Dust Bowl

Played in 16,092 decks

Dust Bowl
$40.85 €29.18

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Numot, the Devastator relevance 4.50 · 17.4% (156 of 899 decks)
  2. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 3.16 · 17.9% (227 of 1,271 decks)
  3. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.13 · 8.0% (339 of 4,214 decks)
  4. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 2.92 · 7.4% (268 of 3,621 decks)
  5. Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 2.49 · 6.2% (54 of 868 decks)
  6. Fin Fang Foom relevance 2.48 · 9.3% (53 of 570 decks)
  7. Titania, Nature's Force relevance 2.35 · 11.0% (114 of 1,041 decks)
  8. Zo-Zu the Punisher relevance 2.31 · 5.6% (77 of 1,373 decks)
  9. Phelia, Exuberant Shepherd relevance 2.27 · 6.6% (141 of 2,134 decks)
  10. The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.26 · 2.6% (137 of 5,340 decks)
  11. The Necrobloom relevance 2.21 · 2.3% (261 of 11,274 decks)
  12. Sygg, River Cutthroat relevance 2.08 · 2.6% (30 of 1,149 decks)
  13. Laughing Jasper Flint relevance 2.06 · 2.0% (72 of 3,519 decks)
  14. Sarulf, Realm Eater relevance 2.04 · 3.2% (60 of 1,877 decks)
  15. Beza, the Bounding Spring relevance 2.04 · 9.0% (53 of 592 decks)
  16. Raphael, Most Attitude relevance 2.03 · 26.8% (11 of 41 decks)
  17. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.01 · 5.6% (195 of 3,511 decks)
  18. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.95 · 4.5% (275 of 6,087 decks)
  19. The Lady of Otaria relevance 1.95 · 7.6% (27 of 357 decks)
  20. Infinite Guideline Station relevance 1.90 · 1.2% (79 of 6,504 decks)
  21. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 1.89 · 3.1% (772 of 25,152 decks)
  22. Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 1.89 · 1.7% (101 of 5,902 decks)
  23. Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 1.84 · 4.3% (244 of 5,705 decks)
  24. Lord Windgrace relevance 1.81 · 4.4% (206 of 4,666 decks)
  25. Marchesa, Dealer of Death relevance 1.81 · 1.1% (38 of 3,442 decks)
  26. Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 1.71 · 2.2% (96 of 4,281 decks)
  27. Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 1.69 · 2.3% (47 of 2,084 decks)
  28. Soul of Windgrace relevance 1.68 · 6.3% (66 of 1,041 decks)
  29. Magda, the Hoardmaster relevance 1.64 · 4.4% (28 of 636 decks)
  30. Klothys, God of Destiny relevance 1.62 · 3.5% (36 of 1,019 decks)

Parallel Cards

20

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Zuran Orb
    0.74 17.8%
    $3.51 €1.80
  • Crucible of Worlds
    0.72 18.4%
    $32.32 €20.30
  • Icetill Explorer
    0.68 18.9%
    $21.84 €23.44
  • Ramunap Excavator
    0.65 17.0%
    $4.81 €3.73
  • Crop Rotation
    0.64 20.7%
    $3.91 €3.60
  • Titania, Protector of Argoth
    0.64 14.6%
    $0.31 €0.44
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    0.63 15.8%
    $6.61 €6.67
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    0.63 16.6%
    $2.01 €2.69
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.62 17.5%
    $12.94 €8.93
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.60 14.6%
    $0.33 €0.76
All most relevant (30)
  1. Zuran Orb relevance 0.74 · 17.8% (2,862 of 16,092 decks)
  2. Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.72 · 18.4% (2,954 of 16,092 decks)
  3. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.68 · 18.9% (3,038 of 16,092 decks)
  4. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.65 · 17.0% (2,728 of 16,092 decks)
  5. Crop Rotation relevance 0.64 · 20.7% (3,326 of 16,092 decks)
  6. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.64 · 14.6% (2,345 of 16,092 decks)
  7. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.63 · 15.8% (2,541 of 16,092 decks)
  8. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.63 · 16.6% (2,679 of 16,092 decks)
  9. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.62 · 17.5% (2,814 of 16,092 decks)
  10. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.60 · 14.6% (2,346 of 16,092 decks)
  11. Harrow relevance 0.60 · 18.2% (2,936 of 16,092 decks)
  12. Lotus Cobra relevance 0.57 · 16.7% (2,681 of 16,092 decks)
  13. Scute Swarm relevance 0.55 · 17.0% (2,738 of 16,092 decks)
  14. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.55 · 14.1% (2,273 of 16,092 decks)
  15. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.53 · 14.0% (2,245 of 16,092 decks)
  16. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.53 · 12.9% (2,083 of 16,092 decks)
  17. Exploration relevance 0.51 · 14.5% (2,341 of 16,092 decks)
  18. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.50 · 11.3% (1,818 of 16,092 decks)
  19. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.48 · 11.6% (1,863 of 16,092 decks)
  20. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.48 · 15.4% (2,474 of 16,092 decks)
  21. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.47 · 9.5% (1,531 of 16,092 decks)
  22. Life from the Loam relevance 0.46 · 11.5% (1,856 of 16,092 decks)
  23. Spelunking relevance 0.46 · 11.2% (1,796 of 16,092 decks)
  24. Horizon Explorer relevance 0.46 · 10.2% (1,640 of 16,092 decks)
  25. Constant Mists relevance 0.45 · 8.9% (1,425 of 16,092 decks)
  26. Expedition Map relevance 0.44 · 11.9% (1,907 of 16,092 decks)
  27. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.44 · 12.1% (1,953 of 16,092 decks)
  28. Scapeshift relevance 0.43 · 9.5% (1,535 of 16,092 decks)
  29. Six relevance 0.43 · 10.9% (1,755 of 16,092 decks)
  30. Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.42 · 9.9% (1,591 of 16,092 decks)

