Planar Engineering

Played in 49,290 decks

Planar Engineering
$1.25 €1.03

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Homer, the Hermit relevance 3.92 · 34.4% (1,541 of 4,483 decks)
  2. Tifa Lockhart relevance 2.91 · 32.0% (3,102 of 9,705 decks)
  3. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 2.86 · 19.9% (1,029 of 5,171 decks)
  4. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.82 · 18.6% (4,660 of 25,006 decks)
  5. Quandrix, the Proof relevance 2.80 · 19.5% (1,197 of 6,137 decks)
  6. Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 2.78 · 9.7% (2,530 of 26,163 decks)
  7. The Necrobloom relevance 2.67 · 7.9% (886 of 11,211 decks)
  8. Choco, Seeker of Paradise relevance 2.56 · 4.6% (493 of 10,721 decks)
  9. Sin, Spira's Punishment relevance 2.45 · 15.2% (507 of 3,335 decks)
  10. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 2.33 · 15.0% (597 of 3,983 decks)
  11. Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 2.28 · 14.2% (603 of 4,257 decks)
  12. Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 2.27 · 10.3% (61 of 594 decks)
  13. The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.27 · 8.5% (449 of 5,311 decks)
  14. Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 2.24 · 45.2% (207 of 458 decks)
  15. Susan Foreman // The Tenth Doctor relevance 2.23 · 14.1% (82 of 583 decks)
  16. Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 2.16 · 24.1% (905 of 3,755 decks)
  17. Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 2.16 · 19.7% (192 of 976 decks)
  18. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 2.14 · 8.6% (165 of 1,928 decks)
  19. Bugenhagen, Wise Elder relevance 2.11 · 39.6% (200 of 505 decks)
  20. Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 2.08 · 17.2% (261 of 1,516 decks)
  21. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 2.08 · 9.7% (349 of 3,608 decks)
  22. Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 2.05 · 9.4% (195 of 2,079 decks)
  23. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.05 · 9.2% (799 of 8,721 decks)
  24. Thranduil the Strategist relevance 2.02 · 17.7% (205 of 1,155 decks)
  25. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 1.96 · 2.1% (247 of 11,537 decks)
  26. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.96 · 9.9% (890 of 8,978 decks)
  27. Ruby, Daring Tracker relevance 1.95 · 12.8% (312 of 2,435 decks)
  28. Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.92 · 5.4% (316 of 5,842 decks)
  29. Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 1.89 · 13.5% (765 of 5,665 decks)
  30. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.85 · 10.7% (490 of 4,588 decks)

Parallel Cards

30

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Harrow
    1.56 47.4%
    $0.31 €0.27
  • Scute Swarm
    1.26 38.7%
    $9.00 €7.90
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.24 36.2%
    $5.67 €6.55
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.21 34.0%
    $13.01 €9.12
  • Entish Restoration
    1.18 31.5%
    $2.88 €1.81
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.18 32.9%
    $19.58 €23.31
  • Roiling Regrowth
    1.17 27.3%
    $0.26 €0.30
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.13 27.7%
    $12.51 €10.39
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.13 31.3%
    $0.39 €0.35
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.10 29.3%
    $2.01 €2.75
All most relevant (30)
  1. Harrow relevance 1.56 · 47.4% (23,342 of 49,290 decks)
  2. Scute Swarm relevance 1.26 · 38.7% (19,080 of 49,290 decks)
  3. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.24 · 36.2% (17,819 of 49,290 decks)
  4. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.21 · 34.0% (16,763 of 49,290 decks)
  5. Entish Restoration relevance 1.18 · 31.5% (15,525 of 49,290 decks)
  6. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.18 · 32.9% (16,207 of 49,290 decks)
  7. Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.17 · 27.3% (13,442 of 49,290 decks)
  8. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.13 · 27.7% (13,656 of 49,290 decks)
  9. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.13 · 31.3% (15,430 of 49,290 decks)
  10. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.10 · 29.3% (14,434 of 49,290 decks)
  11. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.09 · 26.5% (13,040 of 49,290 decks)
  12. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.08 · 34.6% (17,045 of 49,290 decks)
  13. Crop Rotation relevance 1.05 · 33.7% (16,598 of 49,290 decks)
  14. Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.04 · 25.5% (12,585 of 49,290 decks)
  15. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.99 · 25.7% (12,659 of 49,290 decks)
  16. Zuran Orb relevance 0.95 · 22.8% (11,246 of 49,290 decks)
  17. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.93 · 23.9% (11,782 of 49,290 decks)
  18. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.92 · 22.9% (11,283 of 49,290 decks)
  19. Cultivate relevance 0.89 · 50.8% (25,024 of 49,290 decks)
  20. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.88 · 22.0% (10,824 of 49,290 decks)
  21. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.87 · 22.6% (11,156 of 49,290 decks)
  22. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.86 · 25.4% (12,499 of 49,290 decks)
  23. Horizon Explorer relevance 0.85 · 19.0% (9,349 of 49,290 decks)
  24. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.84 · 19.1% (9,407 of 49,290 decks)
  25. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.83 · 18.9% (9,305 of 49,290 decks)
  26. Exploration relevance 0.82 · 23.6% (11,609 of 49,290 decks)
  27. Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.81 · 23.6% (11,646 of 49,290 decks)
  28. Beast Within relevance 0.81 · 40.1% (19,742 of 49,290 decks)
  29. Nature's Lore relevance 0.81 · 41.0% (20,221 of 49,290 decks)
  30. Scapeshift relevance 0.79 · 17.5% (8,637 of 49,290 decks)

