Wrenn and Seven

Played in 30,535 decks

Wrenn and Seven
$2.93 €1.38

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Winter, Cynical Opportunist relevance 5.21 · 62.5% (2,110 of 3,375 decks)
  2. Carth the Lion relevance 4.05 · 39.4% (879 of 2,232 decks)
  3. Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 3.96 · 18.9% (242 of 1,278 decks)
  4. Borborygmos Enraged relevance 3.79 · 27.5% (377 of 1,373 decks)
  5. Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 3.43 · 21.5% (590 of 2,741 decks)
  6. Six relevance 3.29 · 39.2% (715 of 1,825 decks)
  7. Lord Windgrace relevance 3.26 · 18.2% (847 of 4,666 decks)
  8. Borborygmos and Fblthp relevance 3.20 · 14.3% (113 of 792 decks)
  9. Captain Sisay relevance 3.13 · 9.8% (170 of 1,735 decks)
  10. Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 2.98 · 37.4% (426 of 1,140 decks)
  11. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 2.94 · 5.1% (590 of 11,619 decks)
  12. Sasaya, Orochi Ascendant // Sasaya's Essence relevance 2.92 · 42.2% (293 of 695 decks)
  13. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.62 · 9.9% (893 of 9,047 decks)
  14. The Necrobloom relevance 2.50 · 9.4% (1,061 of 11,274 decks)
  15. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 2.46 · 4.9% (176 of 3,621 decks)
  16. Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 2.42 · 28.9% (220 of 760 decks)
  17. Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 2.41 · 6.1% (107 of 1,767 decks)
  18. Child of Alara relevance 2.40 · 4.3% (250 of 5,788 decks)
  19. Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 2.35 · 12.7% (239 of 1,884 decks)
  20. Winter, Misanthropic Guide relevance 2.33 · 10.8% (364 of 3,384 decks)
  21. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.29 · 13.0% (1,141 of 8,798 decks)
  22. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 2.28 · 6.7% (347 of 5,211 decks)
  23. Tam, the Possibility relevance 2.27 · 3.9% (227 of 5,753 decks)
  24. Soul of Windgrace relevance 2.21 · 14.2% (148 of 1,041 decks)
  25. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 2.15 · 6.5% (260 of 4,012 decks)
  26. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.09 · 8.1% (372 of 4,615 decks)
  27. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 2.07 · 4.4% (85 of 1,940 decks)
  28. Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 2.06 · 13.1% (114 of 868 decks)
  29. Grizzlegom, Hurloon Hero relevance 2.04 · 8.1% (126 of 1,564 decks)
  30. Doran, the Siege Tower relevance 2.04 · 10.7% (210 of 1,956 decks)

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.20 33.7%
    $12.74 €9.12
  • Harrow
    1.14 34.6%
    $0.36 €0.27
  • Scute Swarm
    1.12 34.5%
    $8.93 €7.90
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.08 28.1%
    $4.81 €3.72
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.05 28.1%
    $2.02 €2.75
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    1.05 30.8%
    $0.50 €0.60
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.03 29.9%
    $5.58 €6.55
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.03 25.1%
    $12.49 €10.39
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.00 27.7%
    $0.37 €0.35
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.97 23.4%
    $0.33 €0.77
All most relevant (30)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.20 · 33.7% (10,288 of 30,535 decks)
  2. Harrow relevance 1.14 · 34.6% (10,580 of 30,535 decks)
  3. Scute Swarm relevance 1.12 · 34.5% (10,526 of 30,535 decks)
  4. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.08 · 28.1% (8,571 of 30,535 decks)
  5. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.05 · 28.1% (8,570 of 30,535 decks)
  6. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.05 · 30.8% (9,417 of 30,535 decks)
  7. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.03 · 29.9% (9,144 of 30,535 decks)
  8. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.03 · 25.1% (7,669 of 30,535 decks)
  9. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.00 · 27.7% (8,449 of 30,535 decks)
  10. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.97 · 23.4% (7,153 of 30,535 decks)
  11. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.94 · 24.4% (7,441 of 30,535 decks)
  12. Six relevance 0.92 · 23.6% (7,206 of 30,535 decks)
  13. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.91 · 25.4% (7,765 of 30,535 decks)
  14. Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.89 · 18.4% (5,613 of 30,535 decks)
  15. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.88 · 25.1% (7,655 of 30,535 decks)
  16. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.87 · 28.0% (8,553 of 30,535 decks)
  17. Exploration relevance 0.86 · 24.6% (7,520 of 30,535 decks)
  18. Life from the Loam relevance 0.84 · 21.0% (6,422 of 30,535 decks)
  19. Crop Rotation relevance 0.82 · 26.2% (8,006 of 30,535 decks)
  20. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.80 · 29.1% (8,888 of 30,535 decks)
  21. Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.79 · 13.6% (4,145 of 30,535 decks)
  22. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.78 · 20.3% (6,186 of 30,535 decks)
  23. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.75 · 17.0% (5,192 of 30,535 decks)
  24. Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.74 · 14.1% (4,313 of 30,535 decks)
  25. Rampant Growth relevance 0.74 · 35.6% (10,883 of 30,535 decks)
  26. Cultivate relevance 0.73 · 41.8% (12,766 of 30,535 decks)
  27. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.71 · 18.7% (5,710 of 30,535 decks)
  28. Explore relevance 0.71 · 21.7% (6,634 of 30,535 decks)
  29. Entish Restoration relevance 0.71 · 18.9% (5,762 of 30,535 decks)
  30. Spelunking relevance 0.71 · 17.2% (5,243 of 30,535 decks)

