band Warchief relevance 0.63 · 11.0% (16 of 145 decks)
- Pheres-Band Raiders relevance 0.59 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Centaur Rootcaster relevance 0.53 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Spellbane Centaur relevance 0.54 · 7.6% (11 of 145 decks)
- Centaur Chieftain relevance 0.55 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Harmonious Grovestrider relevance 0.43 · 17.9% (26 of 145 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.43 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Pheres-Band Brawler relevance 0.52 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.37 · 30.3% (44 of 145 decks)
- Kalonian Twingrove relevance 0.40 · 21.4% (31 of 145 decks)
- Centaur Nurturer relevance 0.49 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Gaea's Courser relevance 0.49 · 7.6% (11 of 145 decks)
- Skyshooter relevance 0.50 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.38 · 20.0% (29 of 145 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.36 · 25.5% (37 of 145 decks)
- Pheres-Band Thunderhoof relevance 0.49 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
- Pheres-Band Tromper relevance 0.48 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Nylea's Huntmaster relevance 0.45 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Nylea's Disciple relevance 0.44 · 9.0% (13 of 145 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.39 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Centaur Omenreader relevance 0.44 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 0.35 · 23.4% (34 of 145 decks)
- Centaur Battlemaster relevance 0.46 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
- Battlefield Scrounger relevance 0.46 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Grazing Gladehart relevance 0.38 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.34 · 18.6% (27 of 145 decks)
- Centaur Vinecrasher relevance 0.42 · 7.6% (11 of 145 decks)
- Go Forth relevance 0.39 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.35 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Loaming Shaman relevance 0.40 · 9.0% (13 of 145 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.31 · 24.8% (36 of 145 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.30 · 29.0% (42 of 145 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.29 · 30.3% (44 of 145 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.33 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.31 · 22.1% (32 of 145 decks)
- Boseiju Reaches Skyward // Branch of Boseiju relevance 0.35 · 12.4% (18 of 145 decks)
- Pharika's Disciple relevance 0.40 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.32 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Selesnya Eulogist relevance 0.39 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.31 · 20.7% (30 of 145 decks)
- Nyx Herald relevance 0.42 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.30 · 20.7% (30 of 145 decks)
- Territorial Scythecat relevance 0.34 · 11.0% (16 of 145 decks)
- Pheres-Band Centaurs relevance 0.42 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Primeval Herald relevance 0.35 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.29 · 21.4% (31 of 145 decks)
- Dowsing Shaman relevance 0.41 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Freestrider Commando relevance 0.41 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Sophic Centaur relevance 0.46 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru relevance 0.34 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
Card Stacks
23
Card Stacks
23Showing 1-2 of 23
Cards like Cultivate
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
67% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
2.5 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 59%
- Rampant Growth 53%
- Kodama's Reach 48%
- Explosive Vegetation 17%
- Migration Path 11%
- Map the Frontier 8%
- Shared Roots 8%
- Roamer's Routine 7%
- Search for Tomorrow 6%
- Far Wanderings 5%
- Grow from the Ashes 5%
- Beneath the Sands 3%
- Primal Growth 3%
- Reach the Horizon 2%
- Peregrination 2%
- Deep Reconnaissance 2%
- Untamed Wilds 2%
- Map the Wastes 2%
Other options: Terramorph, They Went This Way, Viewpoint Synchronization, Verdant Mastery, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Ashaya, Soul of the Wild
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other green decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards like Dungrove Elder
17× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Gaea's Liege, People of the Woods, Coiling Woodworm, Treefolk Seedlings
Cards like Cultivator Colossus
14× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Explore
9.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards
- Explore 50%
- Summer Bloom 10%
- Journey of Discovery 9%
- Enter the Unknown 6%
Cards like Traverse the Outlands
10× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
- Traverse the Outlands 21%
- Boundless Realms 19%
- Reshape the Earth 3%
- Celebrate the Harvest 2%
- Nissa's Expedition 1%
- Harvest Season 1%
Other options: Turtle Tracks, New Frontiers, Slimefoot's Survey
Cards like Oracle of Mul Daya
2.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other green decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.44 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Farhaven Elf
15× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other green decks
Cards
- Farhaven Elf 21%
- Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru 10%
- Primeval Herald 10%
- Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary 2%
- Ondu Giant 2%
- Wild Wanderer 1%
Other options: Simulacrum Shaper, Yavimaya Granger, Quirion Trailblazer
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 37%
- Skyshroud Claim 28%
- Three Visits 26%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 23%
- Ranger's Path 8%
- Glimpse the Core 3%
Other options: Field Trip, Hunting Wilds
Cards like Mossborn Hydra
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other green decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.38 in other green decks
Cards
- Mossborn Hydra 21%
- Territorial Scythecat 11%
- Scythecat Cub 11%
- Oran-Rief Hydra 7%
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 7%
- Seedship Agrarian 6%
- Undergrowth Champion 3%
- Sazh's Chocobo 3%
- Floral Evoker 1%
- Vinelasher Kudzu 1%
Other options: Foe-liage, Murasa Ranger
Cards like Rishkar's Expertise
3.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Arboreal Grazer
13× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Elder
8.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Oashra Cultivator
Cards like Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel
18× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Titania, Gaea Incarnate
Cards like Colossal Majesty
16× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Exploration
2.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps
12× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards like Harrow
1.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Scapeshift
Cards like Fog
1.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards
- Fog 23%
- Lull 4%
- Moment's Peace 3%
- Haze of Pollen 2%
- Root Snare 1%
Other options: Defend the Hearth, Thwart the Enemy, Tanglesap, Pause for Reflection, Terrifying Presence, Druid's Deliverance, Commencement of Festivities, Chameleon Blur, Serene Sunset, Winds of Qal Sisma, Vine Snare
Cards like Rancor
3.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Cards like Haunted Cloak
4.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards like Wood Elves
4.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards like Scute Swarm
1.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other green decks
Cards
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
All creatures (50)
- Pheres-Band Warchief relevance 0.63 · 11.0% (16 of 145 decks)
- Pheres-Band Raiders relevance 0.59 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Centaur Rootcaster relevance 0.53 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Spellbane Centaur relevance 0.54 · 7.6% (11 of 145 decks)
- Centaur Chieftain relevance 0.55 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Harmonious Grovestrider relevance 0.43 · 17.9% (26 of 145 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.43 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Pheres-Band Brawler relevance 0.52 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.37 · 30.3% (44 of 145 decks)
- Kalonian Twingrove relevance 0.40 · 21.4% (31 of 145 decks)
- Centaur Nurturer relevance 0.49 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Gaea's Courser relevance 0.49 · 7.6% (11 of 145 decks)
- Skyshooter relevance 0.50 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.38 · 20.0% (29 of 145 decks)
