Preemptive Strike

Played in 206 decks

Preemptive Strike
$6.30 €0.93

Change per day

Commanders

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
All commanders (6)
  1. Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 3.20 · 4.3% (39 of 917 decks)
  2. Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 2.06 · 8.2% (7 of 85 decks)
  3. Tetsuo Umezawa relevance 1.91 · 4.1% (3 of 73 decks)
  4. Tobias Andrion relevance 1.09 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
  5. Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 0.73 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
  6. Jedit Ojanen relevance 0.62 · 2.4% (1 of 41 decks)

Parallel Cards

30

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Sun Ce, Young Conquerer
    4.20 43.7%
    $114.40 €33.40
  • Mystic Denial
    4.12 39.8%
    $10.72 €3.85
  • Wu Scout
    4.10 44.7%
    $4.59 €1.26
  • Lu Meng, Wu General
    3.99 40.8%
    $66.92 €19.46
  • Lu Xun, Scholar General
    3.91 48.5%
    $0.31 €0.34
  • Wu Light Cavalry
    3.90 41.3%
    $3.87 €1.02
  • Champion's Victory
    3.87 37.4%
    $10.11 €4.27
  • Broken Dam
    3.86 40.3%
    $7.97 €2.20
  • Lady Sun
    3.76 37.4%
    $104.99 €55.18
  • Extinguish
    3.63 35.9%
    $0.25 €0.33
All most relevant (30)
  1. Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 4.20 · 43.7% (90 of 206 decks)
  2. Mystic Denial relevance 4.12 · 39.8% (82 of 206 decks)
  3. Wu Scout relevance 4.10 · 44.7% (92 of 206 decks)
  4. Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 3.99 · 40.8% (84 of 206 decks)
  5. Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 3.91 · 48.5% (100 of 206 decks)
  6. Wu Light Cavalry relevance 3.90 · 41.3% (85 of 206 decks)
  7. Champion's Victory relevance 3.87 · 37.4% (77 of 206 decks)
  8. Broken Dam relevance 3.86 · 40.3% (83 of 206 decks)
  9. Lady Sun relevance 3.76 · 37.4% (77 of 206 decks)
  10. Extinguish relevance 3.63 · 35.9% (74 of 206 decks)
  11. Wu Elite Cavalry relevance 3.50 · 35.4% (73 of 206 decks)
  12. Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 3.40 · 33.5% (69 of 206 decks)
  13. Forced Retreat relevance 3.17 · 31.6% (65 of 206 decks)
  14. Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 3.05 · 30.1% (62 of 206 decks)
  15. Sage's Knowledge relevance 2.99 · 28.6% (59 of 206 decks)
  16. Exhaustion relevance 2.88 · 35.9% (74 of 206 decks)
  17. Guan Yu, Sainted Warrior relevance 2.69 · 28.2% (58 of 206 decks)
  18. Liu Bei, Lord of Shu relevance 2.68 · 27.2% (56 of 206 decks)
  19. Capture of Jingzhou relevance 2.62 · 44.2% (91 of 206 decks)
  20. Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 2.59 · 40.3% (83 of 206 decks)
  21. Zhang Fei, Fierce Warrior relevance 2.58 · 26.7% (55 of 206 decks)
  22. Brilliant Plan relevance 2.53 · 29.1% (60 of 206 decks)
  23. Counterintelligence relevance 2.51 · 24.8% (51 of 206 decks)
  24. Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 2.51 · 37.9% (78 of 206 decks)
  25. Wu Spy relevance 2.49 · 23.3% (48 of 206 decks)
  26. Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 2.46 · 22.8% (47 of 206 decks)
  27. Balance of Power relevance 2.46 · 26.2% (54 of 206 decks)
  28. Council of Advisors relevance 2.42 · 24.3% (50 of 206 decks)
  29. Zhao Zilong, Tiger General relevance 2.31 · 23.3% (48 of 206 decks)
  30. Huang Zhong, Shu General relevance 2.06 · 19.4% (40 of 206 decks)

