Cards like Tatyova, Benthic Druid
5.2× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Sultai decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Scout
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Springleaf Drum
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Springleaf Drum 42%
- Loam Dryad 9%
- Saruli Caretaker 9%
- Jaspera Sentinel 5%
- Gene Pollinator 5%
- Citanul Stalwart 3%
Other options: Supportive Parents
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
5.0× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Circuitous Route
12× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other Sultai decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. 31% of other Sultai decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.94 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Cultivate 40%
- Rampant Growth 37%
- Kodama's Reach 29%
- Migration Path 10%
- Explosive Vegetation 8%
- Shared Roots 6%
- Far Wanderings 3%
- Search for Tomorrow 3%
- Map the Frontier 2%
- Reach the Horizon 2%
- New Generation's Technique 2%
Other options: Grow from the Ashes, Beneath the Sands, Roamer's Routine, Verdant Mastery, Peregrination, Terramorph, Viewpoint Synchronization, Path to the Festival, They Went This Way, Untamed Wilds, Primal Growth, Map the Wastes, Deep Reconnaissance
Cards like Ramunap Excavator
2.7× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Sultai decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Growth Spiral
7.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Sultai decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Growth Spiral 42%
- Eureka Moment 10%
- Joint Exploration 4%
Cards like Counterspell
1.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 42% of other Sultai decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Sultai decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Counterspell 41%
- Negate 26%
- Essence Scatter 1%
Other options: Wash Away, Spell Snare, Wild Unraveling, Envelop, Remove Soul, Mystic Denial, Intervene, Stern Scolding, Disruption Protocol, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Minor Misstep, Outwit, Preemptive Strike, False Summoning, Extinguish
Cards like Scapeshift
3.0× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Sultai decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Relic of Legends
19× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Patriar's Seal, Bender's Waterskin, Spectral Searchlight, Victory Chimes
Cards like Reshape the Earth
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Reshape the Earth 23%
- Boundless Realms 8%
- Harvest Season 2%
- Traverse the Outlands 2%
- Nissa's Expedition 1%
Other options: Celebrate the Harvest, New Frontiers, Turtle Tracks, Slimefoot's Survey
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
3.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Sultai decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Explore
9.7× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Scute Swarm
2.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Sultai decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Freed from the Real
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Assassin's Trophy
4.2× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Assassin's Trophy 34%
- Deathsprout 8%
Cards like Exploration
2.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Sylvan Scrying
11× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Sylvan Scrying 16%
- Dig Up 3%
Other options: Thirsting Roots, Fork in the Road, Attune with Aether, Seek the Horizon, Scouting Trek, Lay of the Land, Reclaim the Wastes, Rites of Spring
All top picks (50)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.77 · 42.3% (900 of 2,126 decks)
- Bedrock Tortoise relevance 0.94 · 22.1% (470 of 2,126 decks)
- Ambling Stormshell relevance 0.95 · 19.9% (424 of 2,126 decks)
- Dragon Turtle relevance 0.97 · 18.3% (389 of 2,126 decks)
- Meandering Towershell relevance 0.97 · 15.2% (324 of 2,126 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 0.85 · 26.9% (571 of 2,126 decks)
- Mistford River Turtle relevance 0.96 · 14.3% (305 of 2,126 decks)
- Quandrix Cultivator relevance 0.91 · 18.0% (383 of 2,126 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.85 · 24.6% (524 of 2,126 decks)
- Gorex, the Tombshell relevance 0.92 · 16.5% (350 of 2,126 decks)
- Angler Turtle relevance 0.94 · 14.5% (308 of 2,126 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 0.89 · 16.8% (357 of 2,126 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 0.94 · 13.8% (293 of 2,126 decks)
- Riptide Turtle relevance 0.97 · 12.2% (260 of 2,126 decks)
