Cards like Nature's Rhythm
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Gruul decks
64% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Gruul decks
1.9 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
13× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Gruul decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Gruul decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Pyroblast
7.0× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Gruul decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Gruul decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Pyroblast 50%
- Red Elemental Blast 43%
- Burnout 7%
- Guttural Response 7%
Cards like Icetill Explorer
7.1× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Gruul decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Gruul decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Mox Diamond
7.1× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Gruul decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Gruul decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Mox Diamond 36%
- Chrome Mox 29%
Cards like Tannuk, Memorial Ensign
6.4× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Gruul decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Gruul decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign 50%
- Koth, the Geomancer 36%
- Sabotender 29%
- Spitfire Lagac 7%
- Tunneling Geopede 7%
Other options: Akoum Hellkite, Cosi's Ravager
Cards like Sol Ring
4.5× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 74% of other Gruul decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Gruul decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.84 in other Gruul decks
Cards like Scapeshift
3.4× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Gruul decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Gruul decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Scapeshift 43%
- Harrow 21%
- Entish Restoration 14%
- Cycle of Renewal 14%
- Planar Engineering 14%
- Roiling Regrowth 7%
Cards like Simian Spirit Guide
4.0× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Gruul decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Gruul decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Elvish Mystic
1.6× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other Gruul decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 22% of other Gruul decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.71 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Elvish Mystic 43%
- Fyndhorn Elves 36%
- Llanowar Elves 21%
- Boreal Druid 7%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Llanowar Tribe, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Summer Bloom
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Gruul decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Gruul decks
Cards like Lumra, Bellow of the Woods
20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Gruul decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Crucible of Worlds
5.0× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Gruul decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Exploration
4.7× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Gruul decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Gruul decks
Cards like Springheart Nantuko
4.3× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Gruul decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Springheart Nantuko 29%
- Scute Swarm 21%
Cards like Emerald Medallion
3.6× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Gruul decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Lotus Petal
2.3× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Gruul decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Gruul decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.1× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other Gruul decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 27% of other Gruul decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.79 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 36%
- Three Visits 21%
- Skyshroud Claim 7%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Field Trip, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Hunting Wilds, Glimpse the Core
All top picks (50)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.20 · 78.6% (11 of 14 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.25 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.23 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.22 · 64.3% (9 of 14 decks)
- Six relevance 0.23 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.20 · 64.3% (9 of 14 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.20 · 64.3% (9 of 14 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.19 · 64.3% (9 of 14 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.15 · 85.7% (12 of 14 decks)
- Koth, the Geomancer relevance 0.24 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.21 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.20 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.20 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.22 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.21 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.21 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.17 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Rydia, Summoner of Mist relevance 0.20 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.18 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.20 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.17 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.15 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Orcish Lumberjack relevance 0.15 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Tinder Wall relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.16 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.16 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.15 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.15 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.15 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.16 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.16 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Pyroblast relevance 0.14 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.16 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.13 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.16 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Verdant Kraken relevance 0.18 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.14 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Tiller Engine relevance 0.17 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Fault Riders relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.15 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.15 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.13 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.13 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.14 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.15 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.20 · 78.6% (11 of 14 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.25 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.23 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.22 · 64.3% (9 of 14 decks)
- Six relevance 0.23 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.19 · 64.3% (9 of 14 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.15 · 85.7% (12 of 14 decks)
- Koth, the Geomancer relevance 0.24 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.21 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.20 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.22 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Rydia, Summoner of Mist relevance 0.20 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.17 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Orcish Lumberjack relevance 0.15 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Tinder Wall relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.15 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.15 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.16 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.13 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Verdant Kraken relevance 0.18 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Tiller Engine relevance 0.17 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Fault Riders relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Hexing Squelcher relevance 0.13 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Vibrance relevance 0.16 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.11 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Akki Avalanchers relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.14 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.13 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.13 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.13 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Simian Spirit Guide relevance 0.12 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer relevance 0.12 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Lithatog relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.08 · 64.3% (9 of 14 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.10 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- The Scarlet Witch relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Nev, the Practical Dean relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Wild Cantor relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Elvish Spirit Guide relevance 0.10 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Nissa, Worldsoul Speaker relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.10 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
All artifacts (32)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.20 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.16 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.16 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.15 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.15 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.15 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.13 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.12 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.12 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Defense Grid relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Elementalist's Palette relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Sword of Forge and Frontier relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Ruby Medallion relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.04 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.02 · 71.4% (10 of 14 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.01 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
