Map the Frontier

Played in 20,801 decks

Map the Frontier
$0.29 €0.17

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Susan Foreman // The Tenth Doctor relevance 5.03 · 65.7% (383 of 583 decks)
  2. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 4.95 · 74.9% (3,135 of 4,186 decks)
  3. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 4.78 · 72.2% (2,604 of 3,608 decks)
  4. Ruby, Daring Tracker relevance 4.72 · 61.2% (1,490 of 2,435 decks)
  5. Bugenhagen, Wise Elder relevance 4.58 · 75.0% (379 of 505 decks)
  6. Radha, Heir to Keld relevance 4.29 · 64.5% (689 of 1,069 decks)
  7. Susan Foreman // The Twelfth Doctor relevance 4.25 · 51.2% (205 of 400 decks)
  8. Kellan, Inquisitive Prodigy // Tail the Suspect relevance 3.85 · 42.3% (169 of 400 decks)
  9. Susan Foreman // The First Doctor relevance 3.66 · 31.1% (51 of 164 decks)
  10. The Fourteenth Doctor // Susan Foreman relevance 3.61 · 53.8% (64 of 119 decks)
  11. Susan Foreman // The Sixth Doctor relevance 3.60 · 68.6% (72 of 105 decks)
  12. Susan Foreman // The Second Doctor relevance 3.36 · 26.8% (41 of 153 decks)
  13. The Eighth Doctor // Susan Foreman relevance 3.21 · 56.8% (21 of 37 decks)
  14. Katilda, Dawnhart Prime relevance 2.85 · 8.9% (118 of 1,331 decks)
  15. Miriam, Herd Whisperer relevance 2.76 · 13.9% (58 of 417 decks)
  16. Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 2.69 · 11.0% (206 of 1,874 decks)
  17. Susan Foreman // The War Doctor relevance 2.48 · 49.5% (97 of 196 decks)
  18. Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 2.42 · 24.9% (316 of 1,268 decks)
  19. Susan Foreman // The Ninth Doctor relevance 2.19 · 38.3% (18 of 47 decks)
  20. Susan Foreman // The Fugitive Doctor relevance 2.02 · 88.9% (16 of 18 decks)
  21. Izoni, Center of the Web relevance 1.88 · 6.3% (18 of 284 decks)
  22. Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 1.85 · 6.2% (260 of 4,197 decks)
  23. Tifa Lockhart relevance 1.76 · 4.6% (451 of 9,705 decks)
  24. Codie, Vociferous Codex relevance 1.75 · 1.4% (78 of 5,454 decks)
  25. Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 1.60 · 2.2% (45 of 2,066 decks)
  26. Raph & Mikey, Troublemakers relevance 1.60 · 6.0% (503 of 8,451 decks)
  27. The Necrobloom relevance 1.57 · 1.1% (125 of 11,211 decks)
  28. Vial Smasher the Fierce // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 1.57 · 3.9% (15 of 389 decks)
  29. Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 1.55 · 13.9% (27 of 194 decks)
  30. Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 1.55 · 3.8% (114 of 3,034 decks)

Parallel Cards

30

Most Relevant

29

Showing 1-10 of 29

Page size
  • Dune Chanter
    1.87 30.1%
    $1.29 €0.64
  • Migration Path
    1.61 35.8%
    $0.37 €0.30
  • Circuitous Route
    1.61 32.7%
    $0.16 €0.21
  • Explosive Vegetation
    1.57 34.0%
    $0.34 €0.28
  • Vastwood Surge
    1.51 25.3%
    $0.34 €0.19
  • Desert Warfare
    1.50 22.9%
    $0.42 €0.62
  • Hour of Promise
    1.41 25.3%
    $0.34 €0.22
  • Sand Scout
    1.38 23.2%
    $5.81 €6.85
  • Ranger's Path
    1.26 21.1%
    $0.26 €0.37
  • Hunting Wilds
    1.16 17.3%
    $0.73 €0.48
All most relevant (29)
  1. Dune Chanter relevance 1.87 · 30.1% (6,252 of 20,801 decks)
  2. Migration Path relevance 1.61 · 35.8% (7,444 of 20,801 decks)
  3. Circuitous Route relevance 1.61 · 32.7% (6,802 of 20,801 decks)
  4. Explosive Vegetation relevance 1.57 · 34.0% (7,079 of 20,801 decks)
  5. Vastwood Surge relevance 1.51 · 25.3% (5,257 of 20,801 decks)
  6. Desert Warfare relevance 1.50 · 22.9% (4,763 of 20,801 decks)
  7. Hour of Promise relevance 1.41 · 25.3% (5,268 of 20,801 decks)
  8. Sand Scout relevance 1.38 · 23.2% (4,836 of 20,801 decks)
  9. Ranger's Path relevance 1.26 · 21.1% (4,380 of 20,801 decks)
  10. Hunting Wilds relevance 1.16 · 17.3% (3,591 of 20,801 decks)
  11. Path of the Animist relevance 1.16 · 16.4% (3,408 of 20,801 decks)
  12. Reach the Horizon relevance 1.13 · 20.4% (4,238 of 20,801 decks)
  13. Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 1.13 · 19.9% (4,143 of 20,801 decks)
  14. Skyshroud Claim relevance 1.10 · 31.9% (6,639 of 20,801 decks)
  15. Cataclysmic Prospecting relevance 1.05 · 14.4% (2,985 of 20,801 decks)
  16. Harrow relevance 1.01 · 30.7% (6,382 of 20,801 decks)
  17. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.00 · 24.6% (5,118 of 20,801 decks)
  18. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 0.97 · 13.3% (2,760 of 20,801 decks)
  19. Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.97 · 19.6% (4,069 of 20,801 decks)
  20. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.96 · 28.2% (5,864 of 20,801 decks)
  21. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.96 · 21.8% (4,538 of 20,801 decks)
  22. Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.95 · 15.0% (3,113 of 20,801 decks)
  23. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.95 · 25.2% (5,240 of 20,801 decks)
  24. Rumbleweed relevance 0.92 · 15.1% (3,147 of 20,801 decks)
  25. Explore relevance 0.91 · 27.8% (5,782 of 20,801 decks)
  26. Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.91 · 16.2% (3,366 of 20,801 decks)
  27. Vengeful Regrowth relevance 0.89 · 12.4% (2,586 of 20,801 decks)
  28. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.89 · 21.8% (4,531 of 20,801 decks)
  29. Magmatic Insight relevance 0.88 · 14.0% (2,909 of 20,801 decks)

