Horizon of Progress

Played in 59,889 decks

Horizon of Progress
$7.02 €5.52

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 4.71 · 61.4% (4,203 of 6,848 decks)
  2. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 4.42 · 45.0% (2,725 of 6,052 decks)
  3. Sahir, Visitor in Darkness relevance 3.94 · 34.1% (120 of 352 decks)
  4. Ryan Sinclair // The Second Doctor relevance 3.45 · 64.0% (48 of 75 decks)
  5. Rowan, Scion of War relevance 3.25 · 10.7% (554 of 5,154 decks)
  6. Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 3.20 · 13.5% (574 of 4,257 decks)
  7. Clara Oswald // The Second Doctor relevance 3.07 · 31.8% (104 of 327 decks)
  8. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 2.98 · 11.4% (1,318 of 11,537 decks)
  9. Zell Dincht relevance 2.81 · 16.3% (81 of 498 decks)
  10. Jazal Goldmane relevance 2.78 · 35.8% (48 of 134 decks)
  11. Gandalf, Shadow's Foe relevance 2.67 · 25.2% (102 of 404 decks)
  12. Betor, Ancestor's Voice relevance 2.65 · 15.7% (2,093 of 13,307 decks)
  13. Nissa, Leyline Tamer relevance 2.63 · 15.3% (390 of 2,548 decks)
  14. Donna Noble // The Second Doctor relevance 2.50 · 18.0% (45 of 250 decks)
  15. The Necrobloom relevance 2.46 · 14.4% (1,612 of 11,211 decks)
  16. Tameshi, Reality Architect relevance 2.43 · 10.8% (183 of 1,689 decks)
  17. Noble Heritage // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 2.32 · 8.4% (64 of 760 decks)
  18. The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.30 · 3.6% (190 of 5,311 decks)
  19. Mister Negative relevance 2.29 · 6.5% (234 of 3,618 decks)
  20. Dakkon Blackblade relevance 2.22 · 12.6% (112 of 887 decks)
  21. Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 2.21 · 8.6% (48 of 555 decks)
  22. Genku, Future Shaper relevance 2.16 · 12.4% (82 of 663 decks)
  23. Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 2.16 · 6.0% (351 of 5,817 decks)
  24. Zirda, the Dawnwaker relevance 2.16 · 6.5% (104 of 1,601 decks)
  25. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 2.15 · 6.2% (321 of 5,171 decks)
  26. Sin, Spira's Punishment relevance 2.14 · 8.0% (268 of 3,335 decks)
  27. Avatar Roku, Firebender relevance 2.14 · 6.4% (93 of 1,455 decks)
  28. Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 2.13 · 8.5% (230 of 2,719 decks)
  29. Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 2.06 · 4.1% (86 of 2,079 decks)
  30. Uyo, Silent Prophet relevance 2.01 · 29.3% (27 of 92 decks)

Parallel Cards

30

Most Relevant

19

Showing 1-10 of 19

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    0.71 22.7%
    $3.86 €3.64
  • Icetill Explorer
    0.68 19.0%
    $19.93 €23.55
  • Aftermath Analyst
    0.64 16.6%
    $0.82 €1.30
  • Exploration
    0.64 18.3%
    $30.00 €26.36
  • Lotus Cobra
    0.61 17.8%
    $5.60 €6.37
  • Spelunking
    0.61 14.7%
    $3.55 €3.15
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    0.60 15.0%
    $5.83 €6.62
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    0.58 16.6%
    $9.84 €6.73
  • Expedition Map
    0.58 15.6%
    $1.30 €1.32
  • Elvish Reclaimer
    0.56 11.5%
    $5.23 €5.55
All most relevant (19)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 0.71 · 22.7% (13,621 of 59,889 decks)
  2. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.68 · 19.0% (11,374 of 59,889 decks)
  3. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.64 · 16.6% (9,968 of 59,889 decks)
  4. Exploration relevance 0.64 · 18.3% (10,976 of 59,889 decks)
  5. Lotus Cobra relevance 0.61 · 17.8% (10,657 of 59,889 decks)
  6. Spelunking relevance 0.61 · 14.7% (8,807 of 59,889 decks)
  7. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.60 · 15.0% (9,009 of 59,889 decks)
  8. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.58 · 16.6% (9,927 of 59,889 decks)
  9. Expedition Map relevance 0.58 · 15.6% (9,361 of 59,889 decks)
  10. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.56 · 11.5% (6,859 of 59,889 decks)
  11. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.55 · 13.8% (8,237 of 59,889 decks)
  12. Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.53 · 11.7% (7,016 of 59,889 decks)
  13. Six relevance 0.53 · 13.6% (8,159 of 59,889 decks)
  14. Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.53 · 10.7% (6,418 of 59,889 decks)
  15. Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.52 · 11.7% (7,012 of 59,889 decks)
  16. Scapeshift relevance 0.52 · 11.5% (6,891 of 59,889 decks)
  17. Zuran Orb relevance 0.51 · 12.2% (7,308 of 59,889 decks)
  18. Scute Swarm relevance 0.50 · 15.5% (9,282 of 59,889 decks)
  19. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.48 · 12.6% (7,528 of 59,889 decks)