- Ancient Adamantoise relevance 0.86 · 16.3% (347 of 2,126 decks)
- Hexbane Tortoise relevance 0.96 · 10.5% (223 of 2,126 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.91 · 12.8% (273 of 2,126 decks)
- Calcite Snapper relevance 0.96 · 9.5% (203 of 2,126 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.75 · 25.4% (541 of 2,126 decks)
- King Macar, the Gold-Cursed relevance 0.93 · 10.3% (220 of 2,126 decks)
- Saruli Caretaker relevance 0.95 · 9.4% (199 of 2,126 decks)
- Cold-Water Snapper relevance 0.95 · 9.2% (195 of 2,126 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.60 · 46.0% (977 of 2,126 decks)
- Kappa Tech-Wrecker relevance 0.84 · 14.3% (305 of 2,126 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 0.91 · 10.9% (231 of 2,126 decks)
- Patron of the Moon relevance 0.91 · 10.7% (227 of 2,126 decks)
- Loam Dryad relevance 0.94 · 9.4% (200 of 2,126 decks)
- Snapping Voidcraw relevance 0.86 · 12.7% (269 of 2,126 decks)
- Tidepool Turtle relevance 0.95 · 8.2% (174 of 2,126 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.85 · 13.0% (276 of 2,126 decks)
- Wandering Tombshell relevance 0.95 · 8.0% (171 of 2,126 decks)
- Sailors' Bane relevance 0.94 · 8.4% (179 of 2,126 decks)
- Giant Tortoise relevance 0.95 · 7.7% (164 of 2,126 decks)
- Phantasmal Shieldback relevance 0.94 · 7.9% (168 of 2,126 decks)
- Shell Shield relevance 0.93 · 8.0% (170 of 2,126 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.72 · 23.3% (495 of 2,126 decks)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 0.88 · 10.3% (218 of 2,126 decks)
- Tortoise Formation relevance 0.94 · 7.2% (153 of 2,126 decks)
- Shell of the Last Kappa relevance 0.94 · 6.9% (147 of 2,126 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.86 · 10.3% (219 of 2,126 decks)
- Turtle Power! relevance 0.94 · 6.2% (131 of 2,126 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 0.81 · 12.5% (265 of 2,126 decks)
- Scuttlegator relevance 0.86 · 9.5% (202 of 2,126 decks)
- Daring Thunder-Thief relevance 0.93 · 6.0% (128 of 2,126 decks)
- Turtle-Duck relevance 0.91 · 6.4% (136 of 2,126 decks)
- Horned Turtle relevance 0.93 · 5.3% (112 of 2,126 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 0.89 · 7.1% (150 of 2,126 decks)
- Armored Whirl Turtle relevance 0.92 · 5.1% (109 of 2,126 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.72 · 15.4% (328 of 2,126 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.64 · 26.2% (557 of 2,126 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Bedrock Tortoise relevance 0.94 · 22.1% (470 of 2,126 decks)
- Ambling Stormshell relevance 0.95 · 19.9% (424 of 2,126 decks)
- Dragon Turtle relevance 0.97 · 18.3% (389 of 2,126 decks)
- Meandering Towershell relevance 0.97 · 15.2% (324 of 2,126 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 0.85 · 26.9% (571 of 2,126 decks)
- Mistford River Turtle relevance 0.96 · 14.3% (305 of 2,126 decks)
- Quandrix Cultivator relevance 0.91 · 18.0% (383 of 2,126 decks)
- Gorex, the Tombshell relevance 0.92 · 16.5% (350 of 2,126 decks)
- Angler Turtle relevance 0.94 · 14.5% (308 of 2,126 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 0.89 · 16.8% (357 of 2,126 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 0.94 · 13.8% (293 of 2,126 decks)
- Riptide Turtle relevance 0.97 · 12.2% (260 of 2,126 decks)
- Ancient Adamantoise relevance 0.86 · 16.3% (347 of 2,126 decks)
- Hexbane Tortoise relevance 0.96 · 10.5% (223 of 2,126 decks)
- Calcite Snapper relevance 0.96 · 9.5% (203 of 2,126 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.75 · 25.4% (541 of 2,126 decks)
- King Macar, the Gold-Cursed relevance 0.93 · 10.3% (220 of 2,126 decks)
- Saruli Caretaker relevance 0.95 · 9.4% (199 of 2,126 decks)
- Cold-Water Snapper relevance 0.95 · 9.2% (195 of 2,126 decks)
- Kappa Tech-Wrecker relevance 0.84 · 14.3% (305 of 2,126 decks)
- Patron of the Moon relevance 0.91 · 10.7% (227 of 2,126 decks)
- Loam Dryad relevance 0.94 · 9.4% (200 of 2,126 decks)
- Snapping Voidcraw relevance 0.86 · 12.7% (269 of 2,126 decks)
- Tidepool Turtle relevance 0.95 · 8.2% (174 of 2,126 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.85 · 13.0% (276 of 2,126 decks)
- Wandering Tombshell relevance 0.95 · 8.0% (171 of 2,126 decks)
- Sailors' Bane relevance 0.94 · 8.4% (179 of 2,126 decks)
- Giant Tortoise relevance 0.95 · 7.7% (164 of 2,126 decks)
- Phantasmal Shieldback relevance 0.94 · 7.9% (168 of 2,126 decks)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 0.88 · 10.3% (218 of 2,126 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.86 · 10.3% (219 of 2,126 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 0.81 · 12.5% (265 of 2,126 decks)
