Zendikar's Roil

Played in 30,716 decks

Zendikar's Roil
$1.03 €0.92

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 4.88 · 36.3% (640 of 1,761 decks)
  2. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 4.84 · 53.8% (1,041 of 1,935 decks)
  3. Sméagol, Helpful Guide relevance 4.67 · 23.8% (955 of 4,020 decks)
  4. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 4.49 · 45.7% (1,828 of 3,997 decks)
  5. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 4.47 · 12.4% (1,435 of 11,566 decks)
  6. Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 3.87 · 16.1% (543 of 3,373 decks)
  7. Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 3.75 · 21.1% (1,475 of 6,990 decks)
  8. Zimone and Dina relevance 3.66 · 24.9% (834 of 3,351 decks)
  9. Lord Windgrace relevance 3.25 · 9.2% (426 of 4,646 decks)
  10. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.98 · 17.0% (1,534 of 9,008 decks)
  11. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.97 · 20.1% (926 of 4,603 decks)
  12. Galadriel of Lothlórien relevance 2.95 · 23.8% (585 of 2,455 decks)
  13. Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 2.90 · 17.1% (102 of 596 decks)
  14. The Gitrog, Ravenous Ride relevance 2.81 · 8.6% (284 of 3,317 decks)
  15. Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.61 · 7.1% (418 of 5,866 decks)
  16. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.61 · 27.9% (2,444 of 8,762 decks)
  17. The Necrobloom relevance 2.56 · 5.7% (644 of 11,242 decks)
  18. Horde of Notions relevance 2.56 · 7.8% (123 of 1,581 decks)
  19. Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 2.49 · 23.2% (258 of 1,111 decks)
  20. Kodama of the East Tree // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 2.47 · 23.9% (165 of 690 decks)
  21. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.43 · 15.9% (557 of 3,504 decks)
  22. Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 2.43 · 32.2% (121 of 376 decks)
  23. Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 2.35 · 18.8% (291 of 1,545 decks)
  24. The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.31 · 5.2% (276 of 5,328 decks)
  25. Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 2.30 · 16.4% (309 of 1,880 decks)
  26. Titania, Nature's Force relevance 2.27 · 20.1% (209 of 1,038 decks)
  27. Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 2.22 · 1.9% (93 of 4,859 decks)
  28. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 2.08 · 9.7% (506 of 5,195 decks)
  29. Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 2.07 · 19.0% (144 of 756 decks)
  30. Flubs, the Fool relevance 2.05 · 5.9% (677 of 11,541 decks)

Replaced By

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
All replaced by (1)
  1. Dancing from Dark to Dawn 9.4% of swaps out (3 swaps)

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Rampaging Baloths
    2.53 70.2%
    $0.37 €0.35
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    2.09 61.2%
    $0.50 €0.60
  • Scute Swarm
    2.06 63.2%
    $8.93 €7.90
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.72 50.0%
    $5.58 €6.55
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.69 41.5%
    $12.49 €10.39
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.62 52.1%
    $3.94 €3.03
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.47 41.4%
    $12.74 €9.12
  • Harrow
    1.46 44.3%
    $0.36 €0.27
  • Tatyova, Benthic Druid
    1.39 36.4%
    $0.27 €0.14
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.34 34.9%
    $4.81 €3.72
All most relevant (30)
  1. Rampaging Baloths relevance 2.53 · 70.2% (21,549 of 30,716 decks)
  2. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 2.09 · 61.2% (18,801 of 30,716 decks)
  3. Scute Swarm relevance 2.06 · 63.2% (19,402 of 30,716 decks)
  4. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.72 · 50.0% (15,365 of 30,716 decks)
  5. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.69 · 41.5% (12,743 of 30,716 decks)
  6. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.62 · 52.1% (16,007 of 30,716 decks)
  7. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.47 · 41.4% (12,717 of 30,716 decks)
  8. Harrow relevance 1.46 · 44.3% (13,602 of 30,716 decks)
  9. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.39 · 36.4% (11,179 of 30,716 decks)
  10. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.34 · 34.9% (10,712 of 30,716 decks)
  11. Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.23 · 30.2% (9,291 of 30,716 decks)
  12. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.22 · 32.6% (10,017 of 30,716 decks)
  13. Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.19 · 27.6% (8,481 of 30,716 decks)
  14. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.18 · 28.9% (8,870 of 30,716 decks)
  15. Tireless Tracker relevance 1.14 · 28.6% (8,784 of 30,716 decks)
  16. Explore relevance 1.12 · 34.3% (10,522 of 30,716 decks)
  17. Druid Class relevance 1.12 · 22.8% (7,017 of 30,716 decks)
  18. Courser of Kruphix relevance 1.09 · 23.1% (7,092 of 30,716 decks)
  19. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.09 · 31.0% (9,534 of 30,716 decks)
  20. Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.07 · 22.1% (6,800 of 30,716 decks)
  21. Retreat to Kazandu relevance 1.06 · 20.0% (6,142 of 30,716 decks)
  22. Kodama's Reach relevance 1.04 · 44.7% (13,724 of 30,716 decks)
  23. Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.03 · 19.7% (6,052 of 30,716 decks)
  24. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.02 · 26.4% (8,124 of 30,716 decks)
  25. Exploration relevance 1.02 · 29.5% (9,048 of 30,716 decks)
  26. Cultivate relevance 1.01 · 57.5% (17,657 of 30,716 decks)
  27. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.99 · 24.0% (7,380 of 30,716 decks)
  28. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.99 · 24.7% (7,590 of 30,716 decks)
  29. Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.94 · 17.5% (5,360 of 30,716 decks)
  30. Entish Restoration relevance 0.94 · 25.1% (7,704 of 30,716 decks)

