Extinguish
Played in 249 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (9)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 2.27 · 2.2% (21 of 946 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 1.98 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Tetsuo Umezawa relevance 1.41 · 2.7% (2 of 73 decks)
- Ertai, Wizard Adept relevance 0.83 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 0.79 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 0.72 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Uchbenbak, the Great Mistake relevance 0.63 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen relevance 0.56 · 2.4% (1 of 41 decks)
- Tobias Andrion relevance 0.53 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
All parallel cards (30)
- Envelop
- Flash Counter
- Negate
- Dispel
- Spell Snare
- Counterspell
- Cancel
- Outwit
- Quench
- False Summoning
- Preemptive Strike
- Essence Scatter
- Mystic Denial
- Miscast
- Remove Soul
- It'll Quench Ya!
- Nullify
- Minor Misstep
- Disallow
- Revolutionary Rebuff
- Last Word
- Stifle
- Muddle the Mixture
- Spell Blast
- Second Guess
- Thoughtbind
- Intervene
- Rethink
- Annul
- Wild Unraveling
All most relevant (30)
- Preemptive Strike relevance 3.09 · 30.1% (75 of 249 decks)
- Mystic Denial relevance 3.00 · 28.9% (72 of 249 decks)
- Champion's Victory relevance 2.87 · 27.7% (69 of 249 decks)
- False Summoning relevance 2.70 · 28.9% (72 of 249 decks)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 2.58 · 26.9% (67 of 249 decks)
- Broken Dam relevance 2.58 · 26.9% (67 of 249 decks)
- Envelop relevance 2.55 · 29.3% (73 of 249 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 2.51 · 25.7% (64 of 249 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 2.48 · 30.1% (75 of 249 decks)
- Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 2.45 · 24.1% (60 of 249 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 2.42 · 30.1% (75 of 249 decks)
- Lady Sun relevance 2.39 · 23.7% (59 of 249 decks)
- Forced Retreat relevance 2.38 · 23.7% (59 of 249 decks)
- Council of Advisors relevance 2.36 · 23.7% (59 of 249 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 2.34 · 26.9% (67 of 249 decks)
- Balance of Power relevance 2.33 · 24.9% (62 of 249 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 2.32 · 28.9% (72 of 249 decks)
- Counterintelligence relevance 2.25 · 22.1% (55 of 249 decks)
- Sage's Knowledge relevance 2.18 · 20.9% (52 of 249 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 2.14 · 33.3% (83 of 249 decks)
- Wu Light Cavalry relevance 2.12 · 22.5% (56 of 249 decks)
- Wu Scout relevance 2.10 · 22.9% (57 of 249 decks)
- Ceremonious Rejection relevance 1.99 · 21.7% (54 of 249 decks)
- Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 1.96 · 19.3% (48 of 249 decks)
- Guan Yu, Sainted Warrior relevance 1.96 · 20.5% (51 of 249 decks)
- Annul relevance 1.91 · 34.1% (85 of 249 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.86 · 31.3% (78 of 249 decks)
- Liu Bei, Lord of Shu relevance 1.86 · 18.9% (47 of 249 decks)
- Confound relevance 1.83 · 26.1% (65 of 249 decks)
- Eightfold Maze relevance 1.83 · 16.9% (42 of 249 decks)
All creatures (17)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 2.58 · 26.9% (67 of 249 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 2.51 · 25.7% (64 of 249 decks)
- Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 2.45 · 24.1% (60 of 249 decks)
- Lady Sun relevance 2.39 · 23.7% (59 of 249 decks)
- Council of Advisors relevance 2.36 · 23.7% (59 of 249 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 2.32 · 28.9% (72 of 249 decks)
- Wu Light Cavalry relevance 2.12 · 22.5% (56 of 249 decks)
- Wu Scout relevance 2.10 · 22.9% (57 of 249 decks)
- Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 1.96 · 19.3% (48 of 249 decks)
- Guan Yu, Sainted Warrior relevance 1.96 · 20.5% (51 of 249 decks)
- Liu Bei, Lord of Shu relevance 1.86 · 18.9% (47 of 249 decks)
- Wu Elite Cavalry relevance 1.82 · 18.5% (46 of 249 decks)
- Wu Spy relevance 1.68 · 15.7% (39 of 249 decks)
- Zhang Fei, Fierce Warrior relevance 1.63 · 16.9% (42 of 249 decks)
- Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 1.60 · 14.9% (37 of 249 decks)
- Huang Zhong, Shu General relevance 1.57 · 14.9% (37 of 249 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 1.52 · 22.9% (57 of 249 decks)
All instants (23)
- Preemptive Strike relevance 3.09 · 30.1% (75 of 249 decks)
- Mystic Denial relevance 3.00 · 28.9% (72 of 249 decks)
- Champion's Victory relevance 2.87 · 27.7% (69 of 249 decks)
- False Summoning relevance 2.70 · 28.9% (72 of 249 decks)
- Envelop relevance 2.55 · 29.3% (73 of 249 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 2.48 · 30.1% (75 of 249 decks)
- Ceremonious Rejection relevance 1.99 · 21.7% (54 of 249 decks)
- Annul relevance 1.91 · 34.1% (85 of 249 decks)
- Confound relevance 1.83 · 26.1% (65 of 249 decks)
- Eightfold Maze relevance 1.83 · 16.9% (42 of 249 decks)
- Invasive Surgery relevance 1.81 · 19.3% (48 of 249 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 1.79 · 25.3% (63 of 249 decks)
- Cancel relevance 1.75 · 34.9% (87 of 249 decks)
- Dispel relevance 1.72 · 40.2% (100 of 249 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 1.70 · 34.1% (85 of 249 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 1.68 · 24.9% (62 of 249 decks)
- Exclude relevance 1.63 · 24.1% (60 of 249 decks)
- Intervene relevance 1.62 · 20.9% (52 of 249 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 1.58 · 18.9% (47 of 249 decks)
- Ertai's Trickery relevance 1.57 · 14.1% (35 of 249 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 1.54 · 31.3% (78 of 249 decks)
- Dismal Failure relevance 1.52 · 16.1% (40 of 249 decks)
- Deprive relevance 1.47 · 21.7% (54 of 249 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Broken Dam relevance 2.58 · 26.9% (67 of 249 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 2.42 · 30.1% (75 of 249 decks)
- Forced Retreat relevance 2.38 · 23.7% (59 of 249 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 2.34 · 26.9% (67 of 249 decks)
- Balance of Power relevance 2.33 · 24.9% (62 of 249 decks)
- Counterintelligence relevance 2.25 · 22.1% (55 of 249 decks)
- Sage's Knowledge relevance 2.18 · 20.9% (52 of 249 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 2.14 · 33.3% (83 of 249 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.86 · 31.3% (78 of 249 decks)
- False Defeat relevance 1.67 · 19.3% (48 of 249 decks)
EDH data for Extinguish: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 249 real decks.