- Pheres-Band Thunderhoof relevance 0.49 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
- Pheres-Band Tromper relevance 0.48 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Nylea's Huntmaster relevance 0.45 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Nylea's Disciple relevance 0.44 · 9.0% (13 of 145 decks)
- Centaur Omenreader relevance 0.44 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 0.35 · 23.4% (34 of 145 decks)
- Centaur Battlemaster relevance 0.46 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
- Battlefield Scrounger relevance 0.46 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Grazing Gladehart relevance 0.38 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Centaur Vinecrasher relevance 0.42 · 7.6% (11 of 145 decks)
- Loaming Shaman relevance 0.40 · 9.0% (13 of 145 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.31 · 24.8% (36 of 145 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.30 · 29.0% (42 of 145 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.29 · 30.3% (44 of 145 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.33 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.31 · 22.1% (32 of 145 decks)
- Boseiju Reaches Skyward // Branch of Boseiju relevance 0.35 · 12.4% (18 of 145 decks)
- Pharika's Disciple relevance 0.40 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.32 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Selesnya Eulogist relevance 0.39 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.31 · 20.7% (30 of 145 decks)
- Nyx Herald relevance 0.42 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.30 · 20.7% (30 of 145 decks)
- Territorial Scythecat relevance 0.34 · 11.0% (16 of 145 decks)
- Pheres-Band Centaurs relevance 0.42 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Primeval Herald relevance 0.35 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Dowsing Shaman relevance 0.41 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Freestrider Commando relevance 0.41 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Sophic Centaur relevance 0.46 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru relevance 0.34 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- Innocuous Researcher relevance 0.38 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.26 · 29.7% (43 of 145 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.29 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Budoka Gardener // Dokai, Weaver of Life relevance 0.35 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Herald of the Pantheon relevance 0.36 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Ainok Guide relevance 0.36 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
All artifacts (50)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.35 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Cloak of the Bat relevance 0.35 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.27 · 23.4% (34 of 145 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.34 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Vorrac Battlehorns relevance 0.34 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.29 · 12.4% (18 of 145 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.24 · 20.7% (30 of 145 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.26 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.25 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.21 · 13.8% (20 of 145 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.25 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.23 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
- Hero's Heirloom relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Endless Atlas relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.19 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Strata Scythe relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Adventuring Gear relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Fleetfeather Sandals relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.17 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Horned Helm relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (31 of 145 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Armillary Sphere relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Chariot of Victory relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Glowcap Lantern relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.10 · 12.4% (18 of 145 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Cliffhaven Kitesail relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Skyclave Pick-Axe relevance 0.16 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.15 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.11 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.15 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Hunter's Bow relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Leyline Axe relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.10 · 7.6% (11 of 145 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
All enchantments (50)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.36 · 25.5% (37 of 145 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.29 · 21.4% (31 of 145 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.24 · 32.4% (47 of 145 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.28 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.27 · 13.8% (20 of 145 decks)
- Gaea's Embrace relevance 0.31 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.26 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Crystalline Armor relevance 0.27 · 9.0% (13 of 145 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.26 · 11.0% (16 of 145 decks)
- Triumph of Ferocity relevance 0.29 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Frantic Strength relevance 0.28 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.27 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.23 · 13.8% (20 of 145 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.28 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Centaur Glade relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.22 · 16.6% (24 of 145 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.21 · 20.7% (30 of 145 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.25 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.25 · 7.6% (11 of 145 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.22 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.21 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.17 · 22.1% (32 of 145 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.22 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.20 · 11.0% (16 of 145 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.20 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Claim the Kingdom relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Moldering Gym // Weight Room relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Omen of the Hunt relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Aspect of Wolf relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.20 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Master's Guidance relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.18 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.14 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.11 · 45.5% (66 of 145 decks)
- Font of Fertility relevance 0.24 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.15 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.13 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Point the Way relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Gift of Paradise relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Seal of Primordium relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Verdant Haven relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Court of Bounty relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
All instants (50)
- Go Forth relevance 0.39 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.32 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Fated Intervention relevance 0.40 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.28 · 9.0% (13 of 145 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.27 · 9.0% (13 of 145 decks)