Creatures

11

Showing 1-10 of 11

Page size
  • Icetill Explorer
    0.68 19.0%
    $19.93 €23.55
  • Aftermath Analyst
    0.64 16.6%
    $0.82 €1.30
  • Lotus Cobra
    0.61 17.8%
    $5.60 €6.37
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    0.60 15.0%
    $5.83 €6.62
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    0.58 16.6%
    $9.84 €6.73
  • Elvish Reclaimer
    0.56 11.5%
    $5.23 €5.55
  • Springheart Nantuko
    0.55 13.8%
    $6.18 €4.28
  • Six
    0.53 13.6%
    $5.07 €4.92
  • Nissa, Resurgent Animist
    0.53 10.7%
    $21.65 €22.86
  • Scute Swarm
    0.50 15.5%
    $9.06 €7.90
All creatures (11)
  1. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.68 · 19.0% (11,374 of 59,889 decks)
  2. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.64 · 16.6% (9,968 of 59,889 decks)
  3. Lotus Cobra relevance 0.61 · 17.8% (10,657 of 59,889 decks)
  4. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.60 · 15.0% (9,009 of 59,889 decks)
  5. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.58 · 16.6% (9,927 of 59,889 decks)
  6. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.56 · 11.5% (6,859 of 59,889 decks)
  7. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.55 · 13.8% (8,237 of 59,889 decks)
  8. Six relevance 0.53 · 13.6% (8,159 of 59,889 decks)
  9. Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.53 · 10.7% (6,418 of 59,889 decks)
  10. Scute Swarm relevance 0.50 · 15.5% (9,282 of 59,889 decks)
  11. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.48 · 12.6% (7,528 of 59,889 decks)

Artifacts

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Expedition Map
    0.58 15.6%
    $1.30 €1.32
  • Amulet of Vigor
    0.52 11.7%
    $50.58 €33.45
  • Zuran Orb
    0.51 12.2%
    $2.96 €1.84
All artifacts (3)
  1. Expedition Map relevance 0.58 · 15.6% (9,361 of 59,889 decks)
  2. Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.52 · 11.7% (7,012 of 59,889 decks)
  3. Zuran Orb relevance 0.51 · 12.2% (7,308 of 59,889 decks)

Enchantments

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Exploration
    0.64 18.3%
    $30.00 €26.36
  • Spelunking
    0.61 14.7%
    $3.55 €3.15
All enchantments (2)
  1. Exploration relevance 0.64 · 18.3% (10,976 of 59,889 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 0.61 · 14.7% (8,807 of 59,889 decks)

Instants

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    0.71 22.7%
    $3.86 €3.64
All instants (1)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 0.71 · 22.7% (13,621 of 59,889 decks)

Sorceries

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Sylvan Scrying
    0.53 11.7%
    $0.28 €0.22
  • Scapeshift
    0.52 11.5%
    $41.94 €33.47
All sorceries (2)
  1. Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.53 · 11.7% (7,016 of 59,889 decks)
  2. Scapeshift relevance 0.52 · 11.5% (6,891 of 59,889 decks)

