Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar

Played in 39,879 decks

Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar
$6.74 €6.33

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Marina Vendrell relevance 6.06 · 52.9% (3,144 of 5,947 decks)
  2. The Gitrog Monster relevance 3.80 · 17.9% (957 of 5,359 decks)
  3. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.67 · 10.8% (393 of 3,636 decks)
  4. Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 3.44 · 17.2% (1,195 of 6,966 decks)
  5. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.32 · 16.6% (867 of 5,230 decks)
  6. The Necrobloom relevance 3.22 · 21.2% (2,393 of 11,312 decks)
  7. Flubs, the Fool relevance 3.19 · 9.8% (1,142 of 11,625 decks)
  8. Baba Lysaga, Night Witch relevance 3.11 · 14.6% (406 of 2,783 decks)
  9. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 3.09 · 25.4% (6,403 of 25,225 decks)
  10. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 3.04 · 21.6% (764 of 3,529 decks)
  11. Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.80 · 19.2% (1,135 of 5,911 decks)
  12. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.67 · 23.1% (295 of 1,277 decks)
  13. Rydia, Summoner of Mist relevance 2.67 · 19.7% (167 of 848 decks)
  14. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.58 · 5.1% (215 of 4,229 decks)
  15. Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 2.43 · 10.1% (210 of 2,086 decks)
  16. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 2.26 · 8.9% (356 of 4,021 decks)
  17. Teval, the Balanced Scale relevance 2.21 · 9.5% (2,557 of 26,871 decks)
  18. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.18 · 9.1% (805 of 8,840 decks)
  19. Six relevance 2.13 · 13.9% (255 of 1,830 decks)
  20. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.08 · 6.5% (592 of 9,082 decks)
  21. Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 2.07 · 7.5% (324 of 4,292 decks)
  22. Tifa Lockhart relevance 1.97 · 8.0% (782 of 9,806 decks)
  23. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.92 · 6.9% (319 of 4,638 decks)
  24. Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 1.92 · 4.2% (74 of 1,773 decks)
  25. Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 1.90 · 11.3% (98 of 869 decks)
  26. Homer, the Hermit relevance 1.88 · 11.0% (503 of 4,576 decks)
  27. Borborygmos and Fblthp relevance 1.87 · 8.9% (71 of 799 decks)
  28. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 1.83 · 3.9% (452 of 11,657 decks)
  29. Lord Windgrace relevance 1.76 · 14.7% (686 of 4,680 decks)
  30. Thrasios, Triton Hero // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 1.73 · 10.1% (42 of 414 decks)

Parallel Cards

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
All parallel cards (2)
  1. Charred Foyer // Warped Space
  2. Greenhouse // Rickety Gazebo

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Icetill Explorer
    2.02 56.3%
    $23.50 €23.44
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.86 48.5%
    $4.81 €3.73
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.71 48.3%
    $12.67 €8.67
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.70 49.3%
    $5.77 €6.39
  • Aftermath Analyst
    1.67 43.7%
    $0.80 €1.24
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.63 40.8%
    $7.22 €6.68
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.62 41.9%
    $1.13 €1.39
  • The Gitrog Monster
    1.52 36.6%
    $0.48 €1.04
  • Exploration
    1.51 43.5%
    $30.54 €26.77
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.50 39.8%
    $2.02 €2.65
All most relevant (30)
  1. Icetill Explorer relevance 2.02 · 56.3% (22,463 of 39,879 decks)
  2. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.86 · 48.5% (19,349 of 39,879 decks)
  3. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.71 · 48.3% (19,262 of 39,879 decks)
  4. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.70 · 49.3% (19,676 of 39,879 decks)
  5. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.67 · 43.7% (17,419 of 39,879 decks)
  6. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.63 · 40.8% (16,288 of 39,879 decks)
  7. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.62 · 41.9% (16,724 of 39,879 decks)
  8. The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.52 · 36.6% (14,605 of 39,879 decks)
  9. Exploration relevance 1.51 · 43.5% (17,359 of 39,879 decks)
  10. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.50 · 39.8% (15,891 of 39,879 decks)
  11. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.50 · 36.6% (14,609 of 39,879 decks)
  12. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.47 · 35.7% (14,220 of 39,879 decks)
  13. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.46 · 41.8% (16,663 of 39,879 decks)
  14. Scute Swarm relevance 1.43 · 43.9% (17,519 of 39,879 decks)
  15. Zuran Orb relevance 1.42 · 34.3% (13,690 of 39,879 decks)
  16. Six relevance 1.41 · 36.2% (14,426 of 39,879 decks)
  17. Crop Rotation relevance 1.40 · 45.0% (17,960 of 39,879 decks)
  18. Life from the Loam relevance 1.38 · 34.5% (13,763 of 39,879 decks)
  19. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.35 · 34.4% (13,703 of 39,879 decks)
  20. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.34 · 43.0% (17,129 of 39,879 decks)
  21. Scapeshift relevance 1.28 · 28.2% (11,263 of 39,879 decks)
  22. Exploration Broodship relevance 1.28 · 29.1% (11,594 of 39,879 decks)
  23. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.27 · 28.9% (11,518 of 39,879 decks)
  24. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.25 · 28.5% (11,372 of 39,879 decks)
  25. Harrow relevance 1.24 · 37.5% (14,969 of 39,879 decks)
  26. Spelunking relevance 1.18 · 28.8% (11,469 of 39,879 decks)
  27. Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.04 · 26.3% (10,490 of 39,879 decks)
  28. Horizon Explorer relevance 1.02 · 22.7% (9,041 of 39,879 decks)
  29. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.00 · 20.3% (8,082 of 39,879 decks)
  30. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.97 · 22.5% (8,973 of 39,879 decks)

