Skyshroud Claim

Played in 189,202 decks

Skyshroud Claim
$0.95 €1.13

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.88 · 47.2% (11,808 of 25,006 decks)
  2. Quandrix, the Proof relevance 2.87 · 48.3% (2,963 of 6,137 decks)
  3. Gishath, Sun's Avatar relevance 2.74 · 33.2% (3,498 of 10,533 decks)
  4. Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 2.71 · 47.8% (1,932 of 4,040 decks)
  5. Ruby, Daring Tracker relevance 2.69 · 65.4% (1,592 of 2,435 decks)
  6. Susan Foreman // The Tenth Doctor relevance 2.65 · 76.2% (444 of 583 decks)
  7. Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 2.48 · 39.1% (952 of 2,437 decks)
  8. Radha, Heir to Keld relevance 2.45 · 68.3% (730 of 1,069 decks)
  9. Beledros Witherbloom relevance 2.45 · 24.7% (594 of 2,404 decks)
  10. Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 2.42 · 47.2% (2,673 of 5,665 decks)
  11. Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 2.37 · 39.1% (1,457 of 3,728 decks)
  12. Raph & Mikey, Troublemakers relevance 2.28 · 38.2% (3,230 of 8,451 decks)
  13. The Ur-Dragon relevance 2.27 · 17.2% (5,046 of 29,284 decks)
  14. Grizzlegom, Hurloon Hero relevance 2.25 · 53.8% (831 of 1,545 decks)
  15. Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 2.22 · 55.3% (83 of 150 decks)
  16. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 2.19 · 41.8% (1,663 of 3,983 decks)
  17. Susan Foreman // The Twelfth Doctor relevance 2.11 · 57.3% (229 of 400 decks)
  18. Susan Foreman // The War Doctor relevance 2.09 · 61.2% (120 of 196 decks)
  19. Susan Foreman // The First Doctor relevance 2.03 · 34.1% (56 of 164 decks)
  20. Susan Foreman // The Second Doctor relevance 2.02 · 34.6% (53 of 153 decks)
  21. Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 2.01 · 31.3% (951 of 3,034 decks)
  22. Hazezon Tamar relevance 1.98 · 45.9% (162 of 353 decks)
  23. Bugenhagen, Wise Elder relevance 1.95 · 78.6% (397 of 505 decks)
  24. Sisters of Stone Death relevance 1.90 · 32.8% (81 of 247 decks)
  25. Mayael the Anima relevance 1.89 · 26.5% (521 of 1,964 decks)
  26. Kellan, Inquisitive Prodigy // Tail the Suspect relevance 1.88 · 47.8% (191 of 400 decks)
  27. Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 1.86 · 46.7% (43 of 92 decks)
  28. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 1.85 · 20.1% (1,756 of 8,721 decks)
  29. Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 1.85 · 10.9% (1,458 of 13,409 decks)
  30. Witherbloom, the Balancer relevance 1.84 · 9.6% (2,019 of 20,935 decks)

Replaced By

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
All replaced by (1)
  1. Cultivate 3.3% of swaps out (4 swaps)

Parallel Cards

11

Showing 1-10 of 11

Page size
All parallel cards (11)
  1. Ranger's Path
  2. Three Visits
  3. Nature's Lore
  4. Hunting Wilds
  5. Field Trip
  6. Gaea's Bounty
  7. Nissa's Pilgrimage
  8. Spoils of Victory
  9. Land Grant
  10. Glimpse the Core
  11. Safewright Quest

