Scapeshift
Played in 5,332 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (10)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 4.08 · 37.8% (1,651 of 4,371 decks)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.24 · 24.6% (916 of 3,722 decks)
- Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 2.23 · 7.9% (2,151 of 27,179 decks)
- Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 1.79 · 10.8% (199 of 1,836 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 1.64 · 10.3% (143 of 1,394 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 1.39 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
- Hazezon Tamar relevance 1.11 · 9.1% (34 of 372 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 0.38 · 1.6% (40 of 2,576 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (3 of 193 decks)
- Palladia-Mors relevance 0.12 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
All most relevant (28)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.72 · 59.2% (3,154 of 5,332 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.71 · 62.9% (3,355 of 5,332 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.69 · 65.0% (3,465 of 5,332 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.69 · 52.9% (2,821 of 5,332 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.66 · 64.4% (3,435 of 5,332 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.61 · 51.0% (2,720 of 5,332 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.60 · 49.6% (2,643 of 5,332 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.56 · 62.8% (3,350 of 5,332 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.51 · 46.5% (2,477 of 5,332 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.48 · 39.7% (2,117 of 5,332 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.46 · 42.7% (2,278 of 5,332 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.38 · 38.2% (2,036 of 5,332 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.36 · 34.6% (1,847 of 5,332 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.35 · 32.8% (1,750 of 5,332 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.32 · 33.9% (1,805 of 5,332 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.29 · 32.6% (1,738 of 5,332 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 1.29 · 28.7% (1,530 of 5,332 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 1.28 · 30.6% (1,629 of 5,332 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.26 · 38.4% (2,046 of 5,332 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.26 · 33.9% (1,807 of 5,332 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.25 · 37.6% (2,005 of 5,332 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.23 · 36.9% (1,970 of 5,332 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.21 · 52.4% (2,795 of 5,332 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.21 · 34.3% (1,830 of 5,332 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.20 · 33.8% (1,801 of 5,332 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.16 · 51.5% (2,748 of 5,332 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.15 · 30.6% (1,631 of 5,332 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.08 · 41.0% (2,185 of 5,332 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.72 · 59.2% (3,154 of 5,332 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.71 · 62.9% (3,355 of 5,332 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.69 · 52.9% (2,821 of 5,332 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.66 · 64.4% (3,435 of 5,332 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.60 · 49.6% (2,643 of 5,332 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.51 · 46.5% (2,477 of 5,332 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.38 · 38.2% (2,036 of 5,332 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.35 · 32.8% (1,750 of 5,332 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.26 · 38.4% (2,046 of 5,332 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.26 · 33.9% (1,807 of 5,332 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.25 · 37.6% (2,005 of 5,332 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.21 · 52.4% (2,795 of 5,332 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.20 · 33.8% (1,801 of 5,332 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.16 · 51.5% (2,748 of 5,332 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.69 · 65.0% (3,465 of 5,332 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.46 · 42.7% (2,278 of 5,332 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.32 · 33.9% (1,805 of 5,332 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Exploration relevance 1.61 · 51.0% (2,720 of 5,332 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.48 · 39.7% (2,117 of 5,332 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.23 · 36.9% (1,970 of 5,332 decks)
All instants (4)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.56 · 62.8% (3,350 of 5,332 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 1.29 · 28.7% (1,530 of 5,332 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 1.28 · 30.6% (1,629 of 5,332 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.08 · 41.0% (2,185 of 5,332 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.36 · 34.6% (1,847 of 5,332 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.29 · 32.6% (1,738 of 5,332 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.21 · 34.3% (1,830 of 5,332 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.15 · 30.6% (1,631 of 5,332 decks)
All utility lands (15)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 1.60 · 46.8% (2,493 of 5,332 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 1.58 · 46.6% (2,484 of 5,332 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 1.58 · 46.9% (2,499 of 5,332 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 1.58 · 46.1% (2,458 of 5,332 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 1.56 · 46.0% (2,452 of 5,332 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 1.56 · 45.8% (2,444 of 5,332 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 1.53 · 43.8% (2,338 of 5,332 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.49 · 45.2% (2,412 of 5,332 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 1.47 · 42.4% (2,260 of 5,332 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 1.42 · 40.7% (2,172 of 5,332 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 1.37 · 37.3% (1,988 of 5,332 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 1.20 · 33.0% (1,762 of 5,332 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 1.17 · 29.1% (1,553 of 5,332 decks)
- Grasping Dunes relevance 1.14 · 27.5% (1,464 of 5,332 decks)
- Desert relevance 1.12 · 28.2% (1,504 of 5,332 decks)
All lands (7)
- Creosote Heath relevance 1.45 · 45.7% (2,438 of 5,332 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 1.44 · 45.4% (2,420 of 5,332 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 1.42 · 44.7% (2,384 of 5,332 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 1.36 · 35.7% (1,905 of 5,332 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 1.33 · 37.9% (2,020 of 5,332 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 1.29 · 38.1% (2,032 of 5,332 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 1.24 · 33.7% (1,795 of 5,332 decks)
EDH data for Scapeshift: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 5,332 real decks.