Echoing Deeps

Played in 35,386 decks

Echoing Deeps
$0.82 €0.54

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 4.65 · 55.0% (3,349 of 6,087 decks)
  2. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 4.46 · 16.1% (1,869 of 11,619 decks)
  3. Zoraline, Cosmos Caller relevance 3.65 · 8.8% (327 of 3,732 decks)
  4. Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 3.43 · 22.3% (612 of 2,741 decks)
  5. Radha, Heir to Keld relevance 3.37 · 21.0% (228 of 1,085 decks)
  6. The Necrobloom relevance 3.34 · 14.2% (1,600 of 11,274 decks)
  7. Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 3.18 · 13.7% (285 of 2,084 decks)
  8. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.14 · 8.6% (361 of 4,214 decks)
  9. Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 3.12 · 12.2% (837 of 6,874 decks)
  10. Zell Dincht relevance 3.04 · 11.6% (58 of 501 decks)
  11. Kura, the Boundless Sky relevance 2.98 · 51.0% (207 of 406 decks)
  12. Rydia, Summoner of Mist relevance 2.88 · 16.9% (143 of 847 decks)
  13. Impossible Man relevance 2.87 · 22.8% (46 of 202 decks)
  14. Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 2.72 · 11.8% (374 of 3,166 decks)
  15. The Ancient One relevance 2.70 · 6.6% (127 of 1,928 decks)
  16. The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.68 · 7.2% (385 of 5,340 decks)
  17. Isu the Abominable relevance 2.62 · 5.2% (62 of 1,192 decks)
  18. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 2.60 · 6.3% (228 of 3,621 decks)
  19. Baba Lysaga, Night Witch relevance 2.59 · 8.4% (232 of 2,775 decks)
  20. Verrak, Warped Sengir relevance 2.52 · 7.5% (65 of 861 decks)
  21. Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 2.50 · 15.7% (136 of 868 decks)
  22. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.46 · 8.2% (2,055 of 25,152 decks)
  23. The Mycotyrant relevance 2.29 · 5.8% (257 of 4,449 decks)
  24. Lord Windgrace relevance 2.27 · 10.7% (499 of 4,666 decks)
  25. Acolyte of Bahamut // Abdel Adrian, Gorion's Ward relevance 2.26 · 85.7% (6 of 7 decks)
  26. Sakashima the Impostor relevance 2.21 · 11.3% (35 of 309 decks)
  27. Lara Croft, Tomb Raider relevance 2.18 · 6.0% (86 of 1,430 decks)
  28. Tetzin, Gnome Champion // The Golden-Gear Colossus relevance 2.17 · 1.9% (41 of 2,105 decks)
  29. Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 2.14 · 22.1% (177 of 801 decks)
  30. River Song relevance 2.14 · 2.0% (47 of 2,331 decks)

Replaced By

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
All replaced by (1)
  1. Hall of Echoes 19.0% of swaps out (4 swaps)

Parallel Cards

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
All parallel cards (4)
  1. Cavernous Maw
  2. Drownyard Temple
  3. Mirrorpool
  4. Hostile Desert

