Crucible of Worlds

Played in 115,817 decks

Crucible of Worlds
$32.55 €20.90

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Numot, the Devastator relevance 5.62 · 57.2% (511 of 894 decks)
  2. Verrak, Warped Sengir relevance 5.25 · 44.6% (383 of 859 decks)
  3. Doctor Doom, King of Latveria relevance 4.67 · 37.4% (3,904 of 10,452 decks)
  4. Dakkon Blackblade relevance 4.45 · 37.5% (333 of 888 decks)
  5. The Gitrog Monster relevance 4.34 · 39.9% (2,124 of 5,328 decks)
  6. Zell Dincht relevance 3.99 · 57.3% (286 of 499 decks)
  7. Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 3.78 · 51.2% (285 of 557 decks)
  8. Zo-Zu the Punisher relevance 3.68 · 32.7% (447 of 1,366 decks)
  9. Baba Lysaga, Night Witch relevance 3.67 · 33.7% (931 of 2,762 decks)
  10. Quintorius, History Chaser relevance 3.66 · 18.5% (2,378 of 12,849 decks)
  11. Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 3.59 · 49.4% (38 of 77 decks)
  12. Flubs, the Fool relevance 3.55 · 24.6% (2,835 of 11,541 decks)
  13. Nissa, Leyline Tamer relevance 3.47 · 43.1% (1,167 of 2,710 decks)
  14. Koth, the Geomancer relevance 3.41 · 45.8% (170 of 371 decks)
  15. Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 3.41 · 40.0% (2,348 of 5,866 decks)
  16. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 3.37 · 33.4% (1,336 of 3,997 decks)
  17. Braids, Cabal Minion relevance 3.29 · 33.5% (260 of 775 decks)
  18. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 3.28 · 11.4% (1,313 of 11,566 decks)
  19. Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 3.26 · 42.0% (153 of 364 decks)
  20. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.23 · 23.9% (863 of 3,613 decks)
  21. Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 3.20 · 36.5% (31 of 85 decks)
  22. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 3.17 · 24.6% (2,215 of 9,008 decks)
  23. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 3.15 · 45.2% (1,583 of 3,504 decks)
  24. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.15 · 27.3% (1,419 of 5,195 decks)
  25. The Necrobloom relevance 3.10 · 28.7% (3,225 of 11,242 decks)
  26. Ib Halfheart, Goblin Tactician relevance 3.03 · 31.3% (162 of 517 decks)
  27. Tomik, Distinguished Advokist relevance 3.01 · 57.4% (39 of 68 decks)
  28. Terra, Herald of Hope relevance 3.01 · 6.7% (1,032 of 15,426 decks)
  29. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.99 · 53.8% (681 of 1,265 decks)
  30. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.97 · 19.6% (822 of 4,197 decks)

Replaced By

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
All replaced by (4)
  1. Conduit of Worlds 5.8% of swaps out (5 swaps)
  2. Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar 4.7% of swaps out (4 swaps)
  3. Mole Man, Moloid Master 4.7% of swaps out (4 swaps)
  4. Glacierwood Siege 3.5% of swaps out (3 swaps)

Parallel Cards

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
All parallel cards (2)
  1. Conduit of Worlds
  2. Ramunap Excavator