Creatures

16

Showing 1-10 of 16

Page size
  • Icetill Explorer
    0.68 18.9%
    $21.84 €23.44
  • Ramunap Excavator
    0.65 17.0%
    $4.81 €3.73
  • Titania, Protector of Argoth
    0.64 14.6%
    $0.31 €0.44
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    0.63 15.8%
    $6.61 €6.67
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    0.63 16.6%
    $2.01 €2.69
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.62 17.5%
    $12.94 €8.93
  • Lotus Cobra
    0.57 16.7%
    $5.61 €6.44
  • Scute Swarm
    0.55 17.0%
    $8.85 €7.98
  • Aftermath Analyst
    0.53 14.0%
    $0.78 €1.25
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    0.53 12.9%
    $12.76 €10.17
All creatures (16)
  1. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.68 · 18.9% (3,038 of 16,092 decks)
  2. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.65 · 17.0% (2,728 of 16,092 decks)
  3. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.64 · 14.6% (2,345 of 16,092 decks)
  4. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.63 · 15.8% (2,541 of 16,092 decks)
  5. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.63 · 16.6% (2,679 of 16,092 decks)
  6. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.62 · 17.5% (2,814 of 16,092 decks)
  7. Lotus Cobra relevance 0.57 · 16.7% (2,681 of 16,092 decks)
  8. Scute Swarm relevance 0.55 · 17.0% (2,738 of 16,092 decks)
  9. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.53 · 14.0% (2,245 of 16,092 decks)
  10. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.53 · 12.9% (2,083 of 16,092 decks)
  11. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.48 · 11.6% (1,863 of 16,092 decks)
  12. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.48 · 15.4% (2,474 of 16,092 decks)
  13. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.47 · 9.5% (1,531 of 16,092 decks)
  14. Horizon Explorer relevance 0.46 · 10.2% (1,640 of 16,092 decks)
  15. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.44 · 12.1% (1,953 of 16,092 decks)
  16. Six relevance 0.43 · 10.9% (1,755 of 16,092 decks)

Artifacts

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Zuran Orb
    0.74 17.8%
    $3.51 €1.80
  • Crucible of Worlds
    0.72 18.4%
    $32.32 €20.30
  • Conduit of Worlds
    0.55 14.1%
    $1.13 €1.42
  • Exploration Broodship
    0.50 11.3%
    $2.97 €3.27
  • Expedition Map
    0.44 11.9%
    $1.37 €1.34
All artifacts (5)
  1. Zuran Orb relevance 0.74 · 17.8% (2,862 of 16,092 decks)
  2. Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.72 · 18.4% (2,954 of 16,092 decks)
  3. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.55 · 14.1% (2,273 of 16,092 decks)
  4. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.50 · 11.3% (1,818 of 16,092 decks)
  5. Expedition Map relevance 0.44 · 11.9% (1,907 of 16,092 decks)

Enchantments

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Exploration
    0.51 14.5%
    $30.16 €26.59
  • Spelunking
    0.46 11.2%
    $3.57 €3.20
All enchantments (2)
  1. Exploration relevance 0.51 · 14.5% (2,341 of 16,092 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 0.46 · 11.2% (1,796 of 16,092 decks)

