Cards like Sabotender
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
85% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Gruul decks
69% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Gruul decks
2.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Harrow
10× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
87% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Gruul decks
69% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Gruul decks
2.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Harrow 69%
- Roiling Regrowth 48%
- Entish Restoration 42%
- Scapeshift 33%
- Cycle of Renewal 26%
- Planar Engineering 20%
Cards like Snake Umbra
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Gruul decks
54% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Gruul decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Snake Umbra 62%
- Keen Sense 60%
Cards like Icetill Explorer
19× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Gruul decks
53% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Gruul decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
14× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Gruul decks
51% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Gruul decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Zell Dincht
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Gruul decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Scute Swarm
18× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Gruul decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Scute Swarm 50%
- Springheart Nantuko 31%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.6× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other Gruul decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. 27% of other Gruul decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.78 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 50%
- Three Visits 36%
- Skyshroud Claim 26%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 4%
- Ranger's Path 2%
- Glimpse the Core 2%
Other options: Hunting Wilds, Field Trip
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
15× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Gruul decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Exploration
12× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Gruul decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Mossborn Hydra
6.4× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Gruul decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Mossborn Hydra 28%
- Sazh's Chocobo 10%
- Seedship Agrarian 8%
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 6%
- Scythecat Cub 4%
- Territorial Scythecat 4%
- Undergrowth Champion 2%
- Oran-Rief Hydra 2%
- Floral Evoker 2%
Other options: Vinelasher Kudzu, Murasa Ranger, Foe-liage
Cards like Cultivate
1.3× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other Gruul decks
55% of decks run two or more
vs. 44% of other Gruul decks
2.0 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Cultivate 51%
- Rampant Growth 48%
- Kodama's Reach 37%
- Shared Roots 14%
- Explosive Vegetation 9%
- Migration Path 9%
- Grow from the Ashes 5%
- Reach the Horizon 5%
- Search for Tomorrow 4%
- Map the Frontier 4%
- Far Wanderings 3%
- Roamer's Routine 3%
- New Generation's Technique 2%
- They Went This Way 1%
Other options: Terramorph, Primal Growth, Beneath the Sands, Viewpoint Synchronization, Peregrination, Verdant Mastery, Path to the Festival, Map the Wastes, Deep Reconnaissance, Untamed Wilds
Cards like Avenger of Zendikar
9.1× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Gruul decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Explore
12× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Gruul decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Explore 44%
- Summer Bloom 10%
- Journey of Discovery 1%
- Enter the Unknown 1%
Cards like Gladiolus Amicitia
14× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Gruul decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Gladiolus Amicitia 16%
- Icecave Crasher 3%
- Brushfire Elemental 2%
- Remnant Elemental 2%
- Akoum Hellhound 2%
- Baloth Woodcrasher 2%
- Canopy Baloth 1%
- Grove Rumbler 1%
Other options: Skyclave Geopede, Plated Geopede, Makindi Sliderunner, Snapping Gnarlid, Territorial Baloth, Valakut Predator, Attercop, Scythe Leopard, Hedron Rover, Boughside Wanderers, Hedron Scrabbler
Cards like Aftermath Analyst
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Elder
5.9× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Gruul decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Other options: Dawntreader Elk, Krosan Wayfarer, Diligent Farmhand, Oashra Cultivator
All top picks (50)
- Sabotender relevance 0.67 · 77.4% (4,108 of 5,305 decks)
- Spitfire Lagac relevance 0.76 · 59.6% (3,163 of 5,305 decks)
- Tunneling Geopede relevance 0.76 · 55.2% (2,928 of 5,305 decks)
- Zell Dincht relevance 0.79 · 44.6% (2,366 of 5,305 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.74 · 49.3% (2,615 of 5,305 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.63 · 60.2% (3,194 of 5,305 decks)
- Ojer Axonil, Deepest Might // Temple of Power relevance 0.83 · 30.5% (1,617 of 5,305 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.68 · 49.6% (2,629 of 5,305 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.64 · 53.5% (2,838 of 5,305 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.64 · 51.3% (2,720 of 5,305 decks)
