Bant Panorama

Played in 15,005 decks

Bant Panorama
$0.36 €0.31

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Gogo, Master of Mimicry relevance 3.72 · 11.7% (232 of 1,991 decks)
  2. Cosima, God of the Voyage // The Omenkeel relevance 3.02 · 13.6% (70 of 516 decks)
  3. Tifa Lockhart relevance 3.00 · 9.1% (885 of 9,775 decks)
  4. Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 3.00 · 9.5% (659 of 6,939 decks)
  5. Galea, Kindler of Hope relevance 2.57 · 21.7% (558 of 2,573 decks)
  6. Perrie, the Pulverizer relevance 2.56 · 29.0% (275 of 949 decks)
  7. Minthara, Merciless Soul relevance 2.36 · 1.2% (33 of 2,784 decks)
  8. Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 2.31 · 1.5% (31 of 2,084 decks)
  9. The Unluckiest Planeswalker relevance 2.29 · 1.2% (13 of 1,084 decks)
  10. Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 2.17 · 3.4% (198 of 5,902 decks)
  11. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 2.13 · 1.7% (89 of 5,211 decks)
  12. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.07 · 5.6% (257 of 4,615 decks)
  13. Parhelion II relevance 2.05 · 8.4% (13 of 155 decks)
  14. Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 1.91 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
  15. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.85 · 7.3% (93 of 1,271 decks)
  16. Nissa, Leyline Tamer relevance 1.80 · 1.8% (50 of 2,843 decks)
  17. Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 1.75 · 7.4% (64 of 868 decks)
  18. Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.72 · 7.7% (62 of 801 decks)
  19. Rafiq of the Many relevance 1.72 · 11.7% (267 of 2,282 decks)
  20. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.71 · 1.3% (53 of 4,012 decks)
  21. Reaper King relevance 1.71 · 1.9% (95 of 5,102 decks)
  22. Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 1.53 · 3.5% (21 of 597 decks)
  23. Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 1.50 · 3.8% (3 of 78 decks)
  24. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.49 · 1.2% (24 of 1,940 decks)
  25. Uurg, Spawn of Turg relevance 1.41 · 2.0% (6 of 297 decks)
  26. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 1.40 · 2.1% (189 of 8,798 decks)
  27. Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 1.38 · 4.9% (55 of 1,115 decks)
  28. Seluma, Light of Aysen relevance 1.36 · 1.5% (18 of 1,233 decks)
  29. Chromium, the Mutable relevance 1.33 · 1.2% (11 of 906 decks)
  30. The Everforger relevance 1.28 · 1.8% (17 of 958 decks)

Parallel Cards

30

Most Relevant

18

Showing 1-10 of 18

Page size
  • Harrow
    0.68 20.6%
    $0.34 €0.41
  • Cultivate
    0.64 36.5%
    $0.45 €0.48
  • Rampant Growth
    0.64 30.7%
    $1.14 €0.55
  • Bant Charm
    0.54 9.0%
    $0.28 €0.11
  • Sakura-Tribe Elder
    0.53 19.1%
    $0.38 €0.57
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.51 21.9%
    $1.85 €1.54
  • Rampaging Baloths
    0.50 14.0%
    $0.35 €0.32
  • Beast Within
    0.48 23.9%
    $0.73 €0.86
  • Scute Swarm
    0.48 14.7%
    $8.85 €7.98
  • Roiling Regrowth
    0.48 11.1%
    $0.33 €0.31
All most relevant (18)
  1. Harrow relevance 0.68 · 20.6% (3,093 of 15,005 decks)
  2. Cultivate relevance 0.64 · 36.5% (5,476 of 15,005 decks)
  3. Rampant Growth relevance 0.64 · 30.7% (4,609 of 15,005 decks)
  4. Bant Charm relevance 0.54 · 9.0% (1,356 of 15,005 decks)
  5. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.53 · 19.1% (2,867 of 15,005 decks)
  6. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.51 · 21.9% (3,284 of 15,005 decks)
  7. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.50 · 14.0% (2,099 of 15,005 decks)
  8. Beast Within relevance 0.48 · 23.9% (3,585 of 15,005 decks)
  9. Scute Swarm relevance 0.48 · 14.7% (2,201 of 15,005 decks)
  10. Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.48 · 11.1% (1,667 of 15,005 decks)
  11. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.46 · 12.1% (1,822 of 15,005 decks)
  12. Farseek relevance 0.45 · 24.3% (3,644 of 15,005 decks)
  13. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.44 · 12.3% (1,851 of 15,005 decks)
  14. Explore relevance 0.43 · 13.3% (1,990 of 15,005 decks)
  15. Entish Restoration relevance 0.42 · 11.3% (1,697 of 15,005 decks)
  16. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.42 · 11.1% (1,659 of 15,005 decks)
  17. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.42 · 10.4% (1,556 of 15,005 decks)
  18. Growth Spiral relevance 0.42 · 12.8% (1,915 of 15,005 decks)