Creatures

24

Showing 1-10 of 24

Page size
  • Scute Swarm
    1.26 38.7%
    $9.00 €7.90
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.24 36.2%
    $5.67 €6.55
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.21 34.0%
    $13.01 €9.12
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.18 32.9%
    $19.58 €23.31
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.13 27.7%
    $12.51 €10.39
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.13 31.3%
    $0.39 €0.35
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.10 29.3%
    $2.01 €2.75
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.08 34.6%
    $3.94 €3.03
  • Mossborn Hydra
    1.04 25.5%
    $13.47 €11.47
  • Ramunap Excavator
    0.99 25.7%
    $4.84 €3.72
All creatures (24)
  1. Scute Swarm relevance 1.26 · 38.7% (19,080 of 49,290 decks)
  2. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.24 · 36.2% (17,819 of 49,290 decks)
  3. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.21 · 34.0% (16,763 of 49,290 decks)
  4. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.18 · 32.9% (16,207 of 49,290 decks)
  5. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.13 · 27.7% (13,656 of 49,290 decks)
  6. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.13 · 31.3% (15,430 of 49,290 decks)
  7. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.10 · 29.3% (14,434 of 49,290 decks)
  8. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.08 · 34.6% (17,045 of 49,290 decks)
  9. Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.04 · 25.5% (12,585 of 49,290 decks)
  10. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.99 · 25.7% (12,659 of 49,290 decks)
  11. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.92 · 22.9% (11,283 of 49,290 decks)
  12. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.88 · 22.0% (10,824 of 49,290 decks)
  13. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.87 · 22.6% (11,156 of 49,290 decks)
  14. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.86 · 25.4% (12,499 of 49,290 decks)
  15. Horizon Explorer relevance 0.85 · 19.0% (9,349 of 49,290 decks)
  16. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.84 · 19.1% (9,407 of 49,290 decks)
  17. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.78 · 18.0% (8,880 of 49,290 decks)
  18. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.77 · 16.8% (8,264 of 49,290 decks)
  19. Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.75 · 15.9% (7,855 of 49,290 decks)
  20. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.73 · 21.0% (10,351 of 49,290 decks)
  21. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.73 · 17.5% (8,612 of 49,290 decks)
  22. Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.71 · 14.1% (6,928 of 49,290 decks)
  23. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.69 · 16.8% (8,291 of 49,290 decks)
  24. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.67 · 16.0% (7,897 of 49,290 decks)

Artifacts

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Zuran Orb
    0.95 22.8%
    $3.03 €1.81
  • Conduit of Worlds
    0.93 23.9%
    $1.13 €1.46
  • Exploration Broodship
    0.83 18.9%
    $2.93 €3.31
All artifacts (3)
  1. Zuran Orb relevance 0.95 · 22.8% (11,246 of 49,290 decks)
  2. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.93 · 23.9% (11,782 of 49,290 decks)
  3. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.83 · 18.9% (9,305 of 49,290 decks)

