Perennial Behemoth

Played in 16,297 decks

Perennial Behemoth
$0.95 €0.31

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 5.32 · 45.0% (1,624 of 3,608 decks)
  2. Baba Lysaga, Night Witch relevance 3.85 · 17.7% (488 of 2,754 decks)
  3. Tocasia, Dig Site Mentor relevance 3.83 · 11.6% (81 of 698 decks)
  4. Flubs, the Fool relevance 3.44 · 9.7% (1,119 of 11,503 decks)
  5. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 3.39 · 17.2% (600 of 3,491 decks)
  6. The Gitrog Monster relevance 3.31 · 10.3% (548 of 5,311 decks)
  7. Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 3.10 · 14.1% (821 of 5,842 decks)
  8. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.03 · 9.8% (508 of 5,171 decks)
  9. Uurg, Spawn of Turg relevance 2.85 · 23.4% (69 of 295 decks)
  10. Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 2.82 · 20.3% (153 of 753 decks)
  11. Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 2.78 · 11.7% (100 of 858 decks)
  12. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.52 · 13.7% (172 of 1,260 decks)
  13. Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 2.48 · 4.4% (307 of 6,900 decks)
  14. Rydia, Summoner of Mist relevance 2.45 · 12.3% (104 of 844 decks)
  15. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 2.44 · 1.3% (155 of 11,537 decks)
  16. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.44 · 8.2% (345 of 4,186 decks)
  17. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 2.43 · 7.1% (281 of 3,983 decks)
  18. Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 2.40 · 4.0% (24 of 594 decks)
  19. The Lady of Otaria relevance 2.33 · 16.1% (57 of 354 decks)
  20. Borborygmos and Fblthp relevance 2.33 · 11.4% (89 of 784 decks)
  21. The Necrobloom relevance 2.28 · 6.9% (769 of 11,211 decks)
  22. Soul of Windgrace relevance 2.27 · 10.8% (111 of 1,032 decks)
  23. Sidisi, Brood Tyrant relevance 2.20 · 4.1% (150 of 3,673 decks)
  24. Lord Windgrace relevance 2.19 · 6.2% (286 of 4,632 decks)
  25. Winter, Cynical Opportunist relevance 2.18 · 5.5% (185 of 3,345 decks)
  26. Horde of Notions relevance 2.12 · 2.3% (37 of 1,579 decks)
  27. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.00 · 4.6% (402 of 8,721 decks)
  28. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 1.99 · 3.4% (858 of 25,006 decks)
  29. Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 1.86 · 3.4% (93 of 2,719 decks)
  30. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.81 · 3.0% (137 of 4,588 decks)

Parallel Cards

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
All parallel cards (2)
  1. Conduit of Worlds
  2. Etherium Abomination