Instants

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    0.64 20.7%
    $3.91 €3.60
  • Harrow
    0.60 18.2%
    $0.34 €0.41
  • Constant Mists
    0.45 8.9%
    $20.35 €14.60
  • Roiling Regrowth
    0.42 9.9%
    $0.33 €0.31
All instants (4)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 0.64 · 20.7% (3,326 of 16,092 decks)
  2. Harrow relevance 0.60 · 18.2% (2,936 of 16,092 decks)
  3. Constant Mists relevance 0.45 · 8.9% (1,425 of 16,092 decks)
  4. Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.42 · 9.9% (1,591 of 16,092 decks)

Sorceries

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.60 14.6%
    $0.33 €0.76
  • Life from the Loam
    0.46 11.5%
    $5.35 €5.14
  • Scapeshift
    0.43 9.5%
    $41.48 €32.65
All sorceries (3)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.60 · 14.6% (2,346 of 16,092 decks)
  2. Life from the Loam relevance 0.46 · 11.5% (1,856 of 16,092 decks)
  3. Scapeshift relevance 0.43 · 9.5% (1,535 of 16,092 decks)

Utility Lands

15

Showing 1-10 of 15

Page size
  • Strip Mine
    1.03 27.3%
    $10.71 €5.96
  • Wasteland
    0.86 19.4%
    $26.08 €22.43
  • Thespian's Stage
    0.68 17.6%
    $0.46 €0.68
  • Urza's Cave
    0.65 17.8%
    $2.52 €1.28
  • Scavenger Grounds
    0.61 18.5%
    $0.29 €0.20
  • Ghost Quarter
    0.60 14.4%
    $0.92 €0.79
  • Blast Zone
    0.57 12.0%
    $0.37 €0.25
  • Tectonic Edge
    0.55 9.7%
    $0.32 €0.31
  • Field of the Dead
    0.55 14.6%
    $28.53 €26.97
  • Demolition Field
    0.54 15.1%
    $0.31 €0.41
All utility lands (15)
  1. Strip Mine relevance 1.03 · 27.3% (4,395 of 16,092 decks)
  2. Wasteland relevance 0.86 · 19.4% (3,125 of 16,092 decks)
  3. Thespian's Stage relevance 0.68 · 17.6% (2,827 of 16,092 decks)
  4. Urza's Cave relevance 0.65 · 17.8% (2,862 of 16,092 decks)
  5. Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.61 · 18.5% (2,972 of 16,092 decks)
  6. Ghost Quarter relevance 0.60 · 14.4% (2,322 of 16,092 decks)
  7. Blast Zone relevance 0.57 · 12.0% (1,937 of 16,092 decks)
  8. Tectonic Edge relevance 0.55 · 9.7% (1,554 of 16,092 decks)
  9. Field of the Dead relevance 0.55 · 14.6% (2,343 of 16,092 decks)
  10. Demolition Field relevance 0.54 · 15.1% (2,426 of 16,092 decks)
  11. Arid Archway relevance 0.50 · 10.6% (1,711 of 16,092 decks)
  12. Field of Ruin relevance 0.47 · 11.1% (1,788 of 16,092 decks)
  13. Petrified Field relevance 0.47 · 7.5% (1,204 of 16,092 decks)
  14. Deserted Temple relevance 0.43 · 9.5% (1,531 of 16,092 decks)
  15. Glacial Chasm relevance 0.43 · 8.6% (1,379 of 16,092 decks)

Lands

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Lotus Field
    0.65 15.9%
    $2.55 €2.57
  • Echoing Deeps
    0.54 10.5%
    $0.82 €0.54
  • Fabled Passage
    0.51 24.1%
    $0.53 €0.98
  • Vesuva
    0.47 11.3%
    $3.79 €3.08
  • Crystal Vein
    0.43 9.6%
    $8.74 €7.40
All lands (5)
  1. Lotus Field relevance 0.65 · 15.9% (2,562 of 16,092 decks)
  2. Echoing Deeps relevance 0.54 · 10.5% (1,684 of 16,092 decks)
  3. Fabled Passage relevance 0.51 · 24.1% (3,874 of 16,092 decks)
  4. Vesuva relevance 0.47 · 11.3% (1,816 of 16,092 decks)
  5. Crystal Vein relevance 0.43 · 9.6% (1,537 of 16,092 decks)

EDH data for Dust Bowl: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 16,092 real decks.