Creatures

9

Showing 1-9 of 9

Page size
  • Dune Chanter
    1.87 30.1%
    $1.29 €0.64
  • Sand Scout
    1.38 23.2%
    $5.81 €6.85
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.00 24.6%
    $12.51 €10.43
  • Hazezon, Shaper of Sand
    0.97 13.3%
    $0.29 €0.17
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    0.96 28.2%
    $0.47 €0.59
  • Titania, Protector of Argoth
    0.96 21.8%
    $0.32 €0.47
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    0.95 25.2%
    $1.98 €2.76
  • Rumbleweed
    0.92 15.1%
    $3.40 €4.07
  • Omnath, Locus of Rage
    0.89 21.8%
    $0.34 €0.39
All creatures (9)
  1. Dune Chanter relevance 1.87 · 30.1% (6,252 of 20,801 decks)
  2. Sand Scout relevance 1.38 · 23.2% (4,836 of 20,801 decks)
  3. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.00 · 24.6% (5,118 of 20,801 decks)
  4. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 0.97 · 13.3% (2,760 of 20,801 decks)
  5. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.96 · 28.2% (5,864 of 20,801 decks)
  6. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.96 · 21.8% (4,538 of 20,801 decks)
  7. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.95 · 25.2% (5,240 of 20,801 decks)
  8. Rumbleweed relevance 0.92 · 15.1% (3,147 of 20,801 decks)
  9. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.89 · 21.8% (4,531 of 20,801 decks)

Enchantments

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Desert Warfare
    1.50 22.9%
    $0.42 €0.62
  • Encroaching Dragonstorm
    0.97 19.6%
    $0.31 €0.11
All enchantments (2)
  1. Desert Warfare relevance 1.50 · 22.9% (4,763 of 20,801 decks)
  2. Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.97 · 19.6% (4,069 of 20,801 decks)

Instants

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Harrow
    1.01 30.7%
    $0.29 €0.27
All instants (1)
  1. Harrow relevance 1.01 · 30.7% (6,382 of 20,801 decks)

