Cards like Harrow
20× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Golgari decks
53% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Golgari decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Golgari decks
Cards
- Harrow 64%
- Roiling Regrowth 43%
- Entish Restoration 30%
- Scapeshift 17%
- Cycle of Renewal 13%
- Planar Engineering 8%
Cards like Ramunap Excavator
13× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Golgari decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Golgari decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Golgari decks
Cards
Cards like Grapple with the Past
Over 20× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Golgari decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Golgari decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Golgari decks
Cards
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
14× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Golgari decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Golgari decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Golgari decks
Cards
Cards like Aftermath Analyst
8.1× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Golgari decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Golgari decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Golgari decks
Cards
- Aftermath Analyst 29%
- World Shaper 21%
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
8.3× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Golgari decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Golgari decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Golgari decks
Cards like Cultivate
1.2× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other Golgari decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 26% of other Golgari decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.87 in other Golgari decks
Cards
- Cultivate 35%
- Rampant Growth 29%
- Kodama's Reach 18%
- Far Wanderings 16%
- Map the Frontier 1%
- They Went This Way 1%
- Shared Roots 1%
- Explosive Vegetation 1%
Other options: Grow from the Ashes, Roamer's Routine, Beneath the Sands, Search for Tomorrow, Path to the Festival, Reach the Horizon, Viewpoint Synchronization, Deep Reconnaissance, Map the Wastes, Migration Path, Terramorph, Peregrination, Primal Growth, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Crawling Sensation
2.8× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Golgari decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Golgari decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Golgari decks
Cards
Cards like Assassin's Trophy
3.5× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other Golgari decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Golgari decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.52 in other Golgari decks
Cards
- Assassin's Trophy 26%
- Deathsprout 11%
Cards like Circle of the Land Druid
5.0× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Golgari decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Golgari decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Golgari decks
Cards
Other options: Doombot Harbinger, Paramecia Coloniex
Cards like Fork in the Road
8.4× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Golgari decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Golgari decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Golgari decks
Cards
- Fork in the Road 16%
- Dig Up 5%
- Sylvan Scrying 4%
- Rites of Spring 1%
Other options: Seek the Horizon, Reclaim the Wastes, Scouting Trek, Thirsting Roots, Attune with Aether, Lay of the Land
Cards like Rancor
11× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Cards like Stitcher's Supplier
6.4× as likely as other Golgari decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Golgari decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Golgari decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Golgari decks
All top picks (50)
- Terravore relevance 0.81 · 32.5% (98 of 302 decks)
- Drown in Filth relevance 0.62 · 36.8% (111 of 302 decks)
- Centaur Vinecrasher relevance 0.68 · 27.2% (82 of 302 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.48 · 57.9% (175 of 302 decks)
- Worm Harvest relevance 0.57 · 37.7% (114 of 302 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.52 · 43.0% (130 of 302 decks)
- Fork in the Road relevance 0.65 · 16.2% (49 of 302 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.55 · 31.8% (96 of 302 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.49 · 41.4% (125 of 302 decks)
- Skola Grovedancer relevance 0.57 · 26.8% (81 of 302 decks)
- Scion of Halaster relevance 0.60 · 21.9% (66 of 302 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.49 · 39.7% (120 of 302 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 0.59 · 17.5% (53 of 302 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.37 · 63.6% (192 of 302 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.54 · 23.5% (71 of 302 decks)
- Excavating Anurid relevance 0.68 · 8.9% (27 of 302 decks)
- Wasteful Harvest relevance 0.59 · 13.6% (41 of 302 decks)