- Scuttlegator relevance 0.86 · 9.5% (202 of 2,126 decks)
- Daring Thunder-Thief relevance 0.93 · 6.0% (128 of 2,126 decks)
- Turtle-Duck relevance 0.91 · 6.4% (136 of 2,126 decks)
- Horned Turtle relevance 0.93 · 5.3% (112 of 2,126 decks)
- Armored Whirl Turtle relevance 0.92 · 5.1% (109 of 2,126 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.72 · 15.4% (328 of 2,126 decks)
- Taeko, the Patient Avalanche relevance 0.87 · 7.0% (148 of 2,126 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.71 · 14.4% (307 of 2,126 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.66 · 20.9% (445 of 2,126 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 0.76 · 10.3% (220 of 2,126 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 0.79 · 8.6% (183 of 2,126 decks)
- Ticket Tortoise relevance 0.90 · 4.7% (99 of 2,126 decks)
- Disciple of Deceit relevance 0.84 · 5.0% (107 of 2,126 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 0.79 · 7.1% (150 of 2,126 decks)
- Tideforce Elemental relevance 0.80 · 5.6% (120 of 2,126 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.61 · 19.3% (411 of 2,126 decks)
- Cosima, God of the Voyage // The Omenkeel relevance 0.81 · 4.9% (105 of 2,126 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.65 · 13.5% (288 of 2,126 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.77 · 42.3% (900 of 2,126 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.85 · 24.6% (524 of 2,126 decks)
- Shell of the Last Kappa relevance 0.94 · 6.9% (147 of 2,126 decks)
- Paradise Mantle relevance 0.82 · 8.7% (186 of 2,126 decks)
- Smuggler's Copter relevance 0.87 · 6.0% (128 of 2,126 decks)
- Honor-Worn Shaku relevance 0.86 · 5.5% (117 of 2,126 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.80 · 6.8% (145 of 2,126 decks)
- Moonsnare Prototype relevance 0.86 · 4.6% (98 of 2,126 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.57 · 21.1% (449 of 2,126 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 0.63 · 9.8% (208 of 2,126 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.56 · 12.8% (273 of 2,126 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.63 · 8.1% (172 of 2,126 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.53 · 11.9% (253 of 2,126 decks)
- Icon of Ancestry relevance 0.69 · 4.1% (88 of 2,126 decks)
- Cultivator's Caravan relevance 0.81 · 3.2% (67 of 2,126 decks)
- Silent Submersible relevance 0.85 · 2.8% (60 of 2,126 decks)
- Winter Orb relevance 0.63 · 4.3% (92 of 2,126 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.56 · 5.5% (117 of 2,126 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.51 · 8.1% (173 of 2,126 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.64 · 4.0% (84 of 2,126 decks)
- Subterranean Schooner relevance 0.77 · 2.7% (57 of 2,126 decks)
- The Regalia relevance 0.72 · 3.0% (63 of 2,126 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.42 · 13.5% (288 of 2,126 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.48 · 5.8% (124 of 2,126 decks)
- Unlicensed Hearse relevance 0.71 · 2.7% (57 of 2,126 decks)
- Static Orb relevance 0.65 · 3.1% (65 of 2,126 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.64 · 3.1% (65 of 2,126 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.66 · 2.7% (58 of 2,126 decks)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.64 · 2.8% (60 of 2,126 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.61 · 2.6% (56 of 2,126 decks)
- Charcoal Diamond relevance 0.61 · 2.5% (53 of 2,126 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.39 · 5.4% (115 of 2,126 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.39 · 5.1% (108 of 2,126 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.30 · 16.2% (345 of 2,126 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.36 · 7.0% (148 of 2,126 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.55 · 2.7% (57 of 2,126 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.35 · 5.3% (113 of 2,126 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.35 · 4.8% (101 of 2,126 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.41 · 3.7% (78 of 2,126 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.24 · 16.2% (344 of 2,126 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.33 · 4.2% (90 of 2,126 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.27 · 8.9% (190 of 2,126 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.36 · 2.7% (58 of 2,126 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.22 · 10.4% (221 of 2,126 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.34 · 2.7% (58 of 2,126 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (64 of 2,126 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (54 of 2,126 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (63 of 2,126 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (76 of 2,126 decks)
