Glacial Chasm

Played in 39,757 decks

Glacial Chasm
$17.47 €16.54

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Heartless Hidetsugu relevance 4.57 · 37.3% (366 of 982 decks)
  2. The Gitrog Monster relevance 4.27 · 18.0% (960 of 5,328 decks)
  3. The Necrobloom relevance 3.53 · 24.5% (2,749 of 11,242 decks)
  4. Zedruu the Greathearted relevance 3.48 · 5.6% (350 of 6,257 decks)
  5. Angus Mackenzie relevance 3.46 · 15.5% (132 of 851 decks)
  6. Selenia, Dark Angel relevance 3.43 · 16.5% (71 of 430 decks)
  7. Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 3.33 · 23.9% (174 of 729 decks)
  8. Piru, the Volatile relevance 3.28 · 6.7% (71 of 1,063 decks)
  9. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 3.16 · 28.9% (365 of 1,265 decks)
  10. Chisei, Heart of Oceans relevance 2.87 · 23.7% (45 of 190 decks)
  11. Jazal Goldmane relevance 2.87 · 25.7% (35 of 136 decks)
  12. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 2.84 · 5.9% (213 of 3,613 decks)
  13. Patron of the Moon relevance 2.84 · 12.6% (87 of 691 decks)
  14. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.81 · 16.8% (587 of 3,504 decks)
  15. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.80 · 19.4% (4,870 of 25,075 decks)
  16. Flubs, the Fool relevance 2.74 · 4.2% (489 of 11,541 decks)
  17. Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 2.68 · 35.5% (11 of 31 decks)
  18. Maralen of the Mornsong relevance 2.67 · 8.7% (107 of 1,229 decks)
  19. Varragoth, Bloodsky Sire relevance 2.67 · 8.8% (106 of 1,210 decks)
  20. Lord Windgrace relevance 2.67 · 26.0% (1,209 of 4,646 decks)
  21. Zo-Zu the Punisher relevance 2.63 · 10.0% (136 of 1,366 decks)
  22. Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 2.60 · 16.5% (142 of 862 decks)
  23. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 2.59 · 7.3% (381 of 5,195 decks)
  24. Kura, the Boundless Sky relevance 2.58 · 29.6% (120 of 406 decks)
  25. Borborygmos Enraged relevance 2.58 · 11.3% (154 of 1,368 decks)
  26. Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 2.52 · 10.0% (316 of 3,150 decks)
  27. Child of Alara relevance 2.52 · 4.6% (266 of 5,773 decks)
  28. Ashling the Pilgrim relevance 2.38 · 9.0% (99 of 1,095 decks)
  29. Stiltzkin, Moogle Merchant relevance 2.37 · 7.0% (67 of 963 decks)
  30. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 2.27 · 3.1% (360 of 11,566 decks)

Parallel Cards

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
All parallel cards (1)
  1. Halls of Mist

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    1.68 53.9%
    $3.89 €3.57
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.59 44.3%
    $22.14 €23.31
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.51 37.9%
    $6.38 €6.51
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.51 42.5%
    $12.74 €9.12
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.46 42.5%
    $5.58 €6.55
  • Zuran Orb
    1.46 35.3%
    $3.27 €1.81
  • Exploration
    1.45 41.8%
    $30.48 €26.52
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.43 37.2%
    $4.81 €3.72
  • Crucible of Worlds
    1.39 35.5%
    $32.55 €20.90
  • The Gitrog Monster
    1.37 33.0%
    $0.47 €1.03
All most relevant (30)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 1.68 · 53.9% (21,422 of 39,757 decks)
  2. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.59 · 44.3% (17,616 of 39,757 decks)
  3. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.51 · 37.9% (15,054 of 39,757 decks)
  4. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.51 · 42.5% (16,888 of 39,757 decks)
  5. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.46 · 42.5% (16,909 of 39,757 decks)
  6. Zuran Orb relevance 1.46 · 35.3% (14,018 of 39,757 decks)
  7. Exploration relevance 1.45 · 41.8% (16,604 of 39,757 decks)
  8. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.43 · 37.2% (14,805 of 39,757 decks)
  9. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.39 · 35.5% (14,101 of 39,757 decks)
  10. The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.37 · 33.0% (13,122 of 39,757 decks)
  11. Scapeshift relevance 1.35 · 29.8% (11,838 of 39,757 decks)
  12. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.34 · 35.2% (13,980 of 39,757 decks)
  13. Life from the Loam relevance 1.32 · 33.0% (13,112 of 39,757 decks)
  14. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.28 · 31.0% (12,337 of 39,757 decks)
  15. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.18 · 31.5% (12,528 of 39,757 decks)
  16. Six relevance 1.18 · 30.1% (11,971 of 39,757 decks)
  17. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.18 · 33.6% (13,359 of 39,757 decks)
  18. Scute Swarm relevance 1.13 · 34.8% (13,832 of 39,757 decks)
  19. Constant Mists relevance 1.13 · 22.2% (8,840 of 39,757 decks)
  20. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.12 · 36.0% (14,305 of 39,757 decks)
  21. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.11 · 22.6% (8,983 of 39,757 decks)
  22. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.10 · 27.0% (10,751 of 39,757 decks)
  23. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.09 · 24.8% (9,867 of 39,757 decks)
  24. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.05 · 27.2% (10,802 of 39,757 decks)
  25. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.01 · 23.0% (9,142 of 39,757 decks)
  26. Spelunking relevance 0.96 · 23.2% (9,238 of 39,757 decks)
  27. Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.94 · 21.0% (8,338 of 39,757 decks)
  28. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.90 · 22.6% (8,992 of 39,757 decks)
  29. Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.88 · 17.5% (6,965 of 39,757 decks)
  30. Squandered Resources relevance 0.86 · 14.7% (5,827 of 39,757 decks)