- Torbran, Thane of Red Fell relevance 0.75 · 35.9% (1,904 of 5,305 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.75 · 35.6% (1,889 of 5,305 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.69 · 43.1% (2,285 of 5,305 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.56 · 62.3% (3,303 of 5,305 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.64 · 49.1% (2,607 of 5,305 decks)
- Rydia, Summoner of Mist relevance 0.80 · 25.3% (1,342 of 5,305 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.63 · 47.8% (2,537 of 5,305 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.67 · 38.8% (2,060 of 5,305 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.72 · 30.7% (1,630 of 5,305 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.59 · 50.3% (2,667 of 5,305 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.62 · 45.7% (2,423 of 5,305 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.49 · 68.6% (3,639 of 5,305 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.59 · 49.8% (2,642 of 5,305 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.70 · 33.1% (1,755 of 5,305 decks)
- Famished Worldsire relevance 0.79 · 20.6% (1,092 of 5,305 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.74 · 25.8% (1,369 of 5,305 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.69 · 33.6% (1,780 of 5,305 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.58 · 50.5% (2,678 of 5,305 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.56 · 52.8% (2,803 of 5,305 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.64 · 38.7% (2,052 of 5,305 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.64 · 37.8% (2,003 of 5,305 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.63 · 39.7% (2,108 of 5,305 decks)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.84 · 13.0% (688 of 5,305 decks)
- Seedship Impact relevance 0.83 · 13.4% (713 of 5,305 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.79 · 16.4% (871 of 5,305 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.71 · 25.6% (1,359 of 5,305 decks)
- Eumidian Terrabotanist relevance 0.88 · 10.6% (560 of 5,305 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.77 · 16.6% (879 of 5,305 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.79 · 14.4% (766 of 5,305 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.59 · 40.5% (2,148 of 5,305 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.62 · 34.6% (1,837 of 5,305 decks)
- Pull Through the Weft relevance 0.84 · 10.6% (561 of 5,305 decks)
- Sami's Curiosity relevance 0.88 · 8.8% (468 of 5,305 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.67 · 27.3% (1,447 of 5,305 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.60 · 36.4% (1,933 of 5,305 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.74 · 16.5% (876 of 5,305 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.48 · 57.7% (3,062 of 5,305 decks)
- Orbital Plunge relevance 0.90 · 6.3% (332 of 5,305 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.77 · 13.0% (691 of 5,305 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.63 · 30.6% (1,625 of 5,305 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Sabotender relevance 0.67 · 77.4% (4,108 of 5,305 decks)
- Spitfire Lagac relevance 0.76 · 59.6% (3,163 of 5,305 decks)
- Tunneling Geopede relevance 0.76 · 55.2% (2,928 of 5,305 decks)
- Zell Dincht relevance 0.79 · 44.6% (2,366 of 5,305 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.74 · 49.3% (2,615 of 5,305 decks)
- Ojer Axonil, Deepest Might // Temple of Power relevance 0.83 · 30.5% (1,617 of 5,305 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.64 · 53.5% (2,838 of 5,305 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.64 · 51.3% (2,720 of 5,305 decks)
- Torbran, Thane of Red Fell relevance 0.75 · 35.9% (1,904 of 5,305 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.75 · 35.6% (1,889 of 5,305 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.64 · 49.1% (2,607 of 5,305 decks)
- Rydia, Summoner of Mist relevance 0.80 · 25.3% (1,342 of 5,305 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.67 · 38.8% (2,060 of 5,305 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.72 · 30.7% (1,630 of 5,305 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.59 · 50.3% (2,667 of 5,305 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.59 · 49.8% (2,642 of 5,305 decks)
- Famished Worldsire relevance 0.79 · 20.6% (1,092 of 5,305 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.58 · 50.5% (2,678 of 5,305 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.56 · 52.8% (2,803 of 5,305 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.64 · 37.8% (2,003 of 5,305 decks)
- Eumidian Terrabotanist relevance 0.88 · 10.6% (560 of 5,305 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.59 · 40.5% (2,148 of 5,305 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.62 · 34.6% (1,837 of 5,305 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.60 · 36.4% (1,933 of 5,305 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.74 · 16.5% (876 of 5,305 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.48 · 57.7% (3,062 of 5,305 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.77 · 13.0% (691 of 5,305 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.63 · 30.6% (1,625 of 5,305 decks)
