Ancient Greenwarden

Played in 98,571 decks

Ancient Greenwarden
$12.51 €10.43

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. The Gitrog Monster relevance 4.68 · 27.3% (1,445 of 5,291 decks)
  2. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 4.38 · 71.2% (2,556 of 3,591 decks)
  3. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 4.26 · 17.2% (1,976 of 11,500 decks)
  4. Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 4.11 · 20.6% (688 of 3,345 decks)
  5. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 4.07 · 57.1% (1,096 of 1,920 decks)
  6. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 3.98 · 63.7% (2,527 of 3,966 decks)
  7. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.97 · 55.0% (2,294 of 4,174 decks)
  8. The Necrobloom relevance 3.73 · 48.7% (5,437 of 11,170 decks)
  9. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.71 · 51.3% (2,641 of 5,146 decks)
  10. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 3.46 · 49.0% (4,386 of 8,942 decks)
  11. Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 3.42 · 51.0% (3,505 of 6,877 decks)
  12. Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 3.38 · 25.8% (153 of 592 decks)
  13. Homer, the Hermit relevance 3.29 · 37.6% (1,675 of 4,450 decks)
  14. Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 3.21 · 32.2% (2,239 of 6,944 decks)
  15. Horde of Notions relevance 3.20 · 17.7% (279 of 1,578 decks)
  16. Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 3.09 · 42.4% (740 of 1,744 decks)
  17. Lord Windgrace relevance 3.03 · 49.9% (2,302 of 4,616 decks)
  18. Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.99 · 37.3% (2,172 of 5,825 decks)
  19. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.98 · 34.0% (8,460 of 24,918 decks)
  20. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.86 · 62.2% (5,400 of 8,684 decks)
  21. Tifa Lockhart relevance 2.82 · 47.2% (4,565 of 9,672 decks)
  22. Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 2.79 · 51.5% (372 of 723 decks)
  23. Choco, Seeker of Paradise relevance 2.78 · 5.4% (579 of 10,692 decks)
  24. Thrasios, Triton Hero // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 2.77 · 43.7% (178 of 407 decks)
  25. Zagorka, Mother of Sanctum relevance 2.74 · 33.7% (273 of 811 decks)
  26. Flubs, the Fool relevance 2.71 · 15.9% (1,824 of 11,473 decks)
  27. Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 2.63 · 42.2% (409 of 970 decks)
  28. Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Scion of Halaster relevance 2.62 · 21.0% (80 of 381 decks)
  29. Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 2.57 · 33.2% (419 of 1,262 decks)
  30. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.55 · 33.0% (1,508 of 4,569 decks)

Replaced By

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
All replaced by (1)
  1. Avenger of Zendikar 8.6% of swaps out (3 swaps)

Parallel Cards

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
All parallel cards (3)
  1. Icetill Explorer
  2. Ramunap Excavator
  3. Mole Man, Moloid Master