Creatures

18

Showing 1-10 of 18

Page size
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.59 44.3%
    $22.14 €23.31
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.51 37.9%
    $6.38 €6.51
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.51 42.5%
    $12.74 €9.12
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.46 42.5%
    $5.58 €6.55
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.43 37.2%
    $4.81 €3.72
  • The Gitrog Monster
    1.37 33.0%
    $0.47 €1.03
  • Aftermath Analyst
    1.34 35.2%
    $0.77 €1.28
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.18 31.5%
    $2.02 €2.75
  • Six
    1.18 30.1%
    $5.00 €4.86
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.18 33.6%
    $9.88 €6.54
All creatures (18)
  1. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.59 · 44.3% (17,616 of 39,757 decks)
  2. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.51 · 37.9% (15,054 of 39,757 decks)
  3. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.51 · 42.5% (16,888 of 39,757 decks)
  4. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.46 · 42.5% (16,909 of 39,757 decks)
  5. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.43 · 37.2% (14,805 of 39,757 decks)
  6. The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.37 · 33.0% (13,122 of 39,757 decks)
  7. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.34 · 35.2% (13,980 of 39,757 decks)
  8. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.18 · 31.5% (12,528 of 39,757 decks)
  9. Six relevance 1.18 · 30.1% (11,971 of 39,757 decks)
  10. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.18 · 33.6% (13,359 of 39,757 decks)
  11. Scute Swarm relevance 1.13 · 34.8% (13,832 of 39,757 decks)
  12. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.12 · 36.0% (14,305 of 39,757 decks)
  13. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.11 · 22.6% (8,983 of 39,757 decks)
  14. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.10 · 27.0% (10,751 of 39,757 decks)
  15. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.09 · 24.8% (9,867 of 39,757 decks)
  16. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.01 · 23.0% (9,142 of 39,757 decks)
  17. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.90 · 22.6% (8,992 of 39,757 decks)
  18. Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.79 · 15.9% (6,319 of 39,757 decks)

Artifacts

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Zuran Orb
    1.46 35.3%
    $3.27 €1.81
  • Crucible of Worlds
    1.39 35.5%
    $32.55 €20.90
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.05 27.2%
    $1.13 €1.46
  • Amulet of Vigor
    0.94 21.0%
    $50.54 €33.60
  • Exploration Broodship
    0.79 18.1%
    $2.91 €3.31
All artifacts (5)
  1. Zuran Orb relevance 1.46 · 35.3% (14,018 of 39,757 decks)
  2. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.39 · 35.5% (14,101 of 39,757 decks)
  3. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.05 · 27.2% (10,802 of 39,757 decks)
  4. Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.94 · 21.0% (8,338 of 39,757 decks)
  5. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.79 · 18.1% (7,189 of 39,757 decks)

