Cards like Sylvan Advocate
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
- Sylvan Advocate 50%
- Earth Surge 40%
Cards like Vitalize
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Cards like Harvest Season
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
- Harvest Season 42%
- Boundless Realms 40%
- Reshape the Earth 7%
- Traverse the Outlands 3%
- New Frontiers 2%
- Nissa's Expedition 1%
Other options: Turtle Tracks, Slimefoot's Survey, Celebrate the Harvest
Cards like Shamanic Revelation
20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Oracle of Mul Daya
2.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other green decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.44 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
63% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
2.0 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 57%
- Rampant Growth 54%
- Kodama's Reach 48%
- Explosive Vegetation 13%
- Migration Path 9%
- Search for Tomorrow 6%
- Far Wanderings 5%
- Shared Roots 4%
- Primal Growth 1%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Beneath the Sands, Grow from the Ashes, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Terramorph, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, They Went This Way, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 43%
- Skyshroud Claim 41%
- Three Visits 40%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 28%
- Hunting Wilds 3%
- Ranger's Path 1%
Other options: Glimpse the Core, Field Trip
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
4.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Horn of Greed
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
- Horn of Greed 27%
- Seer's Sundial 18%
Cards like Nissa, Who Shakes the World
8.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Harrow
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other green decks
Cards
- Harrow 42%
- Roiling Regrowth 15%
- Entish Restoration 12%
- Planar Engineering 10%
- Scapeshift 4%
- Cycle of Renewal 2%
Cards like Ramunap Excavator
1.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Overrun
2.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Elder
5.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Oashra Cultivator
Cards like Wood Elves
11× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Fog
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Defend the Hearth, Commencement of Festivities, Thwart the Enemy, Chameleon Blur, Tanglesap, Pause for Reflection, Root Snare, Serene Sunset, Haze of Pollen, Vine Snare
Cards like Explore
2.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards like Aftermath Analyst
2.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Nature's Revolt
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.53 in other green decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 25%
- Swiftfoot Boots 22%
Cards like Eternal Witness
1.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Greenwarden of Murasa, Elvish Regrower, Wildwood Escort
All top picks (50)
- Earth Surge relevance 0.70 · 40.4% (65 of 161 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.57 · 49.7% (80 of 161 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.58 · 39.1% (63 of 161 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.63 · 22.4% (36 of 161 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 0.51 · 37.9% (61 of 161 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.48 · 39.1% (63 of 161 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 0.48 · 36.0% (58 of 161 decks)
- Mobilize relevance 0.49 · 31.7% (51 of 161 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.39 · 50.9% (82 of 161 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.43 · 39.8% (64 of 161 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.41 · 42.2% (68 of 161 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.43 · 37.9% (61 of 161 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.45 · 31.7% (51 of 161 decks)
- Mouth // Feed relevance 0.50 · 19.9% (32 of 161 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.46 · 26.7% (43 of 161 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.46 · 24.8% (40 of 161 decks)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 0.48 · 16.1% (26 of 161 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.45 · 21.1% (34 of 161 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.43 · 22.4% (36 of 161 decks)
- Slate of Ancestry relevance 0.47 · 13.7% (22 of 161 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.40 · 27.3% (44 of 161 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.40 · 25.5% (41 of 161 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.34 · 39.8% (64 of 161 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.37 · 29.2% (47 of 161 decks)
- Into the Wilds relevance 0.46 · 12.4% (20 of 161 decks)
- Endless Atlas relevance 0.41 · 18.0% (29 of 161 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.39 · 21.1% (34 of 161 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.27 · 54.0% (87 of 161 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.38 · 21.7% (35 of 161 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.36 · 26.7% (43 of 161 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.37 · 18.0% (29 of 161 decks)
- Throne of the God-Pharaoh relevance 0.39 · 13.0% (21 of 161 decks)
- Echoing Courage relevance 0.37 · 17.4% (28 of 161 decks)
- Rowen relevance 0.42 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.37 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.34 · 19.9% (32 of 161 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.32 · 23.0% (37 of 161 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.28 · 36.0% (58 of 161 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.30 · 26.1% (42 of 161 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.33 · 16.1% (26 of 161 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.33 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
- Vernal Bloom relevance 0.33 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.31 · 20.5% (33 of 161 decks)
- Lost in the Woods relevance 0.38 · 8.1% (13 of 161 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.29 · 28.0% (45 of 161 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.26 · 36.6% (59 of 161 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.28 · 27.3% (44 of 161 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.26 · 33.5% (54 of 161 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.23 · 46.0% (74 of 161 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 0.37 · 8.1% (13 of 161 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.57 · 49.7% (80 of 161 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 0.51 · 37.9% (61 of 161 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.43 · 37.9% (61 of 161 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.45 · 31.7% (51 of 161 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.46 · 24.8% (40 of 161 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.40 · 25.5% (41 of 161 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.37 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.34 · 19.9% (32 of 161 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.32 · 23.0% (37 of 161 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.28 · 36.0% (58 of 161 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.30 · 26.1% (42 of 161 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.26 · 36.6% (59 of 161 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.26 · 33.5% (54 of 161 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.23 · 46.0% (74 of 161 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 0.37 · 8.1% (13 of 161 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.28 · 23.6% (38 of 161 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.27 · 18.0% (29 of 161 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.21 · 39.1% (63 of 161 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.26 · 18.6% (30 of 161 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.32 · 6.2% (10 of 161 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.25 · 19.9% (32 of 161 decks)