Creatures

23

Showing 1-10 of 23

Page size
  • Icetill Explorer
    2.02 56.3%
    $23.50 €23.44
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.86 48.5%
    $4.81 €3.73
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.71 48.3%
    $12.67 €8.67
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.70 49.3%
    $5.77 €6.39
  • Aftermath Analyst
    1.67 43.7%
    $0.80 €1.24
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.63 40.8%
    $7.22 €6.68
  • The Gitrog Monster
    1.52 36.6%
    $0.48 €1.04
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.50 39.8%
    $2.02 €2.65
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.50 36.6%
    $13.05 €10.17
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.46 41.8%
    $9.88 €6.58
All creatures (23)
  1. Icetill Explorer relevance 2.02 · 56.3% (22,463 of 39,879 decks)
  2. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.86 · 48.5% (19,349 of 39,879 decks)
  3. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.71 · 48.3% (19,262 of 39,879 decks)
  4. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.70 · 49.3% (19,676 of 39,879 decks)
  5. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.67 · 43.7% (17,419 of 39,879 decks)
  6. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.63 · 40.8% (16,288 of 39,879 decks)
  7. The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.52 · 36.6% (14,605 of 39,879 decks)
  8. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.50 · 39.8% (15,891 of 39,879 decks)
  9. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.50 · 36.6% (14,609 of 39,879 decks)
  10. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.46 · 41.8% (16,663 of 39,879 decks)
  11. Scute Swarm relevance 1.43 · 43.9% (17,519 of 39,879 decks)
  12. Six relevance 1.41 · 36.2% (14,426 of 39,879 decks)
  13. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.34 · 43.0% (17,129 of 39,879 decks)
  14. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.27 · 28.9% (11,518 of 39,879 decks)
  15. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.25 · 28.5% (11,372 of 39,879 decks)
  16. Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.04 · 26.3% (10,490 of 39,879 decks)
  17. Horizon Explorer relevance 1.02 · 22.7% (9,041 of 39,879 decks)
  18. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.00 · 20.3% (8,082 of 39,879 decks)
  19. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.97 · 22.5% (8,973 of 39,879 decks)
  20. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.93 · 25.9% (10,320 of 39,879 decks)
  21. Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.91 · 19.3% (7,708 of 39,879 decks)
  22. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.89 · 19.3% (7,716 of 39,879 decks)
  23. Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.86 · 17.3% (6,913 of 39,879 decks)