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.58 41.2%
    $4.81 €3.72
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.57 44.4%
    $12.74 €9.12
  • Exploration
    1.45 41.8%
    $30.48 €26.52
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.35 39.4%
    $5.58 €6.55
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.31 31.9%
    $12.49 €10.39
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.30 36.3%
    $22.14 €23.31
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.24 33.0%
    $2.02 €2.75
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.19 34.1%
    $9.88 €6.54
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.18 28.5%
    $0.33 €0.77
  • Scute Swarm
    1.18 36.1%
    $8.93 €7.90
All most relevant (30)
  1. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.58 · 41.2% (47,664 of 115,817 decks)
  2. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.57 · 44.4% (51,399 of 115,817 decks)
  3. Exploration relevance 1.45 · 41.8% (48,460 of 115,817 decks)
  4. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.35 · 39.4% (45,613 of 115,817 decks)
  5. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.31 · 31.9% (37,000 of 115,817 decks)
  6. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.30 · 36.3% (41,998 of 115,817 decks)
  7. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.24 · 33.0% (38,181 of 115,817 decks)
  8. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.19 · 34.1% (39,450 of 115,817 decks)
  9. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.18 · 28.5% (33,040 of 115,817 decks)
  10. Scute Swarm relevance 1.18 · 36.1% (41,830 of 115,817 decks)
  11. Scapeshift relevance 1.17 · 25.9% (29,977 of 115,817 decks)
  12. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.16 · 30.0% (34,793 of 115,817 decks)
  13. Crop Rotation relevance 1.11 · 35.7% (41,307 of 115,817 decks)
  14. Zuran Orb relevance 1.10 · 26.4% (30,603 of 115,817 decks)
  15. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.05 · 33.6% (38,877 of 115,817 decks)
  16. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.03 · 25.7% (29,741 of 115,817 decks)
  17. Harrow relevance 0.95 · 28.8% (33,308 of 115,817 decks)
  18. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.92 · 21.0% (24,340 of 115,817 decks)
  19. Life from the Loam relevance 0.92 · 22.9% (26,502 of 115,817 decks)
  20. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.90 · 21.6% (25,005 of 115,817 decks)
  21. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.86 · 22.6% (26,174 of 115,817 decks)
  22. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.80 · 22.1% (25,583 of 115,817 decks)
  23. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.78 · 22.9% (26,467 of 115,817 decks)
  24. Six relevance 0.76 · 19.5% (22,546 of 115,817 decks)
  25. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.76 · 17.3% (20,069 of 115,817 decks)
  26. Burgeoning relevance 0.74 · 17.7% (20,490 of 115,817 decks)
  27. Spelunking relevance 0.68 · 16.5% (19,157 of 115,817 decks)
  28. Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.68 · 15.1% (17,504 of 115,817 decks)
  29. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.66 · 16.2% (18,709 of 115,817 decks)
  30. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.65 · 14.9% (17,227 of 115,817 decks)

Creatures

22

Showing 1-10 of 22

Page size
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.58 41.2%
    $4.81 €3.72
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.57 44.4%
    $12.74 €9.12
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.35 39.4%
    $5.58 €6.55
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.31 31.9%
    $12.49 €10.39
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.30 36.3%
    $22.14 €23.31
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.24 33.0%
    $2.02 €2.75
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.19 34.1%
    $9.88 €6.54
  • Scute Swarm
    1.18 36.1%
    $8.93 €7.90
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.05 33.6%
    $3.94 €3.03
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.03 25.7%
    $6.38 €6.51
All creatures (22)
  1. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.58 · 41.2% (47,664 of 115,817 decks)
  2. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.57 · 44.4% (51,399 of 115,817 decks)
  3. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.35 · 39.4% (45,613 of 115,817 decks)
  4. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.31 · 31.9% (37,000 of 115,817 decks)
  5. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.30 · 36.3% (41,998 of 115,817 decks)
  6. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.24 · 33.0% (38,181 of 115,817 decks)
  7. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.19 · 34.1% (39,450 of 115,817 decks)
  8. Scute Swarm relevance 1.18 · 36.1% (41,830 of 115,817 decks)
  9. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.05 · 33.6% (38,877 of 115,817 decks)
  10. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.03 · 25.7% (29,741 of 115,817 decks)
  11. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.92 · 21.0% (24,340 of 115,817 decks)
  12. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.90 · 21.6% (25,005 of 115,817 decks)
  13. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.86 · 22.6% (26,174 of 115,817 decks)
  14. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.80 · 22.1% (25,583 of 115,817 decks)
  15. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.78 · 22.9% (26,467 of 115,817 decks)
  16. Six relevance 0.76 · 19.5% (22,546 of 115,817 decks)
  17. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.76 · 17.3% (20,069 of 115,817 decks)
  18. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.66 · 16.2% (18,709 of 115,817 decks)
  19. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.62 · 15.0% (17,332 of 115,817 decks)
  20. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.62 · 14.4% (16,642 of 115,817 decks)
  21. Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.61 · 12.9% (14,980 of 115,817 decks)
  22. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.61 · 12.4% (14,357 of 115,817 decks)