Creatures

24

Showing 1-10 of 24

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.20 33.7%
    $12.74 €9.12
  • Scute Swarm
    1.12 34.5%
    $8.93 €7.90
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.08 28.1%
    $4.81 €3.72
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.05 28.1%
    $2.02 €2.75
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    1.05 30.8%
    $0.50 €0.60
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.03 29.9%
    $5.58 €6.55
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.03 25.1%
    $12.49 €10.39
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.00 27.7%
    $0.37 €0.35
  • Six
    0.92 23.6%
    $5.00 €4.86
  • Icetill Explorer
    0.91 25.4%
    $22.14 €23.31
All creatures (24)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.20 · 33.7% (10,288 of 30,535 decks)
  2. Scute Swarm relevance 1.12 · 34.5% (10,526 of 30,535 decks)
  3. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.08 · 28.1% (8,571 of 30,535 decks)
  4. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.05 · 28.1% (8,570 of 30,535 decks)
  5. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.05 · 30.8% (9,417 of 30,535 decks)
  6. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.03 · 29.9% (9,144 of 30,535 decks)
  7. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.03 · 25.1% (7,669 of 30,535 decks)
  8. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.00 · 27.7% (8,449 of 30,535 decks)
  9. Six relevance 0.92 · 23.6% (7,206 of 30,535 decks)
  10. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.91 · 25.4% (7,765 of 30,535 decks)
  11. Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.89 · 18.4% (5,613 of 30,535 decks)
  12. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.88 · 25.1% (7,655 of 30,535 decks)
  13. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.87 · 28.0% (8,553 of 30,535 decks)
  14. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.80 · 29.1% (8,888 of 30,535 decks)
  15. Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.79 · 13.6% (4,145 of 30,535 decks)
  16. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.78 · 20.3% (6,186 of 30,535 decks)
  17. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.75 · 17.0% (5,192 of 30,535 decks)
  18. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.71 · 18.7% (5,710 of 30,535 decks)
  19. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.70 · 16.3% (4,968 of 30,535 decks)
  20. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.69 · 16.5% (5,027 of 30,535 decks)
  21. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.68 · 16.7% (5,091 of 30,535 decks)
  22. Eternal Witness relevance 0.67 · 24.2% (7,393 of 30,535 decks)
  23. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.62 · 14.2% (4,321 of 30,535 decks)
  24. Dryad Arbor relevance 0.61 · 15.1% (4,623 of 30,535 decks)

Artifacts

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Conduit of Worlds
    0.94 24.4%
    $1.13 €1.46
  • Crucible of Worlds
    0.70 17.8%
    $32.55 €20.90
  • Zuran Orb
    0.63 15.1%
    $3.27 €1.81
All artifacts (3)
  1. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.94 · 24.4% (7,441 of 30,535 decks)
  2. Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.70 · 17.8% (5,443 of 30,535 decks)
  3. Zuran Orb relevance 0.63 · 15.1% (4,615 of 30,535 decks)