- Talisman of Resilience relevance 0.22 · 3.2% (68 of 2,126 decks)
All enchantments (45)
- Opposition relevance 0.91 · 12.8% (273 of 2,126 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.60 · 46.0% (977 of 2,126 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 0.91 · 10.9% (231 of 2,126 decks)
- Turtle Power! relevance 0.94 · 6.2% (131 of 2,126 decks)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 0.60 · 27.0% (574 of 2,126 decks)
- Sight of the Scalelords relevance 0.86 · 4.2% (90 of 2,126 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.83 · 4.3% (92 of 2,126 decks)
- Guild Summit relevance 0.63 · 10.6% (225 of 2,126 decks)
- Treefolk Umbra relevance 0.84 · 4.0% (84 of 2,126 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.52 · 20.6% (439 of 2,126 decks)
- Lost in the Maze relevance 0.67 · 6.3% (133 of 2,126 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.62 · 7.8% (165 of 2,126 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.61 · 8.1% (172 of 2,126 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.63 · 6.4% (137 of 2,126 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.58 · 9.2% (195 of 2,126 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.53 · 12.3% (262 of 2,126 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.47 · 19.1% (406 of 2,126 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.60 · 5.3% (112 of 2,126 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.50 · 11.8% (250 of 2,126 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.55 · 6.0% (128 of 2,126 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.72 · 3.4% (72 of 2,126 decks)
- Trade Routes relevance 0.68 · 3.7% (79 of 2,126 decks)
- Excavation relevance 0.72 · 3.2% (67 of 2,126 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.38 · 22.6% (481 of 2,126 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.51 · 5.4% (115 of 2,126 decks)
- Aura of Dominion relevance 0.73 · 2.8% (60 of 2,126 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.42 · 12.4% (263 of 2,126 decks)
- Root Maze relevance 0.69 · 2.8% (60 of 2,126 decks)
- Frozen Aether relevance 0.63 · 3.2% (69 of 2,126 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.43 · 8.4% (179 of 2,126 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.43 · 7.0% (148 of 2,126 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.54 · 3.6% (77 of 2,126 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.54 · 3.6% (76 of 2,126 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.41 · 6.3% (134 of 2,126 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.56 · 2.8% (60 of 2,126 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.55 · 2.5% (53 of 2,126 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.43 · 3.7% (79 of 2,126 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.34 · 6.9% (147 of 2,126 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.29 · 12.7% (270 of 2,126 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.34 · 5.2% (110 of 2,126 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.26 · 14.6% (310 of 2,126 decks)
- Glacierwood Siege relevance 0.37 · 3.9% (82 of 2,126 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.38 · 2.8% (60 of 2,126 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (53 of 2,126 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (54 of 2,126 decks)
All instants (50)
- Shell Shield relevance 0.93 · 8.0% (170 of 2,126 decks)
- Tortoise Formation relevance 0.94 · 7.2% (153 of 2,126 decks)
- Grim Contest relevance 0.87 · 4.8% (103 of 2,126 decks)
- Tower Defense relevance 0.87 · 4.8% (103 of 2,126 decks)
- Saved by the Shell relevance 0.84 · 5.5% (116 of 2,126 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.53 · 15.1% (321 of 2,126 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.58 · 10.4% (222 of 2,126 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 0.81 · 3.5% (74 of 2,126 decks)
- Deathsprout relevance 0.56 · 8.4% (179 of 2,126 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.35 · 42.5% (903 of 2,126 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.56 · 7.0% (148 of 2,126 decks)
- Sultai Charm relevance 0.48 · 12.4% (263 of 2,126 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.49 · 8.6% (182 of 2,126 decks)
- Joint Exploration relevance 0.59 · 4.4% (93 of 2,126 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.51 · 6.6% (141 of 2,126 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.36 · 28.5% (605 of 2,126 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.49 · 6.8% (144 of 2,126 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.57 · 4.1% (88 of 2,126 decks)
