Extinguish
Played in 244 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (10)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 2.29 · 2.3% (21 of 933 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 2.01 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Tetsuo Umezawa relevance 1.41 · 2.7% (2 of 73 decks)
- Ertai, Wizard Adept relevance 0.83 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 0.80 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 0.72 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Uchbenbak, the Great Mistake relevance 0.63 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
- X relevance 0.63 · 1.0% (1 of 99 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen relevance 0.55 · 2.4% (1 of 41 decks)
- Tobias Andrion relevance 0.53 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
All parallel cards (30)
- Envelop
- Flash Counter
- Negate
- Dispel
- Spell Snare
- Counterspell
- Cancel
- Outwit
- Quench
- False Summoning
- Preemptive Strike
- Essence Scatter
- Mystic Denial
- Miscast
- Remove Soul
- It'll Quench Ya!
- Nullify
- Minor Misstep
- Disallow
- Revolutionary Rebuff
- Last Word
- Stifle
- Muddle the Mixture
- Spell Blast
- Second Guess
- Thoughtbind
- Intervene
- Rethink
- Annul
- Wild Unraveling
All most relevant (30)
- Preemptive Strike relevance 3.12 · 30.3% (74 of 244 decks)
- Mystic Denial relevance 3.06 · 29.5% (72 of 244 decks)
- Champion's Victory relevance 2.89 · 27.9% (68 of 244 decks)
- False Summoning relevance 2.72 · 29.1% (71 of 244 decks)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 2.64 · 27.5% (67 of 244 decks)
- Broken Dam relevance 2.63 · 27.5% (67 of 244 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 2.56 · 26.2% (64 of 244 decks)
- Envelop relevance 2.53 · 29.1% (71 of 244 decks)
- Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 2.50 · 24.6% (60 of 244 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 2.50 · 30.3% (74 of 244 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 2.44 · 30.3% (74 of 244 decks)
- Lady Sun relevance 2.44 · 24.2% (59 of 244 decks)
- Forced Retreat relevance 2.43 · 24.2% (59 of 244 decks)
- Council of Advisors relevance 2.41 · 24.2% (59 of 244 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 2.39 · 27.5% (67 of 244 decks)
- Balance of Power relevance 2.38 · 25.4% (62 of 244 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 2.37 · 29.5% (72 of 244 decks)
- Counterintelligence relevance 2.29 · 22.5% (55 of 244 decks)
- Sage's Knowledge relevance 2.23 · 21.3% (52 of 244 decks)
- Wu Light Cavalry relevance 2.17 · 23.0% (56 of 244 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 2.16 · 33.6% (82 of 244 decks)
- Wu Scout relevance 2.15 · 23.4% (57 of 244 decks)
- Ceremonious Rejection relevance 2.03 · 22.1% (54 of 244 decks)
- Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 2.00 · 19.7% (48 of 244 decks)
- Guan Yu, Sainted Warrior relevance 2.00 · 20.9% (51 of 244 decks)
- Annul relevance 1.92 · 34.4% (84 of 244 decks)
- Liu Bei, Lord of Shu relevance 1.90 · 19.3% (47 of 244 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.88 · 31.6% (77 of 244 decks)
- Confound relevance 1.87 · 26.6% (65 of 244 decks)
- Wu Elite Cavalry relevance 1.86 · 18.9% (46 of 244 decks)
All creatures (17)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 2.64 · 27.5% (67 of 244 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 2.56 · 26.2% (64 of 244 decks)
- Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 2.50 · 24.6% (60 of 244 decks)
- Lady Sun relevance 2.44 · 24.2% (59 of 244 decks)
- Council of Advisors relevance 2.41 · 24.2% (59 of 244 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 2.37 · 29.5% (72 of 244 decks)
- Wu Light Cavalry relevance 2.17 · 23.0% (56 of 244 decks)
- Wu Scout relevance 2.15 · 23.4% (57 of 244 decks)
- Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 2.00 · 19.7% (48 of 244 decks)
- Guan Yu, Sainted Warrior relevance 2.00 · 20.9% (51 of 244 decks)
- Liu Bei, Lord of Shu relevance 1.90 · 19.3% (47 of 244 decks)
- Wu Elite Cavalry relevance 1.86 · 18.9% (46 of 244 decks)
- Wu Spy relevance 1.71 · 16.0% (39 of 244 decks)
- Zhang Fei, Fierce Warrior relevance 1.66 · 17.2% (42 of 244 decks)
- Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 1.64 · 15.2% (37 of 244 decks)
- Huang Zhong, Shu General relevance 1.61 · 15.2% (37 of 244 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 1.55 · 23.4% (57 of 244 decks)
All instants (23)
- Preemptive Strike relevance 3.12 · 30.3% (74 of 244 decks)
- Mystic Denial relevance 3.06 · 29.5% (72 of 244 decks)
- Champion's Victory relevance 2.89 · 27.9% (68 of 244 decks)
- False Summoning relevance 2.72 · 29.1% (71 of 244 decks)
- Envelop relevance 2.53 · 29.1% (71 of 244 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 2.50 · 30.3% (74 of 244 decks)
- Ceremonious Rejection relevance 2.03 · 22.1% (54 of 244 decks)
- Annul relevance 1.92 · 34.4% (84 of 244 decks)
- Confound relevance 1.87 · 26.6% (65 of 244 decks)
- Eightfold Maze relevance 1.86 · 17.2% (42 of 244 decks)
- Invasive Surgery relevance 1.81 · 19.3% (47 of 244 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 1.80 · 25.4% (62 of 244 decks)
- Cancel relevance 1.73 · 34.4% (84 of 244 decks)
- Dispel relevance 1.72 · 40.2% (98 of 244 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 1.71 · 34.4% (84 of 244 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 1.69 · 25.0% (61 of 244 decks)
- Exclude relevance 1.66 · 24.6% (60 of 244 decks)
- Intervene relevance 1.66 · 21.3% (52 of 244 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 1.61 · 19.3% (47 of 244 decks)
- Ertai's Trickery relevance 1.61 · 14.3% (35 of 244 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 1.57 · 32.0% (78 of 244 decks)
- Dismal Failure relevance 1.55 · 16.4% (40 of 244 decks)
- Deprive relevance 1.50 · 22.1% (54 of 244 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Broken Dam relevance 2.63 · 27.5% (67 of 244 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 2.44 · 30.3% (74 of 244 decks)
- Forced Retreat relevance 2.43 · 24.2% (59 of 244 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 2.39 · 27.5% (67 of 244 decks)
- Balance of Power relevance 2.38 · 25.4% (62 of 244 decks)
- Counterintelligence relevance 2.29 · 22.5% (55 of 244 decks)
- Sage's Knowledge relevance 2.23 · 21.3% (52 of 244 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 2.16 · 33.6% (82 of 244 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.88 · 31.6% (77 of 244 decks)
- False Defeat relevance 1.71 · 19.7% (48 of 244 decks)
EDH data for Extinguish: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 244 real decks.