Enchantments

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Exploration
    0.82 23.6%
    $30.17 €26.52
  • Spelunking
    0.76 18.4%
    $3.55 €3.11
All enchantments (2)
  1. Exploration relevance 0.82 · 23.6% (11,609 of 49,290 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 0.76 · 18.4% (9,079 of 49,290 decks)

Instants

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Harrow
    1.56 47.4%
    $0.31 €0.27
  • Entish Restoration
    1.18 31.5%
    $2.88 €1.81
  • Roiling Regrowth
    1.17 27.3%
    $0.26 €0.30
  • Crop Rotation
    1.05 33.7%
    $3.90 €3.57
  • Beast Within
    0.81 40.1%
    $0.72 €0.89
  • Cycle of Renewal
    0.78 17.6%
    $0.29 €0.17
All instants (6)
  1. Harrow relevance 1.56 · 47.4% (23,342 of 49,290 decks)
  2. Entish Restoration relevance 1.18 · 31.5% (15,525 of 49,290 decks)
  3. Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.17 · 27.3% (13,442 of 49,290 decks)
  4. Crop Rotation relevance 1.05 · 33.7% (16,598 of 49,290 decks)
  5. Beast Within relevance 0.81 · 40.1% (19,742 of 49,290 decks)
  6. Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.78 · 17.6% (8,663 of 49,290 decks)

Sorceries

9

Showing 1-9 of 9

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.09 26.5%
    $0.36 €0.77
  • Cultivate
    0.89 50.8%
    $0.43 €0.50
  • Skyshroud Claim
    0.81 23.6%
    $0.95 €1.13
  • Nature's Lore
    0.81 41.0%
    $2.11 €2.78
  • Scapeshift
    0.79 17.5%
    $41.45 €33.73
  • Shared Roots
    0.73 19.1%
    $0.41 €0.74
  • Explore
    0.72 22.1%
    $0.18 €0.26
  • Rampant Growth
    0.71 34.3%
    $1.14 €0.56
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.69 29.5%
    $1.88 €1.54
All sorceries (9)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.09 · 26.5% (13,040 of 49,290 decks)
  2. Cultivate relevance 0.89 · 50.8% (25,024 of 49,290 decks)
  3. Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.81 · 23.6% (11,646 of 49,290 decks)
  4. Nature's Lore relevance 0.81 · 41.0% (20,221 of 49,290 decks)
  5. Scapeshift relevance 0.79 · 17.5% (8,637 of 49,290 decks)
  6. Shared Roots relevance 0.73 · 19.1% (9,408 of 49,290 decks)
  7. Explore relevance 0.72 · 22.1% (10,910 of 49,290 decks)
  8. Rampant Growth relevance 0.71 · 34.3% (16,902 of 49,290 decks)
  9. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.69 · 29.5% (14,534 of 49,290 decks)

Utility Lands

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Escape Tunnel
    0.68 17.5%
    $0.31 €0.12
All utility lands (1)
  1. Escape Tunnel relevance 0.68 · 17.5% (8,605 of 49,290 decks)

Lands

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Fabled Passage
    1.00 47.6%
    $0.60 €1.06
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    0.90 44.3%
    $0.28 €0.10
  • Evolving Wilds
    0.81 47.2%
    $0.28 €0.13
  • Riveteers Overlook
    0.81 20.7%
    $0.30 €0.16
  • Cabaretti Courtyard
    0.80 18.8%
    $0.31 €0.32
All lands (5)
  1. Fabled Passage relevance 1.00 · 47.6% (23,486 of 49,290 decks)
  2. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.90 · 44.3% (21,847 of 49,290 decks)
  3. Evolving Wilds relevance 0.81 · 47.2% (23,254 of 49,290 decks)
  4. Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.81 · 20.7% (10,193 of 49,290 decks)
  5. Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.80 · 18.8% (9,283 of 49,290 decks)

EDH data for Planar Engineering: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 49,290 real decks.