Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Terravore relevance 0.81 · 32.2% (97 of 301 decks)
- Drown in Filth relevance 0.62 · 36.5% (110 of 301 decks)
- Centaur Vinecrasher relevance 0.68 · 27.2% (82 of 301 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.48 · 58.1% (175 of 301 decks)
- Worm Harvest relevance 0.57 · 37.9% (114 of 301 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.52 · 43.2% (130 of 301 decks)
- Fork in the Road relevance 0.65 · 16.3% (49 of 301 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.55 · 31.9% (96 of 301 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.49 · 41.5% (125 of 301 decks)
- Skola Grovedancer relevance 0.57 · 26.9% (81 of 301 decks)
- Scion of Halaster relevance 0.60 · 21.9% (66 of 301 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.49 · 39.9% (120 of 301 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 0.59 · 17.6% (53 of 301 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.37 · 63.8% (192 of 301 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.54 · 23.6% (71 of 301 decks)
- Excavating Anurid relevance 0.68 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Wasteful Harvest relevance 0.59 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Scouring Swarm relevance 0.52 · 21.6% (65 of 301 decks)
- Lasyd Prowler relevance 0.53 · 17.3% (52 of 301 decks)
- Famished Worldsire relevance 0.54 · 15.3% (46 of 301 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.51 · 16.3% (49 of 301 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.41 · 38.2% (115 of 301 decks)
- Tectonic Split relevance 0.54 · 12.6% (38 of 301 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.43 · 31.2% (94 of 301 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.41 · 36.9% (111 of 301 decks)
- Talons of Wildwood relevance 0.58 · 8.6% (26 of 301 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.48 · 17.3% (52 of 301 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.35 · 46.2% (139 of 301 decks)
- Merciless Resolve relevance 0.58 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Corpse Churn relevance 0.47 · 15.6% (47 of 301 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.47 · 17.3% (52 of 301 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.41 · 29.9% (90 of 301 decks)
- Terror Tide relevance 0.47 · 14.6% (44 of 301 decks)
- Formless Genesis relevance 0.44 · 19.9% (60 of 301 decks)
- Circle of the Land Druid relevance 0.46 · 15.6% (47 of 301 decks)
- Grisly Salvage relevance 0.33 · 47.2% (142 of 301 decks)
- Dark Heart of the Wood relevance 0.56 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.45 · 17.3% (52 of 301 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.39 · 29.9% (90 of 301 decks)
- Crawling Sensation relevance 0.39 · 31.6% (95 of 301 decks)
- Kagha, Shadow Archdruid relevance 0.43 · 21.3% (64 of 301 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.47 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.38 · 32.9% (99 of 301 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.41 · 23.9% (72 of 301 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.41 · 21.3% (64 of 301 decks)
- Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 0.41 · 19.6% (59 of 301 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.44 · 14.3% (43 of 301 decks)
- Glowspore Shaman relevance 0.42 · 14.6% (44 of 301 decks)
- Druidic Ritual relevance 0.49 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.43 · 14.3% (43 of 301 decks)
Card Stacks
13
Card Stacks
13Showing 1-2 of 13
Cards like Harrow
20× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Golgari decks
53% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Golgari decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Golgari decks
Cards
- Harrow 64%
- Roiling Regrowth 43%
- Entish Restoration 30%
- Scapeshift 17%
- Cycle of Renewal 13%
- Planar Engineering 8%
Cards like Ramunap Excavator
13× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Golgari decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Golgari decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Golgari decks
Cards
Cards like Grapple with the Past
Over 20× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Golgari decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Golgari decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Golgari decks
Cards
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
14× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Golgari decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Golgari decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Golgari decks
Cards
Cards like Aftermath Analyst
8.2× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Golgari decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Golgari decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Golgari decks
Cards
- Aftermath Analyst 29%
- World Shaper 21%
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
8.3× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Golgari decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Golgari decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Golgari decks
Cards like Cultivate
1.2× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other Golgari decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 26% of other Golgari decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.87 in other Golgari decks
Cards
- Cultivate 35%
- Rampant Growth 29%
- Kodama's Reach 18%
- Far Wanderings 16%
- Map the Frontier 1%
- They Went This Way 1%
- Shared Roots 1%
- Explosive Vegetation 1%
Other options: Grow from the Ashes, Roamer's Routine, Beneath the Sands, Search for Tomorrow, Path to the Festival, Reach the Horizon, Viewpoint Synchronization, Deep Reconnaissance, Map the Wastes, Migration Path, Terramorph, Peregrination, Primal Growth, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Crawling Sensation
