Reap and Sow
Played in 178 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
130+13+4+2+2+19+1+9+
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Soul of Windgrace relevance 1.57 · 1.6% (17 of 1,074 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.35 · 30.3% (54 of 178 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.28 · 30.9% (55 of 178 decks)
- Stone Rain relevance 1.15 · 17.4% (31 of 178 decks)
- Sinkhole relevance 1.08 · 15.7% (28 of 178 decks)
- Pillage relevance 1.04 · 15.2% (27 of 178 decks)
- Army Ants relevance 0.99 · 18.0% (32 of 178 decks)
- Casualties of War relevance 0.89 · 21.3% (38 of 178 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.80 · 41.0% (73 of 178 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.78 · 37.6% (67 of 178 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.75 · 30.9% (55 of 178 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.69 · 17.4% (31 of 178 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.67 · 28.7% (51 of 178 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.67 · 28.1% (50 of 178 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.66 · 41.0% (73 of 178 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.66 · 29.8% (53 of 178 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.66 · 27.5% (49 of 178 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.62 · 24.7% (44 of 178 decks)
- Boom // Bust relevance 0.61 · 10.1% (18 of 178 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.59 · 34.3% (61 of 178 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.59 · 13.5% (24 of 178 decks)
- Cleansing Wildfire relevance 0.58 · 9.0% (16 of 178 decks)
- Wildfire relevance 0.58 · 11.2% (20 of 178 decks)
- Fulminator Mage relevance 0.58 · 8.4% (15 of 178 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.58 · 18.0% (32 of 178 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.56 · 14.6% (26 of 178 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.55 · 9.0% (16 of 178 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.55 · 29.8% (53 of 178 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.55 · 20.8% (37 of 178 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.54 · 14.0% (25 of 178 decks)
- Wrenn and Six relevance 0.53 · 14.6% (26 of 178 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Army Ants relevance 0.99 · 18.0% (32 of 178 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.78 · 37.6% (67 of 178 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.66 · 41.0% (73 of 178 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.66 · 29.8% (53 of 178 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.62 · 24.7% (44 of 178 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.59 · 13.5% (24 of 178 decks)
- Fulminator Mage relevance 0.58 · 8.4% (15 of 178 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.58 · 18.0% (32 of 178 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.55 · 29.8% (53 of 178 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.55 · 20.8% (37 of 178 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.54 · 14.0% (25 of 178 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.52 · 28.7% (51 of 178 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.50 · 24.2% (43 of 178 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.35 · 30.3% (54 of 178 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.75 · 30.9% (55 of 178 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.67 · 28.7% (51 of 178 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.55 · 9.0% (16 of 178 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Exploration relevance 0.66 · 27.5% (49 of 178 decks)
- Impending Disaster relevance 0.52 · 8.4% (15 of 178 decks)
All instants (2)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.80 · 41.0% (73 of 178 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.56 · 14.6% (26 of 178 decks)
All sorceries (19)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.28 · 30.9% (55 of 178 decks)
- Stone Rain relevance 1.15 · 17.4% (31 of 178 decks)
- Sinkhole relevance 1.08 · 15.7% (28 of 178 decks)
- Pillage relevance 1.04 · 15.2% (27 of 178 decks)
- Casualties of War relevance 0.89 · 21.3% (38 of 178 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.69 · 17.4% (31 of 178 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.67 · 28.1% (50 of 178 decks)
- Boom // Bust relevance 0.61 · 10.1% (18 of 178 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.59 · 34.3% (61 of 178 decks)
- Cleansing Wildfire relevance 0.58 · 9.0% (16 of 178 decks)
- Wildfire relevance 0.58 · 11.2% (20 of 178 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.53 · 20.2% (36 of 178 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.52 · 8.4% (15 of 178 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.50 · 9.0% (16 of 178 decks)
- Star of Extinction relevance 0.50 · 8.4% (15 of 178 decks)
- Destroy the Evidence relevance 0.49 · 7.3% (13 of 178 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.49 · 15.2% (27 of 178 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.49 · 15.2% (27 of 178 decks)
- Destructive Force relevance 0.48 · 7.3% (13 of 178 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Wrenn and Six relevance 0.53 · 14.6% (26 of 178 decks)
All utility lands (9)
- Strip Mine relevance 1.03 · 38.8% (69 of 178 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.87 · 21.3% (38 of 178 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.83 · 24.2% (43 of 178 decks)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.68 · 11.8% (21 of 178 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.64 · 13.5% (24 of 178 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.63 · 17.4% (31 of 178 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.61 · 14.0% (25 of 178 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.56 · 14.6% (26 of 178 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.50 · 15.2% (27 of 178 decks)
EDH data for Reap and Sow: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 178 real decks.



















































