Avenger of Zendikar

Played in 196,833 decks

Avenger of Zendikar
$0.49 €0.58

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Ashling, the Limitless relevance 4.44 · 63.7% (21,127 of 33,161 decks)
  2. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.86 · 74.9% (2,722 of 3,636 decks)
  3. The Necrobloom relevance 3.68 · 55.9% (6,323 of 11,312 decks)
  4. Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 3.52 · 51.2% (1,737 of 3,395 decks)
  5. Lord Windgrace relevance 3.42 · 55.8% (2,612 of 4,680 decks)
  6. Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 3.36 · 75.0% (964 of 1,285 decks)
  7. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 3.31 · 58.0% (1,131 of 1,949 decks)
  8. The Gitrog, Ravenous Ride relevance 3.25 · 45.3% (1,516 of 3,344 decks)
  9. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 3.23 · 51.7% (2,080 of 4,021 decks)
  10. Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 3.22 · 75.2% (741 of 985 decks)
  11. Roon of the Hidden Realm relevance 3.18 · 33.0% (631 of 1,914 decks)
  12. Sméagol, Helpful Guide relevance 3.16 · 40.9% (1,655 of 4,045 decks)
  13. Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 3.06 · 23.4% (1,145 of 4,886 decks)
  14. Teval, the Balanced Scale relevance 2.98 · 48.6% (13,068 of 26,871 decks)
  15. Mass of Mysteries relevance 2.94 · 50.6% (1,360 of 2,686 decks)
  16. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.83 · 60.8% (5,520 of 9,082 decks)
  17. Averna, the Chaos Bloom relevance 2.81 · 38.0% (1,126 of 2,965 decks)
  18. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 2.79 · 37.4% (1,955 of 5,230 decks)
  19. Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 2.78 · 62.3% (4,294 of 6,892 decks)
  20. Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.71 · 37.1% (2,191 of 5,911 decks)
  21. Thromok the Insatiable relevance 2.70 · 49.5% (674 of 1,361 decks)
  22. Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 2.69 · 52.9% (3,722 of 7,031 decks)
  23. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.67 · 56.5% (4,995 of 8,840 decks)
  24. Flubs, the Fool relevance 2.67 · 25.3% (2,946 of 11,625 decks)
  25. The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.64 · 27.7% (1,487 of 5,359 decks)
  26. Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 2.60 · 75.6% (1,294 of 1,711 decks)
  27. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.43 · 57.2% (2,018 of 3,529 decks)
  28. Horde of Notions relevance 2.40 · 40.6% (645 of 1,588 decks)
  29. Witherbloom, the Balancer relevance 2.39 · 17.6% (3,702 of 21,079 decks)
  30. Zagorka, Mother of Sanctum relevance 2.33 · 38.6% (332 of 860 decks)

Replaced By

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
All replaced by (1)
  1. Tendershoot Dryad 2.8% of swaps out (3 swaps)

Parallel Cards

10

Showing 1-10 of 10

Page size
All parallel cards (10)
  1. Phylath, World Sculptor
  2. Vinelasher Kudzu
  3. Territorial Scythecat
  4. Seedship Agrarian
  5. Sazh's Chocobo
  6. Khalni Garden
  7. Prowling Felidar
  8. Oran-Rief Hydra
  9. Foe-liage
  10. Scythe Leopard