Enchantments

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Exploration
    1.45 41.8%
    $30.48 €26.52
  • Spelunking
    0.96 23.2%
    $3.51 €3.11
  • Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar
    0.88 17.5%
    $7.05 €6.43
  • Squandered Resources
    0.86 14.7%
    $83.00 €56.96
  • Burgeoning
    0.79 19.0%
    $34.10 €25.64
All enchantments (5)
  1. Exploration relevance 1.45 · 41.8% (16,604 of 39,757 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 0.96 · 23.2% (9,238 of 39,757 decks)
  3. Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.88 · 17.5% (6,965 of 39,757 decks)
  4. Squandered Resources relevance 0.86 · 14.7% (5,827 of 39,757 decks)
  5. Burgeoning relevance 0.79 · 19.0% (7,554 of 39,757 decks)

Instants

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    1.68 53.9%
    $3.89 €3.57
  • Constant Mists
    1.13 22.2%
    $20.36 €14.65
  • Harrow
    0.83 25.3%
    $0.36 €0.27
  • Realms Uncharted
    0.79 13.8%
    $9.73 €10.08
All instants (4)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 1.68 · 53.9% (21,422 of 39,757 decks)
  2. Constant Mists relevance 1.13 · 22.2% (8,840 of 39,757 decks)
  3. Harrow relevance 0.83 · 25.3% (10,064 of 39,757 decks)
  4. Realms Uncharted relevance 0.79 · 13.8% (5,479 of 39,757 decks)

Sorceries

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Scapeshift
    1.35 29.8%
    $41.50 €33.73
  • Life from the Loam
    1.32 33.0%
    $5.14 €4.96
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.28 31.0%
    $0.33 €0.77
All sorceries (3)
  1. Scapeshift relevance 1.35 · 29.8% (11,838 of 39,757 decks)
  2. Life from the Loam relevance 1.32 · 33.0% (13,112 of 39,757 decks)
  3. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.28 · 31.0% (12,337 of 39,757 decks)

Utility Lands

8

Showing 1-8 of 8

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    1.66 44.0%
    $28.53 €27.22
  • Strip Mine
    1.41 37.5%
    $10.71 €5.96
  • Shifting Woodland
    1.10 31.7%
    $6.96 €5.29
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    1.01 39.8%
    $17.19 €12.85
  • Boseiju, Who Endures
    0.95 37.9%
    $48.70 €40.11
  • Thespian's Stage
    0.93 23.9%
    $0.46 €0.70
  • Urza's Cave
    0.87 23.8%
    $2.46 €1.26
  • Wasteland
    0.77 17.4%
    $26.21 €22.43
All utility lands (8)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 1.66 · 44.0% (17,498 of 39,757 decks)
  2. Strip Mine relevance 1.41 · 37.5% (14,903 of 39,757 decks)
  3. Shifting Woodland relevance 1.10 · 31.7% (12,597 of 39,757 decks)
  4. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 1.01 · 39.8% (15,805 of 39,757 decks)
  5. Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.95 · 37.9% (15,072 of 39,757 decks)
  6. Thespian's Stage relevance 0.93 · 23.9% (9,512 of 39,757 decks)
  7. Urza's Cave relevance 0.87 · 23.8% (9,456 of 39,757 decks)
  8. Wasteland relevance 0.77 · 17.4% (6,899 of 39,757 decks)

Lands

7

Showing 1-7 of 7

Page size
  • Lotus Field
    1.03 25.2%
    $2.61 €2.52
  • Verdant Catacombs
    0.97 42.4%
    $29.61 €24.52
  • Vesuva
    0.88 20.9%
    $3.79 €3.14
  • Overgrown Tomb
    0.87 36.5%
    $8.43 €8.31
  • Dark Depths
    0.86 18.4%
    $3.04 €2.53
  • Snow-Covered Forest
    0.80 19.3%
    $0.91 €0.58
  • Wooded Foothills
    0.80 34.7%
    $17.87 €16.71
All lands (7)
  1. Lotus Field relevance 1.03 · 25.2% (10,038 of 39,757 decks)
  2. Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.97 · 42.4% (16,873 of 39,757 decks)
  3. Vesuva relevance 0.88 · 20.9% (8,312 of 39,757 decks)
  4. Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.87 · 36.5% (14,510 of 39,757 decks)
  5. Dark Depths relevance 0.86 · 18.4% (7,327 of 39,757 decks)
  6. Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.80 · 19.3% (7,689 of 39,757 decks)
  7. Wooded Foothills relevance 0.80 · 34.7% (13,791 of 39,757 decks)

EDH data for Glacial Chasm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 39,757 real decks.