2.8× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Golgari decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Golgari decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Golgari decks
Cards
Cards like Assassin's Trophy
3.5× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other Golgari decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Golgari decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.52 in other Golgari decks
Cards
- Assassin's Trophy 26%
- Deathsprout 11%
Cards like Circle of the Land Druid
5.0× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Golgari decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Golgari decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Golgari decks
Cards
Other options: Doombot Harbinger, Paramecia Coloniex
Cards like Fork in the Road
8.4× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Golgari decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Golgari decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Golgari decks
Cards
- Fork in the Road 16%
- Dig Up 5%
- Sylvan Scrying 4%
- Rites of Spring 1%
Other options: Seek the Horizon, Reclaim the Wastes, Scouting Trek, Thirsting Roots, Attune with Aether, Lay of the Land
Cards like Rancor
11× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Cards like Stitcher's Supplier
6.5× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Golgari decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Golgari decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Golgari decks
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Terravore relevance 0.81 · 32.2% (97 of 301 decks)
- Centaur Vinecrasher relevance 0.68 · 27.2% (82 of 301 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.48 · 58.1% (175 of 301 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.55 · 31.9% (96 of 301 decks)
- Skola Grovedancer relevance 0.57 · 26.9% (81 of 301 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.49 · 39.9% (120 of 301 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 0.59 · 17.6% (53 of 301 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.54 · 23.6% (71 of 301 decks)
- Excavating Anurid relevance 0.68 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Scouring Swarm relevance 0.52 · 21.6% (65 of 301 decks)
- Lasyd Prowler relevance 0.53 · 17.3% (52 of 301 decks)
- Famished Worldsire relevance 0.54 · 15.3% (46 of 301 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.41 · 38.2% (115 of 301 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.35 · 46.2% (139 of 301 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.47 · 17.3% (52 of 301 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.41 · 29.9% (90 of 301 decks)
- Circle of the Land Druid relevance 0.46 · 15.6% (47 of 301 decks)
- Kagha, Shadow Archdruid relevance 0.43 · 21.3% (64 of 301 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.41 · 23.9% (72 of 301 decks)
- Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 0.41 · 19.6% (59 of 301 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.44 · 14.3% (43 of 301 decks)
- Glowspore Shaman relevance 0.42 · 14.6% (44 of 301 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 0.47 · 9.6% (29 of 301 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 0.47 · 9.6% (29 of 301 decks)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 0.36 · 28.9% (87 of 301 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.37 · 20.6% (62 of 301 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.42 · 11.3% (34 of 301 decks)
- Lord of Extinction relevance 0.38 · 17.9% (54 of 301 decks)
- Loamcrafter Faun relevance 0.48 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Crow of Dark Tidings relevance 0.48 · 5.6% (17 of 301 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.32 · 33.6% (101 of 301 decks)
- Eccentric Farmer relevance 0.46 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.37 · 18.3% (55 of 301 decks)
- Blanchwood Prowler relevance 0.44 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.36 · 20.6% (62 of 301 decks)
- Skull Prophet relevance 0.32 · 30.2% (91 of 301 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.32 · 28.9% (87 of 301 decks)
- Groundskeeper relevance 0.45 · 6.0% (18 of 301 decks)
- Six relevance 0.33 · 26.6% (80 of 301 decks)
- Stoic Builder relevance 0.57 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker relevance 0.42 · 7.3% (22 of 301 decks)
- Akawalli, the Seething Tower relevance 0.40 · 9.3% (28 of 301 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.36 · 12.3% (37 of 301 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.36 · 12.0% (36 of 301 decks)
- Iridescent Vinelasher relevance 0.39 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Exdeath, Void Warlock // Neo Exdeath, Dimension's End relevance 0.40 · 7.3% (22 of 301 decks)
- Nyx Weaver relevance 0.30 · 22.6% (68 of 301 decks)
- Rampant Frogantua relevance 0.41 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Patient Naturalist relevance 0.42 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.35 · 10.0% (30 of 301 decks)
Artifacts
42
Artifacts
42 Showing 1-10 of 42
Page size
All artifacts (42)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.49 · 41.5% (125 of 301 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.47 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.38 · 32.9% (99 of 301 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.41 · 21.3% (64 of 301 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.43 · 14.3% (43 of 301 decks)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.49 · 7.3% (22 of 301 decks)
- Key to the City relevance 0.43 · 9.6% (29 of 301 decks)
- Arcane Spyglass relevance 0.53 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Broodheart Engine relevance 0.35 · 6.0% (18 of 301 decks)
- Perpetual Timepiece relevance 0.32 · 7.6% (23 of 301 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.32 · 6.0% (18 of 301 decks)
