Exploration
Played in 17,318 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
9.1% Jund
3030+23+5+5+3+3+6+5+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Lord Windgrace relevance 2.70 · 49.1% (2,357 of 4,801 decks)
- Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.56 · 32.3% (8,323 of 25,807 decks)
- Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 1.92 · 27.3% (1,596 of 5,851 decks)
- Soul of Windgrace relevance 1.74 · 34.6% (368 of 1,065 decks)
- Korvold, Fae-Cursed King relevance 1.44 · 15.9% (2,083 of 13,119 decks)
- Coram, the Undertaker relevance 0.87 · 10.2% (494 of 4,865 decks)
- Tormod, the Desecrator // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.59 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.54 · 13.3% (24 of 181 decks)
- Vaevictis Asmadi relevance 0.51 · 12.4% (23 of 186 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.46 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Vaevictis Asmadi, the Dire relevance 0.41 · 5.5% (109 of 1,987 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.41 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Winter, Misanthropic Guide relevance 0.39 · 4.6% (163 of 3,554 decks)
- Darigaaz Reincarnated relevance 0.35 · 8.9% (15 of 168 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Hardy of Myra's Marvels relevance 0.32 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Darigaaz, Shivan Champion relevance 0.32 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Xira Arien relevance 0.30 · 6.3% (20 of 318 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.29 · 5.6% (23 of 409 decks)
- Korvold, Gleeful Glutton relevance 0.27 · 4.9% (27 of 548 decks)
- Darigaaz, the Igniter relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Henzie "Toolbox" Torre relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (229 of 11,087 decks)
- Adun Oakenshield relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (10 of 206 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.19 · 5.3% (8 of 152 decks)
- Prossh, Skyraider of Kher relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (86 of 3,778 decks)
- Indoraptor, the Perfect Hybrid relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (139 of 6,849 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.18 · 9.1% (3 of 33 decks)
- Yurlok of Scorch Thrash relevance 0.17 · 1.9% (129 of 6,954 decks)
- Eddie Brock // Venom, Lethal Protector relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (115 of 6,392 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.14 · 5.4% (4 of 74 decks)
- Gyrus, Waker of Corpses relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (17 of 653 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.41 · 63.6% (11,017 of 17,318 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.39 · 68.4% (11,846 of 17,318 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.36 · 51.6% (8,944 of 17,318 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.34 · 55.1% (9,541 of 17,318 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.28 · 61.5% (10,647 of 17,318 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.27 · 50.7% (8,788 of 17,318 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.26 · 68.0% (11,778 of 17,318 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.26 · 62.3% (10,783 of 17,318 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.24 · 63.8% (11,056 of 17,318 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 1.16 · 38.0% (6,579 of 17,318 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.15 · 55.1% (9,534 of 17,318 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.13 · 70.4% (12,186 of 17,318 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.10 · 41.1% (7,110 of 17,318 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.09 · 58.4% (10,107 of 17,318 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.07 · 62.0% (10,730 of 17,318 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.06 · 40.3% (6,971 of 17,318 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.05 · 50.2% (8,688 of 17,318 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.03 · 46.7% (8,086 of 17,318 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.03 · 43.5% (7,525 of 17,318 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.03 · 62.3% (10,795 of 17,318 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.00 · 55.6% (9,628 of 17,318 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.97 · 31.7% (5,498 of 17,318 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.96 · 35.9% (6,215 of 17,318 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.93 · 28.8% (4,985 of 17,318 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.93 · 50.2% (8,700 of 17,318 decks)
- Six relevance 0.92 · 40.5% (7,016 of 17,318 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.90 · 48.7% (8,426 of 17,318 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.89 · 37.8% (6,552 of 17,318 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.88 · 25.3% (4,374 of 17,318 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.88 · 32.1% (5,561 of 17,318 decks)
All creatures (23)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.41 · 63.6% (11,017 of 17,318 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.39 · 68.4% (11,846 of 17,318 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.28 · 61.5% (10,647 of 17,318 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.27 · 50.7% (8,788 of 17,318 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.26 · 68.0% (11,778 of 17,318 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.15 · 55.1% (9,534 of 17,318 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.13 · 70.4% (12,186 of 17,318 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.10 · 41.1% (7,110 of 17,318 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.09 · 58.4% (10,107 of 17,318 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.06 · 40.3% (6,971 of 17,318 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.05 · 50.2% (8,688 of 17,318 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.03 · 46.7% (8,086 of 17,318 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.03 · 62.3% (10,795 of 17,318 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.00 · 55.6% (9,628 of 17,318 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.93 · 50.2% (8,700 of 17,318 decks)
- Six relevance 0.92 · 40.5% (7,016 of 17,318 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.88 · 25.3% (4,374 of 17,318 decks)
- Orcish Lumberjack relevance 0.87 · 33.2% (5,753 of 17,318 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.82 · 25.6% (4,440 of 17,318 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.81 · 42.5% (7,364 of 17,318 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.77 · 26.6% (4,605 of 17,318 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.75 · 37.2% (6,441 of 17,318 decks)
- Braids, Arisen Nightmare relevance 0.73 · 45.8% (7,935 of 17,318 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.34 · 55.1% (9,541 of 17,318 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.26 · 62.3% (10,783 of 17,318 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.93 · 28.8% (4,985 of 17,318 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.90 · 48.7% (8,426 of 17,318 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.89 · 37.8% (6,552 of 17,318 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Squandered Resources relevance 1.16 · 38.0% (6,579 of 17,318 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.96 · 35.9% (6,215 of 17,318 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.88 · 32.1% (5,561 of 17,318 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.87 · 26.5% (4,597 of 17,318 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.76 · 24.6% (4,262 of 17,318 decks)
All instants (3)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.24 · 63.8% (11,056 of 17,318 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.97 · 31.7% (5,498 of 17,318 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.80 · 51.4% (8,908 of 17,318 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.36 · 51.6% (8,944 of 17,318 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.07 · 62.0% (10,730 of 17,318 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.03 · 43.5% (7,525 of 17,318 decks)
All utility lands (6)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.09 · 41.9% (7,264 of 17,318 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 1.07 · 40.3% (6,986 of 17,318 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.91 · 28.5% (4,933 of 17,318 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.80 · 35.0% (6,058 of 17,318 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.80 · 45.0% (7,799 of 17,318 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.79 · 43.9% (7,606 of 17,318 decks)
All lands (5)
- Lotus Field relevance 1.02 · 39.4% (6,823 of 17,318 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.76 · 60.0% (10,398 of 17,318 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.75 · 31.6% (5,475 of 17,318 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.73 · 29.6% (5,122 of 17,318 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.73 · 26.7% (4,628 of 17,318 decks)
EDH data for Exploration: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 17,318 real decks.
















































