Creatures

7

Showing 1-7 of 7

Page size
  • Sakura-Tribe Elder
    0.53 19.1%
    $0.38 €0.57
  • Rampaging Baloths
    0.50 14.0%
    $0.35 €0.32
  • Scute Swarm
    0.48 14.7%
    $8.85 €7.98
  • Tatyova, Benthic Druid
    0.46 12.1%
    $0.28 €0.14
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.44 12.3%
    $12.94 €8.93
  • Ramunap Excavator
    0.42 11.1%
    $4.81 €3.73
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    0.42 10.4%
    $12.76 €10.17
All creatures (7)
  1. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.53 · 19.1% (2,867 of 15,005 decks)
  2. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.50 · 14.0% (2,099 of 15,005 decks)
  3. Scute Swarm relevance 0.48 · 14.7% (2,201 of 15,005 decks)
  4. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.46 · 12.1% (1,822 of 15,005 decks)
  5. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.44 · 12.3% (1,851 of 15,005 decks)
  6. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.42 · 11.1% (1,659 of 15,005 decks)
  7. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.42 · 10.4% (1,556 of 15,005 decks)

Instants

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Harrow
    0.68 20.6%
    $0.34 €0.41
  • Bant Charm
    0.54 9.0%
    $0.28 €0.11
  • Beast Within
    0.48 23.9%
    $0.73 €0.86
  • Roiling Regrowth
    0.48 11.1%
    $0.33 €0.31
  • Entish Restoration
    0.42 11.3%
    $3.19 €1.86
  • Growth Spiral
    0.42 12.8%
    $0.32 €0.48
All instants (6)
  1. Harrow relevance 0.68 · 20.6% (3,093 of 15,005 decks)
  2. Bant Charm relevance 0.54 · 9.0% (1,356 of 15,005 decks)
  3. Beast Within relevance 0.48 · 23.9% (3,585 of 15,005 decks)
  4. Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.48 · 11.1% (1,667 of 15,005 decks)
  5. Entish Restoration relevance 0.42 · 11.3% (1,697 of 15,005 decks)
  6. Growth Spiral relevance 0.42 · 12.8% (1,915 of 15,005 decks)

Sorceries

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Cultivate
    0.64 36.5%
    $0.45 €0.48
  • Rampant Growth
    0.64 30.7%
    $1.14 €0.55
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.51 21.9%
    $1.85 €1.54
  • Farseek
    0.45 24.3%
    $0.46 €0.79
  • Explore
    0.43 13.3%
    $0.18 €0.25
All sorceries (5)
  1. Cultivate relevance 0.64 · 36.5% (5,476 of 15,005 decks)
  2. Rampant Growth relevance 0.64 · 30.7% (4,609 of 15,005 decks)
  3. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.51 · 21.9% (3,284 of 15,005 decks)
  4. Farseek relevance 0.45 · 24.3% (3,644 of 15,005 decks)
  5. Explore relevance 0.43 · 13.3% (1,990 of 15,005 decks)