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Aftermath Analyst
    1.37 35.7%
    $0.78 €1.25
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.31 36.6%
    $21.84 €23.44
  • Crop Rotation
    1.31 41.9%
    $3.91 €3.60
  • Spelunking
    1.30 31.6%
    $3.57 €3.20
  • Zuran Orb
    1.29 31.2%
    $3.51 €1.80
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.25 31.2%
    $6.61 €6.67
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.20 35.0%
    $5.61 €6.44
  • Elvish Reclaimer
    1.15 23.4%
    $5.11 €5.47
  • Six
    1.13 29.0%
    $5.27 €4.95
  • Scapeshift
    1.12 24.7%
    $41.48 €32.65
All most relevant (30)
  1. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.37 · 35.7% (12,629 of 35,386 decks)
  2. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.31 · 36.6% (12,938 of 35,386 decks)
  3. Crop Rotation relevance 1.31 · 41.9% (14,821 of 35,386 decks)
  4. Spelunking relevance 1.30 · 31.6% (11,171 of 35,386 decks)
  5. Zuran Orb relevance 1.29 · 31.2% (11,033 of 35,386 decks)
  6. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.25 · 31.2% (11,051 of 35,386 decks)
  7. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.20 · 35.0% (12,385 of 35,386 decks)
  8. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.15 · 23.4% (8,270 of 35,386 decks)
  9. Six relevance 1.13 · 29.0% (10,278 of 35,386 decks)
  10. Scapeshift relevance 1.12 · 24.7% (8,727 of 35,386 decks)
  11. Exploration relevance 1.08 · 31.1% (11,001 of 35,386 decks)
  12. Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.02 · 22.9% (8,092 of 35,386 decks)
  13. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.94 · 23.7% (8,401 of 35,386 decks)
  14. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.93 · 26.2% (9,264 of 35,386 decks)
  15. Horizon Explorer relevance 0.92 · 20.6% (7,275 of 35,386 decks)
  16. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.92 · 22.3% (7,888 of 35,386 decks)
  17. Life from the Loam relevance 0.88 · 21.9% (7,744 of 35,386 decks)
  18. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.87 · 28.0% (9,919 of 35,386 decks)
  19. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.87 · 22.6% (7,997 of 35,386 decks)
  20. Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.86 · 17.4% (6,155 of 35,386 decks)
  21. Tiller Engine relevance 0.83 · 15.4% (5,432 of 35,386 decks)
  22. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.77 · 17.6% (6,219 of 35,386 decks)
  23. Famished Worldsire relevance 0.76 · 14.4% (5,103 of 35,386 decks)
  24. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.75 · 19.8% (7,021 of 35,386 decks)
  25. Expedition Map relevance 0.74 · 20.1% (7,125 of 35,386 decks)
  26. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.73 · 20.9% (7,400 of 35,386 decks)
  27. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.73 · 17.5% (6,183 of 35,386 decks)
  28. Scute Swarm relevance 0.72 · 22.2% (7,853 of 35,386 decks)
  29. Burgeoning relevance 0.72 · 17.2% (6,076 of 35,386 decks)
  30. Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.71 · 18.3% (6,485 of 35,386 decks)

Creatures

19

Showing 1-10 of 19

Page size
  • Aftermath Analyst
    1.37 35.7%
    $0.78 €1.25
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.31 36.6%
    $21.84 €23.44
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.25 31.2%
    $6.61 €6.67
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.20 35.0%
    $5.61 €6.44
  • Elvish Reclaimer
    1.15 23.4%
    $5.11 €5.47
  • Six
    1.13 29.0%
    $5.27 €4.95
  • Springheart Nantuko
    0.94 23.7%
    $6.59 €4.44
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.93 26.2%
    $12.94 €8.93
  • Horizon Explorer
    0.92 20.6%
    $2.04 €3.18
  • Tireless Provisioner
    0.87 28.0%
    $4.19 €3.03
All creatures (19)
  1. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.37 · 35.7% (12,629 of 35,386 decks)
  2. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.31 · 36.6% (12,938 of 35,386 decks)
  3. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.25 · 31.2% (11,051 of 35,386 decks)
  4. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.20 · 35.0% (12,385 of 35,386 decks)
  5. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.15 · 23.4% (8,270 of 35,386 decks)
  6. Six relevance 1.13 · 29.0% (10,278 of 35,386 decks)
  7. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.94 · 23.7% (8,401 of 35,386 decks)
  8. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.93 · 26.2% (9,264 of 35,386 decks)
  9. Horizon Explorer relevance 0.92 · 20.6% (7,275 of 35,386 decks)
  10. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.87 · 28.0% (9,919 of 35,386 decks)
  11. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.87 · 22.6% (7,997 of 35,386 decks)
  12. Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.86 · 17.4% (6,155 of 35,386 decks)
  13. Tiller Engine relevance 0.83 · 15.4% (5,432 of 35,386 decks)
  14. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.77 · 17.6% (6,219 of 35,386 decks)
  15. Famished Worldsire relevance 0.76 · 14.4% (5,103 of 35,386 decks)
  16. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.75 · 19.8% (7,021 of 35,386 decks)
  17. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.73 · 20.9% (7,400 of 35,386 decks)
  18. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.73 · 17.5% (6,183 of 35,386 decks)
  19. Scute Swarm relevance 0.72 · 22.2% (7,853 of 35,386 decks)

Artifacts

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Zuran Orb
    1.29 31.2%
    $3.51 €1.80
  • Amulet of Vigor
    1.02 22.9%
    $50.54 €33.91
  • Expedition Map
    0.74 20.1%
    $1.37 €1.34
All artifacts (3)
  1. Zuran Orb relevance 1.29 · 31.2% (11,033 of 35,386 decks)
  2. Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.02 · 22.9% (8,092 of 35,386 decks)
  3. Expedition Map relevance 0.74 · 20.1% (7,125 of 35,386 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Spelunking
    1.30 31.6%
    $3.57 €3.20
  • Exploration
    1.08 31.1%
    $30.16 €26.59
  • Burgeoning
    0.72 17.2%
    $34.04 €25.64
All enchantments (3)
  1. Spelunking relevance 1.30 · 31.6% (11,171 of 35,386 decks)
  2. Exploration relevance 1.08 · 31.1% (11,001 of 35,386 decks)
  3. Burgeoning relevance 0.72 · 17.2% (6,076 of 35,386 decks)