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Nature's Lore
    1.32 67.2%
    $2.11 €2.78
  • Three Visits
    1.11 49.9%
    $5.66 €4.82
  • Cultivate
    1.06 60.5%
    $0.43 €0.50
  • Kodama's Reach
    1.03 44.3%
    $1.88 €1.54
  • Farseek
    1.01 54.4%
    $0.48 €0.78
  • Beast Within
    0.95 47.3%
    $0.72 €0.89
  • Rampant Growth
    0.85 41.0%
    $1.14 €0.56
  • Harrow
    0.83 25.1%
    $0.31 €0.27
  • Garruk's Uprising
    0.80 31.0%
    $0.54 €0.56
  • Heroic Intervention
    0.79 39.9%
    $17.54 €14.11
All most relevant (30)
  1. Nature's Lore relevance 1.32 · 67.2% (127,219 of 189,202 decks)
  2. Three Visits relevance 1.11 · 49.9% (94,372 of 189,202 decks)
  3. Cultivate relevance 1.06 · 60.5% (114,460 of 189,202 decks)
  4. Kodama's Reach relevance 1.03 · 44.3% (83,807 of 189,202 decks)
  5. Farseek relevance 1.01 · 54.4% (102,950 of 189,202 decks)
  6. Beast Within relevance 0.95 · 47.3% (89,423 of 189,202 decks)
  7. Rampant Growth relevance 0.85 · 41.0% (77,525 of 189,202 decks)
  8. Harrow relevance 0.83 · 25.1% (47,450 of 189,202 decks)
  9. Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.80 · 31.0% (58,639 of 189,202 decks)
  10. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.79 · 39.9% (75,477 of 189,202 decks)
  11. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.72 · 19.1% (36,095 of 189,202 decks)
  12. Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.68 · 20.8% (39,306 of 189,202 decks)
  13. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.66 · 18.3% (34,566 of 189,202 decks)
  14. Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.62 · 20.3% (38,378 of 189,202 decks)
  15. Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.59 · 13.7% (26,003 of 189,202 decks)
  16. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.58 · 21.1% (39,832 of 189,202 decks)
  17. Entish Restoration relevance 0.57 · 15.1% (28,623 of 189,202 decks)
  18. Explore relevance 0.57 · 17.3% (32,764 of 189,202 decks)
  19. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.56 · 13.5% (25,496 of 189,202 decks)
  20. Birds of Paradise relevance 0.55 · 26.9% (50,896 of 189,202 decks)
  21. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.53 · 15.1% (28,507 of 189,202 decks)
  22. The Great Henge relevance 0.53 · 16.5% (31,165 of 189,202 decks)
  23. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.52 · 22.7% (43,011 of 189,202 decks)
  24. Lotus Cobra relevance 0.52 · 15.0% (28,378 of 189,202 decks)
  25. Scute Swarm relevance 0.51 · 15.8% (29,822 of 189,202 decks)
  26. Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.49 · 15.3% (28,908 of 189,202 decks)
  27. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.49 · 12.2% (23,108 of 189,202 decks)
  28. Exploration relevance 0.49 · 14.0% (26,500 of 189,202 decks)
  29. Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.48 · 10.5% (19,773 of 189,202 decks)
  30. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.48 · 14.0% (26,455 of 189,202 decks)

Creatures

13

Showing 1-10 of 13

Page size
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    0.72 19.1%
    $2.01 €2.75
  • Rampaging Baloths
    0.66 18.3%
    $0.39 €0.35
  • Sakura-Tribe Elder
    0.58 21.1%
    $0.38 €0.56
  • Birds of Paradise
    0.55 26.9%
    $10.00 €8.38
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.53 15.1%
    $13.01 €9.12
  • Llanowar Elves
    0.52 22.7%
    $0.24 €0.21
  • Lotus Cobra
    0.52 15.0%
    $5.67 €6.55
  • Scute Swarm
    0.51 15.8%
    $9.00 €7.90
  • Springbloom Druid
    0.49 12.2%
    $0.59 €2.00
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    0.48 14.0%
    $0.46 €0.60
All creatures (13)
  1. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.72 · 19.1% (36,095 of 189,202 decks)
  2. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.66 · 18.3% (34,566 of 189,202 decks)
  3. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.58 · 21.1% (39,832 of 189,202 decks)
  4. Birds of Paradise relevance 0.55 · 26.9% (50,896 of 189,202 decks)
  5. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.53 · 15.1% (28,507 of 189,202 decks)
  6. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.52 · 22.7% (43,011 of 189,202 decks)
  7. Lotus Cobra relevance 0.52 · 15.0% (28,378 of 189,202 decks)
  8. Scute Swarm relevance 0.51 · 15.8% (29,822 of 189,202 decks)
  9. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.49 · 12.2% (23,108 of 189,202 decks)
  10. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.48 · 14.0% (26,455 of 189,202 decks)
  11. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.47 · 10.8% (20,462 of 189,202 decks)
  12. Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.47 · 11.4% (21,574 of 189,202 decks)
  13. Eternal Witness relevance 0.46 · 16.4% (31,114 of 189,202 decks)

Artifacts

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • The Great Henge
    0.53 16.5%
    $65.94 €52.02
All artifacts (1)
  1. The Great Henge relevance 0.53 · 16.5% (31,165 of 189,202 decks)

Enchantments

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Garruk's Uprising
    0.80 31.0%
    $0.54 €0.56
  • Rhythm of the Wild
    0.49 15.3%
    $5.10 €3.61
  • Exploration
    0.49 14.0%
    $30.17 €26.52
  • Elemental Bond
    0.46 12.2%
    $4.79 €4.06
All enchantments (4)
  1. Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.80 · 31.0% (58,639 of 189,202 decks)
  2. Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.49 · 15.3% (28,908 of 189,202 decks)
  3. Exploration relevance 0.49 · 14.0% (26,500 of 189,202 decks)
  4. Elemental Bond relevance 0.46 · 12.2% (23,055 of 189,202 decks)