- Scouring Swarm relevance 0.52 · 21.5% (65 of 302 decks)
- Lasyd Prowler relevance 0.53 · 17.2% (52 of 302 decks)
- Famished Worldsire relevance 0.54 · 15.6% (47 of 302 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.51 · 16.2% (49 of 302 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.41 · 38.1% (115 of 302 decks)
- Tectonic Split relevance 0.54 · 12.6% (38 of 302 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.43 · 31.1% (94 of 302 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.41 · 36.8% (111 of 302 decks)
- Talons of Wildwood relevance 0.58 · 8.6% (26 of 302 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.48 · 17.2% (52 of 302 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.35 · 46.0% (139 of 302 decks)
- Merciless Resolve relevance 0.58 · 7.0% (21 of 302 decks)
- Corpse Churn relevance 0.47 · 15.6% (47 of 302 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.47 · 17.2% (52 of 302 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.41 · 29.8% (90 of 302 decks)
- Terror Tide relevance 0.47 · 14.6% (44 of 302 decks)
- Formless Genesis relevance 0.44 · 19.9% (60 of 302 decks)
- Circle of the Land Druid relevance 0.46 · 15.6% (47 of 302 decks)
- Grisly Salvage relevance 0.33 · 47.0% (142 of 302 decks)
- Dark Heart of the Wood relevance 0.56 · 7.0% (21 of 302 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.45 · 17.2% (52 of 302 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.39 · 29.8% (90 of 302 decks)
- Crawling Sensation relevance 0.39 · 31.5% (95 of 302 decks)
- Kagha, Shadow Archdruid relevance 0.43 · 21.2% (64 of 302 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.47 · 13.6% (41 of 302 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.38 · 32.8% (99 of 302 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.41 · 23.8% (72 of 302 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.41 · 21.5% (65 of 302 decks)
- Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 0.41 · 19.5% (59 of 302 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.44 · 14.2% (43 of 302 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.43 · 14.6% (44 of 302 decks)
- Glowspore Shaman relevance 0.42 · 14.6% (44 of 302 decks)
- Druidic Ritual relevance 0.49 · 8.3% (25 of 302 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Terravore relevance 0.81 · 32.5% (98 of 302 decks)
- Centaur Vinecrasher relevance 0.68 · 27.2% (82 of 302 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.48 · 57.9% (175 of 302 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.55 · 31.8% (96 of 302 decks)
- Skola Grovedancer relevance 0.57 · 26.8% (81 of 302 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.49 · 39.7% (120 of 302 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 0.59 · 17.5% (53 of 302 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.54 · 23.5% (71 of 302 decks)
- Excavating Anurid relevance 0.68 · 8.9% (27 of 302 decks)
- Scouring Swarm relevance 0.52 · 21.5% (65 of 302 decks)
- Lasyd Prowler relevance 0.53 · 17.2% (52 of 302 decks)
- Famished Worldsire relevance 0.54 · 15.6% (47 of 302 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.41 · 38.1% (115 of 302 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.35 · 46.0% (139 of 302 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.47 · 17.2% (52 of 302 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.41 · 29.8% (90 of 302 decks)
- Circle of the Land Druid relevance 0.46 · 15.6% (47 of 302 decks)
- Kagha, Shadow Archdruid relevance 0.43 · 21.2% (64 of 302 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.41 · 23.8% (72 of 302 decks)
- Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 0.41 · 19.5% (59 of 302 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.44 · 14.2% (43 of 302 decks)
- Glowspore Shaman relevance 0.42 · 14.6% (44 of 302 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 0.47 · 9.6% (29 of 302 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 0.47 · 9.6% (29 of 302 decks)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 0.36 · 28.8% (87 of 302 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.37 · 20.5% (62 of 302 decks)
- Lord of Extinction relevance 0.38 · 18.2% (55 of 302 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.42 · 11.3% (34 of 302 decks)
- Loamcrafter Faun relevance 0.48 · 5.3% (16 of 302 decks)
- Crow of Dark Tidings relevance 0.48 · 5.6% (17 of 302 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.32 · 33.4% (101 of 302 decks)
- Eccentric Farmer relevance 0.46 · 7.0% (21 of 302 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.37 · 18.2% (55 of 302 decks)
- Blanchwood Prowler relevance 0.44 · 8.3% (25 of 302 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.36 · 20.5% (62 of 302 decks)
- Skull Prophet relevance 0.32 · 30.1% (91 of 302 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.32 · 29.1% (88 of 302 decks)
- Groundskeeper relevance 0.45 · 6.0% (18 of 302 decks)
- Six relevance 0.33 · 26.5% (80 of 302 decks)