Enchantments

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Exploration
    0.86 24.6%
    $30.48 €26.52
  • Spelunking
    0.71 17.2%
    $3.51 €3.11
  • Druid Class
    0.61 12.5%
    $1.19 €1.70
  • Burgeoning
    0.61 14.5%
    $34.10 €25.64
All enchantments (4)
  1. Exploration relevance 0.86 · 24.6% (7,520 of 30,535 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 0.71 · 17.2% (5,243 of 30,535 decks)
  3. Druid Class relevance 0.61 · 12.5% (3,803 of 30,535 decks)
  4. Burgeoning relevance 0.61 · 14.5% (4,433 of 30,535 decks)

Instants

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Harrow
    1.14 34.6%
    $0.36 €0.27
  • Crop Rotation
    0.82 26.2%
    $3.89 €3.57
  • Entish Restoration
    0.71 18.9%
    $3.00 €1.81
  • Beast Within
    0.67 33.2%
    $0.73 €0.89
All instants (4)
  1. Harrow relevance 1.14 · 34.6% (10,580 of 30,535 decks)
  2. Crop Rotation relevance 0.82 · 26.2% (8,006 of 30,535 decks)
  3. Entish Restoration relevance 0.71 · 18.9% (5,762 of 30,535 decks)
  4. Beast Within relevance 0.67 · 33.2% (10,149 of 30,535 decks)

Sorceries

8

Showing 1-8 of 8

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.97 23.4%
    $0.33 €0.77
  • Life from the Loam
    0.84 21.0%
    $5.14 €4.96
  • Rampant Growth
    0.74 35.6%
    $1.14 €0.56
  • Cultivate
    0.73 41.8%
    $0.44 €0.50
  • Explore
    0.71 21.7%
    $0.18 €0.26
  • Scapeshift
    0.66 14.5%
    $41.50 €33.73
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.65 28.0%
    $1.83 €1.54
  • Mulch
    0.63 10.7%
    $0.29 €0.13
All sorceries (8)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.97 · 23.4% (7,153 of 30,535 decks)
  2. Life from the Loam relevance 0.84 · 21.0% (6,422 of 30,535 decks)
  3. Rampant Growth relevance 0.74 · 35.6% (10,883 of 30,535 decks)
  4. Cultivate relevance 0.73 · 41.8% (12,766 of 30,535 decks)
  5. Explore relevance 0.71 · 21.7% (6,634 of 30,535 decks)
  6. Scapeshift relevance 0.66 · 14.5% (4,429 of 30,535 decks)
  7. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.65 · 28.0% (8,540 of 30,535 decks)
  8. Mulch relevance 0.63 · 10.7% (3,276 of 30,535 decks)

Planeswalkers

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Wrenn and Realmbreaker
    0.74 14.1%
    $6.50 €3.03
  • Nissa, Who Shakes the World
    0.69 14.1%
    $3.47 €2.08
All planeswalkers (2)
  1. Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.74 · 14.1% (4,313 of 30,535 decks)
  2. Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.69 · 14.1% (4,304 of 30,535 decks)

Utility Lands

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.63 24.8%
    $17.19 €12.85
All utility lands (1)
  1. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.63 · 24.8% (7,572 of 30,535 decks)

Lands

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    0.70 34.5%
    $0.28 €0.10
  • Evolving Wilds
    0.68 39.5%
    $0.28 €0.13
  • Golgari Rot Farm
    0.64 18.6%
    $0.31 €0.21
  • Fabled Passage
    0.60 28.7%
    $0.55 €1.06
All lands (4)
  1. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.70 · 34.5% (10,522 of 30,535 decks)
  2. Evolving Wilds relevance 0.68 · 39.5% (12,063 of 30,535 decks)
  3. Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.64 · 18.6% (5,682 of 30,535 decks)
  4. Fabled Passage relevance 0.60 · 28.7% (8,768 of 30,535 decks)

EDH data for Wrenn and Seven: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 30,535 real decks.