Wood Elves

Played in 109,120 decks

Wood Elves
$0.23 €0.08

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Nikya of the Old Ways relevance 3.75 · 58.5% (1,009 of 1,725 decks)
  2. Galadriel, Elven-Queen relevance 3.73 · 79.8% (1,548 of 1,941 decks)
  3. Vaevictis Asmadi, the Dire relevance 3.46 · 37.9% (724 of 1,909 decks)
  4. Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 3.41 · 71.0% (1,083 of 1,525 decks)
  5. Voja, Jaws of the Conclave relevance 3.39 · 27.5% (2,586 of 9,397 decks)
  6. Galadriel, Light of Valinor relevance 3.37 · 37.5% (3,812 of 10,158 decks)
  7. Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 3.29 · 47.8% (3,340 of 6,990 decks)
  8. Roon of the Hidden Realm relevance 3.19 · 51.4% (978 of 1,902 decks)
  9. Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 3.11 · 32.8% (1,147 of 3,493 decks)
  10. Thranduil the Strategist relevance 3.01 · 60.1% (701 of 1,167 decks)
  11. Emiel the Blessed relevance 2.96 · 42.4% (461 of 1,086 decks)
  12. Karador, Ghost Chieftain relevance 2.94 · 31.4% (1,067 of 3,396 decks)
  13. Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 2.86 · 31.4% (6,203 of 19,764 decks)
  14. Meren of Clan Nel Toth relevance 2.73 · 31.9% (3,973 of 12,449 decks)
  15. Radagast of Rhosgobel relevance 2.73 · 43.6% (2,055 of 4,715 decks)
  16. Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 2.73 · 26.5% (895 of 3,373 decks)
  17. Elda, Conjurer of Spectacle relevance 2.64 · 27.4% (665 of 2,430 decks)
  18. Animar, Soul of Elements relevance 2.64 · 13.2% (1,568 of 11,841 decks)
  19. Thranduil, the Elvenking relevance 2.54 · 27.0% (3,211 of 11,900 decks)
  20. Lonis, Cryptozoologist relevance 2.51 · 35.9% (846 of 2,359 decks)
  21. Elrond of the White Council relevance 2.48 · 66.5% (179 of 269 decks)
  22. Gyrus, Waker of Corpses relevance 2.45 · 28.1% (177 of 629 decks)
  23. Lagrella, the Magpie relevance 2.44 · 37.4% (392 of 1,049 decks)
  24. Kellan, Daring Traveler // Journey On relevance 2.43 · 47.4% (128 of 270 decks)
  25. Torsten, Founder of Benalia relevance 2.36 · 45.2% (119 of 263 decks)
  26. Bright-Palm, Soul Awakener relevance 2.34 · 23.0% (342 of 1,486 decks)
  27. Asmira, Holy Avenger relevance 2.31 · 43.1% (118 of 274 decks)
  28. Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 2.29 · 44.1% (582 of 1,321 decks)
  29. Atraxa, Grand Unifier relevance 2.25 · 17.9% (1,699 of 9,514 decks)
  30. Kitt Kanto, Mayhem Diva relevance 2.22 · 23.9% (233 of 976 decks)

Replaced By

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
All replaced by (4)
  1. Simulacrum Shaper 7.8% of swaps out (10 swaps)
  2. Farhaven Elf 2.3% of swaps out (3 swaps)
  3. Selvala, Heart of the Wilds 2.3% of swaps out (3 swaps)
  4. Sakura-Tribe Elder 2.3% of swaps out (3 swaps)