Creatures

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Sun Ce, Young Conquerer
    4.20 43.7%
    $114.40 €33.40
  • Wu Scout
    4.10 44.7%
    $4.59 €1.26
  • Lu Meng, Wu General
    3.99 40.8%
    $66.92 €19.46
  • Lu Xun, Scholar General
    3.91 48.5%
    $0.31 €0.34
  • Wu Light Cavalry
    3.90 41.3%
    $3.87 €1.02
  • Lady Sun
    3.76 37.4%
    $104.99 €55.18
  • Wu Elite Cavalry
    3.50 35.4%
    $2.20 €0.76
  • Lu Su, Wu Advisor
    3.40 33.5%
    $42.43 €19.53
  • Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist
    3.05 30.1%
    $76.91 €42.46
  • Guan Yu, Sainted Warrior
    2.69 28.2%
    $49.02 €16.08
All creatures (30)
  1. Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 4.20 · 43.7% (90 of 206 decks)
  2. Wu Scout relevance 4.10 · 44.7% (92 of 206 decks)
  3. Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 3.99 · 40.8% (84 of 206 decks)
  4. Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 3.91 · 48.5% (100 of 206 decks)
  5. Wu Light Cavalry relevance 3.90 · 41.3% (85 of 206 decks)
  6. Lady Sun relevance 3.76 · 37.4% (77 of 206 decks)
  7. Wu Elite Cavalry relevance 3.50 · 35.4% (73 of 206 decks)
  8. Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 3.40 · 33.5% (69 of 206 decks)
  9. Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 3.05 · 30.1% (62 of 206 decks)
  10. Guan Yu, Sainted Warrior relevance 2.69 · 28.2% (58 of 206 decks)
  11. Liu Bei, Lord of Shu relevance 2.68 · 27.2% (56 of 206 decks)
  12. Zhang Fei, Fierce Warrior relevance 2.58 · 26.7% (55 of 206 decks)
  13. Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 2.51 · 37.9% (78 of 206 decks)
  14. Wu Spy relevance 2.49 · 23.3% (48 of 206 decks)
  15. Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 2.46 · 22.8% (47 of 206 decks)
  16. Council of Advisors relevance 2.42 · 24.3% (50 of 206 decks)
  17. Zhao Zilong, Tiger General relevance 2.31 · 23.3% (48 of 206 decks)
  18. Huang Zhong, Shu General relevance 2.06 · 19.4% (40 of 206 decks)
  19. Pang Tong, "Young Phoenix" relevance 2.02 · 18.4% (38 of 206 decks)
  20. Kongming, "Sleeping Dragon" relevance 1.98 · 23.8% (49 of 206 decks)
  21. Shu Cavalry relevance 1.97 · 20.4% (42 of 206 decks)
  22. Wu Infantry relevance 1.95 · 17.5% (36 of 206 decks)
  23. Shu General relevance 1.92 · 19.4% (40 of 206 decks)
  24. Wu Longbowman relevance 1.89 · 18.9% (39 of 206 decks)
  25. Shu Elite Companions relevance 1.82 · 18.0% (37 of 206 decks)
  26. Red Cliffs Armada relevance 1.82 · 16.0% (33 of 206 decks)
  27. Lu Bu, Master-at-Arms relevance 1.74 · 18.0% (37 of 206 decks)
  28. Wu Admiral relevance 1.73 · 15.0% (31 of 206 decks)
  29. Zhang He, Wei General relevance 1.71 · 17.0% (35 of 206 decks)
  30. Yuan Shao, the Indecisive relevance 1.69 · 17.5% (36 of 206 decks)

Instants

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Mystic Denial
    4.12 39.8%
    $10.72 €3.85
  • Champion's Victory
    3.87 37.4%
    $10.11 €4.27
  • Extinguish
    3.63 35.9%
    $0.25 €0.33
  • Eightfold Maze
    1.78 16.5%
    $50.51 €14.89
  • Rally the Troops
    1.72 17.5%
    $11.38 €4.17
All instants (5)
  1. Mystic Denial relevance 4.12 · 39.8% (82 of 206 decks)
  2. Champion's Victory relevance 3.87 · 37.4% (77 of 206 decks)
  3. Extinguish relevance 3.63 · 35.9% (74 of 206 decks)
  4. Eightfold Maze relevance 1.78 · 16.5% (34 of 206 decks)
  5. Rally the Troops relevance 1.72 · 17.5% (36 of 206 decks)

Sorceries

15

Showing 1-10 of 15

Page size
  • Broken Dam
    3.86 40.3%
    $7.97 €2.20
  • Forced Retreat
    3.17 31.6%
    $2.74 €0.54
  • Sage's Knowledge
    2.99 28.6%
    $3.43 €2.17
  • Exhaustion
    2.88 35.9%
    $0.28 €0.32
  • Capture of Jingzhou
    2.62 44.2%
    $7.81 €6.70
  • Borrowing 100,000 Arrows
    2.59 40.3%
    $0.42 €0.26
  • Brilliant Plan
    2.53 29.1%
    $0.21 €0.13
  • Counterintelligence
    2.51 24.8%
    $10.49 €5.21
  • Balance of Power
    2.46 26.2%
    $0.32 €0.28
  • Riding Red Hare
    2.03 20.9%
    $12.33 €3.93
All sorceries (15)
  1. Broken Dam relevance 3.86 · 40.3% (83 of 206 decks)
  2. Forced Retreat relevance 3.17 · 31.6% (65 of 206 decks)
  3. Sage's Knowledge relevance 2.99 · 28.6% (59 of 206 decks)
  4. Exhaustion relevance 2.88 · 35.9% (74 of 206 decks)
  5. Capture of Jingzhou relevance 2.62 · 44.2% (91 of 206 decks)
  6. Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 2.59 · 40.3% (83 of 206 decks)
  7. Brilliant Plan relevance 2.53 · 29.1% (60 of 206 decks)
  8. Counterintelligence relevance 2.51 · 24.8% (51 of 206 decks)
  9. Balance of Power relevance 2.46 · 26.2% (54 of 206 decks)
  10. Riding Red Hare relevance 2.03 · 20.9% (43 of 206 decks)
  11. False Defeat relevance 2.02 · 23.3% (48 of 206 decks)
  12. Guan Yu's 1,000-Li March relevance 1.81 · 17.5% (36 of 206 decks)
  13. Peach Garden Oath relevance 1.81 · 20.9% (43 of 206 decks)
  14. Return to Battle relevance 1.79 · 18.0% (37 of 206 decks)
  15. Strategic Planning relevance 1.72 · 26.7% (55 of 206 decks)

EDH data for Preemptive Strike: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 206 real decks.