Dust Bowl
Played in 526 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
3.2% Simic
-
Green 1,642 · 10.0%
-
Jund 1,622 · 9.9%
-
Colorless 1,563 · 9.5%
-
Naya 1,196 · 7.3%
-
White 1,061 · 6.4%
-
Red 777 · 4.7%
-
Golgari 757 · 4.6%
-
Gruul 710 · 4.3%
-
Black 676 · 4.1%
-
Five-Color 589 · 3.6%
-
Sultai 582 · 3.5%
-
Simic 526 · 3.2%
-
Abzan 484 · 2.9%
-
Rakdos 442 · 2.7%
-
Blue 422 · 2.6%
-
Azorius 388 · 2.4%
-
Boros 388 · 2.4%
-
Orzhov 349 · 2.1%
-
Jeskai 332 · 2.0%
- Other (13) 1,952 · 11.9%
1327+16+3+3+3+2+17+6+
That's every commander.
All commanders (13)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 2.49 · 6.1% (54 of 880 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 1.57 · 2.0% (39 of 1,932 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 1.20 · 1.7% (20 of 1,199 decks)
- Kellan, Inquisitive Prodigy // Tail the Suspect relevance 0.83 · 1.7% (7 of 408 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.77 · 4.3% (3 of 69 decks)
- Dungeon Delver // Erinis, Gloom Stalker relevance 0.61 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- The Sixth Doctor // Clara Oswald relevance 0.39 · 1.4% (2 of 148 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.35 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.34 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Master Chef relevance 0.34 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.24 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
- The Thirteenth Doctor // Clara Oswald relevance 0.24 · 1.2% (1 of 83 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.23 · 1.2% (1 of 84 decks)
All most relevant (27)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.78 · 34.4% (181 of 526 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.72 · 27.4% (144 of 526 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.69 · 19.8% (104 of 526 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.68 · 24.3% (128 of 526 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.67 · 21.5% (113 of 526 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.67 · 29.8% (157 of 526 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.64 · 14.3% (75 of 526 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.64 · 14.4% (76 of 526 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.63 · 27.9% (147 of 526 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.62 · 26.6% (140 of 526 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.62 · 27.2% (143 of 526 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.62 · 19.0% (100 of 526 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.60 · 23.4% (123 of 526 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.60 · 16.0% (84 of 526 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.60 · 31.4% (165 of 526 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.58 · 21.7% (114 of 526 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.57 · 41.6% (219 of 526 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.57 · 18.3% (96 of 526 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.57 · 12.4% (65 of 526 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.56 · 13.9% (73 of 526 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.55 · 26.8% (141 of 526 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.55 · 25.5% (134 of 526 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.53 · 25.1% (132 of 526 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.51 · 27.0% (142 of 526 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.49 · 15.8% (83 of 526 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.49 · 16.2% (85 of 526 decks)
- Excavation relevance 0.48 · 8.2% (43 of 526 decks)
All creatures (16)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.78 · 34.4% (181 of 526 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.72 · 27.4% (144 of 526 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.68 · 24.3% (128 of 526 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.67 · 21.5% (113 of 526 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.62 · 27.2% (143 of 526 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.60 · 23.4% (123 of 526 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.60 · 16.0% (84 of 526 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.60 · 31.4% (165 of 526 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.58 · 21.7% (114 of 526 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.57 · 41.6% (219 of 526 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.57 · 12.4% (65 of 526 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.55 · 26.8% (141 of 526 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.55 · 25.5% (134 of 526 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.53 · 25.1% (132 of 526 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.51 · 27.0% (142 of 526 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.49 · 16.2% (85 of 526 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.69 · 19.8% (104 of 526 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.64 · 14.4% (76 of 526 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.62 · 19.0% (100 of 526 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Exploration relevance 0.63 · 27.9% (147 of 526 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.49 · 15.8% (83 of 526 decks)
- Excavation relevance 0.48 · 8.2% (43 of 526 decks)
All instants (3)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.67 · 29.8% (157 of 526 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.64 · 14.3% (75 of 526 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.62 · 26.6% (140 of 526 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.57 · 18.3% (96 of 526 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.56 · 13.9% (73 of 526 decks)
All utility lands (17)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.95 · 25.1% (132 of 526 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.87 · 18.6% (98 of 526 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.76 · 23.0% (121 of 526 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.74 · 25.3% (133 of 526 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.72 · 21.9% (115 of 526 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.58 · 14.4% (76 of 526 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.55 · 16.2% (85 of 526 decks)
- Petrified Field relevance 0.55 · 9.1% (48 of 526 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.52 · 11.6% (61 of 526 decks)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.51 · 8.6% (45 of 526 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.50 · 11.4% (60 of 526 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.50 · 12.9% (68 of 526 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.50 · 12.7% (67 of 526 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.50 · 14.4% (76 of 526 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.49 · 14.4% (76 of 526 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.49 · 11.6% (61 of 526 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.48 · 11.4% (60 of 526 decks)
All lands (6)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.77 · 18.4% (97 of 526 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.72 · 24.3% (128 of 526 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.71 · 15.8% (83 of 526 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.65 · 20.9% (110 of 526 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.60 · 37.5% (197 of 526 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.54 · 33.5% (176 of 526 decks)
EDH data for Dust Bowl: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 526 real decks.




































