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Scute Swarm
    1.55 47.6%
    $8.84 €7.89
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.42 39.4%
    $0.33 €0.32
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.14 33.1%
    $5.77 €6.39
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.08 34.5%
    $4.19 €3.08
  • Omnath, Locus of Rage
    1.06 25.9%
    $0.33 €0.40
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.03 25.3%
    $13.05 €10.17
  • Harrow
    1.01 30.6%
    $0.33 €0.40
  • Ramunap Excavator
    0.99 25.9%
    $4.81 €3.73
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.99 28.0%
    $12.67 €8.67
  • Cultivate
    0.93 52.9%
    $0.45 €0.48
All most relevant (30)
  1. Scute Swarm relevance 1.55 · 47.6% (93,704 of 196,833 decks)
  2. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.42 · 39.4% (77,472 of 196,833 decks)
  3. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.14 · 33.1% (65,080 of 196,833 decks)
  4. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.08 · 34.5% (67,887 of 196,833 decks)
  5. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.06 · 25.9% (50,942 of 196,833 decks)
  6. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.03 · 25.3% (49,797 of 196,833 decks)
  7. Harrow relevance 1.01 · 30.6% (60,211 of 196,833 decks)
  8. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.99 · 25.9% (50,891 of 196,833 decks)
  9. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.99 · 28.0% (55,095 of 196,833 decks)
  10. Cultivate relevance 0.93 · 52.9% (104,149 of 196,833 decks)
  11. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.92 · 24.4% (48,078 of 196,833 decks)
  12. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.87 · 37.1% (73,104 of 196,833 decks)
  13. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.84 · 22.0% (43,294 of 196,833 decks)
  14. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.84 · 21.6% (42,539 of 196,833 decks)
  15. Beast Within relevance 0.84 · 41.4% (81,570 of 196,833 decks)
  16. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.83 · 30.0% (59,110 of 196,833 decks)
  17. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.78 · 22.4% (44,105 of 196,833 decks)
  18. Risen Reef relevance 0.77 · 16.6% (32,650 of 196,833 decks)
  19. Eternal Witness relevance 0.77 · 27.7% (54,485 of 196,833 decks)
  20. Rampant Growth relevance 0.75 · 36.1% (71,060 of 196,833 decks)
  21. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.74 · 18.1% (35,674 of 196,833 decks)
  22. Crop Rotation relevance 0.73 · 23.5% (46,325 of 196,833 decks)
  23. Nature's Lore relevance 0.72 · 36.8% (72,377 of 196,833 decks)
  24. Farseek relevance 0.72 · 38.4% (75,654 of 196,833 decks)
  25. Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 0.71 · 16.6% (32,605 of 196,833 decks)
  26. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.71 · 19.8% (39,037 of 196,833 decks)
  27. Exploration relevance 0.71 · 20.4% (40,227 of 196,833 decks)
  28. Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.71 · 27.6% (54,283 of 196,833 decks)
  29. Tireless Tracker relevance 0.68 · 17.0% (33,456 of 196,833 decks)
  30. Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.68 · 20.5% (40,436 of 196,833 decks)

Creatures

28

Showing 1-10 of 28

Page size
  • Scute Swarm
    1.55 47.6%
    $8.84 €7.89
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.42 39.4%
    $0.33 €0.32
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.14 33.1%
    $5.77 €6.39
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.08 34.5%
    $4.19 €3.08
  • Omnath, Locus of Rage
    1.06 25.9%
    $0.33 €0.40
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.03 25.3%
    $13.05 €10.17
  • Ramunap Excavator
    0.99 25.9%
    $4.81 €3.73
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.99 28.0%
    $12.67 €8.67
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    0.92 24.4%
    $2.02 €2.65
  • Tatyova, Benthic Druid
    0.84 22.0%
    $0.28 €0.13
All creatures (28)
  1. Scute Swarm relevance 1.55 · 47.6% (93,704 of 196,833 decks)
  2. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.42 · 39.4% (77,472 of 196,833 decks)
  3. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.14 · 33.1% (65,080 of 196,833 decks)
  4. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.08 · 34.5% (67,887 of 196,833 decks)
  5. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.06 · 25.9% (50,942 of 196,833 decks)
  6. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.03 · 25.3% (49,797 of 196,833 decks)
  7. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.99 · 25.9% (50,891 of 196,833 decks)
  8. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.99 · 28.0% (55,095 of 196,833 decks)
  9. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.92 · 24.4% (48,078 of 196,833 decks)
  10. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.84 · 22.0% (43,294 of 196,833 decks)
  11. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.83 · 30.0% (59,110 of 196,833 decks)
  12. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.78 · 22.4% (44,105 of 196,833 decks)
  13. Risen Reef relevance 0.77 · 16.6% (32,650 of 196,833 decks)
  14. Eternal Witness relevance 0.77 · 27.7% (54,485 of 196,833 decks)
  15. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.74 · 18.1% (35,674 of 196,833 decks)
  16. Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 0.71 · 16.6% (32,605 of 196,833 decks)
  17. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.71 · 19.8% (39,037 of 196,833 decks)
  18. Tireless Tracker relevance 0.68 · 17.0% (33,456 of 196,833 decks)
  19. Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.68 · 20.5% (40,436 of 196,833 decks)
  20. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.67 · 16.7% (32,908 of 196,833 decks)
  21. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.66 · 14.9% (29,406 of 196,833 decks)
  22. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 0.65 · 12.7% (25,064 of 196,833 decks)
  23. Titan of Industry relevance 0.63 · 13.3% (26,107 of 196,833 decks)
  24. Mulldrifter relevance 0.62 · 16.2% (31,802 of 196,833 decks)
  25. Greenwarden of Murasa relevance 0.60 · 12.1% (23,807 of 196,833 decks)
  26. Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 0.60 · 12.3% (24,275 of 196,833 decks)
  27. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.59 · 14.9% (29,276 of 196,833 decks)
  28. Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.58 · 12.0% (23,714 of 196,833 decks)

