Reap and Sow
Played in 340 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
330+12+4+2+1+12+7+12+
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 3.84 · 7.0% (196 of 2,815 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 1.53 · 5.0% (9 of 180 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.49 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 2.82 · 72.6% (247 of 340 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 2.54 · 58.5% (199 of 340 decks)
- District Guide relevance 2.50 · 54.4% (185 of 340 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 2.50 · 55.6% (189 of 340 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 2.47 · 63.2% (215 of 340 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 2.34 · 51.5% (175 of 340 decks)
- Guild Summit relevance 2.31 · 51.5% (175 of 340 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 2.28 · 50.6% (172 of 340 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 2.20 · 56.8% (193 of 340 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 2.09 · 42.6% (145 of 340 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.90 · 48.8% (166 of 340 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 1.64 · 36.2% (123 of 340 decks)
- Gate Colossus relevance 1.60 · 32.6% (111 of 340 decks)
- Gatebreaker Ram relevance 1.58 · 32.1% (109 of 340 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 1.52 · 29.1% (99 of 340 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 1.49 · 30.6% (104 of 340 decks)
- Glaive of the Guildpact relevance 1.35 · 26.2% (89 of 340 decks)
- Greenside Watcher relevance 1.27 · 23.2% (79 of 340 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.26 · 58.8% (200 of 340 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 1.23 · 21.5% (73 of 340 decks)
- World Map relevance 1.21 · 21.8% (74 of 340 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 1.21 · 27.1% (92 of 340 decks)
- Gateway Sneak relevance 1.21 · 22.6% (77 of 340 decks)
- Way of the Thief relevance 1.19 · 22.1% (75 of 340 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 1.19 · 26.2% (89 of 340 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 1.17 · 24.4% (83 of 340 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 1.13 · 25.0% (85 of 340 decks)
- Explore relevance 1.13 · 38.8% (132 of 340 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.12 · 26.5% (90 of 340 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 1.11 · 25.0% (85 of 340 decks)
All creatures (12)
- District Guide relevance 2.50 · 54.4% (185 of 340 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 2.50 · 55.6% (189 of 340 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 1.64 · 36.2% (123 of 340 decks)
- Gate Colossus relevance 1.60 · 32.6% (111 of 340 decks)
- Gatebreaker Ram relevance 1.58 · 32.1% (109 of 340 decks)
- Greenside Watcher relevance 1.27 · 23.2% (79 of 340 decks)
- Gateway Sneak relevance 1.21 · 22.6% (77 of 340 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 1.19 · 26.2% (89 of 340 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 1.17 · 24.4% (83 of 340 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.12 · 26.5% (90 of 340 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 1.11 · 25.0% (85 of 340 decks)
- Realm Seekers relevance 1.10 · 19.1% (65 of 340 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Navigation Orb relevance 2.34 · 51.5% (175 of 340 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 2.20 · 56.8% (193 of 340 decks)
- Glaive of the Guildpact relevance 1.35 · 26.2% (89 of 340 decks)
- World Map relevance 1.21 · 21.8% (74 of 340 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Guild Summit relevance 2.31 · 51.5% (175 of 340 decks)
- Way of the Thief relevance 1.19 · 22.1% (75 of 340 decks)
All instants (1)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.26 · 58.8% (200 of 340 decks)
All sorceries (12)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 2.82 · 72.6% (247 of 340 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 2.54 · 58.5% (199 of 340 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 2.47 · 63.2% (215 of 340 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 2.28 · 50.6% (172 of 340 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 2.09 · 42.6% (145 of 340 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.90 · 48.8% (166 of 340 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 1.52 · 29.1% (99 of 340 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 1.49 · 30.6% (104 of 340 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 1.23 · 21.5% (73 of 340 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 1.21 · 27.1% (92 of 340 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 1.13 · 25.0% (85 of 340 decks)
- Explore relevance 1.13 · 38.8% (132 of 340 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Maze's End relevance 2.69 · 65.0% (221 of 340 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 2.66 · 64.7% (220 of 340 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 2.64 · 64.1% (218 of 340 decks)
- The Black Gate relevance 1.66 · 42.4% (144 of 340 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.50 · 45.3% (154 of 340 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 1.38 · 42.4% (144 of 340 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 1.27 · 33.8% (115 of 340 decks)
All lands (12)
- Gond Gate relevance 2.61 · 64.1% (218 of 340 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 2.61 · 63.5% (216 of 340 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 2.58 · 63.2% (215 of 340 decks)
- Black Dragon Gate relevance 2.58 · 65.3% (222 of 340 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 2.55 · 64.1% (218 of 340 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 2.54 · 64.1% (218 of 340 decks)
- Thran Portal relevance 2.47 · 58.2% (198 of 340 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 2.35 · 66.8% (227 of 340 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 2.28 · 66.5% (226 of 340 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 2.23 · 65.9% (224 of 340 decks)
- Plaza of Harmony relevance 1.69 · 35.6% (121 of 340 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 1.36 · 29.1% (99 of 340 decks)
EDH data for Reap and Sow: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 340 real decks.























