Instants

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Beast Within
    0.95 47.3%
    $0.72 €0.89
  • Harrow
    0.83 25.1%
    $0.31 €0.27
  • Heroic Intervention
    0.79 39.9%
    $17.54 €14.11
  • Return of the Wildspeaker
    0.62 20.3%
    $2.63 €1.15
  • Roiling Regrowth
    0.59 13.7%
    $0.26 €0.30
  • Entish Restoration
    0.57 15.1%
    $2.88 €1.81
All instants (6)
  1. Beast Within relevance 0.95 · 47.3% (89,423 of 189,202 decks)
  2. Harrow relevance 0.83 · 25.1% (47,450 of 189,202 decks)
  3. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.79 · 39.9% (75,477 of 189,202 decks)
  4. Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.62 · 20.3% (38,378 of 189,202 decks)
  5. Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.59 · 13.7% (26,003 of 189,202 decks)
  6. Entish Restoration relevance 0.57 · 15.1% (28,623 of 189,202 decks)

Sorceries

11

Showing 1-10 of 11

Page size
  • Nature's Lore
    1.32 67.2%
    $2.11 €2.78
  • Three Visits
    1.11 49.9%
    $5.66 €4.82
  • Cultivate
    1.06 60.5%
    $0.43 €0.50
  • Kodama's Reach
    1.03 44.3%
    $1.88 €1.54
  • Farseek
    1.01 54.4%
    $0.48 €0.78
  • Rampant Growth
    0.85 41.0%
    $1.14 €0.56
  • Rishkar's Expertise
    0.68 20.8%
    $5.67 €2.35
  • Explore
    0.57 17.3%
    $0.18 €0.26
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.56 13.5%
    $0.36 €0.77
  • Explosive Vegetation
    0.48 10.5%
    $0.34 €0.28
All sorceries (11)
  1. Nature's Lore relevance 1.32 · 67.2% (127,219 of 189,202 decks)
  2. Three Visits relevance 1.11 · 49.9% (94,372 of 189,202 decks)
  3. Cultivate relevance 1.06 · 60.5% (114,460 of 189,202 decks)
  4. Kodama's Reach relevance 1.03 · 44.3% (83,807 of 189,202 decks)
  5. Farseek relevance 1.01 · 54.4% (102,950 of 189,202 decks)
  6. Rampant Growth relevance 0.85 · 41.0% (77,525 of 189,202 decks)
  7. Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.68 · 20.8% (39,306 of 189,202 decks)
  8. Explore relevance 0.57 · 17.3% (32,764 of 189,202 decks)
  9. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.56 · 13.5% (25,496 of 189,202 decks)
  10. Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.48 · 10.5% (19,773 of 189,202 decks)
  11. Migration Path relevance 0.47 · 10.6% (19,972 of 189,202 decks)

Utility Lands

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.54 21.4%
    $17.17 €12.85
  • Mosswort Bridge
    0.51 16.2%
    $0.38 €0.38
  • Boseiju, Who Endures
    0.49 19.6%
    $48.11 €40.11
All utility lands (3)
  1. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.54 · 21.4% (40,463 of 189,202 decks)
  2. Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.51 · 16.2% (30,643 of 189,202 decks)
  3. Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.49 · 19.6% (37,027 of 189,202 decks)

Lands

12

Showing 1-10 of 12

Page size
  • Stomping Ground
    0.73 29.9%
    $7.34 €7.22
  • Cinder Glade
    0.69 27.1%
    $0.28 €0.26
  • Breeding Pool
    0.59 24.5%
    $9.52 €9.36
  • Wooded Foothills
    0.58 25.2%
    $17.41 €16.71
  • Fabled Passage
    0.56 26.5%
    $0.60 €1.06
  • Karplusan Forest
    0.53 17.2%
    $0.44 €0.89
  • Windswept Heath
    0.48 21.3%
    $12.47 €10.58
  • Temple Garden
    0.48 19.3%
    $6.54 €6.62
  • Misty Rainforest
    0.48 21.1%
    $36.18 €25.96
  • Rootbound Crag
    0.47 17.3%
    $0.32 €0.38
All lands (12)
  1. Stomping Ground relevance 0.73 · 29.9% (56,567 of 189,202 decks)
  2. Cinder Glade relevance 0.69 · 27.1% (51,276 of 189,202 decks)
  3. Breeding Pool relevance 0.59 · 24.5% (46,386 of 189,202 decks)
  4. Wooded Foothills relevance 0.58 · 25.2% (47,659 of 189,202 decks)
  5. Fabled Passage relevance 0.56 · 26.5% (50,199 of 189,202 decks)
  6. Karplusan Forest relevance 0.53 · 17.2% (32,499 of 189,202 decks)
  7. Windswept Heath relevance 0.48 · 21.3% (40,280 of 189,202 decks)
  8. Temple Garden relevance 0.48 · 19.3% (36,436 of 189,202 decks)
  9. Misty Rainforest relevance 0.48 · 21.1% (39,923 of 189,202 decks)
  10. Rootbound Crag relevance 0.47 · 17.3% (32,799 of 189,202 decks)
  11. Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.47 · 11.1% (21,047 of 189,202 decks)
  12. Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.47 · 19.7% (37,287 of 189,202 decks)

EDH data for Skyshroud Claim: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 189,202 real decks.