Creatures

27

Showing 1-10 of 27

Page size
  • Rampaging Baloths
    2.53 70.2%
    $0.37 €0.35
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    2.09 61.2%
    $0.50 €0.60
  • Scute Swarm
    2.06 63.2%
    $8.93 €7.90
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.72 50.0%
    $5.58 €6.55
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.69 41.5%
    $12.49 €10.39
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.62 52.1%
    $3.94 €3.03
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.47 41.4%
    $12.74 €9.12
  • Tatyova, Benthic Druid
    1.39 36.4%
    $0.27 €0.14
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.34 34.9%
    $4.81 €3.72
  • Mossborn Hydra
    1.23 30.2%
    $13.57 €11.47
All creatures (27)
  1. Rampaging Baloths relevance 2.53 · 70.2% (21,549 of 30,716 decks)
  2. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 2.09 · 61.2% (18,801 of 30,716 decks)
  3. Scute Swarm relevance 2.06 · 63.2% (19,402 of 30,716 decks)
  4. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.72 · 50.0% (15,365 of 30,716 decks)
  5. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.69 · 41.5% (12,743 of 30,716 decks)
  6. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.62 · 52.1% (16,007 of 30,716 decks)
  7. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.47 · 41.4% (12,717 of 30,716 decks)
  8. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.39 · 36.4% (11,179 of 30,716 decks)
  9. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.34 · 34.9% (10,712 of 30,716 decks)
  10. Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.23 · 30.2% (9,291 of 30,716 decks)
  11. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.22 · 32.6% (10,017 of 30,716 decks)
  12. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.18 · 28.9% (8,870 of 30,716 decks)
  13. Tireless Tracker relevance 1.14 · 28.6% (8,784 of 30,716 decks)
  14. Courser of Kruphix relevance 1.09 · 23.1% (7,092 of 30,716 decks)
  15. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.09 · 31.0% (9,534 of 30,716 decks)
  16. Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.03 · 19.7% (6,052 of 30,716 decks)
  17. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.99 · 24.7% (7,590 of 30,716 decks)
  18. Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.94 · 17.5% (5,360 of 30,716 decks)
  19. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.93 · 21.2% (6,521 of 30,716 decks)
  20. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.93 · 33.5% (10,303 of 30,716 decks)
  21. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.92 · 21.1% (6,480 of 30,716 decks)
  22. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.90 · 21.6% (6,627 of 30,716 decks)
  23. Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.89 · 18.5% (5,670 of 30,716 decks)
  24. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.85 · 19.7% (6,057 of 30,716 decks)
  25. Sporemound relevance 0.82 · 14.5% (4,457 of 30,716 decks)
  26. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.81 · 20.5% (6,285 of 30,716 decks)
  27. Risen Reef relevance 0.80 · 17.2% (5,291 of 30,716 decks)