Artifacts

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.16 30.0%
    $1.13 €1.46
  • Zuran Orb
    1.10 26.4%
    $3.27 €1.81
  • Amulet of Vigor
    0.68 15.1%
    $50.54 €33.60
  • Exploration Broodship
    0.65 14.9%
    $2.91 €3.31
All artifacts (4)
  1. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.16 · 30.0% (34,793 of 115,817 decks)
  2. Zuran Orb relevance 1.10 · 26.4% (30,603 of 115,817 decks)
  3. Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.68 · 15.1% (17,504 of 115,817 decks)
  4. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.65 · 14.9% (17,227 of 115,817 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Exploration
    1.45 41.8%
    $30.48 €26.52
  • Burgeoning
    0.74 17.7%
    $34.10 €25.64
  • Spelunking
    0.68 16.5%
    $3.51 €3.11
All enchantments (3)
  1. Exploration relevance 1.45 · 41.8% (48,460 of 115,817 decks)
  2. Burgeoning relevance 0.74 · 17.7% (20,490 of 115,817 decks)
  3. Spelunking relevance 0.68 · 16.5% (19,157 of 115,817 decks)

Instants

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    1.11 35.7%
    $3.89 €3.57
  • Harrow
    0.95 28.8%
    $0.36 €0.27
  • Constant Mists
    0.64 12.7%
    $20.36 €14.65
  • Entish Restoration
    0.61 16.3%
    $3.00 €1.81
All instants (4)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 1.11 · 35.7% (41,307 of 115,817 decks)
  2. Harrow relevance 0.95 · 28.8% (33,308 of 115,817 decks)
  3. Constant Mists relevance 0.64 · 12.7% (14,653 of 115,817 decks)
  4. Entish Restoration relevance 0.61 · 16.3% (18,860 of 115,817 decks)

Sorceries

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.18 28.5%
    $0.33 €0.77
  • Scapeshift
    1.17 25.9%
    $41.50 €33.73
  • Life from the Loam
    0.92 22.9%
    $5.14 €4.96
  • Nature's Lore
    0.65 32.9%
    $2.12 €2.78
All sorceries (4)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.18 · 28.5% (33,040 of 115,817 decks)
  2. Scapeshift relevance 1.17 · 25.9% (29,977 of 115,817 decks)
  3. Life from the Loam relevance 0.92 · 22.9% (26,502 of 115,817 decks)
  4. Nature's Lore relevance 0.65 · 32.9% (38,144 of 115,817 decks)

Utility Lands

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    1.04 27.4%
    $28.53 €27.22
  • Strip Mine
    0.90 23.9%
    $10.71 €5.96
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.77 30.4%
    $17.19 €12.85
  • Boseiju, Who Endures
    0.68 26.9%
    $48.70 €40.11
  • Glacial Chasm
    0.61 12.2%
    $17.47 €16.54
All utility lands (5)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 1.04 · 27.4% (31,776 of 115,817 decks)
  2. Strip Mine relevance 0.90 · 23.9% (27,692 of 115,817 decks)
  3. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.77 · 30.4% (35,168 of 115,817 decks)
  4. Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.68 · 26.9% (31,147 of 115,817 decks)
  5. Glacial Chasm relevance 0.61 · 12.2% (14,101 of 115,817 decks)

Lands

8

Showing 1-8 of 8

Page size
  • Fabled Passage
    0.89 42.0%
    $0.55 €1.06
  • Verdant Catacombs
    0.80 34.8%
    $29.61 €24.52
  • Lotus Field
    0.76 18.5%
    $2.61 €2.52
  • Wooded Foothills
    0.75 32.7%
    $17.87 €16.71
  • Misty Rainforest
    0.69 30.4%
    $35.99 €25.96
  • Windswept Heath
    0.66 28.9%
    $12.54 €10.58
  • Prismatic Vista
    0.62 20.0%
    $30.65 €32.78
  • Overgrown Tomb
    0.61 25.8%
    $8.43 €8.31
All lands (8)
  1. Fabled Passage relevance 0.89 · 42.0% (48,657 of 115,817 decks)
  2. Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.80 · 34.8% (40,286 of 115,817 decks)
  3. Lotus Field relevance 0.76 · 18.5% (21,396 of 115,817 decks)
  4. Wooded Foothills relevance 0.75 · 32.7% (37,907 of 115,817 decks)
  5. Misty Rainforest relevance 0.69 · 30.4% (35,153 of 115,817 decks)
  6. Windswept Heath relevance 0.66 · 28.9% (33,491 of 115,817 decks)
  7. Prismatic Vista relevance 0.62 · 20.0% (23,208 of 115,817 decks)
  8. Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.61 · 25.8% (29,827 of 115,817 decks)

EDH data for Crucible of Worlds: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 115,817 real decks.