Parallel Cards

6

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Reclamation Sage
    1.57 44.7%
    $0.37 €0.12
  • Farhaven Elf
    1.45 31.0%
    $0.22 €0.13
  • Llanowar Elves
    1.18 51.1%
    $0.24 €0.21
  • Elvish Mystic
    1.17 45.4%
    $5.21 €4.86
  • Elvish Archdruid
    1.05 26.3%
    $7.36 €4.66
  • Beast Whisperer
    1.01 31.6%
    $9.08 €7.47
  • Eternal Witness
    0.98 35.5%
    $2.18 €0.92
  • Sakura-Tribe Elder
    0.97 35.2%
    $0.38 €0.56
  • Priest of Titania
    0.92 23.5%
    $2.04 €0.96
  • Fyndhorn Elves
    0.86 27.3%
    $2.14 €3.31
All most relevant (30)
  1. Reclamation Sage relevance 1.57 · 44.7% (48,816 of 109,120 decks)
  2. Farhaven Elf relevance 1.45 · 31.0% (33,843 of 109,120 decks)
  3. Llanowar Elves relevance 1.18 · 51.1% (55,715 of 109,120 decks)
  4. Elvish Mystic relevance 1.17 · 45.4% (49,517 of 109,120 decks)
  5. Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.05 · 26.3% (28,740 of 109,120 decks)
  6. Beast Whisperer relevance 1.01 · 31.6% (34,435 of 109,120 decks)
  7. Eternal Witness relevance 0.98 · 35.5% (38,730 of 109,120 decks)
  8. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.97 · 35.2% (38,398 of 109,120 decks)
  9. Priest of Titania relevance 0.92 · 23.5% (25,589 of 109,120 decks)
  10. Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.86 · 27.3% (29,795 of 109,120 decks)
  11. Imperious Perfect relevance 0.83 · 19.0% (20,778 of 109,120 decks)
  12. Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.83 · 18.4% (20,110 of 109,120 decks)
  13. Beast Within relevance 0.79 · 39.4% (42,959 of 109,120 decks)
  14. Elvish Visionary relevance 0.79 · 15.7% (17,172 of 109,120 decks)
  15. Arbor Elf relevance 0.77 · 20.0% (21,838 of 109,120 decks)
  16. Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.72 · 16.6% (18,159 of 109,120 decks)
  17. Cultivate relevance 0.69 · 39.6% (43,233 of 109,120 decks)
  18. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.69 · 17.2% (18,784 of 109,120 decks)
  19. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.67 · 33.7% (36,726 of 109,120 decks)
  20. Rampant Growth relevance 0.66 · 31.6% (34,448 of 109,120 decks)
  21. Nature's Lore relevance 0.64 · 32.4% (35,385 of 109,120 decks)
  22. Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.62 · 12.7% (13,873 of 109,120 decks)
  23. Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.61 · 18.4% (20,100 of 109,120 decks)
  24. Coiling Oracle relevance 0.61 · 13.2% (14,365 of 109,120 decks)
  25. Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.60 · 12.9% (14,071 of 109,120 decks)
  26. Guardian Project relevance 0.58 · 16.6% (18,135 of 109,120 decks)
  27. Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.56 · 11.7% (12,792 of 109,120 decks)
  28. Birds of Paradise relevance 0.55 · 27.0% (29,408 of 109,120 decks)
  29. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.54 · 23.1% (25,213 of 109,120 decks)
  30. Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.52 · 10.3% (11,230 of 109,120 decks)

Creatures

29

Showing 1-10 of 29

Page size
  • Reclamation Sage
    1.57 44.7%
    $0.37 €0.12
  • Farhaven Elf
    1.45 31.0%
    $0.22 €0.13
  • Llanowar Elves
    1.18 51.1%
    $0.24 €0.21
  • Elvish Mystic
    1.17 45.4%
    $5.21 €4.86
  • Elvish Archdruid
    1.05 26.3%
    $7.36 €4.66
  • Beast Whisperer
    1.01 31.6%
    $9.08 €7.47
  • Eternal Witness
    0.98 35.5%
    $2.18 €0.92
  • Sakura-Tribe Elder
    0.97 35.2%
    $0.38 €0.56
  • Priest of Titania
    0.92 23.5%
    $2.04 €0.96
  • Fyndhorn Elves
    0.86 27.3%
    $2.14 €3.31
All creatures (29)
  1. Reclamation Sage relevance 1.57 · 44.7% (48,816 of 109,120 decks)
  2. Farhaven Elf relevance 1.45 · 31.0% (33,843 of 109,120 decks)
  3. Llanowar Elves relevance 1.18 · 51.1% (55,715 of 109,120 decks)
  4. Elvish Mystic relevance 1.17 · 45.4% (49,517 of 109,120 decks)
  5. Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.05 · 26.3% (28,740 of 109,120 decks)
  6. Beast Whisperer relevance 1.01 · 31.6% (34,435 of 109,120 decks)
  7. Eternal Witness relevance 0.98 · 35.5% (38,730 of 109,120 decks)
  8. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.97 · 35.2% (38,398 of 109,120 decks)
  9. Priest of Titania relevance 0.92 · 23.5% (25,589 of 109,120 decks)
  10. Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.86 · 27.3% (29,795 of 109,120 decks)
  11. Imperious Perfect relevance 0.83 · 19.0% (20,778 of 109,120 decks)
  12. Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.83 · 18.4% (20,110 of 109,120 decks)
  13. Elvish Visionary relevance 0.79 · 15.7% (17,172 of 109,120 decks)
  14. Arbor Elf relevance 0.77 · 20.0% (21,838 of 109,120 decks)
  15. Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.72 · 16.6% (18,159 of 109,120 decks)
  16. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.69 · 17.2% (18,784 of 109,120 decks)
  17. Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.62 · 12.7% (13,873 of 109,120 decks)
  18. Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.61 · 18.4% (20,100 of 109,120 decks)
  19. Coiling Oracle relevance 0.61 · 13.2% (14,365 of 109,120 decks)
  20. Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.60 · 12.9% (14,071 of 109,120 decks)
  21. Birds of Paradise relevance 0.55 · 27.0% (29,408 of 109,120 decks)
  22. Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.52 · 10.3% (11,230 of 109,120 decks)
  23. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.51 · 14.8% (16,182 of 109,120 decks)
  24. Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.49 · 10.0% (10,894 of 109,120 decks)
  25. Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.47 · 9.3% (10,164 of 109,120 decks)
  26. Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.47 · 9.6% (10,458 of 109,120 decks)
  27. Paradise Druid relevance 0.46 · 9.4% (10,254 of 109,120 decks)
  28. Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.45 · 10.5% (11,481 of 109,120 decks)
  29. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.44 · 14.2% (15,524 of 109,120 decks)