All enchantments (38)
- Exploration relevance 0.15 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.16 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.16 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.15 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.14 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.11 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Case of the Crimson Pulse relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Way of the Paradox relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- The Hunger Tide Rises relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Earthcraft relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Need for Speed relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Shadow of the Goblin relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.08 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- The Rollercrusher Ride relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Double Vision relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Artist's Talent relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Ajani's Anguish relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Raiding Schemes relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- City on Fire relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.04 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.04 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.02 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
All instants (50)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.20 · 64.3% (9 of 14 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.21 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.16 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Pyroblast relevance 0.14 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.14 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.13 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.13 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Red Elemental Blast relevance 0.13 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.10 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Commune with Lava relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Final Fortune relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Flaring Pain relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.09 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Redirect Lightning relevance 0.11 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Wildwood Rebirth relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.09 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Burnout relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.08 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.08 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Tibalt's Trickery relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Avoid Fate relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.06 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Klauth's Will relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.06 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Artifact Mutation relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- The Last Agni Kai relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Guttural Response relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Flare of Duplication relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Demand Answers relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Return the Favor relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.04 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.04 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Bolt Bend relevance 0.04 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.04 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Untimely Malfunction relevance 0.04 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.04 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.03 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.03 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.20 · 64.3% (9 of 14 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.21 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.17 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.18 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.20 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.15 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Wreck and Rebuild relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Rite of Flame relevance 0.13 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Zenith Festival relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- New Generation's Technique relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Ancestral Communion relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Gamble relevance 0.10 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Survivors' Bond relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Nature's Spiral relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Revive relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Enter the Unknown relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Wheel of Fortune relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Growth Spasm relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Call Damage Control relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Will of the Sultai relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.07 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Jeska's Will relevance 0.06 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Infernal Plunge relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Jaya's Immolating Inferno relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.05 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Crackle with Power relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.05 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (5)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Koth of the Hammer relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.13 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
All utility lands (47)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.20 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.14 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.17 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.18 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.10 · 64.3% (9 of 14 decks)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 0.14 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Cryptic Caves relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.09 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Bazaar of Baghdad relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Winding Canyons relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.10 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Barbarian Ring relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Mishra's Factory relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Drownyard Temple relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Blinkmoth Nexus relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Fire Nation Palace relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Omashu City relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.06 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Sheltered Thicket relevance 0.05 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.04 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Arena of Glory relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.04 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.04 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.04 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.03 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.02 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Kessig Wolf Run relevance 0.02 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
All lands (44)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.16 · 64.3% (9 of 14 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.15 · 71.4% (10 of 14 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.15 · 71.4% (10 of 14 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.14 · 71.4% (10 of 14 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.14 · 64.3% (9 of 14 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.14 · 64.3% (9 of 14 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.15 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.16 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.15 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.15 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Elven Passage relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Taiga relevance 0.11 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.14 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.10 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.09 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.07 · 78.6% (11 of 14 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.11 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.12 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Crumbling Vestige relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Stomping Ground relevance 0.05 · 78.6% (11 of 14 decks)
- Sandstone Needle relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.05 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.04 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.04 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Thornspire Verge relevance 0.04 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.03 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Cragcrown Pathway // Timbercrown Pathway relevance 0.03 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Copperline Gorge relevance 0.03 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.02 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.02 · 64.3% (9 of 14 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.03 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Cinder Glade relevance 0.02 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Rootbound Crag relevance 0.02 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Rockfall Vale relevance 0.02 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Mountain relevance 0.01 · 85.7% (12 of 14 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 85.7% (12 of 14 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Dal R'El, Augment Orphan, from 14 real Commander decks.