Artifacts

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.62 41.9%
    $1.13 €1.39
  • Zuran Orb
    1.42 34.3%
    $3.60 €1.83
  • Crucible of Worlds
    1.35 34.4%
    $33.00 €19.98
  • Exploration Broodship
    1.28 29.1%
    $3.01 €3.22
All artifacts (4)
  1. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.62 · 41.9% (16,724 of 39,879 decks)
  2. Zuran Orb relevance 1.42 · 34.3% (13,690 of 39,879 decks)
  3. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.35 · 34.4% (13,703 of 39,879 decks)
  4. Exploration Broodship relevance 1.28 · 29.1% (11,594 of 39,879 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Exploration
    1.51 43.5%
    $30.54 €26.77
  • Spelunking
    1.18 28.8%
    $3.70 €3.17
  • Valakut Exploration
    0.86 18.4%
    $3.60 €3.55
All enchantments (3)
  1. Exploration relevance 1.51 · 43.5% (17,359 of 39,879 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 1.18 · 28.8% (11,469 of 39,879 decks)
  3. Valakut Exploration relevance 0.86 · 18.4% (7,319 of 39,879 decks)

Instants

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    1.40 45.0%
    $3.92 €3.60
  • Harrow
    1.24 37.5%
    $0.33 €0.40
  • Entish Restoration
    0.86 22.8%
    $2.97 €1.87
  • Constant Mists
    0.83 16.4%
    $20.22 €14.28
All instants (4)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 1.40 · 45.0% (17,960 of 39,879 decks)
  2. Harrow relevance 1.24 · 37.5% (14,969 of 39,879 decks)
  3. Entish Restoration relevance 0.86 · 22.8% (9,087 of 39,879 decks)
  4. Constant Mists relevance 0.83 · 16.4% (6,548 of 39,879 decks)

Sorceries

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.47 35.7%
    $0.34 €0.76
  • Life from the Loam
    1.38 34.5%
    $5.30 €5.15
  • Scapeshift
    1.28 28.2%
    $41.48 €32.43
  • Nature's Lore
    0.91 46.4%
    $2.11 €2.82
All sorceries (4)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.47 · 35.7% (14,220 of 39,879 decks)
  2. Life from the Loam relevance 1.38 · 34.5% (13,763 of 39,879 decks)
  3. Scapeshift relevance 1.28 · 28.2% (11,263 of 39,879 decks)
  4. Nature's Lore relevance 0.91 · 46.4% (18,495 of 39,879 decks)

Utility Lands

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Shifting Woodland
    1.26 36.0%
    $7.05 €5.31
  • Field of the Dead
    1.25 33.1%
    $28.53 €27.27
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.95 37.3%
    $17.14 €12.94
  • Strip Mine
    0.92 24.4%
    $10.71 €5.96
  • Boseiju, Who Endures
    0.90 35.8%
    $48.85 €39.81
  • Glacial Chasm
    0.88 17.6%
    $16.84 €16.30
All utility lands (6)
  1. Shifting Woodland relevance 1.26 · 36.0% (14,365 of 39,879 decks)
  2. Field of the Dead relevance 1.25 · 33.1% (13,202 of 39,879 decks)
  3. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.95 · 37.3% (14,886 of 39,879 decks)
  4. Strip Mine relevance 0.92 · 24.4% (9,734 of 39,879 decks)
  5. Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.90 · 35.8% (14,266 of 39,879 decks)
  6. Glacial Chasm relevance 0.88 · 17.6% (7,020 of 39,879 decks)

Lands

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Fabled Passage
    1.04 49.5%
    $0.60 €0.96
  • Verdant Catacombs
    1.04 45.1%
    $29.24 €24.89
  • Overgrown Tomb
    0.94 39.3%
    $8.75 €8.37
  • Wooded Foothills
    0.93 40.3%
    $18.52 €16.79
  • Lotus Field
    0.90 22.0%
    $2.52 €2.59
  • Windswept Heath
    0.84 36.8%
    $12.29 €10.54
All lands (6)
  1. Fabled Passage relevance 1.04 · 49.5% (19,758 of 39,879 decks)
  2. Verdant Catacombs relevance 1.04 · 45.1% (17,999 of 39,879 decks)
  3. Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.94 · 39.3% (15,677 of 39,879 decks)
  4. Wooded Foothills relevance 0.93 · 40.3% (16,053 of 39,879 decks)
  5. Lotus Field relevance 0.90 · 22.0% (8,759 of 39,879 decks)
  6. Windswept Heath relevance 0.84 · 36.8% (14,689 of 39,879 decks)

EDH data for Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 39,879 real decks.