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Ramunap Excavator
    2.29 59.7%
    $4.84 €3.72
  • Titania, Protector of Argoth
    1.74 39.6%
    $0.31 €0.45
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.69 43.6%
    $1.13 €1.46
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.66 40.7%
    $12.51 €10.39
  • Harrow
    1.60 48.6%
    $0.31 €0.27
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.59 42.4%
    $2.01 €2.75
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.53 37.0%
    $0.36 €0.77
  • Scute Swarm
    1.52 46.8%
    $9.00 €7.90
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.51 41.8%
    $0.39 €0.35
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    1.46 42.9%
    $0.46 €0.60
All most relevant (30)
  1. Ramunap Excavator relevance 2.29 · 59.7% (9,737 of 16,297 decks)
  2. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.74 · 39.6% (6,450 of 16,297 decks)
  3. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.69 · 43.6% (7,104 of 16,297 decks)
  4. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.66 · 40.7% (6,635 of 16,297 decks)
  5. Harrow relevance 1.60 · 48.6% (7,918 of 16,297 decks)
  6. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.59 · 42.4% (6,903 of 16,297 decks)
  7. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.53 · 37.0% (6,036 of 16,297 decks)
  8. Scute Swarm relevance 1.52 · 46.8% (7,629 of 16,297 decks)
  9. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.51 · 41.8% (6,809 of 16,297 decks)
  10. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.46 · 42.9% (6,986 of 16,297 decks)
  11. Springbloom Druid relevance 1.27 · 31.8% (5,183 of 16,297 decks)
  12. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.27 · 35.9% (5,854 of 16,297 decks)
  13. World Shaper relevance 1.22 · 25.6% (4,176 of 16,297 decks)
  14. Zuran Orb relevance 1.19 · 28.7% (4,670 of 16,297 decks)
  15. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.17 · 30.6% (4,989 of 16,297 decks)
  16. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.12 · 32.7% (5,326 of 16,297 decks)
  17. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.09 · 34.8% (5,679 of 16,297 decks)
  18. Explore relevance 1.05 · 32.0% (5,215 of 16,297 decks)
  19. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.05 · 25.6% (4,167 of 16,297 decks)
  20. Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.03 · 24.0% (3,917 of 16,297 decks)
  21. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.02 · 28.5% (4,637 of 16,297 decks)
  22. Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.99 · 25.3% (4,115 of 16,297 decks)
  23. Tireless Tracker relevance 0.98 · 24.5% (3,996 of 16,297 decks)
  24. The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.97 · 17.1% (2,788 of 16,297 decks)
  25. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.95 · 27.1% (4,411 of 16,297 decks)
  26. Crop Rotation relevance 0.93 · 29.9% (4,866 of 16,297 decks)
  27. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.90 · 20.9% (3,405 of 16,297 decks)
  28. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.90 · 21.6% (3,522 of 16,297 decks)
  29. Life from the Loam relevance 0.88 · 22.0% (3,589 of 16,297 decks)
  30. Druid Class relevance 0.88 · 18.0% (2,931 of 16,297 decks)

Creatures

27

Showing 1-10 of 27

Page size
  • Ramunap Excavator
    2.29 59.7%
    $4.84 €3.72
  • Titania, Protector of Argoth
    1.74 39.6%
    $0.31 €0.45
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.66 40.7%
    $12.51 €10.39
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.59 42.4%
    $2.01 €2.75
  • Scute Swarm
    1.52 46.8%
    $9.00 €7.90
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.51 41.8%
    $0.39 €0.35
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    1.46 42.9%
    $0.46 €0.60
  • Springbloom Druid
    1.27 31.8%
    $0.59 €2.00
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.27 35.9%
    $13.01 €9.12
  • World Shaper
    1.22 25.6%
    $6.80 €5.30
All creatures (27)
  1. Ramunap Excavator relevance 2.29 · 59.7% (9,737 of 16,297 decks)
  2. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.74 · 39.6% (6,450 of 16,297 decks)
  3. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.66 · 40.7% (6,635 of 16,297 decks)
  4. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.59 · 42.4% (6,903 of 16,297 decks)
  5. Scute Swarm relevance 1.52 · 46.8% (7,629 of 16,297 decks)
  6. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.51 · 41.8% (6,809 of 16,297 decks)
  7. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.46 · 42.9% (6,986 of 16,297 decks)
  8. Springbloom Druid relevance 1.27 · 31.8% (5,183 of 16,297 decks)
  9. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.27 · 35.9% (5,854 of 16,297 decks)
  10. World Shaper relevance 1.22 · 25.6% (4,176 of 16,297 decks)
  11. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.17 · 30.6% (4,989 of 16,297 decks)
  12. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.12 · 32.7% (5,326 of 16,297 decks)
  13. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.09 · 34.8% (5,679 of 16,297 decks)
  14. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.05 · 25.6% (4,167 of 16,297 decks)
  15. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.02 · 28.5% (4,637 of 16,297 decks)
  16. Tireless Tracker relevance 0.98 · 24.5% (3,996 of 16,297 decks)
  17. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.95 · 27.1% (4,411 of 16,297 decks)
  18. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.90 · 20.9% (3,405 of 16,297 decks)
  19. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.90 · 21.6% (3,522 of 16,297 decks)
  20. Turntimber Sower relevance 0.87 · 13.3% (2,172 of 16,297 decks)
  21. Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.86 · 18.2% (2,973 of 16,297 decks)
  22. Dune Chanter relevance 0.85 · 13.6% (2,213 of 16,297 decks)
  23. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.82 · 20.4% (3,330 of 16,297 decks)
  24. Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.78 · 14.8% (2,420 of 16,297 decks)
  25. Six relevance 0.76 · 19.6% (3,187 of 16,297 decks)
  26. Rumbleweed relevance 0.76 · 12.6% (2,055 of 16,297 decks)
  27. Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.75 · 16.9% (2,760 of 16,297 decks)