Artifacts

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.02 26.4%
    $1.13 €1.46
  • Chocobo Racetrack
    0.86 16.1%
    $0.29 €0.18
All artifacts (2)
  1. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.02 · 26.4% (8,124 of 30,716 decks)
  2. Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.86 · 16.1% (4,947 of 30,716 decks)

Enchantments

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Druid Class
    1.12 22.8%
    $1.19 €1.70
  • Retreat to Coralhelm
    1.07 22.1%
    $0.41 €0.63
  • Retreat to Kazandu
    1.06 20.0%
    $0.47 €0.18
  • Exploration
    1.02 29.5%
    $30.48 €26.52
  • Khalni Heart Expedition
    0.91 16.8%
    $0.33 €0.28
All enchantments (5)
  1. Druid Class relevance 1.12 · 22.8% (7,017 of 30,716 decks)
  2. Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.07 · 22.1% (6,800 of 30,716 decks)
  3. Retreat to Kazandu relevance 1.06 · 20.0% (6,142 of 30,716 decks)
  4. Exploration relevance 1.02 · 29.5% (9,048 of 30,716 decks)
  5. Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.91 · 16.8% (5,148 of 30,716 decks)

Instants

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Harrow
    1.46 44.3%
    $0.36 €0.27
  • Roiling Regrowth
    1.19 27.6%
    $0.32 €0.30
  • Entish Restoration
    0.94 25.1%
    $3.00 €1.81
  • Growth Spiral
    0.93 28.0%
    $0.32 €0.50
  • Beast Within
    0.93 46.0%
    $0.73 €0.89
  • Crop Rotation
    0.86 27.6%
    $3.89 €3.57
All instants (6)
  1. Harrow relevance 1.46 · 44.3% (13,602 of 30,716 decks)
  2. Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.19 · 27.6% (8,481 of 30,716 decks)
  3. Entish Restoration relevance 0.94 · 25.1% (7,704 of 30,716 decks)
  4. Growth Spiral relevance 0.93 · 28.0% (8,610 of 30,716 decks)
  5. Beast Within relevance 0.93 · 46.0% (14,143 of 30,716 decks)
  6. Crop Rotation relevance 0.86 · 27.6% (8,464 of 30,716 decks)

Sorceries

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Explore
    1.12 34.3%
    $0.18 €0.26
  • Kodama's Reach
    1.04 44.7%
    $1.83 €1.54
  • Cultivate
    1.01 57.5%
    $0.44 €0.50
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.99 24.0%
    $0.33 €0.77
  • Rampant Growth
    0.94 45.3%
    $1.14 €0.56
All sorceries (5)
  1. Explore relevance 1.12 · 34.3% (10,522 of 30,716 decks)
  2. Kodama's Reach relevance 1.04 · 44.7% (13,724 of 30,716 decks)
  3. Cultivate relevance 1.01 · 57.5% (17,657 of 30,716 decks)
  4. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.99 · 24.0% (7,380 of 30,716 decks)
  5. Rampant Growth relevance 0.94 · 45.3% (13,921 of 30,716 decks)

Utility Lands

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Blighted Woodland
    0.83 18.8%
    $0.40 €0.22
All utility lands (1)
  1. Blighted Woodland relevance 0.83 · 18.8% (5,763 of 30,716 decks)

Lands

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Simic Growth Chamber
    1.01 28.4%
    $0.37 €0.38
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    0.98 48.3%
    $0.28 €0.10
  • Evolving Wilds
    0.93 54.3%
    $0.28 €0.13
  • Gruul Turf
    0.80 21.1%
    $0.36 €0.20
All lands (4)
  1. Simic Growth Chamber relevance 1.01 · 28.4% (8,728 of 30,716 decks)
  2. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.98 · 48.3% (14,848 of 30,716 decks)
  3. Evolving Wilds relevance 0.93 · 54.3% (16,664 of 30,716 decks)
  4. Gruul Turf relevance 0.80 · 21.1% (6,493 of 30,716 decks)

EDH data for Zendikar's Roil: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 30,716 real decks.