Dust Bowl
Played in 1,205 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
7.2% Naya
- Green 1,662 · 10.0%
- Jund 1,647 · 9.9%
- Colorless 1,594 · 9.5%
- Naya 1,205 · 7.2%
- White 1,077 · 6.4%
- Red 787 · 4.7%
- Golgari 766 · 4.6%
- Gruul 722 · 4.3%
- Black 691 · 4.1%
- Five-Color 599 · 3.6%
- Sultai 589 · 3.5%
- Simic 531 · 3.2%
- Abzan 493 · 3.0%
- Rakdos 445 · 2.7%
- Blue 434 · 2.6%
- Azorius 403 · 2.4%
- Boros 393 · 2.4%
- Orzhov 353 · 2.1%
- Jeskai 335 · 2.0%
- Other (13) 1,976 · 11.8%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (8)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.14 · 7.9% (347 of 4,371 decks)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 2.96 · 7.4% (277 of 3,722 decks)
- Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 1.44 · 1.3% (353 of 27,179 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 1.25 · 2.6% (36 of 1,394 decks)
- Hazezon Tamar relevance 0.98 · 3.2% (12 of 372 decks)
- Annie Flash, the Veteran relevance 0.55 · 1.5% (7 of 474 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.27 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Prava of the Steel Legion // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.18 · 1.4% (1 of 70 decks)
All most relevant (25)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.66 · 51.4% (619 of 1,205 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.53 · 41.0% (494 of 1,205 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.42 · 38.3% (461 of 1,205 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.40 · 39.8% (479 of 1,205 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.30 · 50.0% (602 of 1,205 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.27 · 38.9% (469 of 1,205 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.26 · 35.3% (425 of 1,205 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.23 · 37.0% (446 of 1,205 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.21 · 37.8% (456 of 1,205 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.19 · 31.5% (379 of 1,205 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.18 · 35.8% (431 of 1,205 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.09 · 27.7% (334 of 1,205 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.08 · 43.7% (526 of 1,205 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.05 · 36.2% (436 of 1,205 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.03 · 28.5% (344 of 1,205 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.99 · 37.3% (450 of 1,205 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.98 · 24.6% (297 of 1,205 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.97 · 35.7% (430 of 1,205 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.97 · 41.7% (503 of 1,205 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.96 · 23.2% (279 of 1,205 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.95 · 36.8% (444 of 1,205 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 0.95 · 22.5% (271 of 1,205 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 0.94 · 20.4% (246 of 1,205 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 0.92 · 22.6% (272 of 1,205 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.91 · 21.8% (263 of 1,205 decks)
All creatures (17)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.66 · 51.4% (619 of 1,205 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.42 · 38.3% (461 of 1,205 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.27 · 38.9% (469 of 1,205 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.26 · 35.3% (425 of 1,205 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.23 · 37.0% (446 of 1,205 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.21 · 37.8% (456 of 1,205 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.18 · 35.8% (431 of 1,205 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.05 · 36.2% (436 of 1,205 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.03 · 28.5% (344 of 1,205 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.97 · 35.7% (430 of 1,205 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.97 · 41.7% (503 of 1,205 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.96 · 23.2% (279 of 1,205 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.95 · 36.8% (444 of 1,205 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 0.95 · 22.5% (271 of 1,205 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 0.94 · 20.4% (246 of 1,205 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 0.92 · 22.6% (272 of 1,205 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.91 · 21.8% (263 of 1,205 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.30 · 50.0% (602 of 1,205 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.53 · 41.0% (494 of 1,205 decks)
All instants (2)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.08 · 43.7% (526 of 1,205 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.99 · 37.3% (450 of 1,205 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.40 · 39.8% (479 of 1,205 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.19 · 31.5% (379 of 1,205 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.09 · 27.7% (334 of 1,205 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.98 · 24.6% (297 of 1,205 decks)
All utility lands (19)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 1.72 · 51.0% (615 of 1,205 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 1.72 · 50.5% (608 of 1,205 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 1.71 · 50.4% (607 of 1,205 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 1.71 · 49.8% (600 of 1,205 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 1.71 · 49.9% (601 of 1,205 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 1.70 · 50.3% (606 of 1,205 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 1.66 · 47.6% (573 of 1,205 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 1.64 · 47.5% (572 of 1,205 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 1.63 · 46.6% (561 of 1,205 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 1.62 · 44.1% (531 of 1,205 decks)
- Desert relevance 1.31 · 33.0% (398 of 1,205 decks)
- Endless Sands relevance 1.26 · 30.4% (366 of 1,205 decks)
- Grasping Dunes relevance 1.25 · 30.0% (362 of 1,205 decks)
- Sandstorm Verge relevance 1.24 · 30.0% (362 of 1,205 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 1.20 · 29.8% (359 of 1,205 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 1.18 · 32.5% (392 of 1,205 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 1.14 · 51.1% (616 of 1,205 decks)
- Cradle of the Accursed relevance 1.09 · 25.4% (306 of 1,205 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.92 · 23.7% (286 of 1,205 decks)
All lands (6)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 1.68 · 53.2% (641 of 1,205 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 1.64 · 51.8% (624 of 1,205 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 1.63 · 51.3% (618 of 1,205 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 1.50 · 42.6% (513 of 1,205 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 1.43 · 38.8% (468 of 1,205 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 1.32 · 34.6% (417 of 1,205 decks)
EDH data for Dust Bowl: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,205 real decks.