Dryad of the Ilysian Grove

Played in 179,727 decks

Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
$9.88 €6.58

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Baba Lysaga, Night Witch relevance 4.33 · 53.8% (1,498 of 2,783 decks)
  2. Rendmaw, Creaking Nest relevance 4.18 · 40.1% (2,331 of 5,818 decks)
  3. Grizzlegom, Hurloon Hero relevance 3.88 · 85.7% (1,352 of 1,577 decks)
  4. Sythis, Harvest's Hand relevance 3.72 · 43.4% (2,983 of 6,871 decks)
  5. Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 3.55 · 64.3% (4,430 of 6,892 decks)
  6. Flubs, the Fool relevance 3.48 · 46.7% (5,434 of 11,625 decks)
  7. Tuvasa the Sunlit relevance 3.45 · 33.1% (1,250 of 3,778 decks)
  8. Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 3.25 · 36.6% (9,673 of 26,394 decks)
  9. The Gitrog Monster relevance 3.25 · 24.5% (1,311 of 5,359 decks)
  10. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.18 · 52.4% (2,216 of 4,229 decks)
  11. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.12 · 40.5% (2,116 of 5,230 decks)
  12. Anikthea, Hand of Erebos relevance 3.02 · 57.2% (3,890 of 6,802 decks)
  13. Lord Windgrace relevance 3.01 · 54.9% (2,569 of 4,680 decks)
  14. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 2.93 · 38.3% (1,540 of 4,021 decks)
  15. Go-Shintai of Life's Origin relevance 2.90 · 50.1% (4,543 of 9,073 decks)
  16. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.87 · 40.8% (3,709 of 9,082 decks)
  17. The Necrobloom relevance 2.86 · 47.0% (5,313 of 11,312 decks)
  18. Yuna, Hope of Spira relevance 2.82 · 31.2% (990 of 3,171 decks)
  19. Loot, the Key to Everything relevance 2.77 · 48.3% (858 of 1,778 decks)
  20. Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 2.71 · 31.6% (4,287 of 13,549 decks)
  21. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.71 · 32.6% (8,211 of 25,225 decks)
  22. Wildsear, Scouring Maw relevance 2.71 · 42.9% (655 of 1,528 decks)
  23. Tifa Lockhart relevance 2.67 · 26.5% (2,599 of 9,806 decks)
  24. Kestia, the Cultivator relevance 2.67 · 38.0% (190 of 500 decks)
  25. Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 2.58 · 48.6% (356 of 732 decks)
  26. Maular, the Next Evolution relevance 2.57 · 38.5% (613 of 1,594 decks)
  27. Kura, the Boundless Sky relevance 2.43 · 52.7% (214 of 406 decks)
  28. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 2.41 · 35.1% (4,090 of 11,657 decks)
  29. Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 2.37 · 48.1% (226 of 470 decks)
  30. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.36 · 34.0% (1,577 of 4,638 decks)

Replaced By

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
All replaced by (2)
  1. Chromatic Lantern 3.2% of swaps out (3 swaps)
  2. Hexhaven Invigorator 3.2% of swaps out (3 swaps)

Parallel Cards

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
All parallel cards (5)
  1. Prismatic Omen
  2. Azusa, Lost but Seeking
  3. Exploration
  4. Nature's Revolt
  5. Living Plane