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    2.35 66.2%
    $13.01 €9.08
  • Lotus Cobra
    2.23 65.0%
    $5.60 €6.37
  • Scute Swarm
    2.18 67.0%
    $9.06 €7.90
  • Ramunap Excavator
    2.09 54.5%
    $4.83 €3.69
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    2.00 53.2%
    $1.98 €2.76
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.75 56.3%
    $3.94 €3.03
  • Exploration
    1.75 50.3%
    $30.00 €26.36
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    1.70 49.8%
    $0.47 €0.59
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.69 48.2%
    $9.84 €6.73
  • Harrow
    1.68 51.1%
    $0.29 €0.27
All most relevant (30)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.35 · 66.2% (65,301 of 98,571 decks)
  2. Lotus Cobra relevance 2.23 · 65.0% (64,053 of 98,571 decks)
  3. Scute Swarm relevance 2.18 · 67.0% (66,076 of 98,571 decks)
  4. Ramunap Excavator relevance 2.09 · 54.5% (53,751 of 98,571 decks)
  5. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 2.00 · 53.2% (52,432 of 98,571 decks)
  6. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.75 · 56.3% (55,458 of 98,571 decks)
  7. Exploration relevance 1.75 · 50.3% (49,592 of 98,571 decks)
  8. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.70 · 49.8% (49,098 of 98,571 decks)
  9. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.69 · 48.2% (47,516 of 98,571 decks)
  10. Harrow relevance 1.68 · 51.1% (50,399 of 98,571 decks)
  11. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.67 · 46.2% (45,569 of 98,571 decks)
  12. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.62 · 45.1% (44,494 of 98,571 decks)
  13. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.56 · 37.7% (37,136 of 98,571 decks)
  14. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.55 · 40.1% (39,532 of 98,571 decks)
  15. Crop Rotation relevance 1.51 · 48.5% (47,799 of 98,571 decks)
  16. Scapeshift relevance 1.47 · 32.5% (32,072 of 98,571 decks)
  17. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.46 · 37.3% (36,726 of 98,571 decks)
  18. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.40 · 32.0% (31,517 of 98,571 decks)
  19. Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.40 · 34.4% (33,922 of 98,571 decks)
  20. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.34 · 33.5% (33,047 of 98,571 decks)
  21. Zuran Orb relevance 1.30 · 31.5% (31,023 of 98,571 decks)
  22. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.30 · 31.1% (30,683 of 98,571 decks)
  23. Entish Restoration relevance 1.23 · 32.8% (32,372 of 98,571 decks)
  24. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.20 · 27.7% (27,337 of 98,571 decks)
  25. Traveling Chocobo relevance 1.17 · 24.7% (24,330 of 98,571 decks)
  26. Spelunking relevance 1.11 · 27.0% (26,570 of 98,571 decks)
  27. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.10 · 26.9% (26,548 of 98,571 decks)
  28. Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.09 · 25.3% (24,942 of 98,571 decks)
  29. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.07 · 28.1% (27,669 of 98,571 decks)
  30. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.06 · 24.2% (23,831 of 98,571 decks)

Creatures

28

Showing 1-10 of 28

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    2.35 66.2%
    $13.01 €9.08
  • Lotus Cobra
    2.23 65.0%
    $5.60 €6.37
  • Scute Swarm
    2.18 67.0%
    $9.06 €7.90
  • Ramunap Excavator
    2.09 54.5%
    $4.83 €3.69
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    2.00 53.2%
    $1.98 €2.76
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.75 56.3%
    $3.94 €3.03
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    1.70 49.8%
    $0.47 €0.59
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.69 48.2%
    $9.84 €6.73
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.67 46.2%
    $0.36 €0.33
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.62 45.1%
    $19.93 €23.55
All creatures (28)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.35 · 66.2% (65,301 of 98,571 decks)
  2. Lotus Cobra relevance 2.23 · 65.0% (64,053 of 98,571 decks)
  3. Scute Swarm relevance 2.18 · 67.0% (66,076 of 98,571 decks)
  4. Ramunap Excavator relevance 2.09 · 54.5% (53,751 of 98,571 decks)
  5. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 2.00 · 53.2% (52,432 of 98,571 decks)
  6. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.75 · 56.3% (55,458 of 98,571 decks)
  7. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.70 · 49.8% (49,098 of 98,571 decks)
  8. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.69 · 48.2% (47,516 of 98,571 decks)
  9. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.67 · 46.2% (45,569 of 98,571 decks)
  10. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.62 · 45.1% (44,494 of 98,571 decks)
  11. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.40 · 32.0% (31,517 of 98,571 decks)
  12. Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.40 · 34.4% (33,922 of 98,571 decks)
  13. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.34 · 33.5% (33,047 of 98,571 decks)
  14. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.30 · 31.1% (30,683 of 98,571 decks)
  15. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.20 · 27.7% (27,337 of 98,571 decks)
  16. Traveling Chocobo relevance 1.17 · 24.7% (24,330 of 98,571 decks)
  17. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.10 · 26.9% (26,548 of 98,571 decks)
  18. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.07 · 28.1% (27,669 of 98,571 decks)
  19. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.06 · 24.2% (23,831 of 98,571 decks)
  20. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.05 · 27.5% (27,092 of 98,571 decks)
  21. The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.00 · 24.1% (23,787 of 98,571 decks)
  22. Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.00 · 25.2% (24,877 of 98,571 decks)
  23. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.96 · 22.1% (21,736 of 98,571 decks)
  24. Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.94 · 19.5% (19,228 of 98,571 decks)
  25. Tireless Tracker relevance 0.92 · 23.0% (22,672 of 98,571 decks)
  26. Six relevance 0.90 · 23.1% (22,816 of 98,571 decks)
  27. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.89 · 22.2% (21,896 of 98,571 decks)
  28. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.89 · 19.2% (18,930 of 98,571 decks)