- Stoic Builder relevance 0.57 · 3.3% (10 of 302 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker relevance 0.42 · 7.3% (22 of 302 decks)
- Akawalli, the Seething Tower relevance 0.40 · 9.3% (28 of 302 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.36 · 12.3% (37 of 302 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.36 · 11.9% (36 of 302 decks)
- Iridescent Vinelasher relevance 0.39 · 8.3% (25 of 302 decks)
- Exdeath, Void Warlock // Neo Exdeath, Dimension's End relevance 0.40 · 7.3% (22 of 302 decks)
- Nyx Weaver relevance 0.30 · 22.5% (68 of 302 decks)
- Rampant Frogantua relevance 0.41 · 4.6% (14 of 302 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.35 · 9.9% (30 of 302 decks)
- Patient Naturalist relevance 0.42 · 4.3% (13 of 302 decks)
All artifacts (42)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.49 · 41.4% (125 of 302 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.47 · 13.6% (41 of 302 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.38 · 32.8% (99 of 302 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.41 · 21.5% (65 of 302 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.43 · 14.6% (44 of 302 decks)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.50 · 7.6% (23 of 302 decks)
- Key to the City relevance 0.43 · 9.6% (29 of 302 decks)
- Arcane Spyglass relevance 0.53 · 3.3% (10 of 302 decks)
- Broodheart Engine relevance 0.35 · 6.0% (18 of 302 decks)
- Perpetual Timepiece relevance 0.32 · 7.6% (23 of 302 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.32 · 6.0% (18 of 302 decks)
- Millstone relevance 0.43 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.29 · 8.6% (26 of 302 decks)
- Charcoal Diamond relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (13 of 302 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 0.36 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
- Mirran Safehouse relevance 0.44 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.26 · 7.0% (21 of 302 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (13 of 302 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.18 · 24.2% (73 of 302 decks)
- Ghoulcaller's Bell relevance 0.35 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (15 of 302 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.33 · 2.6% (8 of 302 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.17 · 17.2% (52 of 302 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Golgari Locket relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (8 of 302 decks)
- Sword of Vengeance relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (10 of 302 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.15 · 10.9% (33 of 302 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (8 of 302 decks)
- Talisman of Resilience relevance 0.14 · 10.3% (31 of 302 decks)
- Mesmeric Orb relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Cauldron of Essence relevance 0.13 · 5.3% (16 of 302 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (8 of 302 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.06 · 38.4% (116 of 302 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.11 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.03 · 48.7% (147 of 302 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.06 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
All enchantments (47)
- Scion of Halaster relevance 0.60 · 21.9% (66 of 302 decks)
- Tectonic Split relevance 0.54 · 12.6% (38 of 302 decks)
- Talons of Wildwood relevance 0.58 · 8.6% (26 of 302 decks)
- Dark Heart of the Wood relevance 0.56 · 7.0% (21 of 302 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.45 · 17.2% (52 of 302 decks)
- Crawling Sensation relevance 0.39 · 31.5% (95 of 302 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.37 · 20.2% (61 of 302 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.43 · 8.9% (27 of 302 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.35 · 18.2% (55 of 302 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.39 · 8.9% (27 of 302 decks)
- Ayula's Influence relevance 0.44 · 4.6% (14 of 302 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.40 · 7.9% (24 of 302 decks)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 0.35 · 9.6% (29 of 302 decks)
- Ripples of Undeath relevance 0.29 · 16.9% (51 of 302 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.35 · 5.3% (16 of 302 decks)
- Demonic Embrace relevance 0.38 · 4.3% (13 of 302 decks)
- Crawling Infestation relevance 0.31 · 10.3% (31 of 302 decks)
- Crop Sigil relevance 0.38 · 4.0% (12 of 302 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.31 · 7.0% (21 of 302 decks)
- Cemetery Tampering relevance 0.31 · 7.0% (21 of 302 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.38 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
- Deadbridge Chant relevance 0.28 · 8.9% (27 of 302 decks)
- Vessel of Nascency relevance 0.39 · 3.3% (10 of 302 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.36 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (13 of 302 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.34 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.33 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (25 of 302 decks)