Instants

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    1.31 41.9%
    $3.91 €3.60
  • Archdruid's Charm
    0.71 18.3%
    $7.87 €6.17
All instants (2)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 1.31 · 41.9% (14,821 of 35,386 decks)
  2. Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.71 · 18.3% (6,485 of 35,386 decks)

Sorceries

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Scapeshift
    1.12 24.7%
    $41.48 €32.65
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.92 22.3%
    $0.33 €0.76
  • Life from the Loam
    0.88 21.9%
    $5.35 €5.14
All sorceries (3)
  1. Scapeshift relevance 1.12 · 24.7% (8,727 of 35,386 decks)
  2. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.92 · 22.3% (7,888 of 35,386 decks)
  3. Life from the Loam relevance 0.88 · 21.9% (7,744 of 35,386 decks)

Utility Lands

13

Showing 1-10 of 13

Page size
  • Urza's Cave
    1.58 43.1%
    $2.52 €1.28
  • Thespian's Stage
    1.43 36.7%
    $0.46 €0.68
  • Field of the Dead
    1.21 32.0%
    $28.53 €26.97
  • Shifting Woodland
    1.20 34.6%
    $7.33 €5.34
  • Talon Gates of Madara
    1.03 27.1%
    $41.42 €99.29
  • Mirrorpool
    1.01 19.5%
    $2.84 €2.09
  • Horizon of Progress
    0.95 20.8%
    $7.04 €5.52
  • Strip Mine
    0.92 24.3%
    $10.71 €5.96
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.83 32.5%
    $17.18 €13.09
  • Pit of Offerings
    0.80 14.5%
    $0.38 €0.20
All utility lands (13)
  1. Urza's Cave relevance 1.58 · 43.1% (15,265 of 35,386 decks)
  2. Thespian's Stage relevance 1.43 · 36.7% (12,981 of 35,386 decks)
  3. Field of the Dead relevance 1.21 · 32.0% (11,333 of 35,386 decks)
  4. Shifting Woodland relevance 1.20 · 34.6% (12,227 of 35,386 decks)
  5. Talon Gates of Madara relevance 1.03 · 27.1% (9,586 of 35,386 decks)
  6. Mirrorpool relevance 1.01 · 19.5% (6,912 of 35,386 decks)
  7. Horizon of Progress relevance 0.95 · 20.8% (7,352 of 35,386 decks)
  8. Strip Mine relevance 0.92 · 24.3% (8,590 of 35,386 decks)
  9. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.83 · 32.5% (11,514 of 35,386 decks)
  10. Pit of Offerings relevance 0.80 · 14.5% (5,115 of 35,386 decks)
  11. Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.79 · 31.7% (11,200 of 35,386 decks)
  12. Arid Archway relevance 0.74 · 15.7% (5,551 of 35,386 decks)
  13. Wasteland relevance 0.71 · 16.0% (5,668 of 35,386 decks)

Lands

7

Showing 1-7 of 7

Page size
  • Vesuva
    1.75 41.6%
    $3.79 €3.08
  • Lotus Field
    1.31 32.1%
    $2.55 €2.57
  • Dark Depths
    0.94 20.2%
    $3.04 €2.62
  • Snow-Covered Forest
    0.76 18.3%
    $0.91 €0.61
  • Crumbling Vestige
    0.75 11.7%
    $0.20 €0.24
  • Hickory Woodlot
    0.73 12.3%
    $4.65 €3.83
  • Havenwood Battleground
    0.71 11.1%
    $0.44 €0.19
All lands (7)
  1. Vesuva relevance 1.75 · 41.6% (14,704 of 35,386 decks)
  2. Lotus Field relevance 1.31 · 32.1% (11,342 of 35,386 decks)
  3. Dark Depths relevance 0.94 · 20.2% (7,132 of 35,386 decks)
  4. Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.76 · 18.3% (6,493 of 35,386 decks)
  5. Crumbling Vestige relevance 0.75 · 11.7% (4,138 of 35,386 decks)
  6. Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.73 · 12.3% (4,354 of 35,386 decks)
  7. Havenwood Battleground relevance 0.71 · 11.1% (3,923 of 35,386 decks)

EDH data for Echoing Deeps: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 35,386 real decks.