Dust Bowl
Played in 1,645 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
10.0% Green
- Green 1,645 · 10.0%
- Jund 1,628 · 9.9%
- Colorless 1,570 · 9.5%
- Naya 1,199 · 7.3%
- White 1,063 · 6.4%
- Red 779 · 4.7%
- Golgari 758 · 4.6%
- Gruul 709 · 4.3%
- Black 675 · 4.1%
- Five-Color 591 · 3.6%
- Sultai 584 · 3.5%
- Simic 527 · 3.2%
- Abzan 485 · 2.9%
- Rakdos 444 · 2.7%
- Blue 424 · 2.6%
- Azorius 392 · 2.4%
- Boros 390 · 2.4%
- Orzhov 349 · 2.1%
- Jeskai 332 · 2.0%
- Other (13) 1,960 · 11.9%
All commanders (30)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 3.18 · 17.7% (230 of 1,302 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 2.37 · 10.8% (117 of 1,085 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.01 · 5.4% (197 of 3,629 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.97 · 4.5% (280 of 6,221 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 1.32 · 4.8% (38 of 784 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 1.17 · 4.9% (24 of 490 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.88 · 2.8% (23 of 825 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 0.81 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Six relevance 0.77 · 1.8% (34 of 1,878 decks)
- Kura, the Boundless Sky relevance 0.72 · 2.9% (12 of 418 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.72 · 1.3% (52 of 3,865 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.72 · 1.7% (28 of 1,601 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.71 · 1.3% (56 of 4,343 decks)
- Benjamin Sisko, Besieged relevance 0.65 · 18.2% (2 of 11 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.62 · 1.8% (17 of 964 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.56 · 1.5% (17 of 1,143 decks)
- Haru, Hidden Talent relevance 0.55 · 4.3% (4 of 94 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.54 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.52 · 1.9% (9 of 465 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.50 · 2.2% (7 of 319 decks)
- Groundchuck & Dirtbag relevance 0.49 · 2.8% (5 of 181 decks)
- Nakia, Wakandan Operative relevance 0.45 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Autumn Willow relevance 0.41 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- The Boulder, Ready to Rumble relevance 0.36 · 1.9% (4 of 210 decks)
- Multani, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.34 · 1.4% (5 of 346 decks)
- Greensleeves relevance 0.33 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Hua Tuo, Honored Physician relevance 0.32 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Erinis, Gloom Stalker relevance 0.32 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- Jolrael, Mwonvuli Recluse relevance 0.32 · 1.5% (4 of 261 decks)
- Kaysa relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (2 of 85 decks)
All most relevant (25)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.04 · 37.8% (621 of 1,645 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.96 · 42.3% (696 of 1,645 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.91 · 40.5% (666 of 1,645 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.89 · 52.6% (866 of 1,645 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.89 · 30.0% (494 of 1,645 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.83 · 33.6% (553 of 1,645 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.81 · 27.4% (450 of 1,645 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.80 · 41.9% (690 of 1,645 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.78 · 23.0% (378 of 1,645 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.78 · 29.5% (485 of 1,645 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.77 · 27.2% (447 of 1,645 decks)
- Six relevance 0.77 · 27.7% (456 of 1,645 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.75 · 26.9% (442 of 1,645 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.74 · 23.3% (383 of 1,645 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.73 · 39.2% (645 of 1,645 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.73 · 40.4% (665 of 1,645 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.72 · 30.2% (496 of 1,645 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.71 · 21.5% (354 of 1,645 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.70 · 35.0% (575 of 1,645 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.69 · 36.2% (596 of 1,645 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.68 · 24.3% (400 of 1,645 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.68 · 26.8% (441 of 1,645 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.66 · 32.3% (532 of 1,645 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.66 · 34.6% (569 of 1,645 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.66 · 33.0% (543 of 1,645 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.96 · 42.3% (696 of 1,645 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.91 · 40.5% (666 of 1,645 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.89 · 30.0% (494 of 1,645 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.83 · 33.6% (553 of 1,645 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.80 · 41.9% (690 of 1,645 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.77 · 27.2% (447 of 1,645 decks)
- Six relevance 0.77 · 27.7% (456 of 1,645 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.72 · 30.2% (496 of 1,645 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.70 · 35.0% (575 of 1,645 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.69 · 36.2% (596 of 1,645 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.68 · 26.8% (441 of 1,645 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.66 · 32.3% (532 of 1,645 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.66 · 34.6% (569 of 1,645 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.66 · 33.0% (543 of 1,645 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.04 · 37.8% (621 of 1,645 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.81 · 27.4% (450 of 1,645 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.78 · 29.5% (485 of 1,645 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Spelunking relevance 0.75 · 26.9% (442 of 1,645 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.73 · 39.2% (645 of 1,645 decks)
All instants (3)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.89 · 52.6% (866 of 1,645 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.73 · 40.4% (665 of 1,645 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.71 · 21.5% (354 of 1,645 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.78 · 23.0% (378 of 1,645 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.74 · 23.3% (383 of 1,645 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.68 · 24.3% (400 of 1,645 decks)
All utility lands (15)
- Strip Mine relevance 1.02 · 37.0% (608 of 1,645 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.96 · 23.8% (391 of 1,645 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.94 · 27.4% (450 of 1,645 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.92 · 33.6% (553 of 1,645 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.89 · 27.0% (444 of 1,645 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.85 · 28.9% (476 of 1,645 decks)
- Petrified Field relevance 0.81 · 17.9% (295 of 1,645 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.79 · 24.3% (400 of 1,645 decks)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.78 · 15.1% (249 of 1,645 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.76 · 18.8% (310 of 1,645 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.73 · 20.4% (335 of 1,645 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.72 · 28.8% (474 of 1,645 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.71 · 47.6% (783 of 1,645 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.67 · 19.8% (326 of 1,645 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.66 · 33.1% (544 of 1,645 decks)
All lands (10)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.97 · 33.2% (546 of 1,645 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.90 · 46.7% (769 of 1,645 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.83 · 24.8% (408 of 1,645 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.82 · 21.0% (346 of 1,645 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.78 · 24.4% (401 of 1,645 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.75 · 20.8% (342 of 1,645 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.72 · 31.6% (520 of 1,645 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.68 · 29.1% (478 of 1,645 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.66 · 27.8% (457 of 1,645 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.65 · 27.1% (446 of 1,645 decks)
EDH data for Dust Bowl: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,645 real decks.