Artifacts

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.55 40.1%
    $1.11 €1.46
  • Crucible of Worlds
    1.46 37.3%
    $31.27 €20.74
  • Zuran Orb
    1.30 31.5%
    $2.96 €1.84
  • Exploration Broodship
    0.90 20.6%
    $2.94 €3.33
All artifacts (4)
  1. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.55 · 40.1% (39,532 of 98,571 decks)
  2. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.46 · 37.3% (36,726 of 98,571 decks)
  3. Zuran Orb relevance 1.30 · 31.5% (31,023 of 98,571 decks)
  4. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.90 · 20.6% (20,347 of 98,571 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Exploration
    1.75 50.3%
    $30.00 €26.36
  • Spelunking
    1.11 27.0%
    $3.55 €3.15
  • Burgeoning
    0.91 21.9%
    $33.58 €25.77
All enchantments (3)
  1. Exploration relevance 1.75 · 50.3% (49,592 of 98,571 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 1.11 · 27.0% (26,570 of 98,571 decks)
  3. Burgeoning relevance 0.91 · 21.9% (21,550 of 98,571 decks)

Instants

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Harrow
    1.68 51.1%
    $0.29 €0.27
  • Crop Rotation
    1.51 48.5%
    $3.86 €3.64
  • Entish Restoration
    1.23 32.8%
    $2.84 €1.84
  • Roiling Regrowth
    1.09 25.3%
    $0.24 €0.28
  • Beast Within
    0.97 48.1%
    $0.68 €0.89
  • Heroic Intervention
    0.84 42.7%
    $17.62 €14.07
All instants (6)
  1. Harrow relevance 1.68 · 51.1% (50,399 of 98,571 decks)
  2. Crop Rotation relevance 1.51 · 48.5% (47,799 of 98,571 decks)
  3. Entish Restoration relevance 1.23 · 32.8% (32,372 of 98,571 decks)
  4. Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.09 · 25.3% (24,942 of 98,571 decks)
  5. Beast Within relevance 0.97 · 48.1% (47,377 of 98,571 decks)
  6. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.84 · 42.7% (42,097 of 98,571 decks)

Sorceries

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.56 37.7%
    $0.37 €0.75
  • Scapeshift
    1.47 32.5%
    $41.94 €33.47
  • Nature's Lore
    0.97 49.4%
    $2.07 €2.80
  • Life from the Loam
    0.93 23.2%
    $5.19 €5.20
  • Explore
    0.87 26.6%
    $0.19 €0.27
All sorceries (5)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.56 · 37.7% (37,136 of 98,571 decks)
  2. Scapeshift relevance 1.47 · 32.5% (32,072 of 98,571 decks)
  3. Nature's Lore relevance 0.97 · 49.4% (48,667 of 98,571 decks)
  4. Life from the Loam relevance 0.93 · 23.2% (22,866 of 98,571 decks)
  5. Explore relevance 0.87 · 26.6% (26,238 of 98,571 decks)

Utility Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    1.17 30.9%
    $27.75 €27.07
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.88 34.6%
    $17.31 €12.76
All utility lands (2)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 1.17 · 30.9% (30,456 of 98,571 decks)
  2. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.88 · 34.6% (34,147 of 98,571 decks)

Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Fabled Passage
    1.13 53.7%
    $0.53 €1.08
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    0.90 44.6%
    $0.28 €0.10
All lands (2)
  1. Fabled Passage relevance 1.13 · 53.7% (52,973 of 98,571 decks)
  2. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.90 · 44.6% (43,950 of 98,571 decks)

EDH data for Ancient Greenwarden: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 98,571 real decks.