Utility Lands

13

Showing 1-10 of 13

Page size
  • Talon Gates of Madara
    1.25 33.1%
    $41.02 €99.29
  • Urza's Cave
    1.00 27.3%
    $2.15 €1.27
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.75 29.5%
    $17.31 €12.76
  • Thespian's Stage
    0.73 18.7%
    $0.46 €0.66
  • Lazotep Quarry
    0.69 14.6%
    $2.76
  • Shifting Woodland
    0.67 19.3%
    $6.65 €5.25
  • Field of the Dead
    0.67 17.7%
    $27.75 €27.07
  • Boseiju, Who Endures
    0.65 26.0%
    $48.20 €39.84
  • Strip Mine
    0.49 13.0%
    $10.87 €5.96
  • Basilisk Gate
    0.48 8.9%
    $0.35 €0.51
All utility lands (13)
  1. Talon Gates of Madara relevance 1.25 · 33.1% (19,851 of 59,889 decks)
  2. Urza's Cave relevance 1.00 · 27.3% (16,328 of 59,889 decks)
  3. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.75 · 29.5% (17,654 of 59,889 decks)
  4. Thespian's Stage relevance 0.73 · 18.7% (11,182 of 59,889 decks)
  5. Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.69 · 14.6% (8,757 of 59,889 decks)
  6. Shifting Woodland relevance 0.67 · 19.3% (11,579 of 59,889 decks)
  7. Field of the Dead relevance 0.67 · 17.7% (10,620 of 59,889 decks)
  8. Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.65 · 26.0% (15,553 of 59,889 decks)
  9. Strip Mine relevance 0.49 · 13.0% (7,810 of 59,889 decks)
  10. Basilisk Gate relevance 0.48 · 8.9% (5,324 of 59,889 decks)
  11. Urza's Saga relevance 0.48 · 17.7% (10,605 of 59,889 decks)
  12. Mirrorpool relevance 0.47 · 9.0% (5,399 of 59,889 decks)
  13. Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.46 · 17.8% (10,688 of 59,889 decks)

Lands

18

Showing 1-10 of 18

Page size
  • Vesuva
    0.95 22.7%
    $3.64 €3.14
  • Verdant Catacombs
    0.65 28.3%
    $29.63 €24.58
  • Windswept Heath
    0.65 28.4%
    $12.29 €10.69
  • Misty Rainforest
    0.64 28.1%
    $36.53 €25.92
  • Echoing Deeps
    0.62 12.2%
    $0.87 €0.44
  • Lotus Field
    0.61 14.9%
    $2.50 €2.52
  • Dark Depths
    0.60 12.8%
    $3.04 €2.60
  • Planar Nexus
    0.57 10.9%
    $9.35 €7.85
  • Wooded Foothills
    0.56 24.4%
    $17.82 €16.59
  • Prismatic Vista
    0.55 17.9%
    $30.75 €32.59
All lands (18)
  1. Vesuva relevance 0.95 · 22.7% (13,612 of 59,889 decks)
  2. Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.65 · 28.3% (16,943 of 59,889 decks)
  3. Windswept Heath relevance 0.65 · 28.4% (17,025 of 59,889 decks)
  4. Misty Rainforest relevance 0.64 · 28.1% (16,828 of 59,889 decks)
  5. Echoing Deeps relevance 0.62 · 12.2% (7,302 of 59,889 decks)
  6. Lotus Field relevance 0.61 · 14.9% (8,942 of 59,889 decks)
  7. Dark Depths relevance 0.60 · 12.8% (7,643 of 59,889 decks)
  8. Planar Nexus relevance 0.57 · 10.9% (6,553 of 59,889 decks)
  9. Wooded Foothills relevance 0.56 · 24.4% (14,611 of 59,889 decks)
  10. Prismatic Vista relevance 0.55 · 17.9% (10,743 of 59,889 decks)
  11. City of Brass relevance 0.55 · 22.1% (13,242 of 59,889 decks)
  12. Mana Confluence relevance 0.50 · 19.0% (11,392 of 59,889 decks)
  13. Fabled Passage relevance 0.50 · 23.7% (14,201 of 59,889 decks)
  14. Polluted Delta relevance 0.49 · 22.7% (13,588 of 59,889 decks)
  15. Marsh Flats relevance 0.48 · 20.7% (12,375 of 59,889 decks)
  16. Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.48 · 21.4% (12,790 of 59,889 decks)
  17. Cloudpost relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (4,695 of 59,889 decks)
  18. Flooded Strand relevance 0.47 · 20.9% (12,511 of 59,889 decks)

EDH data for Horizon of Progress: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 59,889 real decks.