Artifacts

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.69 43.6%
    $1.13 €1.46
  • Zuran Orb
    1.19 28.7%
    $3.03 €1.81
  • Crucible of Worlds
    0.99 25.3%
    $31.82 €20.90
  • Exploration Broodship
    0.77 17.6%
    $2.93 €3.31
All artifacts (4)
  1. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.69 · 43.6% (7,104 of 16,297 decks)
  2. Zuran Orb relevance 1.19 · 28.7% (4,670 of 16,297 decks)
  3. Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.99 · 25.3% (4,115 of 16,297 decks)
  4. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.77 · 17.6% (2,863 of 16,297 decks)

Enchantments

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • The Mending of Dominaria
    0.97 17.1%
    $0.35 €0.16
  • Druid Class
    0.88 18.0%
    $1.19 €1.70
  • Exploration
    0.76 22.0%
    $30.17 €26.52
  • Spelunking
    0.76 18.4%
    $3.55 €3.11
  • Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar
    0.74 14.8%
    $6.87 €6.43
All enchantments (5)
  1. The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.97 · 17.1% (2,788 of 16,297 decks)
  2. Druid Class relevance 0.88 · 18.0% (2,931 of 16,297 decks)
  3. Exploration relevance 0.76 · 22.0% (3,590 of 16,297 decks)
  4. Spelunking relevance 0.76 · 18.4% (2,994 of 16,297 decks)
  5. Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.74 · 14.8% (2,419 of 16,297 decks)

Instants

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Harrow
    1.60 48.6%
    $0.31 €0.27
  • Roiling Regrowth
    1.03 24.0%
    $0.26 €0.30
  • Crop Rotation
    0.93 29.9%
    $3.90 €3.57
All instants (3)
  1. Harrow relevance 1.60 · 48.6% (7,918 of 16,297 decks)
  2. Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.03 · 24.0% (3,917 of 16,297 decks)
  3. Crop Rotation relevance 0.93 · 29.9% (4,866 of 16,297 decks)

Sorceries

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.53 37.0%
    $0.36 €0.77
  • Explore
    1.05 32.0%
    $0.18 €0.26
  • Life from the Loam
    0.88 22.0%
    $5.16 €4.96
  • Vengeful Regrowth
    0.76 10.6%
    $0.37 €0.20
All sorceries (4)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.53 · 37.0% (6,036 of 16,297 decks)
  2. Explore relevance 1.05 · 32.0% (5,215 of 16,297 decks)
  3. Life from the Loam relevance 0.88 · 22.0% (3,589 of 16,297 decks)
  4. Vengeful Regrowth relevance 0.76 · 10.6% (1,726 of 16,297 decks)

Utility Lands

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Dunes of the Dead
    0.90 14.6%
    $0.29 €0.21
  • Desert of the Indomitable
    0.84 14.8%
    $0.21 €0.15
  • Hashep Oasis
    0.76 13.1%
    $0.24 €0.22
All utility lands (3)
  1. Dunes of the Dead relevance 0.90 · 14.6% (2,374 of 16,297 decks)
  2. Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.84 · 14.8% (2,412 of 16,297 decks)
  3. Hashep Oasis relevance 0.76 · 13.1% (2,141 of 16,297 decks)

Lands

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    1.09 53.7%
    $0.28 €0.10
  • Evolving Wilds
    1.00 58.5%
    $0.28 €0.13
  • Riveteers Overlook
    0.80 20.4%
    $0.30 €0.16
  • Cabaretti Courtyard
    0.80 18.8%
    $0.31 €0.32
All lands (4)
  1. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 1.09 · 53.7% (8,758 of 16,297 decks)
  2. Evolving Wilds relevance 1.00 · 58.5% (9,526 of 16,297 decks)
  3. Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.80 · 20.4% (3,323 of 16,297 decks)
  4. Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.80 · 18.8% (3,061 of 16,297 decks)

EDH data for Perennial Behemoth: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 16,297 real decks.