- Strands of Night relevance 0.36 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Avatar Destiny relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.22 · 5.3% (16 of 302 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.20 · 8.9% (27 of 302 decks)
- Pestilence relevance 0.30 · 2.6% (8 of 302 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.31 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.27 · 2.6% (8 of 302 decks)
- Tortured Existence relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Binding the Old Gods relevance 0.18 · 4.6% (14 of 302 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (8 of 302 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Oversold Cemetery relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (8 of 302 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
- Phyrexian Reclamation relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (8 of 302 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Moldervine Reclamation relevance 0.08 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
All instants (50)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.52 · 43.0% (130 of 302 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.37 · 63.6% (192 of 302 decks)
- Wasteful Harvest relevance 0.59 · 13.6% (41 of 302 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.41 · 36.8% (111 of 302 decks)
- Merciless Resolve relevance 0.58 · 7.0% (21 of 302 decks)
- Corpse Churn relevance 0.47 · 15.6% (47 of 302 decks)
- Grisly Salvage relevance 0.33 · 47.0% (142 of 302 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.39 · 29.8% (90 of 302 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.44 · 12.3% (37 of 302 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.43 · 13.2% (40 of 302 decks)
- Unseal the Necropolis relevance 0.49 · 7.0% (21 of 302 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.38 · 13.9% (42 of 302 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.30 · 34.8% (105 of 302 decks)
- Seed of Hope relevance 0.45 · 5.0% (15 of 302 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.43 · 6.0% (18 of 302 decks)
- Another Chance relevance 0.40 · 5.6% (17 of 302 decks)
- Rain of Filth relevance 0.37 · 7.3% (22 of 302 decks)
- You Happen On a Glade relevance 0.42 · 4.0% (12 of 302 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (16 of 302 decks)
- Deathsprout relevance 0.32 · 10.9% (33 of 302 decks)
- Murder relevance 0.32 · 9.9% (30 of 302 decks)
- In the Presence of Ages relevance 0.40 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
- Dark Bargain relevance 0.43 · 3.3% (10 of 302 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.35 · 4.0% (12 of 302 decks)
- Drag to the Roots relevance 0.28 · 7.0% (21 of 302 decks)
- Dig Up the Body relevance 0.39 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.27 · 7.6% (23 of 302 decks)
- Dredge relevance 0.42 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.28 · 5.6% (17 of 302 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (16 of 302 decks)
- Cruel Truths relevance 0.37 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Tear Asunder relevance 0.20 · 18.9% (57 of 302 decks)
- Go for the Throat relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (18 of 302 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.28 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
- Stomped by the Foot relevance 0.35 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Cache Grab relevance 0.23 · 5.3% (16 of 302 decks)
- Fake Your Own Death relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (12 of 302 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.16 · 33.1% (100 of 302 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.20 · 10.9% (33 of 302 decks)
- Season of Renewal relevance 0.33 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.21 · 7.3% (22 of 302 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.21 · 7.9% (24 of 302 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.18 · 12.6% (38 of 302 decks)
- Elemental Teachings relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Overwhelming Remorse relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Seedship Impact relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.24 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (8 of 302 decks)
- Cast Down relevance 0.30 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Drown in Filth relevance 0.62 · 36.8% (111 of 302 decks)
- Worm Harvest relevance 0.57 · 37.7% (114 of 302 decks)
- Fork in the Road relevance 0.65 · 16.2% (49 of 302 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.51 · 16.2% (49 of 302 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.43 · 31.1% (94 of 302 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.48 · 17.2% (52 of 302 decks)
- Terror Tide relevance 0.47 · 14.6% (44 of 302 decks)
- Formless Genesis relevance 0.44 · 19.9% (60 of 302 decks)