- Weather the Storm relevance 0.66 · 3.1% (65 of 2,126 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.52 · 4.2% (90 of 2,126 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.32 · 26.4% (562 of 2,126 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.43 · 6.2% (132 of 2,126 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.42 · 6.4% (137 of 2,126 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.36 · 12.6% (268 of 2,126 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.40 · 6.9% (146 of 2,126 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.30 · 19.3% (410 of 2,126 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.39 · 5.1% (108 of 2,126 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.32 · 14.2% (302 of 2,126 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (151 of 2,126 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.46 · 4.0% (84 of 2,126 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.45 · 4.0% (86 of 2,126 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.25 · 32.9% (700 of 2,126 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.36 · 6.7% (143 of 2,126 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.53 · 2.8% (59 of 2,126 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.49 · 3.2% (69 of 2,126 decks)
- Plumb the Forbidden relevance 0.51 · 2.5% (54 of 2,126 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.38 · 4.2% (90 of 2,126 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.32 · 7.9% (168 of 2,126 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.32 · 6.6% (140 of 2,126 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (177 of 2,126 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.27 · 13.5% (287 of 2,126 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.39 · 3.9% (82 of 2,126 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.45 · 2.8% (59 of 2,126 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.43 · 3.0% (64 of 2,126 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.29 · 7.9% (167 of 2,126 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.42 · 3.2% (67 of 2,126 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.24 · 16.6% (352 of 2,126 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.43 · 2.8% (60 of 2,126 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.25 · 12.6% (268 of 2,126 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.18 · 41.4% (880 of 2,126 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.72 · 23.3% (495 of 2,126 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 0.89 · 7.1% (150 of 2,126 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.64 · 26.2% (557 of 2,126 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.78 · 7.9% (167 of 2,126 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.59 · 16.4% (348 of 2,126 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.55 · 20.1% (428 of 2,126 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 0.62 · 11.8% (251 of 2,126 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.63 · 9.8% (209 of 2,126 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.57 · 13.4% (284 of 2,126 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.65 · 7.5% (159 of 2,126 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.60 · 10.4% (222 of 2,126 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.48 · 26.2% (557 of 2,126 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.59 · 10.4% (221 of 2,126 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.49 · 22.7% (483 of 2,126 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.63 · 7.0% (149 of 2,126 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.61 · 8.3% (177 of 2,126 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.59 · 7.8% (166 of 2,126 decks)
- Tendrils of Agony relevance 0.71 · 4.1% (88 of 2,126 decks)
- Chatterstorm relevance 0.78 · 3.4% (72 of 2,126 decks)
- Crippling Fear relevance 0.61 · 4.6% (97 of 2,126 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.51 · 9.2% (195 of 2,126 decks)
- In Garruk's Wake relevance 0.53 · 5.6% (119 of 2,126 decks)
- Emergent Ultimatum relevance 0.50 · 7.5% (160 of 2,126 decks)
- Painful Truths relevance 0.58 · 4.4% (93 of 2,126 decks)
- Temporal Fissure relevance 0.75 · 2.7% (57 of 2,126 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 0.35 · 26.2% (558 of 2,126 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.48 · 6.1% (129 of 2,126 decks)
- Mythos of Brokkos relevance 0.49 · 4.8% (101 of 2,126 decks)