- Seedship Agrarian relevance 0.86 · 8.4% (444 of 5,305 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.59 · 36.4% (1,929 of 5,305 decks)
- Six relevance 0.71 · 16.9% (897 of 5,305 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.75 · 13.2% (698 of 5,305 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.71 · 15.6% (826 of 5,305 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 0.75 · 12.6% (670 of 5,305 decks)
- Koth, the Geomancer relevance 0.85 · 7.2% (383 of 5,305 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.62 · 28.2% (1,494 of 5,305 decks)
- Gladiolus Amicitia relevance 0.69 · 16.3% (867 of 5,305 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.79 · 9.8% (518 of 5,305 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.48 · 52.0% (2,757 of 5,305 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.56 · 37.3% (1,977 of 5,305 decks)
- Kav Landseeker relevance 0.92 · 4.7% (250 of 5,305 decks)
- Geode Rager relevance 0.70 · 14.9% (789 of 5,305 decks)
- Cosi's Ravager relevance 0.86 · 5.3% (280 of 5,305 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.77 · 9.9% (523 of 5,305 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.59 · 28.2% (1,495 of 5,305 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.69 · 13.9% (736 of 5,305 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.81 · 7.0% (374 of 5,305 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.65 · 18.7% (991 of 5,305 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.67 · 15.4% (817 of 5,305 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.76 · 9.5% (505 of 5,305 decks)
All artifacts (24)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.69 · 33.6% (1,780 of 5,305 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.64 · 38.7% (2,052 of 5,305 decks)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.84 · 13.0% (688 of 5,305 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.71 · 25.6% (1,359 of 5,305 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.79 · 14.4% (766 of 5,305 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.67 · 27.3% (1,447 of 5,305 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.74 · 10.3% (547 of 5,305 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.74 · 7.6% (404 of 5,305 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.62 · 13.3% (704 of 5,305 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.67 · 6.2% (331 of 5,305 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.64 · 6.6% (350 of 5,305 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.60 · 4.3% (229 of 5,305 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.67 · 2.9% (153 of 5,305 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.65 · 3.0% (161 of 5,305 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.41 · 4.9% (260 of 5,305 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.27 · 13.7% (726 of 5,305 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.38 · 3.7% (196 of 5,305 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.39 · 3.4% (180 of 5,305 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.22 · 14.4% (764 of 5,305 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (149 of 5,305 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.22 · 4.3% (227 of 5,305 decks)
- Talisman of Impulse relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (224 of 5,305 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.10 · 29.2% (1,547 of 5,305 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.06 · 54.1% (2,868 of 5,305 decks)
All enchantments (39)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.63 · 60.2% (3,194 of 5,305 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.56 · 62.3% (3,303 of 5,305 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.62 · 45.7% (2,423 of 5,305 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.63 · 39.7% (2,108 of 5,305 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.79 · 16.4% (871 of 5,305 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.77 · 16.6% (879 of 5,305 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.72 · 16.0% (847 of 5,305 decks)
- Mechanized Warfare relevance 0.78 · 11.3% (600 of 5,305 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.70 · 15.6% (827 of 5,305 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.52 · 41.3% (2,193 of 5,305 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.82 · 6.4% (342 of 5,305 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.61 · 22.2% (1,177 of 5,305 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.69 · 13.0% (690 of 5,305 decks)
- Virtue of Courage // Embereth Blaze relevance 0.74 · 6.4% (341 of 5,305 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.55 · 23.0% (1,221 of 5,305 decks)
- Fated Firepower relevance 0.70 · 7.0% (374 of 5,305 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.69 · 7.1% (376 of 5,305 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.64 · 9.7% (515 of 5,305 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.67 · 6.1% (326 of 5,305 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.65 · 6.8% (359 of 5,305 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.66 · 6.1% (324 of 5,305 decks)
- Spiked Corridor // Torture Pit relevance 0.82 · 3.2% (169 of 5,305 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.57 · 7.8% (416 of 5,305 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.74 · 3.5% (188 of 5,305 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.54 · 8.0% (422 of 5,305 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.67 · 3.3% (177 of 5,305 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.49 · 6.2% (330 of 5,305 decks)
