Reap and Sow
Played in 480 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (14)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 2.34 · 2.2% (159 of 7,079 decks)
- Omega, Heartless Evolution relevance 1.46 · 2.9% (17 of 583 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 1.29 · 7.1% (6 of 85 decks)
- Absorbing Man relevance 0.90 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.87 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.79 · 4.1% (3 of 73 decks)
- Kellan, Inquisitive Prodigy // Tail the Suspect relevance 0.64 · 1.2% (5 of 417 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Thirteenth Doctor relevance 0.59 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.59 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.58 · 1.2% (4 of 329 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Fourth Doctor relevance 0.57 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.55 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Nael, Avizoa Aeronaut relevance 0.28 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
All most relevant (23)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.95 · 62.1% (298 of 480 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.78 · 54.0% (259 of 480 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.71 · 46.7% (224 of 480 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.31 · 37.9% (182 of 480 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 1.30 · 32.1% (154 of 480 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.10 · 49.6% (238 of 480 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 1.00 · 28.3% (136 of 480 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.98 · 25.4% (122 of 480 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.97 · 26.3% (126 of 480 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.91 · 17.5% (84 of 480 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.91 · 30.0% (144 of 480 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.90 · 16.5% (79 of 480 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 0.87 · 23.5% (113 of 480 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.84 · 19.4% (93 of 480 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.78 · 15.6% (75 of 480 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.76 · 24.4% (117 of 480 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.75 · 15.2% (73 of 480 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.66 · 24.4% (117 of 480 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.62 · 24.2% (116 of 480 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.61 · 21.5% (103 of 480 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.59 · 27.7% (133 of 480 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.58 · 24.6% (118 of 480 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.57 · 13.3% (64 of 480 decks)
All creatures (6)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 1.30 · 32.1% (154 of 480 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 1.00 · 28.3% (136 of 480 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.97 · 26.3% (126 of 480 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 0.87 · 23.5% (113 of 480 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.84 · 19.4% (93 of 480 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.62 · 24.2% (116 of 480 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.78 · 54.0% (259 of 480 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.90 · 16.5% (79 of 480 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.61 · 21.5% (103 of 480 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Copy Land relevance 0.98 · 25.4% (122 of 480 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.76 · 24.4% (117 of 480 decks)
All instants (4)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.10 · 49.6% (238 of 480 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.91 · 30.0% (144 of 480 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.59 · 27.7% (133 of 480 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.58 · 24.6% (118 of 480 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.95 · 62.1% (298 of 480 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.71 · 46.7% (224 of 480 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.31 · 37.9% (182 of 480 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.91 · 17.5% (84 of 480 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.78 · 15.6% (75 of 480 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.75 · 15.2% (73 of 480 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.66 · 24.4% (117 of 480 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.57 · 13.3% (64 of 480 decks)
All utility lands (13)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.36 · 46.5% (223 of 480 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 1.32 · 39.8% (191 of 480 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 0.96 · 24.8% (119 of 480 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.95 · 26.7% (128 of 480 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.90 · 31.7% (152 of 480 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 0.78 · 16.7% (80 of 480 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.78 · 18.3% (88 of 480 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.72 · 17.7% (85 of 480 decks)
- Trenchpost relevance 0.72 · 18.3% (88 of 480 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.64 · 16.7% (80 of 480 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.61 · 17.9% (86 of 480 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.59 · 18.1% (87 of 480 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.59 · 33.8% (162 of 480 decks)
All lands (14)
- Urza's Tower relevance 1.23 · 38.3% (184 of 480 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 1.23 · 39.6% (190 of 480 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 1.21 · 37.3% (179 of 480 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 1.20 · 37.1% (178 of 480 decks)
- Cloudpost relevance 1.16 · 33.3% (160 of 480 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 1.14 · 32.1% (154 of 480 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.98 · 32.9% (158 of 480 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 0.96 · 25.0% (120 of 480 decks)
- Glimmerpost relevance 0.96 · 25.6% (123 of 480 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 0.92 · 20.8% (100 of 480 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.66 · 25.2% (121 of 480 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.66 · 15.4% (74 of 480 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 0.64 · 14.8% (71 of 480 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.62 · 14.0% (67 of 480 decks)
EDH data for Reap and Sow: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 480 real decks.