Sorceries

16

Showing 1-10 of 16

Page size
  • Migration Path
    1.61 35.8%
    $0.37 €0.30
  • Circuitous Route
    1.61 32.7%
    $0.16 €0.21
  • Explosive Vegetation
    1.57 34.0%
    $0.34 €0.28
  • Vastwood Surge
    1.51 25.3%
    $0.34 €0.19
  • Hour of Promise
    1.41 25.3%
    $0.34 €0.22
  • Ranger's Path
    1.26 21.1%
    $0.26 €0.37
  • Hunting Wilds
    1.16 17.3%
    $0.73 €0.48
  • Path of the Animist
    1.16 16.4%
    $0.35 €0.28
  • Reach the Horizon
    1.13 20.4%
    $0.31 €0.15
  • Skyshroud Claim
    1.10 31.9%
    $0.96 €1.15
All sorceries (16)
  1. Migration Path relevance 1.61 · 35.8% (7,444 of 20,801 decks)
  2. Circuitous Route relevance 1.61 · 32.7% (6,802 of 20,801 decks)
  3. Explosive Vegetation relevance 1.57 · 34.0% (7,079 of 20,801 decks)
  4. Vastwood Surge relevance 1.51 · 25.3% (5,257 of 20,801 decks)
  5. Hour of Promise relevance 1.41 · 25.3% (5,268 of 20,801 decks)
  6. Ranger's Path relevance 1.26 · 21.1% (4,380 of 20,801 decks)
  7. Hunting Wilds relevance 1.16 · 17.3% (3,591 of 20,801 decks)
  8. Path of the Animist relevance 1.16 · 16.4% (3,408 of 20,801 decks)
  9. Reach the Horizon relevance 1.13 · 20.4% (4,238 of 20,801 decks)
  10. Skyshroud Claim relevance 1.10 · 31.9% (6,639 of 20,801 decks)
  11. Cataclysmic Prospecting relevance 1.05 · 14.4% (2,985 of 20,801 decks)
  12. Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.95 · 15.0% (3,113 of 20,801 decks)
  13. Explore relevance 0.91 · 27.8% (5,782 of 20,801 decks)
  14. Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.91 · 16.2% (3,366 of 20,801 decks)
  15. Vengeful Regrowth relevance 0.89 · 12.4% (2,586 of 20,801 decks)
  16. Magmatic Insight relevance 0.88 · 14.0% (2,909 of 20,801 decks)

Battles

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • 1.13 19.9%
    $0.33 €0.22
All battles (1)
  1. Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 1.13 · 19.9% (4,143 of 20,801 decks)

Utility Lands

15

Showing 1-10 of 15

Page size
  • Hashep Oasis
    1.80 31.2%
    $0.24 €0.22
  • Desert of the Indomitable
    1.76 31.1%
    $0.21 €0.16
  • Shefet Dunes
    1.72 28.5%
    $0.30 €0.29
  • Dunes of the Dead
    1.71 27.7%
    $0.29 €0.17
  • Ramunap Ruins
    1.64 28.8%
    $0.33 €0.45
  • Desert of the True
    1.59 28.7%
    $0.26 €0.17
  • Cactus Preserve
    1.58 27.7%
    $4.12 €5.04
  • Desert of the Fervent
    1.58 28.7%
    $0.24 €0.12
  • Conduit Pylons
    1.47 30.1%
    $0.35 €0.23
  • Arid Archway
    1.28 27.3%
    $1.48 €0.56
All utility lands (15)
  1. Hashep Oasis relevance 1.80 · 31.2% (6,481 of 20,801 decks)
  2. Desert of the Indomitable relevance 1.76 · 31.1% (6,471 of 20,801 decks)
  3. Shefet Dunes relevance 1.72 · 28.5% (5,934 of 20,801 decks)
  4. Dunes of the Dead relevance 1.71 · 27.7% (5,760 of 20,801 decks)
  5. Ramunap Ruins relevance 1.64 · 28.8% (5,982 of 20,801 decks)
  6. Desert of the True relevance 1.59 · 28.7% (5,980 of 20,801 decks)
  7. Cactus Preserve relevance 1.58 · 27.7% (5,752 of 20,801 decks)
  8. Desert of the Fervent relevance 1.58 · 28.7% (5,969 of 20,801 decks)
  9. Conduit Pylons relevance 1.47 · 30.1% (6,251 of 20,801 decks)
  10. Arid Archway relevance 1.28 · 27.3% (5,679 of 20,801 decks)
  11. Scavenger Grounds relevance 1.13 · 34.2% (7,121 of 20,801 decks)
  12. Sandstorm Verge relevance 0.97 · 15.6% (3,249 of 20,801 decks)
  13. Grasping Dunes relevance 0.91 · 13.8% (2,879 of 20,801 decks)
  14. Desert relevance 0.86 · 14.9% (3,099 of 20,801 decks)
  15. Endless Sands relevance 0.86 · 14.0% (2,921 of 20,801 decks)

Lands

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Bristling Backwoods
    1.90 33.4%
    $0.30 €0.14
  • Creosote Heath
    1.82 31.3%
    $0.25 €0.14
  • Mirage Mesa
    1.61 27.5%
    $0.22 €0.12
  • Abraded Bluffs
    1.58 28.9%
    $0.33 €0.27
  • Painted Bluffs
    1.49 23.2%
    $0.20 €0.22
  • Survivors' Encampment
    0.97 18.4%
    $0.36 €0.35
All lands (6)
  1. Bristling Backwoods relevance 1.90 · 33.4% (6,941 of 20,801 decks)
  2. Creosote Heath relevance 1.82 · 31.3% (6,518 of 20,801 decks)
  3. Mirage Mesa relevance 1.61 · 27.5% (5,721 of 20,801 decks)
  4. Abraded Bluffs relevance 1.58 · 28.9% (6,018 of 20,801 decks)
  5. Painted Bluffs relevance 1.49 · 23.2% (4,818 of 20,801 decks)
  6. Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.97 · 18.4% (3,829 of 20,801 decks)

EDH data for Map the Frontier: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 20,801 real decks.