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.53 43.1%
    $12.67 €8.67
  • Exploration
    1.32 38.0%
    $30.54 €26.77
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.31 38.0%
    $5.77 €6.39
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.19 30.9%
    $4.81 €3.73
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.16 31.0%
    $2.02 €2.65
  • Scute Swarm
    1.16 35.6%
    $8.84 €7.89
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.10 26.8%
    $13.05 €10.17
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.03 33.0%
    $4.19 €3.08
  • Crop Rotation
    0.98 31.5%
    $3.92 €3.60
  • Icetill Explorer
    0.98 27.2%
    $23.50 €23.44
All most relevant (30)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.53 · 43.1% (77,424 of 179,727 decks)
  2. Exploration relevance 1.32 · 38.0% (68,384 of 179,727 decks)
  3. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.31 · 38.0% (68,303 of 179,727 decks)
  4. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.19 · 30.9% (55,460 of 179,727 decks)
  5. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.16 · 31.0% (55,637 of 179,727 decks)
  6. Scute Swarm relevance 1.16 · 35.6% (63,952 of 179,727 decks)
  7. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.10 · 26.8% (48,247 of 179,727 decks)
  8. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.03 · 33.0% (59,398 of 179,727 decks)
  9. Crop Rotation relevance 0.98 · 31.5% (56,591 of 179,727 decks)
  10. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.98 · 27.2% (48,909 of 179,727 decks)
  11. Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.87 · 22.1% (39,735 of 179,727 decks)
  12. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.84 · 24.5% (44,105 of 179,727 decks)
  13. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.83 · 20.2% (36,281 of 179,727 decks)
  14. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.83 · 21.5% (38,647 of 179,727 decks)
  15. Scapeshift relevance 0.82 · 18.0% (32,422 of 179,727 decks)
  16. Zuran Orb relevance 0.82 · 19.7% (35,352 of 179,727 decks)
  17. Nature's Lore relevance 0.81 · 40.9% (73,532 of 179,727 decks)
  18. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.80 · 19.9% (35,822 of 179,727 decks)
  19. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.80 · 22.1% (39,660 of 179,727 decks)
  20. Farseek relevance 0.78 · 42.0% (75,512 of 179,727 decks)
  21. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.76 · 38.2% (68,668 of 179,727 decks)
  22. Harrow relevance 0.76 · 22.9% (41,185 of 179,727 decks)
  23. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.75 · 19.6% (35,171 of 179,727 decks)
  24. Spelunking relevance 0.74 · 18.0% (32,296 of 179,727 decks)
  25. Three Visits relevance 0.74 · 33.0% (59,233 of 179,727 decks)
  26. Sanctum Weaver relevance 0.72 · 17.5% (31,424 of 179,727 decks)
  27. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.71 · 16.5% (29,681 of 179,727 decks)
  28. Beast Within relevance 0.69 · 34.4% (61,823 of 179,727 decks)
  29. Burgeoning relevance 0.69 · 16.5% (29,577 of 179,727 decks)
  30. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.66 · 15.8% (28,415 of 179,727 decks)

Creatures

22

Showing 1-10 of 22

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.53 43.1%
    $12.67 €8.67
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.31 38.0%
    $5.77 €6.39
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.19 30.9%
    $4.81 €3.73
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.16 31.0%
    $2.02 €2.65
  • Scute Swarm
    1.16 35.6%
    $8.84 €7.89
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.10 26.8%
    $13.05 €10.17
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.03 33.0%
    $4.19 €3.08
  • Icetill Explorer
    0.98 27.2%
    $23.50 €23.44
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    0.84 24.5%
    $0.49 €0.58
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    0.80 19.9%
    $7.22 €6.68
All creatures (22)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.53 · 43.1% (77,424 of 179,727 decks)
  2. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.31 · 38.0% (68,303 of 179,727 decks)
  3. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.19 · 30.9% (55,460 of 179,727 decks)
  4. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.16 · 31.0% (55,637 of 179,727 decks)
  5. Scute Swarm relevance 1.16 · 35.6% (63,952 of 179,727 decks)
  6. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.10 · 26.8% (48,247 of 179,727 decks)
  7. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.03 · 33.0% (59,398 of 179,727 decks)
  8. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.98 · 27.2% (48,909 of 179,727 decks)
  9. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.84 · 24.5% (44,105 of 179,727 decks)
  10. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.80 · 19.9% (35,822 of 179,727 decks)
  11. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.80 · 22.1% (39,660 of 179,727 decks)
  12. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.75 · 19.6% (35,171 of 179,727 decks)
  13. Sanctum Weaver relevance 0.72 · 17.5% (31,424 of 179,727 decks)
  14. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.71 · 16.5% (29,681 of 179,727 decks)
  15. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.66 · 15.8% (28,415 of 179,727 decks)
  16. Birds of Paradise relevance 0.66 · 32.1% (57,640 of 179,727 decks)
  17. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.65 · 14.9% (26,775 of 179,727 decks)
  18. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.65 · 15.5% (27,933 of 179,727 decks)
  19. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.64 · 14.0% (25,090 of 179,727 decks)
  20. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.63 · 15.9% (28,628 of 179,727 decks)
  21. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.63 · 15.4% (27,617 of 179,727 decks)
  22. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.62 · 16.2% (29,186 of 179,727 decks)