- Millstone relevance 0.43 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.29 · 8.6% (26 of 301 decks)
- Charcoal Diamond relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 0.36 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Mirran Safehouse relevance 0.44 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.26 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.18 · 24.3% (73 of 301 decks)
- Ghoulcaller's Bell relevance 0.35 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (15 of 301 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.17 · 17.3% (52 of 301 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Golgari Locket relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Sword of Vengeance relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.15 · 11.0% (33 of 301 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.20 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Talisman of Resilience relevance 0.14 · 10.3% (31 of 301 decks)
- Mesmeric Orb relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Cauldron of Essence relevance 0.13 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.06 · 38.5% (116 of 301 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.11 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.03 · 48.8% (147 of 301 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.06 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
Enchantments
47
Enchantments
47 Showing 1-10 of 47
Page size
All enchantments (47)
- Scion of Halaster relevance 0.60 · 21.9% (66 of 301 decks)
- Tectonic Split relevance 0.54 · 12.6% (38 of 301 decks)
- Talons of Wildwood relevance 0.58 · 8.6% (26 of 301 decks)
- Dark Heart of the Wood relevance 0.56 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.45 · 17.3% (52 of 301 decks)
- Crawling Sensation relevance 0.39 · 31.6% (95 of 301 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.37 · 20.3% (61 of 301 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.43 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.35 · 18.3% (55 of 301 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.39 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Ayula's Influence relevance 0.44 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.40 · 8.0% (24 of 301 decks)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 0.35 · 9.6% (29 of 301 decks)
- Ripples of Undeath relevance 0.29 · 16.9% (51 of 301 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.35 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Demonic Embrace relevance 0.38 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Crawling Infestation relevance 0.31 · 10.3% (31 of 301 decks)
- Crop Sigil relevance 0.38 · 4.0% (12 of 301 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.31 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Cemetery Tampering relevance 0.31 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.38 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Deadbridge Chant relevance 0.28 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Vessel of Nascency relevance 0.39 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.36 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.34 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.33 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Strands of Night relevance 0.36 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Avatar Destiny relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.22 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.20 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Pestilence relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.31 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Tortured Existence relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Binding the Old Gods relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Oversold Cemetery relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Phyrexian Reclamation relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Moldervine Reclamation relevance 0.08 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.52 · 43.2% (130 of 301 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.37 · 63.8% (192 of 301 decks)
- Wasteful Harvest relevance 0.59 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.41 · 36.9% (111 of 301 decks)
- Merciless Resolve relevance 0.58 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Corpse Churn relevance 0.47 · 15.6% (47 of 301 decks)
- Grisly Salvage relevance 0.33 · 47.2% (142 of 301 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.39 · 29.9% (90 of 301 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.44 · 12.3% (37 of 301 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.43 · 13.3% (40 of 301 decks)
- Unseal the Necropolis relevance 0.49 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.38 · 14.0% (42 of 301 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.30 · 34.9% (105 of 301 decks)
- Seed of Hope relevance 0.45 · 5.0% (15 of 301 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.43 · 6.0% (18 of 301 decks)
- Another Chance relevance 0.40 · 5.6% (17 of 301 decks)
- Rain of Filth relevance 0.36 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- You Happen On a Glade relevance 0.42 · 4.0% (12 of 301 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Deathsprout relevance 0.32 · 11.0% (33 of 301 decks)
- Murder relevance 0.32 · 10.0% (30 of 301 decks)
- In the Presence of Ages relevance 0.40 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Dark Bargain relevance 0.43 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Dig Up the Body relevance 0.39 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.27 · 7.6% (23 of 301 decks)
- Drag to the Roots relevance 0.28 · 6.6% (20 of 301 decks)