- Druidic Ritual relevance 0.49 · 8.3% (25 of 302 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 0.46 · 10.3% (31 of 302 decks)
- Urborg Repossession relevance 0.44 · 10.9% (33 of 302 decks)
- Funeral Rites relevance 0.47 · 6.6% (20 of 302 decks)
- Commune with the Gods relevance 0.46 · 7.9% (24 of 302 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.44 · 8.6% (26 of 302 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.35 · 19.5% (59 of 302 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.32 · 25.8% (78 of 302 decks)
- Atrocious Experiment relevance 0.44 · 5.3% (16 of 302 decks)
- Will of the Sultai relevance 0.40 · 7.3% (22 of 302 decks)
- Reprocess relevance 0.41 · 4.6% (14 of 302 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.35 · 7.9% (24 of 302 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.32 · 8.6% (26 of 302 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.31 · 8.9% (27 of 302 decks)
- Diresight relevance 0.33 · 5.0% (15 of 302 decks)
- Squirming Emergence relevance 0.30 · 7.3% (22 of 302 decks)
- Tapping at the Window relevance 0.40 · 3.3% (10 of 302 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.30 · 7.0% (21 of 302 decks)
- Stargaze relevance 0.29 · 7.0% (21 of 302 decks)
- Grim Discovery relevance 0.40 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (13 of 302 decks)
- Ransack the Lab relevance 0.39 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Dig Up relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (16 of 302 decks)
- Relentless Pursuit relevance 0.38 · 2.6% (8 of 302 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.24 · 8.9% (27 of 302 decks)
- Scout the Borders relevance 0.38 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Feed the Swarm relevance 0.23 · 9.9% (30 of 302 decks)
- Pitiless Carnage relevance 0.32 · 3.3% (10 of 302 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (28 of 302 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.19 · 18.2% (55 of 302 decks)
- Resentful Revelation relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Commune with Evil relevance 0.33 · 2.6% (8 of 302 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.16 · 29.1% (88 of 302 decks)
- Rite of Consumption relevance 0.28 · 3.3% (10 of 302 decks)
- Pull Through the Weft relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (8 of 302 decks)
- Life's Legacy relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.17 · 13.9% (42 of 302 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.21 · 5.6% (17 of 302 decks)
- Pillage the Bog relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Gaze of Granite relevance 0.26 · 3.3% (10 of 302 decks)
- Dryad's Revival relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (8 of 302 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (5)
- Nissa of Shadowed Boughs relevance 0.37 · 8.3% (25 of 302 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.34 · 5.3% (16 of 302 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.29 · 5.3% (16 of 302 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.29 · 4.0% (12 of 302 decks)
- Grist, the Hunger Tide relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (12 of 302 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.53 · 15.6% (47 of 302 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.51 · 13.9% (42 of 302 decks)
- Polluted Mire relevance 0.49 · 17.2% (52 of 302 decks)
- Desert of the Glorified relevance 0.51 · 13.2% (40 of 302 decks)
- The Dross Pits relevance 0.51 · 11.9% (36 of 302 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.48 · 14.9% (45 of 302 decks)
- Barren Moor relevance 0.34 · 38.7% (117 of 302 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.45 · 12.6% (38 of 302 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.33 · 37.7% (114 of 302 decks)
- Dakmor Salvage relevance 0.34 · 31.8% (96 of 302 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.40 · 15.2% (46 of 302 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.36 · 16.6% (50 of 302 decks)
- Eumidian Hatchery relevance 0.38 · 10.6% (32 of 302 decks)
- Cryptic Caves relevance 0.42 · 5.6% (17 of 302 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.28 · 32.8% (99 of 302 decks)
- Memorial to Folly relevance 0.38 · 7.9% (24 of 302 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.35 · 8.9% (27 of 302 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.40 · 4.3% (13 of 302 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.37 · 5.6% (17 of 302 decks)
- Drownyard Temple relevance 0.35 · 6.0% (18 of 302 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.35 · 6.6% (20 of 302 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.32 · 7.9% (24 of 302 decks)
- Haunted Fengraf relevance 0.39 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
- Mortuary Mire relevance 0.28 · 8.6% (26 of 302 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.20 · 32.8% (99 of 302 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (12 of 302 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.30 · 4.6% (14 of 302 decks)