Artifacts

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Conduit of Worlds
    0.84 21.6%
    $1.13 €1.39
All artifacts (1)
  1. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.84 · 21.6% (42,539 of 196,833 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Exploration
    0.71 20.4%
    $30.54 €26.77
  • Garruk's Uprising
    0.71 27.6%
    $0.57 €0.60
  • Spelunking
    0.59 14.3%
    $3.70 €3.17
All enchantments (3)
  1. Exploration relevance 0.71 · 20.4% (40,227 of 196,833 decks)
  2. Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.71 · 27.6% (54,283 of 196,833 decks)
  3. Spelunking relevance 0.59 · 14.3% (28,151 of 196,833 decks)

Instants

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Harrow
    1.01 30.6%
    $0.33 €0.40
  • Beast Within
    0.84 41.4%
    $0.68 €0.86
  • Crop Rotation
    0.73 23.5%
    $3.92 €3.60
  • Return of the Wildspeaker
    0.63 20.6%
    $2.62 €1.19
  • Heroic Intervention
    0.62 31.2%
    $17.53 €14.32
All instants (5)
  1. Harrow relevance 1.01 · 30.6% (60,211 of 196,833 decks)
  2. Beast Within relevance 0.84 · 41.4% (81,570 of 196,833 decks)
  3. Crop Rotation relevance 0.73 · 23.5% (46,325 of 196,833 decks)
  4. Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.63 · 20.6% (40,586 of 196,833 decks)
  5. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.62 · 31.2% (61,454 of 196,833 decks)

Sorceries

9

Showing 1-9 of 9

Page size
  • Cultivate
    0.93 52.9%
    $0.45 €0.48
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.87 37.1%
    $1.85 €1.52
  • Rampant Growth
    0.75 36.1%
    $1.22 €0.53
  • Nature's Lore
    0.72 36.8%
    $2.11 €2.82
  • Farseek
    0.72 38.4%
    $0.47 €0.79
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.64 15.5%
    $0.34 €0.76
  • Life from the Loam
    0.63 15.6%
    $5.30 €5.15
  • Explore
    0.62 18.8%
    $0.19 €0.25
  • Three Visits
    0.61 27.4%
    $5.55 €4.84
All sorceries (9)
  1. Cultivate relevance 0.93 · 52.9% (104,149 of 196,833 decks)
  2. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.87 · 37.1% (73,104 of 196,833 decks)
  3. Rampant Growth relevance 0.75 · 36.1% (71,060 of 196,833 decks)
  4. Nature's Lore relevance 0.72 · 36.8% (72,377 of 196,833 decks)
  5. Farseek relevance 0.72 · 38.4% (75,654 of 196,833 decks)
  6. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.64 · 15.5% (30,478 of 196,833 decks)
  7. Life from the Loam relevance 0.63 · 15.6% (30,774 of 196,833 decks)
  8. Explore relevance 0.62 · 18.8% (37,089 of 196,833 decks)
  9. Three Visits relevance 0.61 · 27.4% (53,976 of 196,833 decks)

Utility Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    0.65 17.1%
    $28.53 €27.27
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.60 23.7%
    $17.14 €12.94
All utility lands (2)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 0.65 · 17.1% (33,652 of 196,833 decks)
  2. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.60 · 23.7% (46,572 of 196,833 decks)

Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    0.64 31.8%
    $0.28 €0.11
  • Fabled Passage
    0.63 29.8%
    $0.60 €0.96
All lands (2)
  1. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.64 · 31.8% (62,656 of 196,833 decks)
  2. Fabled Passage relevance 0.63 · 29.8% (58,716 of 196,833 decks)

EDH data for Avenger of Zendikar: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 196,833 real decks.