- City on Fire relevance 0.46 · 8.4% (448 of 5,305 decks)
- Fiery Emancipation relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (530 of 5,305 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.38 · 14.7% (782 of 5,305 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.45 · 5.7% (303 of 5,305 decks)
- Gratuitous Violence relevance 0.35 · 6.9% (364 of 5,305 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.51 · 2.9% (155 of 5,305 decks)
- Cindervines relevance 0.47 · 3.1% (162 of 5,305 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.36 · 3.8% (199 of 5,305 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.30 · 4.1% (220 of 5,305 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.27 · 4.6% (246 of 5,305 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.16 · 5.8% (306 of 5,305 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.14 · 6.2% (329 of 5,305 decks)
All instants (50)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.63 · 47.8% (2,537 of 5,305 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.49 · 68.6% (3,639 of 5,305 decks)
- Seedship Impact relevance 0.83 · 13.4% (713 of 5,305 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.76 · 9.4% (497 of 5,305 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.58 · 26.5% (1,405 of 5,305 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.49 · 41.8% (2,217 of 5,305 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.47 · 44.7% (2,371 of 5,305 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.68 · 11.0% (583 of 5,305 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.51 · 22.2% (1,177 of 5,305 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.67 · 5.7% (300 of 5,305 decks)
- Atarka's Command relevance 0.67 · 5.2% (276 of 5,305 decks)
- Elemental Teachings relevance 0.65 · 5.2% (278 of 5,305 decks)
- Lithobraking relevance 0.84 · 3.3% (173 of 5,305 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.73 · 3.7% (194 of 5,305 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.57 · 5.8% (308 of 5,305 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.52 · 8.8% (465 of 5,305 decks)
- Return the Favor relevance 0.49 · 8.0% (422 of 5,305 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.58 · 4.3% (228 of 5,305 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.40 · 16.0% (850 of 5,305 decks)
- Untimely Malfunction relevance 0.39 · 13.5% (716 of 5,305 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.47 · 6.2% (328 of 5,305 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.41 · 11.3% (597 of 5,305 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.45 · 6.9% (365 of 5,305 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.37 · 15.0% (798 of 5,305 decks)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.66 · 2.9% (154 of 5,305 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.34 · 20.8% (1,106 of 5,305 decks)
- Road // Ruin relevance 0.66 · 2.7% (144 of 5,305 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.43 · 6.4% (337 of 5,305 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.39 · 10.3% (545 of 5,305 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.59 · 3.0% (158 of 5,305 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.41 · 6.8% (362 of 5,305 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.34 · 14.5% (769 of 5,305 decks)
- Pyroblast relevance 0.40 · 6.7% (353 of 5,305 decks)
- Red Elemental Blast relevance 0.40 · 6.5% (344 of 5,305 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.36 · 10.4% (552 of 5,305 decks)
- Redirect Lightning relevance 0.38 · 6.6% (348 of 5,305 decks)
- Tibalt's Trickery relevance 0.42 · 4.7% (247 of 5,305 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.29 · 17.2% (913 of 5,305 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.41 · 4.4% (234 of 5,305 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.51 · 3.0% (160 of 5,305 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.32 · 9.9% (524 of 5,305 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.32 · 4.8% (253 of 5,305 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.42 · 2.9% (153 of 5,305 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.20 · 32.9% (1,743 of 5,305 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.19 · 33.7% (1,790 of 5,305 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.39 · 3.1% (166 of 5,305 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.15 · 52.4% (2,780 of 5,305 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.34 · 2.9% (152 of 5,305 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (135 of 5,305 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.21 · 4.4% (236 of 5,305 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.68 · 49.6% (2,629 of 5,305 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.69 · 43.1% (2,285 of 5,305 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.70 · 33.1% (1,755 of 5,305 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.74 · 25.8% (1,369 of 5,305 decks)
- Pull Through the Weft relevance 0.84 · 10.6% (561 of 5,305 decks)
- Sami's Curiosity relevance 0.88 · 8.8% (468 of 5,305 decks)
- Orbital Plunge relevance 0.90 · 6.3% (332 of 5,305 decks)