- Hidden Necropolis relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (12 of 302 decks)
- Festering Thicket relevance 0.22 · 17.9% (54 of 302 decks)
- Foggy Bottom Swamp relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (16 of 302 decks)
- Witch's Cottage relevance 0.27 · 6.0% (18 of 302 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.35 · 3.3% (10 of 302 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (15 of 302 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.26 · 7.0% (21 of 302 decks)
- Tocasia's Dig Site relevance 0.37 · 2.6% (8 of 302 decks)
- Nurturing Peatland relevance 0.21 · 14.6% (44 of 302 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.30 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
- Blighted Fen relevance 0.34 · 2.6% (8 of 302 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.21 · 9.9% (30 of 302 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.20 · 9.6% (29 of 302 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (8 of 302 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.20 · 8.6% (26 of 302 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.17 · 14.6% (44 of 302 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.17 · 14.9% (45 of 302 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.27 · 3.3% (10 of 302 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.21 · 4.6% (14 of 302 decks)
- Susur Secundi, Void Altar relevance 0.23 · 4.3% (13 of 302 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
All lands (50)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.39 · 36.4% (110 of 302 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.47 · 12.6% (38 of 302 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.43 · 17.5% (53 of 302 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.38 · 29.5% (89 of 302 decks)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.47 · 9.6% (29 of 302 decks)
- Obscura Storefront relevance 0.46 · 8.9% (27 of 302 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.43 · 10.9% (33 of 302 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.44 · 8.3% (25 of 302 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.42 · 7.6% (23 of 302 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.21 · 65.6% (198 of 302 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.22 · 60.9% (184 of 302 decks)
- Jund Panorama relevance 0.41 · 5.3% (16 of 302 decks)
- Terminal Moraine relevance 0.47 · 4.0% (12 of 302 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.39 · 7.0% (21 of 302 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.36 · 8.9% (27 of 302 decks)
- Ebon Stronghold relevance 0.39 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
- Warped Landscape relevance 0.40 · 3.3% (10 of 302 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.20 · 34.4% (104 of 302 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (13 of 302 decks)
- Woodland Chasm relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (24 of 302 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.38 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Command Bridge relevance 0.36 · 3.3% (10 of 302 decks)
- Festering Gulch relevance 0.27 · 6.0% (18 of 302 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.41 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Peat Bog relevance 0.33 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (28 of 302 decks)
- Thriving Moor relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (14 of 302 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (25 of 302 decks)
- Foul Orchard relevance 0.25 · 5.3% (16 of 302 decks)
- Haunted Mire relevance 0.20 · 16.2% (49 of 302 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.24 · 7.0% (21 of 302 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.25 · 4.6% (14 of 302 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.18 · 24.5% (74 of 302 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.23 · 7.0% (21 of 302 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.22 · 5.3% (16 of 302 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.21 · 7.6% (23 of 302 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (19 of 302 decks)
- Strangled Cemetery relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (19 of 302 decks)
- Hobbit Hole relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Gemstone Mine relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Havenwood Battleground relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (7 of 302 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.23 · 4.3% (13 of 302 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.21 · 5.6% (17 of 302 decks)
- Darkmoss Bridge relevance 0.20 · 5.3% (16 of 302 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.14 · 29.8% (90 of 302 decks)
- Blooming Marsh relevance 0.17 · 9.6% (29 of 302 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.14 · 21.5% (65 of 302 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (11 of 302 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Uurg, Spawn of Turg, from 302 real Commander decks.