- Through the Forest Gate relevance 0.52 · 4.3% (92 of 2,126 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.46 · 5.4% (115 of 2,126 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.44 · 6.3% (134 of 2,126 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.45 · 5.0% (106 of 2,126 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.30 · 28.8% (613 of 2,126 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.43 · 5.5% (116 of 2,126 decks)
- Lessons from Life relevance 0.53 · 3.5% (75 of 2,126 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.39 · 7.8% (165 of 2,126 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.57 · 3.1% (65 of 2,126 decks)
- Disorienting Choice relevance 0.57 · 3.0% (63 of 2,126 decks)
- Dig Up relevance 0.52 · 3.4% (73 of 2,126 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.41 · 5.0% (107 of 2,126 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.41 · 4.9% (104 of 2,126 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.36 · 9.2% (195 of 2,126 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.39 · 4.9% (104 of 2,126 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.39 · 4.7% (99 of 2,126 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.52 · 2.8% (60 of 2,126 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.39 · 4.6% (97 of 2,126 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.52 · 2.6% (56 of 2,126 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.27 · 15.1% (322 of 2,126 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.45 · 3.2% (69 of 2,126 decks)
- Death Begets Life relevance 0.39 · 4.0% (86 of 2,126 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (3)
- Professor Onyx relevance 0.72 · 4.4% (94 of 2,126 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.53 · 5.2% (111 of 2,126 decks)
- Nissa of Shadowed Boughs relevance 0.52 · 5.6% (119 of 2,126 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Maze's End relevance 0.66 · 23.0% (488 of 2,126 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 0.66 · 22.3% (474 of 2,126 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.85 · 6.4% (136 of 2,126 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.65 · 20.6% (437 of 2,126 decks)
- Turtle Lair relevance 0.84 · 4.8% (103 of 2,126 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.57 · 21.3% (453 of 2,126 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.70 · 6.1% (129 of 2,126 decks)
- The Black Gate relevance 0.57 · 13.1% (278 of 2,126 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.64 · 7.9% (168 of 2,126 decks)
- Witch's Cottage relevance 0.62 · 6.4% (136 of 2,126 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.54 · 11.6% (246 of 2,126 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.49 · 15.2% (323 of 2,126 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.63 · 4.5% (95 of 2,126 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.65 · 4.1% (88 of 2,126 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.47 · 11.8% (251 of 2,126 decks)
- Shelldock Isle relevance 0.76 · 2.8% (60 of 2,126 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.60 · 4.1% (88 of 2,126 decks)
- Susur Secundi, Void Altar relevance 0.53 · 4.7% (100 of 2,126 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.52 · 4.8% (101 of 2,126 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.47 · 6.2% (131 of 2,126 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.48 · 5.5% (117 of 2,126 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.59 · 3.7% (78 of 2,126 decks)
- Festering Thicket relevance 0.46 · 6.0% (127 of 2,126 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.34 · 25.8% (549 of 2,126 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.35 · 21.1% (448 of 2,126 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.66 · 2.7% (57 of 2,126 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.36 · 15.9% (337 of 2,126 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.34 · 18.6% (396 of 2,126 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.47 · 4.4% (93 of 2,126 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.36 · 12.2% (260 of 2,126 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.41 · 5.4% (115 of 2,126 decks)
- Restless Reef relevance 0.50 · 3.7% (78 of 2,126 decks)
- Temple of Malady relevance 0.29 · 22.3% (475 of 2,126 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.39 · 5.6% (120 of 2,126 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.48 · 3.6% (76 of 2,126 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.24 · 36.6% (779 of 2,126 decks)
- Hagra Mauling // Hagra Broodpit relevance 0.51 · 3.1% (65 of 2,126 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.49 · 3.3% (71 of 2,126 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.49 · 3.0% (64 of 2,126 decks)
