Scapeshift
Played in 2,745 Ink-Treader decks
630+29+3+7+4+2+1+4+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Omnath, Locus of Creation 27.3% of decks
Omnath, Locus of Creation 27.3% of decks
Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis 1.7% of decks
Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis 1.7% of decks
Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus 5.7% of decks
Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus 5.7% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 2.1% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 2.1% of decks
Akiri, Line-Slinger // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix 2.7% of decks
Akiri, Line-Slinger // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix 2.7% of decks
Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 1.2% of decks
Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 1.2% of decks
Most Relevant
Ancient Greenwarden 82.4% of decks
Ancient Greenwarden 82.4% of decks
Lotus Cobra 84.7% of decks
Lotus Cobra 84.7% of decks
Azusa, Lost but Seeking 85.4% of decks
Azusa, Lost but Seeking 85.4% of decks
Crucible of Worlds 64.8% of decks
Crucible of Worlds 64.8% of decks
Exploration 79.3% of decks
Exploration 79.3% of decks
Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait 77.6% of decks
Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait 77.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (6)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.60 · 27.3% (2,531 of 9,258 decks)
- Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis relevance 0.25 · 1.7% (174 of 10,371 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.18 · 5.7% (3 of 53 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (9 of 421 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.08 · 2.7% (2 of 74 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.03 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.70 · 82.4% (2,262 of 2,745 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.63 · 84.7% (2,325 of 2,745 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.63 · 85.4% (2,343 of 2,745 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.63 · 64.8% (1,780 of 2,745 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.62 · 79.3% (2,176 of 2,745 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.55 · 77.6% (2,130 of 2,745 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.50 · 78.5% (2,154 of 2,745 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.49 · 52.8% (1,449 of 2,745 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.48 · 63.8% (1,752 of 2,745 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.48 · 65.5% (1,797 of 2,745 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.41 · 83.7% (2,298 of 2,745 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.40 · 72.5% (1,991 of 2,745 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.38 · 54.6% (1,499 of 2,745 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.33 · 84.6% (2,322 of 2,745 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.32 · 65.0% (1,785 of 2,745 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.31 · 63.5% (1,743 of 2,745 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.31 · 43.8% (1,201 of 2,745 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.27 · 54.8% (1,504 of 2,745 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.26 · 62.9% (1,727 of 2,745 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 1.24 · 48.1% (1,319 of 2,745 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 1.21 · 43.8% (1,203 of 2,745 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.20 · 44.2% (1,213 of 2,745 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.16 · 65.3% (1,792 of 2,745 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.15 · 47.7% (1,308 of 2,745 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.12 · 40.6% (1,114 of 2,745 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.12 · 50.7% (1,393 of 2,745 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.11 · 39.7% (1,089 of 2,745 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.10 · 48.5% (1,331 of 2,745 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.07 · 43.5% (1,195 of 2,745 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.07 · 40.1% (1,101 of 2,745 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.70 · 82.4% (2,262 of 2,745 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.63 · 84.7% (2,325 of 2,745 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.63 · 85.4% (2,343 of 2,745 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.55 · 77.6% (2,130 of 2,745 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.50 · 78.5% (2,154 of 2,745 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.48 · 63.8% (1,752 of 2,745 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.48 · 65.5% (1,797 of 2,745 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.41 · 83.7% (2,298 of 2,745 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.40 · 72.5% (1,991 of 2,745 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.38 · 54.6% (1,499 of 2,745 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.33 · 84.6% (2,322 of 2,745 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.32 · 65.0% (1,785 of 2,745 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.31 · 43.8% (1,201 of 2,745 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.27 · 54.8% (1,504 of 2,745 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.26 · 62.9% (1,727 of 2,745 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 1.24 · 48.1% (1,319 of 2,745 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.15 · 47.7% (1,308 of 2,745 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.12 · 40.6% (1,114 of 2,745 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.12 · 50.7% (1,393 of 2,745 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.11 · 39.7% (1,089 of 2,745 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.07 · 43.5% (1,195 of 2,745 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.07 · 40.1% (1,101 of 2,745 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 1.07 · 35.5% (974 of 2,745 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.06 · 40.5% (1,111 of 2,745 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Mother of Machines relevance 1.06 · 35.4% (973 of 2,745 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.04 · 34.2% (939 of 2,745 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 1.02 · 34.5% (947 of 2,745 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.01 · 37.2% (1,020 of 2,745 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.87 · 29.1% (800 of 2,745 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.63 · 64.8% (1,780 of 2,745 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.20 · 44.2% (1,213 of 2,745 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.93 · 27.0% (742 of 2,745 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Exploration relevance 1.62 · 79.3% (2,176 of 2,745 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.31 · 63.5% (1,743 of 2,745 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 1.21 · 43.8% (1,203 of 2,745 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.03 · 37.2% (1,020 of 2,745 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.94 · 37.9% (1,039 of 2,745 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.88 · 31.4% (862 of 2,745 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.83 · 29.0% (795 of 2,745 decks)
All instants (4)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.16 · 65.3% (1,792 of 2,745 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.10 · 48.5% (1,331 of 2,745 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.88 · 37.4% (1,027 of 2,745 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.82 · 40.9% (1,124 of 2,745 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.49 · 52.8% (1,449 of 2,745 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 1.01 · 30.3% (831 of 2,745 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.50 · 58.3% (1,599 of 2,745 decks)
All lands (4)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 1.02 · 50.5% (1,385 of 2,745 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.92 · 42.8% (1,175 of 2,745 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.85 · 31.1% (855 of 2,745 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.85 · 38.8% (1,065 of 2,745 decks)
EDH data for Scapeshift: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 2,745 real decks.





