Artifacts

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Crucible of Worlds
    0.87 22.1%
    $33.00 €19.98
  • Conduit of Worlds
    0.83 21.5%
    $1.13 €1.39
  • Zuran Orb
    0.82 19.7%
    $3.60 €1.83
All artifacts (3)
  1. Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.87 · 22.1% (39,735 of 179,727 decks)
  2. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.83 · 21.5% (38,647 of 179,727 decks)
  3. Zuran Orb relevance 0.82 · 19.7% (35,352 of 179,727 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Exploration
    1.32 38.0%
    $30.54 €26.77
  • Spelunking
    0.74 18.0%
    $3.70 €3.17
  • Burgeoning
    0.69 16.5%
    $34.04 €25.54
All enchantments (3)
  1. Exploration relevance 1.32 · 38.0% (68,384 of 179,727 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 0.74 · 18.0% (32,296 of 179,727 decks)
  3. Burgeoning relevance 0.69 · 16.5% (29,577 of 179,727 decks)

Instants

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    0.98 31.5%
    $3.92 €3.60
  • Heroic Intervention
    0.76 38.2%
    $17.53 €14.32
  • Harrow
    0.76 22.9%
    $0.33 €0.40
  • Beast Within
    0.69 34.4%
    $0.68 €0.86
All instants (4)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 0.98 · 31.5% (56,591 of 179,727 decks)
  2. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.76 · 38.2% (68,668 of 179,727 decks)
  3. Harrow relevance 0.76 · 22.9% (41,185 of 179,727 decks)
  4. Beast Within relevance 0.69 · 34.4% (61,823 of 179,727 decks)

Sorceries

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.83 20.2%
    $0.34 €0.76
  • Scapeshift
    0.82 18.0%
    $41.48 €32.43
  • Nature's Lore
    0.81 40.9%
    $2.11 €2.82
  • Farseek
    0.78 42.0%
    $0.47 €0.79
  • Three Visits
    0.74 33.0%
    $5.55 €4.84
  • Cultivate
    0.64 36.7%
    $0.45 €0.48
All sorceries (6)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.83 · 20.2% (36,281 of 179,727 decks)
  2. Scapeshift relevance 0.82 · 18.0% (32,422 of 179,727 decks)
  3. Nature's Lore relevance 0.81 · 40.9% (73,532 of 179,727 decks)
  4. Farseek relevance 0.78 · 42.0% (75,512 of 179,727 decks)
  5. Three Visits relevance 0.74 · 33.0% (59,233 of 179,727 decks)
  6. Cultivate relevance 0.64 · 36.7% (65,923 of 179,727 decks)

Utility Lands

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.92 36.2%
    $17.14 €12.94
  • Field of the Dead
    0.79 21.0%
    $28.53 €27.27
  • Boseiju, Who Endures
    0.64 25.3%
    $48.85 €39.81
All utility lands (3)
  1. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.92 · 36.2% (65,140 of 179,727 decks)
  2. Field of the Dead relevance 0.79 · 21.0% (37,728 of 179,727 decks)
  3. Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.64 · 25.3% (45,481 of 179,727 decks)

Lands

9

Showing 1-9 of 9

Page size
  • Stomping Ground
    0.76 30.9%
    $7.20 €7.09
  • Windswept Heath
    0.74 32.4%
    $12.29 €10.54
  • Wooded Foothills
    0.72 31.3%
    $18.52 €16.79
  • Breeding Pool
    0.71 29.8%
    $9.75 €9.20
  • Fabled Passage
    0.69 32.7%
    $0.60 €0.96
  • Temple Garden
    0.69 27.7%
    $7.15 €6.60
  • Overgrown Tomb
    0.68 28.6%
    $8.75 €8.37
  • Misty Rainforest
    0.67 29.7%
    $35.97 €26.45
  • Verdant Catacombs
    0.67 29.3%
    $29.24 €24.89
All lands (9)
  1. Stomping Ground relevance 0.76 · 30.9% (55,490 of 179,727 decks)
  2. Windswept Heath relevance 0.74 · 32.4% (58,282 of 179,727 decks)
  3. Wooded Foothills relevance 0.72 · 31.3% (56,339 of 179,727 decks)
  4. Breeding Pool relevance 0.71 · 29.8% (53,546 of 179,727 decks)
  5. Fabled Passage relevance 0.69 · 32.7% (58,856 of 179,727 decks)
  6. Temple Garden relevance 0.69 · 27.7% (49,706 of 179,727 decks)
  7. Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.68 · 28.6% (51,484 of 179,727 decks)
  8. Misty Rainforest relevance 0.67 · 29.7% (53,460 of 179,727 decks)
  9. Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.67 · 29.3% (52,579 of 179,727 decks)

EDH data for Dryad of the Ilysian Grove: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 179,727 real decks.