- Dredge relevance 0.42 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.28 · 5.6% (17 of 301 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.34 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Cruel Truths relevance 0.37 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Tear Asunder relevance 0.20 · 18.9% (57 of 301 decks)
- Go for the Throat relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (18 of 301 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.28 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Stomped by the Foot relevance 0.35 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Cache Grab relevance 0.23 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Fake Your Own Death relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (12 of 301 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.16 · 33.2% (100 of 301 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.20 · 11.0% (33 of 301 decks)
- Season of Renewal relevance 0.33 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.21 · 7.3% (22 of 301 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.21 · 8.0% (24 of 301 decks)
- Elemental Teachings relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Overwhelming Remorse relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Seedship Impact relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.18 · 12.3% (37 of 301 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Cast Down relevance 0.30 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All sorceries (50)
- Drown in Filth relevance 0.62 · 36.5% (110 of 301 decks)
- Worm Harvest relevance 0.57 · 37.9% (114 of 301 decks)
- Fork in the Road relevance 0.65 · 16.3% (49 of 301 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.51 · 16.3% (49 of 301 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.43 · 31.2% (94 of 301 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.48 · 17.3% (52 of 301 decks)
- Terror Tide relevance 0.47 · 14.6% (44 of 301 decks)
- Formless Genesis relevance 0.44 · 19.9% (60 of 301 decks)
- Druidic Ritual relevance 0.49 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Urborg Repossession relevance 0.44 · 11.0% (33 of 301 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 0.45 · 10.0% (30 of 301 decks)
- Funeral Rites relevance 0.47 · 6.6% (20 of 301 decks)
- Commune with the Gods relevance 0.46 · 8.0% (24 of 301 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.44 · 8.6% (26 of 301 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.35 · 19.6% (59 of 301 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.32 · 25.9% (78 of 301 decks)
- Atrocious Experiment relevance 0.44 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Will of the Sultai relevance 0.40 · 7.3% (22 of 301 decks)
- Reprocess relevance 0.41 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.35 · 8.0% (24 of 301 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.32 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.31 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Diresight relevance 0.33 · 5.0% (15 of 301 decks)
- Squirming Emergence relevance 0.30 · 7.3% (22 of 301 decks)
- Tapping at the Window relevance 0.40 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.30 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Stargaze relevance 0.29 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Grim Discovery relevance 0.40 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Ransack the Lab relevance 0.39 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Dig Up relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Relentless Pursuit relevance 0.38 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.24 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Scout the Borders relevance 0.38 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Feed the Swarm relevance 0.23 · 10.0% (30 of 301 decks)
- Pitiless Carnage relevance 0.32 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (28 of 301 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.19 · 18.3% (55 of 301 decks)
- Resentful Revelation relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Commune with Evil relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.16 · 29.2% (88 of 301 decks)
- Rite of Consumption relevance 0.29 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Pull Through the Weft relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.26 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.17 · 14.0% (42 of 301 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.21 · 5.6% (17 of 301 decks)
- Pillage the Bog relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Gaze of Granite relevance 0.26 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Dryad's Revival relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Roots of Wisdom relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
Planeswalkers
5
Planeswalkers
5 Showing 1-5 of 5
Page size
All planeswalkers (5)
- Nissa of Shadowed Boughs relevance 0.37 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.34 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.29 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.29 · 4.0% (12 of 301 decks)
- Grist, the Hunger Tide relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (12 of 301 decks)
Utility Lands
50
Utility Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All utility lands (50)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.53 · 15.6% (47 of 301 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.51 · 14.0% (42 of 301 decks)
- Polluted Mire relevance 0.49 · 17.3% (52 of 301 decks)
- Desert of the Glorified relevance 0.51 · 13.3% (40 of 301 decks)
- The Dross Pits relevance 0.52 · 12.0% (36 of 301 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.48 · 15.0% (45 of 301 decks)
- Barren Moor relevance 0.34 · 38.9% (117 of 301 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.45 · 12.6% (38 of 301 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.33 · 37.9% (114 of 301 decks)