- Revitalizing Repast // Old-Growth Grove relevance 0.33 · 7.4% (157 of 2,126 decks)
- Port of Karfell relevance 0.46 · 3.1% (65 of 2,126 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.27 · 14.8% (314 of 2,126 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.25 · 21.0% (446 of 2,126 decks)
- Barren Moor relevance 0.47 · 2.8% (59 of 2,126 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.32 · 5.6% (120 of 2,126 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.41 · 3.6% (76 of 2,126 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.27 · 13.1% (279 of 2,126 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.32 · 5.0% (107 of 2,126 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.47 · 2.6% (56 of 2,126 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (110 of 2,126 decks)
All lands (50)
- Holdout Settlement relevance 0.93 · 25.3% (538 of 2,126 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.93 · 24.5% (520 of 2,126 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.78 · 13.6% (290 of 2,126 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 0.65 · 26.5% (563 of 2,126 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.65 · 26.4% (562 of 2,126 decks)
- Black Dragon Gate relevance 0.65 · 26.3% (560 of 2,126 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 0.66 · 23.8% (506 of 2,126 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 0.66 · 23.9% (509 of 2,126 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.59 · 31.2% (663 of 2,126 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.58 · 32.4% (689 of 2,126 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.57 · 31.3% (666 of 2,126 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.64 · 18.3% (388 of 2,126 decks)
- Thran Portal relevance 0.64 · 16.2% (344 of 2,126 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.38 · 60.6% (1,288 of 2,126 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.40 · 53.6% (1,140 of 2,126 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.51 · 18.2% (386 of 2,126 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.54 · 12.5% (265 of 2,126 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.32 · 58.4% (1,241 of 2,126 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.60 · 6.6% (140 of 2,126 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.53 · 10.6% (225 of 2,126 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.55 · 7.0% (148 of 2,126 decks)
- Plaza of Harmony relevance 0.57 · 4.9% (104 of 2,126 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.73 · 3.3% (70 of 2,126 decks)
- Crumbling Vestige relevance 0.70 · 3.3% (71 of 2,126 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.71 · 3.1% (65 of 2,126 decks)
- Havenwood Battleground relevance 0.70 · 3.1% (65 of 2,126 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.48 · 6.3% (135 of 2,126 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.45 · 7.6% (162 of 2,126 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.55 · 4.0% (86 of 2,126 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.46 · 5.9% (125 of 2,126 decks)
- Woodland Chasm relevance 0.46 · 5.2% (111 of 2,126 decks)
- Bad River relevance 0.58 · 3.4% (73 of 2,126 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.41 · 8.6% (183 of 2,126 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.40 · 9.6% (205 of 2,126 decks)
- Haunted Mire relevance 0.38 · 9.1% (193 of 2,126 decks)
- Darkmoss Bridge relevance 0.55 · 3.2% (69 of 2,126 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.38 · 8.3% (177 of 2,126 decks)
- Contaminated Aquifer relevance 0.39 · 7.1% (150 of 2,126 decks)
- Soured Springs relevance 0.55 · 3.2% (67 of 2,126 decks)
- Festering Gulch relevance 0.52 · 3.4% (73 of 2,126 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.56 · 2.9% (61 of 2,126 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.38 · 6.5% (138 of 2,126 decks)
- Ice Tunnel relevance 0.45 · 4.0% (86 of 2,126 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.38 · 6.1% (129 of 2,126 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.45 · 3.9% (83 of 2,126 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (112 of 2,126 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.49 · 2.9% (61 of 2,126 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.24 · 28.8% (612 of 2,126 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.24 · 23.4% (498 of 2,126 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.39 · 3.9% (82 of 2,126 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Archelos, Lagoon Mystic, from 2,126 real Commander decks.