Enchantments

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Guardian Project
    0.58 16.6%
    $15.38 €17.08
All enchantments (1)
  1. Guardian Project relevance 0.58 · 16.6% (18,135 of 109,120 decks)

Instants

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Beast Within
    0.79 39.4%
    $0.72 €0.89
  • Heroic Intervention
    0.67 33.7%
    $17.54 €14.11
  • Galadhrim Ambush
    0.56 11.7%
    $6.52 €6.15
  • Assassin's Trophy
    0.46 17.6%
    $1.21 €1.41
  • Elven Ambush
    0.45 8.8%
    $6.44 €7.75
All instants (5)
  1. Beast Within relevance 0.79 · 39.4% (42,959 of 109,120 decks)
  2. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.67 · 33.7% (36,726 of 109,120 decks)
  3. Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.56 · 11.7% (12,792 of 109,120 decks)
  4. Assassin's Trophy relevance 0.46 · 17.6% (19,206 of 109,120 decks)
  5. Elven Ambush relevance 0.45 · 8.8% (9,593 of 109,120 decks)

Sorceries

7

Showing 1-7 of 7

Page size
  • Cultivate
    0.69 39.6%
    $0.43 €0.50
  • Rampant Growth
    0.66 31.6%
    $1.14 €0.56
  • Nature's Lore
    0.64 32.4%
    $2.11 €2.78
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.54 23.1%
    $1.88 €1.54
  • Three Visits
    0.52 23.0%
    $5.66 €4.82
  • Farseek
    0.51 27.7%
    $0.48 €0.78
  • Overwhelming Stampede
    0.48 12.6%
    $1.12 €1.37
All sorceries (7)
  1. Cultivate relevance 0.69 · 39.6% (43,233 of 109,120 decks)
  2. Rampant Growth relevance 0.66 · 31.6% (34,448 of 109,120 decks)
  3. Nature's Lore relevance 0.64 · 32.4% (35,385 of 109,120 decks)
  4. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.54 · 23.1% (25,213 of 109,120 decks)
  5. Three Visits relevance 0.52 · 23.0% (25,144 of 109,120 decks)
  6. Farseek relevance 0.51 · 27.7% (30,179 of 109,120 decks)
  7. Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.48 · 12.6% (13,734 of 109,120 decks)

Utility Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • 0.52 14.5%
    $4.73 €3.03
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.52 20.3%
    $17.17 €12.85
All utility lands (2)
  1. Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.52 · 14.5% (15,788 of 109,120 decks)
  2. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.52 · 20.3% (22,151 of 109,120 decks)

Lands

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Overgrown Tomb
    0.56 23.4%
    $7.99 €8.31
  • Woodland Cemetery
    0.55 21.2%
    $0.86 €1.05
  • Hinterland Harbor
    0.54 21.1%
    $0.31 €0.34
  • Llanowar Wastes
    0.52 18.8%
    $1.06 €1.50
  • Rejuvenating Springs
    0.46 15.6%
    $4.60 €4.05
  • Breeding Pool
    0.46 19.2%
    $9.52 €9.36
All lands (6)
  1. Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.56 · 23.4% (25,576 of 109,120 decks)
  2. Woodland Cemetery relevance 0.55 · 21.2% (23,131 of 109,120 decks)
  3. Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.54 · 21.1% (23,022 of 109,120 decks)
  4. Llanowar Wastes relevance 0.52 · 18.8% (20,471 of 109,120 decks)
  5. Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.46 · 15.6% (17,050 of 109,120 decks)
  6. Breeding Pool relevance 0.46 · 19.2% (20,958 of 109,120 decks)

EDH data for Wood Elves: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 109,120 real decks.