- Dakmor Salvage relevance 0.34 · 31.9% (96 of 301 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.40 · 15.3% (46 of 301 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.36 · 16.6% (50 of 301 decks)
- Cryptic Caves relevance 0.42 · 5.6% (17 of 301 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.28 · 32.9% (99 of 301 decks)
- Eumidian Hatchery relevance 0.38 · 10.3% (31 of 301 decks)
- Memorial to Folly relevance 0.38 · 8.0% (24 of 301 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.35 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.40 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.37 · 5.6% (17 of 301 decks)
- Drownyard Temple relevance 0.35 · 6.0% (18 of 301 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.35 · 6.6% (20 of 301 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.32 · 8.0% (24 of 301 decks)
- Haunted Fengraf relevance 0.39 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Mortuary Mire relevance 0.28 · 8.6% (26 of 301 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.20 · 32.9% (99 of 301 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (12 of 301 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Hidden Necropolis relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (12 of 301 decks)
- Festering Thicket relevance 0.22 · 17.9% (54 of 301 decks)
- Foggy Bottom Swamp relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Witch's Cottage relevance 0.27 · 6.0% (18 of 301 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.35 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (15 of 301 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.26 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Tocasia's Dig Site relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Nurturing Peatland relevance 0.21 · 14.6% (44 of 301 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.30 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Blighted Fen relevance 0.34 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.21 · 10.0% (30 of 301 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.20 · 9.3% (28 of 301 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.20 · 8.6% (26 of 301 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.17 · 14.6% (44 of 301 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.27 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.17 · 15.0% (45 of 301 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.26 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Susur Secundi, Void Altar relevance 0.23 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
Lands
50
Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All lands (50)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.39 · 36.5% (110 of 301 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.47 · 12.6% (38 of 301 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.43 · 17.3% (52 of 301 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.38 · 29.6% (89 of 301 decks)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.47 · 9.6% (29 of 301 decks)
- Obscura Storefront relevance 0.46 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.43 · 11.0% (33 of 301 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.44 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.21 · 65.8% (198 of 301 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.42 · 7.6% (23 of 301 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.22 · 61.1% (184 of 301 decks)
- Jund Panorama relevance 0.41 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Terminal Moraine relevance 0.47 · 4.0% (12 of 301 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.39 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.36 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Ebon Stronghold relevance 0.39 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Warped Landscape relevance 0.40 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.20 · 34.6% (104 of 301 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Woodland Chasm relevance 0.28 · 8.0% (24 of 301 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.38 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Command Bridge relevance 0.36 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Festering Gulch relevance 0.27 · 6.0% (18 of 301 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.41 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Peat Bog relevance 0.33 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (28 of 301 decks)
- Thriving Moor relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Foul Orchard relevance 0.25 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Haunted Mire relevance 0.20 · 16.3% (49 of 301 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.24 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.18 · 24.6% (74 of 301 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.23 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.21 · 7.6% (23 of 301 decks)
- Strangled Cemetery relevance 0.26 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (15 of 301 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (19 of 301 decks)
- Hobbit Hole relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (19 of 301 decks)
- Havenwood Battleground relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.23 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.21 · 5.6% (17 of 301 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.14 · 29.9% (90 of 301 decks)
- Darkmoss Bridge relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (15 of 301 decks)
- Blooming Marsh relevance 0.17 · 9.6% (29 of 301 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.14 · 21.6% (65 of 301 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Uurg, Spawn of Turg, from 301 real Commander decks.