- Will of the Sultai relevance 0.81 · 10.5% (557 of 5,305 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.67 · 19.9% (1,056 of 5,305 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.64 · 23.7% (1,255 of 5,305 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.69 · 14.5% (771 of 5,305 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.76 · 10.2% (543 of 5,305 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.68 · 13.5% (714 of 5,305 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.72 · 8.7% (464 of 5,305 decks)
- Through the Forest Gate relevance 0.70 · 6.0% (320 of 5,305 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.70 · 6.0% (316 of 5,305 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.56 · 11.3% (599 of 5,305 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.61 · 7.3% (386 of 5,305 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.51 · 14.5% (771 of 5,305 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.38 · 43.9% (2,329 of 5,305 decks)
- Escape to the Wilds relevance 0.50 · 15.1% (801 of 5,305 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.62 · 5.9% (312 of 5,305 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.61 · 6.3% (333 of 5,305 decks)
- Planetary Annihilation relevance 0.77 · 3.7% (194 of 5,305 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.42 · 26.0% (1,380 of 5,305 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.56 · 6.6% (350 of 5,305 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.61 · 4.6% (244 of 5,305 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.61 · 4.6% (245 of 5,305 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.51 · 9.0% (479 of 5,305 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.44 · 13.9% (738 of 5,305 decks)
- Ground Assault relevance 0.68 · 3.6% (193 of 5,305 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.52 · 6.7% (357 of 5,305 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.50 · 8.6% (457 of 5,305 decks)
- Chocobo Kick relevance 0.68 · 3.4% (181 of 5,305 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.53 · 5.0% (263 of 5,305 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.73 · 3.0% (158 of 5,305 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.69 · 3.2% (169 of 5,305 decks)
- Dire-Strain Rampage relevance 0.58 · 4.2% (223 of 5,305 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.69 · 3.0% (160 of 5,305 decks)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 0.74 · 2.5% (133 of 5,305 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.59 · 3.8% (201 of 5,305 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.46 · 7.3% (385 of 5,305 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.46 · 6.8% (359 of 5,305 decks)
- Cleansing Wildfire relevance 0.67 · 3.0% (159 of 5,305 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.61 · 3.5% (187 of 5,305 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.55 · 4.0% (213 of 5,305 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.43 · 8.3% (440 of 5,305 decks)
- Into the North relevance 0.63 · 3.0% (161 of 5,305 decks)
- Hull Breach relevance 0.42 · 8.9% (470 of 5,305 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.52 · 4.1% (218 of 5,305 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.72 · 6.7% (353 of 5,305 decks)
- Wrenn and Six relevance 0.69 · 6.1% (326 of 5,305 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.50 · 2.5% (132 of 5,305 decks)
All utility lands (45)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.69 · 32.3% (1,713 of 5,305 decks)
- Ghost Town relevance 0.78 · 12.6% (667 of 5,305 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.75 · 12.6% (668 of 5,305 decks)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 0.68 · 16.5% (876 of 5,305 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.67 · 17.7% (938 of 5,305 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.66 · 13.7% (726 of 5,305 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.76 · 7.3% (388 of 5,305 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.62 · 15.6% (826 of 5,305 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.76 · 5.0% (267 of 5,305 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.73 · 6.0% (316 of 5,305 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.60 · 12.8% (680 of 5,305 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.70 · 6.1% (323 of 5,305 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.55 · 17.5% (928 of 5,305 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.66 · 8.4% (445 of 5,305 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.66 · 6.9% (366 of 5,305 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.43 · 37.8% (2,006 of 5,305 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.63 · 7.9% (418 of 5,305 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.49 · 22.1% (1,172 of 5,305 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.58 · 9.0% (479 of 5,305 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 0.82 · 3.1% (163 of 5,305 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.62 · 4.6% (242 of 5,305 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.57 · 4.4% (233 of 5,305 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.48 · 6.8% (363 of 5,305 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.46 · 5.5% (292 of 5,305 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.32 · 27.2% (1,441 of 5,305 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.39 · 10.7% (567 of 5,305 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.44 · 5.0% (267 of 5,305 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.31 · 24.0% (1,274 of 5,305 decks)
