Reap and Sow
Played in 102 Ink-Treader decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (2)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.96 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Susan Foreman relevance 0.44 · 1.6% (2 of 128 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Titania's Command relevance 2.13 · 41.2% (42 of 102 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 1.97 · 44.1% (45 of 102 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.66 · 40.2% (41 of 102 decks)
- Gladiolus Amicitia relevance 1.63 · 35.3% (36 of 102 decks)
- Commit // Memory relevance 1.58 · 27.5% (28 of 102 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 1.56 · 30.4% (31 of 102 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 1.49 · 43.1% (44 of 102 decks)
- Disallow relevance 1.46 · 28.4% (29 of 102 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.44 · 36.3% (37 of 102 decks)
- Into the North relevance 1.44 · 28.4% (29 of 102 decks)
- Trade Routes relevance 1.41 · 34.3% (35 of 102 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 1.31 · 30.4% (31 of 102 decks)
- Admonition Angel relevance 1.24 · 29.4% (30 of 102 decks)
- Geode Rager relevance 1.24 · 37.3% (38 of 102 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 1.23 · 29.4% (30 of 102 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.22 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Settle the Wreckage relevance 1.21 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Delay relevance 1.21 · 23.5% (24 of 102 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 1.17 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Wargate relevance 1.16 · 39.2% (40 of 102 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 1.16 · 30.4% (31 of 102 decks)
- Perch Protection relevance 1.15 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.15 · 42.2% (43 of 102 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.14 · 58.8% (60 of 102 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.14 · 30.4% (31 of 102 decks)
- Dragonback Assault relevance 1.12 · 37.3% (38 of 102 decks)
- Emeria Shepherd relevance 1.12 · 32.4% (33 of 102 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 1.12 · 27.5% (28 of 102 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.11 · 57.8% (59 of 102 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.09 · 48.0% (49 of 102 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 1.97 · 44.1% (45 of 102 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.66 · 40.2% (41 of 102 decks)
- Gladiolus Amicitia relevance 1.63 · 35.3% (36 of 102 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 1.31 · 30.4% (31 of 102 decks)
- Admonition Angel relevance 1.24 · 29.4% (30 of 102 decks)
- Geode Rager relevance 1.24 · 37.3% (38 of 102 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.15 · 42.2% (43 of 102 decks)
- Emeria Shepherd relevance 1.12 · 32.4% (33 of 102 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.11 · 57.8% (59 of 102 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.09 · 48.0% (49 of 102 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.08 · 39.2% (40 of 102 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.06 · 52.9% (54 of 102 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.01 · 59.8% (61 of 102 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.00 · 63.7% (65 of 102 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.00 · 49.0% (50 of 102 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.22 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
All enchantments (8)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 1.56 · 30.4% (31 of 102 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 1.49 · 43.1% (44 of 102 decks)
- Trade Routes relevance 1.41 · 34.3% (35 of 102 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 1.16 · 30.4% (31 of 102 decks)
- Dragonback Assault relevance 1.12 · 37.3% (38 of 102 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 1.12 · 27.5% (28 of 102 decks)
- Collective Restraint relevance 1.08 · 27.5% (28 of 102 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 1.01 · 29.4% (30 of 102 decks)
All instants (7)
- Commit // Memory relevance 1.58 · 27.5% (28 of 102 decks)
- Disallow relevance 1.46 · 28.4% (29 of 102 decks)
- Settle the Wreckage relevance 1.21 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Delay relevance 1.21 · 23.5% (24 of 102 decks)
- Perch Protection relevance 1.15 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.08 · 60.8% (62 of 102 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 1.03 · 27.5% (28 of 102 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Titania's Command relevance 2.13 · 41.2% (42 of 102 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.44 · 36.3% (37 of 102 decks)
- Into the North relevance 1.44 · 28.4% (29 of 102 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 1.17 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Wargate relevance 1.16 · 39.2% (40 of 102 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.14 · 58.8% (60 of 102 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.14 · 30.4% (31 of 102 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 1.23 · 29.4% (30 of 102 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Urza's Cave relevance 2.01 · 49.0% (50 of 102 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 1.42 · 27.5% (28 of 102 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 1.40 · 35.3% (36 of 102 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 1.34 · 28.4% (29 of 102 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 1.20 · 36.3% (37 of 102 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.17 · 45.1% (46 of 102 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 1.10 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
All lands (4)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 1.36 · 38.2% (39 of 102 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 1.33 · 36.3% (37 of 102 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 1.31 · 36.3% (37 of 102 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 1.30 · 37.3% (38 of 102 decks)
EDH data for Reap and Sow: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 102 real decks.