Utility Lands

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Blighted Woodland
    0.81 18.4%
    $0.40 €0.25
  • Escape Tunnel
    0.80 20.5%
    $0.35 €0.11
  • Myriad Landscape
    0.79 36.1%
    $0.26 €0.26
  • Tranquil Landscape
    0.62 12.1%
    $0.19 €0.19
  • Temple of Mystery
    0.49 13.9%
    $0.23 €0.17
  • Krosan Verge
    0.46 10.4%
    $0.31 €0.18
All utility lands (6)
  1. Blighted Woodland relevance 0.81 · 18.4% (2,766 of 15,005 decks)
  2. Escape Tunnel relevance 0.80 · 20.5% (3,078 of 15,005 decks)
  3. Myriad Landscape relevance 0.79 · 36.1% (5,415 of 15,005 decks)
  4. Tranquil Landscape relevance 0.62 · 12.1% (1,810 of 15,005 decks)
  5. Temple of Mystery relevance 0.49 · 13.9% (2,089 of 15,005 decks)
  6. Krosan Verge relevance 0.46 · 10.4% (1,564 of 15,005 decks)

Lands

26

Showing 1-10 of 26

Page size
  • Brokers Hideout
    1.55 33.6%
    $0.83 €0.76
  • Naya Panorama
    1.47 25.1%
    $0.39 €0.22
  • Jund Panorama
    1.24 20.5%
    $0.50 €0.43
  • Esper Panorama
    1.13 18.1%
    $0.40 €0.25
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    1.08 53.1%
    $0.28 €0.09
  • Seaside Citadel
    1.07 29.8%
    $0.33 €0.28
  • Evolving Wilds
    1.04 60.6%
    $0.26 €0.14
  • Shire Terrace
    0.94 18.5%
    $0.24 €0.11
  • Promising Vein
    0.92 16.9%
    $0.31 €0.17
  • Grixis Panorama
    0.85 13.8%
    $0.38 €0.44
All lands (26)
  1. Brokers Hideout relevance 1.55 · 33.6% (5,049 of 15,005 decks)
  2. Naya Panorama relevance 1.47 · 25.1% (3,764 of 15,005 decks)
  3. Jund Panorama relevance 1.24 · 20.5% (3,075 of 15,005 decks)
  4. Esper Panorama relevance 1.13 · 18.1% (2,717 of 15,005 decks)
  5. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 1.08 · 53.1% (7,975 of 15,005 decks)
  6. Seaside Citadel relevance 1.07 · 29.8% (4,474 of 15,005 decks)
  7. Evolving Wilds relevance 1.04 · 60.6% (9,087 of 15,005 decks)
  8. Shire Terrace relevance 0.94 · 18.5% (2,771 of 15,005 decks)
  9. Promising Vein relevance 0.92 · 16.9% (2,531 of 15,005 decks)
  10. Grixis Panorama relevance 0.85 · 13.8% (2,077 of 15,005 decks)
  11. Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.74 · 17.4% (2,604 of 15,005 decks)
  12. Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.72 · 20.3% (3,045 of 15,005 decks)
  13. Prairie Stream relevance 0.62 · 23.3% (3,497 of 15,005 decks)
  14. Fabled Passage relevance 0.61 · 28.8% (4,326 of 15,005 decks)
  15. Canopy Vista relevance 0.60 · 22.4% (3,354 of 15,005 decks)
  16. Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.58 · 14.1% (2,115 of 15,005 decks)
  17. Azorius Chancery relevance 0.57 · 14.8% (2,228 of 15,005 decks)
  18. Grasslands relevance 0.54 · 9.0% (1,357 of 15,005 decks)
  19. Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.51 · 13.0% (1,957 of 15,005 decks)
  20. Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.50 · 19.4% (2,917 of 15,005 decks)
  21. Ash Barrens relevance 0.48 · 15.7% (2,352 of 15,005 decks)
  22. Warped Landscape relevance 0.46 · 7.2% (1,073 of 15,005 decks)
  23. Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.44 · 15.5% (2,332 of 15,005 decks)
  24. Flood Plain relevance 0.44 · 7.2% (1,073 of 15,005 decks)
  25. Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.44 · 11.0% (1,648 of 15,005 decks)
  26. Port Town relevance 0.42 · 12.2% (1,830 of 15,005 decks)

EDH data for Bant Panorama: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 15,005 real decks.