- Wilt relevance 0.29 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- You Happen On a Glade relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.26 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Clear Shot relevance 0.28 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.18 · 29.7% (43 of 145 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.23 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.24 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.16 · 30.3% (44 of 145 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.20 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Primal Bellow relevance 0.22 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.23 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.21 · 9.0% (13 of 145 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.17 · 23.4% (34 of 145 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.18 · 13.8% (20 of 145 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.20 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.18 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.16 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.19 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Seedship Impact relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.19 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.18 · 7.6% (11 of 145 decks)
- Rampage of the Clans relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Respite relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.19 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.15 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.18 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.18 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.15 · 12.4% (18 of 145 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Ranger's Guile relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.18 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.17 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Shower of Arrows relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.16 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.15 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.13 · 16.6% (24 of 145 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.11 · 31.0% (45 of 145 decks)
- Aerial Predation relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.13 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Sheltering Word relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
All sorceries (50)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.39 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.34 · 18.6% (27 of 145 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.33 · 9.0% (13 of 145 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.26 · 23.4% (34 of 145 decks)
- Emergent Sequence relevance 0.34 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.26 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.19 · 49.7% (72 of 145 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.26 · 16.6% (24 of 145 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.23 · 26.2% (38 of 145 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.27 · 13.8% (20 of 145 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.29 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- Enter the Unknown relevance 0.31 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.28 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.30 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.29 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.29 · 9.0% (13 of 145 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.30 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.24 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.22 · 20.7% (30 of 145 decks)
- Adventurous Impulse relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Soul's Majesty relevance 0.24 · 12.4% (18 of 145 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.24 · 11.0% (16 of 145 decks)
- Woodland Guidance relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Abundant Harvest relevance 0.27 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.26 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Adventure Awaits relevance 0.28 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.17 · 27.6% (40 of 145 decks)
- Into the North relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.23 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Seismic Sense relevance 0.24 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 47.6% (69 of 145 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Beneath the Sands relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Primal Growth relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.11 · 53.1% (77 of 145 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Mwonvuli Acid-Moss relevance 0.26 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.17 · 11.0% (16 of 145 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.17 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.18 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Path of the Animist relevance 0.26 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.17 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.18 · 7.6% (11 of 145 decks)
- Nissa's Triumph relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.18 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
Planeswalkers
6
Planeswalkers
6 Showing 1-6 of 6
All planeswalkers (6)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.26 · 11.0% (16 of 145 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.21 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.24 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.16 · 12.4% (18 of 145 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.14 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.14 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
Battles
1
Battles
1 Showing 1-1 of 1
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
Utility Lands
50
Utility Lands
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
All utility lands (50)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.21 · 19.3% (28 of 145 decks)
- Kazandu Mammoth // Kazandu Valley relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.20 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.24 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 26.2% (38 of 145 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (7 of 145 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.18 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.18 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.18 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.17 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.11 · 37.9% (55 of 145 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.14 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.17 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Roiling Canopy relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Avishkar Raceway relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.14 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.12 · 20.7% (30 of 145 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.12 · 20.7% (30 of 145 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.14 · 9.0% (13 of 145 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.12 · 13.8% (20 of 145 decks)
- Treetop Village relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.12 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Arena relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Ghost Town relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.16 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.16 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.16 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.10 · 11.0% (16 of 145 decks)
- Adventurer's Inn relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.15 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Sapseep Forest relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.10 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.11 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.12 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.12 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.12 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
Lands
24
Lands
24 Showing 1-24 of 24
All lands (24)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.21 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.23 · 6.2% (9 of 145 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.16 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.16 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Grasslands relevance 0.24 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.14 · 11.0% (16 of 145 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.15 · 5.5% (8 of 145 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.13 · 6.9% (10 of 145 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.10 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.11 · 4.1% (6 of 145 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.12 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (3 of 145 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 91.7% (133 of 145 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Braulios of Pheres Band, from 145 real Commander decks.