- Budoka Gardener // Dokai, Weaver of Life relevance 0.32 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.29 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.21 · 30.4% (49 of 161 decks)
- Great Oak Guardian relevance 0.28 · 8.1% (13 of 161 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 0.29 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.23 · 18.6% (30 of 161 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.28 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Skyshroud Ranger relevance 0.28 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.18 · 40.4% (65 of 161 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.26 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.26 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Groundskeeper relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.22 · 16.1% (26 of 161 decks)
- The Legend of Kyoshi // Avatar Kyoshi relevance 0.25 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.21 · 20.5% (33 of 161 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.21 · 18.6% (30 of 161 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 0.26 · 6.2% (10 of 161 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.19 · 26.7% (43 of 161 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.21 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
- Krosan Restorer relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Thelonite Druid relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.21 · 13.7% (22 of 161 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.19 · 22.4% (36 of 161 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.23 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.18 · 26.1% (42 of 161 decks)
- Genesis relevance 0.26 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Baru, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Nacatl War-Pride relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
All artifacts (45)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.63 · 22.4% (36 of 161 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.43 · 22.4% (36 of 161 decks)
- Slate of Ancestry relevance 0.47 · 13.7% (22 of 161 decks)
- Endless Atlas relevance 0.41 · 18.0% (29 of 161 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.36 · 26.7% (43 of 161 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.37 · 18.0% (29 of 161 decks)
- Throne of the God-Pharaoh relevance 0.39 · 13.0% (21 of 161 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.35 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Library of Leng relevance 0.37 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Time Bomb relevance 0.42 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.26 · 24.2% (39 of 161 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.27 · 18.6% (30 of 161 decks)
- Otherworld Atlas relevance 0.37 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Powder Keg relevance 0.41 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.28 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.23 · 9.9% (16 of 161 decks)
- Eye of Vecna relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Coercive Portal relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.20 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.20 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.14 · 25.5% (41 of 161 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Eldrazi Monument relevance 0.18 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.12 · 21.7% (35 of 161 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.16 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Extinguisher Battleship relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Dolmen Gate relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.10 · 11.2% (18 of 161 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.09 · 21.7% (35 of 161 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.08 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 36.6% (59 of 161 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Earth Surge relevance 0.70 · 40.4% (65 of 161 decks)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 0.48 · 16.1% (26 of 161 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.37 · 29.2% (47 of 161 decks)
- Into the Wilds relevance 0.46 · 12.4% (20 of 161 decks)
- Rowen relevance 0.42 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.33 · 16.1% (26 of 161 decks)
- Vernal Bloom relevance 0.33 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
- Lost in the Woods relevance 0.38 · 8.1% (13 of 161 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.28 · 27.3% (44 of 161 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.30 · 19.3% (31 of 161 decks)
- Primal Order relevance 0.36 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Epic Struggle relevance 0.36 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.24 · 31.1% (50 of 161 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.25 · 21.7% (35 of 161 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.25 · 18.0% (29 of 161 decks)
- Living Lands relevance 0.32 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.27 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.20 · 33.5% (54 of 161 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.27 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Awakening relevance 0.30 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Verdant Succession relevance 0.35 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.26 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.24 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Cyclone relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.27 · 6.2% (10 of 161 decks)
- Hall of Gemstone relevance 0.26 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.21 · 16.8% (27 of 161 decks)
- Nature's Will relevance 0.26 · 6.2% (10 of 161 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 0.26 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- Living Plane relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.22 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.17 · 21.7% (35 of 161 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.17 · 21.1% (34 of 161 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.20 · 8.1% (13 of 161 decks)
- Compost relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.18 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.16 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Recycle relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.16 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.13 · 17.4% (28 of 161 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.15 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Viridian Revel relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- City of Solitude relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
All instants (50)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.58 · 39.1% (63 of 161 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 0.48 · 36.0% (58 of 161 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.39 · 50.9% (82 of 161 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.46 · 26.7% (43 of 161 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.39 · 21.1% (34 of 161 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.38 · 21.7% (35 of 161 decks)
- Echoing Courage relevance 0.37 · 17.4% (28 of 161 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.31 · 20.5% (33 of 161 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.20 · 42.2% (68 of 161 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.28 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.23 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
- Snag relevance 0.32 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.18 · 19.9% (32 of 161 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.19 · 11.2% (18 of 161 decks)
- Reap relevance 0.28 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Primal Bellow relevance 0.20 · 6.2% (10 of 161 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Skyshroud Blessing relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.16 · 18.6% (30 of 161 decks)
