Reap and Sow
Played in 287 Temur decks
530+11+5+4+2+10+10+8+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Riku of Many Paths 1.6% of decks
Riku of Many Paths 1.6% of decks
Susan Foreman // The Tenth Doctor 2.0% of decks
Susan Foreman // The Tenth Doctor 2.0% of decks
Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Kodama of the East Tree 5.7% of decks
Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Kodama of the East Tree 5.7% of decks
Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Kodama of the East Tree 1.7% of decks
Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Kodama of the East Tree 1.7% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Jeska, Thrice Reborn 1.3% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Jeska, Thrice Reborn 1.3% of decks
Most Relevant
Pir's Whim 23.7% of decks
Pir's Whim 23.7% of decks
Sylvan Scrying 38.3% of decks
Sylvan Scrying 38.3% of decks
Tempt with Discovery 35.5% of decks
Tempt with Discovery 35.5% of decks
Hour of Promise 22.6% of decks
Hour of Promise 22.6% of decks
Nylea's Intervention 21.3% of decks
Nylea's Intervention 21.3% of decks
Expedition Map 35.5% of decks
Expedition Map 35.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Riku of Many Paths relevance 1.86 · 1.6% (58 of 3,609 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Tenth Doctor relevance 1.26 · 2.0% (12 of 614 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.94 · 5.7% (3 of 53 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.75 · 1.7% (4 of 237 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.47 · 1.3% (2 of 149 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Pir's Whim relevance 1.38 · 23.7% (68 of 287 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.34 · 38.3% (110 of 287 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.34 · 35.5% (102 of 287 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.32 · 22.6% (65 of 287 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 1.20 · 21.3% (61 of 287 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.18 · 35.5% (102 of 287 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 1.16 · 33.4% (96 of 287 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 1.14 · 35.5% (102 of 287 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 1.08 · 17.1% (49 of 287 decks)
- World Map relevance 1.05 · 17.4% (50 of 287 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.02 · 46.0% (132 of 287 decks)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 1.01 · 19.2% (55 of 287 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.85 · 18.8% (54 of 287 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.81 · 17.4% (50 of 287 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.80 · 18.1% (52 of 287 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.77 · 16.7% (48 of 287 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.77 · 14.6% (42 of 287 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.76 · 21.3% (61 of 287 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.76 · 15.0% (43 of 287 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.75 · 20.6% (59 of 287 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.75 · 21.3% (61 of 287 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.74 · 26.5% (76 of 287 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.70 · 21.3% (61 of 287 decks)
- Vibrance relevance 0.70 · 20.9% (60 of 287 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.68 · 25.8% (74 of 287 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.68 · 22.6% (65 of 287 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.67 · 13.6% (39 of 287 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.67 · 19.5% (56 of 287 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.67 · 19.5% (56 of 287 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.63 · 18.8% (54 of 287 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 1.14 · 35.5% (102 of 287 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.76 · 21.3% (61 of 287 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.74 · 26.5% (76 of 287 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.70 · 21.3% (61 of 287 decks)
- Vibrance relevance 0.70 · 20.9% (60 of 287 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.68 · 25.8% (74 of 287 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.68 · 22.6% (65 of 287 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.67 · 13.6% (39 of 287 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.67 · 19.5% (56 of 287 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.67 · 19.5% (56 of 287 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.63 · 18.8% (54 of 287 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.18 · 35.5% (102 of 287 decks)
- World Map relevance 1.05 · 17.4% (50 of 287 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.77 · 14.6% (42 of 287 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.75 · 20.6% (59 of 287 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.75 · 21.3% (61 of 287 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Copy Land relevance 1.08 · 17.1% (49 of 287 decks)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 1.01 · 19.2% (55 of 287 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.81 · 17.4% (50 of 287 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.62 · 24.7% (71 of 287 decks)
All instants (2)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 1.16 · 33.4% (96 of 287 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.02 · 46.0% (132 of 287 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Pir's Whim relevance 1.38 · 23.7% (68 of 287 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.34 · 38.3% (110 of 287 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.34 · 35.5% (102 of 287 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.32 · 22.6% (65 of 287 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 1.20 · 21.3% (61 of 287 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.85 · 18.8% (54 of 287 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.80 · 18.1% (52 of 287 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.77 · 16.7% (48 of 287 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.76 · 15.0% (43 of 287 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.62 · 15.0% (43 of 287 decks)
All utility lands (10)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.19 · 27.9% (80 of 287 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 1.18 · 26.8% (77 of 287 decks)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 1.03 · 22.3% (64 of 287 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.92 · 16.7% (48 of 287 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.78 · 25.8% (74 of 287 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.71 · 30.7% (88 of 287 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.70 · 29.3% (84 of 287 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.69 · 15.0% (43 of 287 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.65 · 24.4% (70 of 287 decks)
- Thundering Falls relevance 0.62 · 24.0% (69 of 287 decks)
All lands (8)
- Vesuva relevance 1.14 · 25.4% (73 of 287 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.72 · 18.5% (53 of 287 decks)
- Highland Forest relevance 0.68 · 16.0% (46 of 287 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.68 · 18.5% (53 of 287 decks)
- Wooded Ridgeline relevance 0.65 · 16.7% (48 of 287 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.63 · 27.5% (79 of 287 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.63 · 28.9% (83 of 287 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.62 · 31.4% (90 of 287 decks)
EDH data for Reap and Sow: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 287 real decks.















