- Sheltered Thicket relevance 0.30 · 25.4% (1,348 of 5,305 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.38 · 8.2% (435 of 5,305 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.29 · 20.2% (1,071 of 5,305 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.45 · 3.9% (206 of 5,305 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.54 · 2.6% (140 of 5,305 decks)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 0.31 · 11.3% (600 of 5,305 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.26 · 18.0% (957 of 5,305 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.39 · 3.5% (186 of 5,305 decks)
- Sundering Eruption // Volcanic Fissure relevance 0.40 · 3.3% (174 of 5,305 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.31 · 4.2% (225 of 5,305 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.38 · 2.6% (140 of 5,305 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.22 · 9.5% (503 of 5,305 decks)
- Raging Ravine relevance 0.32 · 3.3% (175 of 5,305 decks)
- Kessig Wolf Run relevance 0.19 · 12.4% (657 of 5,305 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (159 of 5,305 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.20 · 3.7% (198 of 5,305 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (166 of 5,305 decks)
All lands (50)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.68 · 43.8% (2,325 of 5,305 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.67 · 45.1% (2,390 of 5,305 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.84 · 20.1% (1,065 of 5,305 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.84 · 17.0% (904 of 5,305 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.70 · 26.3% (1,394 of 5,305 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.70 · 16.6% (878 of 5,305 decks)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.76 · 12.1% (644 of 5,305 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.70 · 15.1% (800 of 5,305 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.77 · 10.4% (552 of 5,305 decks)
- Naya Panorama relevance 0.75 · 9.2% (490 of 5,305 decks)
- Jund Panorama relevance 0.76 · 6.7% (354 of 5,305 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.38 · 61.9% (3,282 of 5,305 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.70 · 9.2% (489 of 5,305 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.40 · 55.1% (2,925 of 5,305 decks)
- Hobbit Hole relevance 0.82 · 4.3% (230 of 5,305 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.33 · 65.9% (3,497 of 5,305 decks)
- Mountain Valley relevance 0.61 · 10.4% (554 of 5,305 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.70 · 4.8% (255 of 5,305 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.49 · 20.2% (1,070 of 5,305 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.54 · 11.7% (619 of 5,305 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.53 · 11.7% (621 of 5,305 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.43 · 28.5% (1,510 of 5,305 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.45 · 24.0% (1,271 of 5,305 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.45 · 23.4% (1,241 of 5,305 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.45 · 17.5% (930 of 5,305 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.43 · 21.5% (1,142 of 5,305 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.43 · 20.2% (1,074 of 5,305 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.66 · 3.8% (200 of 5,305 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 0.53 · 5.2% (277 of 5,305 decks)
- Highland Forest relevance 0.48 · 8.4% (448 of 5,305 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.52 · 4.9% (261 of 5,305 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.25 · 54.6% (2,897 of 5,305 decks)
- Wooded Ridgeline relevance 0.38 · 10.9% (580 of 5,305 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.41 · 6.2% (328 of 5,305 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.24 · 45.4% (2,411 of 5,305 decks)
- Taiga relevance 0.33 · 11.9% (633 of 5,305 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (389 of 5,305 decks)
- Gongaga, Reactor Town relevance 0.53 · 2.5% (134 of 5,305 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.41 · 4.2% (221 of 5,305 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.34 · 5.1% (269 of 5,305 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.43 · 3.4% (178 of 5,305 decks)
- Thornspire Verge relevance 0.25 · 17.4% (925 of 5,305 decks)
- Fire-Lit Thicket relevance 0.27 · 7.3% (388 of 5,305 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.39 · 3.1% (163 of 5,305 decks)
- Stomping Ground relevance 0.15 · 52.2% (2,767 of 5,305 decks)
- Copperline Gorge relevance 0.26 · 6.9% (364 of 5,305 decks)
- Cragcrown Pathway // Timbercrown Pathway relevance 0.26 · 6.6% (349 of 5,305 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.23 · 10.5% (555 of 5,305 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.19 · 22.0% (1,169 of 5,305 decks)
- Rockfall Vale relevance 0.17 · 20.8% (1,102 of 5,305 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Tannuk, Memorial Ensign, from 5,305 real Commander decks.