- Vitalizing Wind relevance 0.27 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.15 · 12.4% (20 of 161 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (23 of 161 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.11 · 31.1% (50 of 161 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.16 · 8.1% (13 of 161 decks)
- Setessan Tactics relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Bind relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.09 · 49.1% (79 of 161 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.14 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Avoid Fate relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Rampage of the Clans relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.15 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Respite relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.13 · 9.9% (16 of 161 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.12 · 11.2% (18 of 161 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.14 · 6.2% (10 of 161 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.12 · 13.0% (21 of 161 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.14 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.13 · 6.2% (10 of 161 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.07 · 49.1% (79 of 161 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.11 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.48 · 39.1% (63 of 161 decks)
- Mobilize relevance 0.49 · 31.7% (51 of 161 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.43 · 39.8% (64 of 161 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.41 · 42.2% (68 of 161 decks)
- Mouth // Feed relevance 0.50 · 19.9% (32 of 161 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.45 · 21.1% (34 of 161 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.40 · 27.3% (44 of 161 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.34 · 39.8% (64 of 161 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.27 · 54.0% (87 of 161 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.29 · 28.0% (45 of 161 decks)
- Waiting in the Weeds relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.20 · 57.8% (93 of 161 decks)
- The Great Aurora relevance 0.33 · 8.1% (13 of 161 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.28 · 15.5% (25 of 161 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.27 · 18.6% (30 of 161 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.30 · 9.9% (16 of 161 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.32 · 8.1% (13 of 161 decks)
- Clear the Land relevance 0.37 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.20 · 41.0% (66 of 161 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 0.29 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.27 · 11.8% (19 of 161 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.29 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Revive relevance 0.29 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Creeping Corrosion relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.24 · 16.8% (27 of 161 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.25 · 13.0% (21 of 161 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.29 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.17 · 45.3% (73 of 161 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.27 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.26 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.21 · 16.8% (27 of 161 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.21 · 17.4% (28 of 161 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.25 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Wave of Vitriol relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.22 · 11.8% (19 of 161 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.23 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.24 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.24 · 6.2% (10 of 161 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.17 · 30.4% (49 of 161 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.22 · 9.9% (16 of 161 decks)
- Beacon of Creation relevance 0.28 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Tranquility relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 47.8% (77 of 161 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.14 · 39.8% (64 of 161 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.12 · 54.0% (87 of 161 decks)
- Through the Forest Gate relevance 0.21 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Gaea's Blessing relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (9)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.33 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.23 · 43.5% (70 of 161 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.28 · 12.4% (20 of 161 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.31 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.26 · 13.7% (22 of 161 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.21 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.37 · 13.7% (22 of 161 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.22 · 19.9% (32 of 161 decks)
- Treetop Village relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.18 · 19.9% (32 of 161 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.17 · 25.5% (41 of 161 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 26.7% (43 of 161 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.20 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.20 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.20 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.22 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Cryptic Caves relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Sea Gate Wreckage relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.19 · 6.2% (10 of 161 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.17 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.21 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.20 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.20 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.20 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.12 · 22.4% (36 of 161 decks)
- Mariposa Military Base relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Haunted Fengraf relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Roadside Reliquary relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Drownyard Temple relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.12 · 18.0% (29 of 161 decks)
- Blinkmoth Nexus relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.16 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.12 · 13.7% (22 of 161 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.15 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Hall of the Bandit Lord relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.13 · 9.9% (16 of 161 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.16 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.13 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.15 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Roiling Canopy relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.11 · 13.0% (21 of 161 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.13 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
All lands (23)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.20 · 11.8% (19 of 161 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.15 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.15 · 9.9% (16 of 161 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.15 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.15 · 8.1% (13 of 161 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.14 · 9.9% (16 of 161 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.14 · 8.1% (13 of 161 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.15 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.12 · 13.0% (21 of 161 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.15 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.14 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 87.0% (140 of 161 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Jolrael, Empress of Beasts, from 161 real Commander decks.